logo
National Science Foundation Ends 196 Grants To Harvard Amid Feud With Trump

National Science Foundation Ends 196 Grants To Harvard Amid Feud With Trump

Yahoo20-05-2025

WASHINGTON ― The National Science Foundation has terminated dozens of active grants with Harvard University for reasons that NSF employees told HuffPost can only be viewed as punishment for the university refusing to cave to President Donald Trump's authoritarian efforts to dictate what it can teach and who it can hire or admit as students.
NSF last week quietly ended 196 grants with Harvard, which amounts to a collective loss of nearly $46 million that hasn't yet been paid out to the university for various research projects already underway. HuffPost obtained a copy of the full list of these canceled awards, but isn't printing it at the request of the NSF staffer who shared it.
Jamie French, a division director in NSF's Division of Grants and Agreements, last Monday sent a 'notice of termination' letter to Harvard president Alan Garber along with a list of all the canceled grants.
'The agency has determined that termination of certain awards is necessary because they are not in alignment with current NSF priorities and/or programmatic goals,' reads French's letter. 'NSF understands that Harvard continues to engage in race discrimination including in its admissions process, and in other areas of student life, as well as failing to promote a research environment free of antisemitism and bias.'
'Effective immediately, the attached awards are terminated,' reads his letter. 'This is the final agency decision and not subject to appeal.'
NSF is yanking research grants from Harvard as Trump has been threatening the university to comply with his Orwellian list of demands, or risk losing federal funding. His demands include ending all programs related to diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI; shutting down academic departments that may be critical of Israel; limiting admissions of foreign students; and banning certain student groups from campus. Harvard has said no.
The Trump administration claims to be motivated by rooting out anti-semitism on college campuses, but in fact has been trying to unconstitutionally silence pro-Palestinian voices and, chillingly, to stifle academic freedom and intellectual inquiry.
Here's a copy of French's letter:
The grants that NSF just canceled have been funding a range of cutting-edge research. One project has been studying the impacts of volcanic eruption on the stratosphere. Another has been tracking methane emissions at different scales. Another has been developing 'neural network theory for uncovering how the brain learns.'
NSF terminated a major award to the Center for Integrated Quantum Materials, which is led by Harvard but involves other universities. Its cancellation means related awards to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Howard University and a network of colleges are all terminated, too. This grant has supported the center's work in producing a whopping 545 papers and 60,000 citations in scientific papers, in addition to graduate students, post-doctorate students, patents and startup companies.
NSF employees were 'blindsided' by this grant being canceled, one NSF staffer told HuffPost. It appears to have been terminated by a single person who is part of Elon Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency and who has 'admin credentials in our financial system,' said this employee, who requested anonymity to protect their job.
The termination of this award also makes no sense given that the Trump administration has specifically told NSF employees that quantum research is a top funding priority as it reorganizes the agency. Unless Harvard is involved, apparently.
'Pure retribution,' added this staffer. 'We as a nation are shooting ourselves in both feet. Willingly. The brain drain will be profound.'
Asked for comment, NSF spokesperson Mike England said the agency terminated its 196 grants with Harvard as part of its 'review of its award portfolio.'
'The agency has determined that termination of certain awards is necessary because they are not in alignment with current NSF priorities and/or programmatic goals,' England said in a statement, sharing a link to a page on NSF's website that outlines its priorities.
Except this page specifically cites quantum research as a funding priority for the agency, which contradicts its decision to terminate the major quantum grant previously cited. Asked to explain the discrepancy, England said only, 'NSF declines comment.'
A Harvard University spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.
Trump has been blatantly weaponizing the government to try to punish Harvard. He's threatened $9 billion in federal grants and contracts. He's threatened to strip the university of its tax-exempt status. The administration last week announced it was cutting $450 million in grants to the university, citing its supposed fight against anti-semitism. NSF's terminated grants with Harvard are a piece of that $450 million.
Still, unlike some other elite institutions, Harvard isn't backing down. The university last month sued the administration for freezing billions of dollars in grants in what it described as an effort to 'gain control of academic decision-making at Harvard.' In response to Trump terminating its $450 million in grants last week, Harvard simply expanded its lawsuit.
The university's president announced last week that he's taking a 25% pay cut as Harvard is being 'blacklisted' from getting federal funding.
'The University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights,' Garber said last month in a message to the community. 'No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.'
It's not clear if NSF's terminated grants with Harvard can or will be restored if the university prevails in its lawsuit against the administration.
Some of NSF's newly terminated grants were being used by early-career faculty, as part of the agency's so-called CAREER program. These are prestigious grants specifically aimed at lifting up scientists early in their careers who have the potential to serve as academic role models in U.S. research and education.
One CAREER grant was being used by a young assistant professor working on quantum properties of topological materials, or substances with unusual electronic properties because of their unique structures. The principal investigator in this research has already achieved a stunning 33,000 citations of his papers, despite being so early in his career.
Another CAREER award that NSF just terminated was being used by a young investigator looking into methods to 'stabilize novel oxide-based quantum materials.' This work is considered vital for things like low-energy computing or dissipationless transport, which is the movement of energy without any loss or conversion of that energy into other forms, like heat.
NSF employees learned of all of these Harvard grants being terminated last Wednesday, and the news was received both as a shock and as a devastating blow to science.
The agency previously halted funding for hundreds of research awards to universities by claiming they weren't complying with Trump's demands to eliminate DEI initiatives. This time, though, the Harvard grant cancellations appear to be totally random ― except that they all involve Harvard.
This decision was 'a huge mistake, with irreparable consequences and leading to lasting damage,' said a second NSF employee, who also requested anonymity to protect their job. 'A decision seemingly driven by pure revenge, not by any logical reasons.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hamas to release 10 alive hostages in response to U.S. cease-fire plan
Hamas to release 10 alive hostages in response to U.S. cease-fire plan

UPI

time30 minutes ago

  • UPI

Hamas to release 10 alive hostages in response to U.S. cease-fire plan

1 of 2 | An internally displaced Palestinian girl stands as she plays on the streets of Gaza City, northern Gaza Strip, on April 14. File photo by Mohammed Saber/ EPA-EFE May 31 (UPI) -- Militant Hamas said Saturday it would release 10 living hostages and 18 bodies in return for Israel's release of Palestinian prisoners and ending the war that began in October 2023. Steve Witkoff, who is President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy, on Thursday submitted his proposal to mediators from Qatar and Egypt. "As part of this agreement, 10 living Israeli prisoners held by the resistance will be released, in addition to the return of eighteen bodies, in exchange for an agreed-upon number of Palestinian prisoners," Hamas said in a statement obtained by CNN. The group said it came to the decision "after conducting a round of national consultations." "This proposal aims to achieve a permanent cease-fire, a comprehensive withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, and ensure the flow of aid to our people and our families in the Gaza Strip," Hamas said in a statement also obtained by The Guardian. The Hamas response is similar to an earlier proposal to release 10 hostages, as well as a number of hostages' remains during the cease-fire in exchange for 1,100 Palestinian prisoners. An unidentified Israeli official told Israeli reporters in Saturday that they are treating Hamas' response as an "effective rejection." Fifty-eight hostages are believed to still be alive. A total of 146 Israeli hostages have been freed or rescued from Gaza, including 25 during the truce. The U.S. proposal called for a 60-day pause in fighting and renewed efforts toward long-term peace, as well as guarantees from Israel that it will not resume its offensive after Hamas releases hostages. Negotiations toward a permanent ceasefire would begin immediately on the first day of the 60-day truce, according to the proposal. Israeli negotiators accepted the deal, but Hamas has not backed it. On Thursday, Hamas official Basem Naim said the U.S. proposal "does not respond to any of our people's demands," including lifting the humanitarian blockade on the Gaza Strip that has led to famine-like conditions among 2 million. Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz on Friday threatened Hamas if it did not accept. "The Hamas murderers will now be forced to choose: accept the terms of the 'Witkoff deal' for the release of the hostages -- or be annihilated," Katz said. A cease-fire lasted from Jan. 19 to March 1. Israel refused to move to a planned second phase that could have led to a permanent end to the war. Israel began fighting, including airstrikes. In a ramped-up offensive, at least 60 people have been killed by Israeli strikes in Gaza over the last 24 hours, Hamas-run health officials said. And 72 were killed on Thursday. Negotiators have made little progress. "Negotiations are ongoing on the current proposal," Qatar's ambassador to the United Nations, Ayla Ahmed Saif al-Thani said Friday. He noted the mediators from Qatar are "very determined to find an ending to the horrific situation in Gaza." For three months, Israel's blockade has stopped virtually all humanitarian aid into Gaza. "After nearly 80 days of a total blockade, communities are starving - and they are no longer willing to watch food pass them by," the World Food Program said on Saturday. The United Nations aid agency was allowed to bring 77 trucks loaded with flour into Gaza overnight, but the trucks were stopped by crowds of hungry people. Lindsey Hutchison of Plan International said "having the military control aid and choose who they distribute it to in limited ways completely violates the way humanitarian operations are supposed to be conducted." She said the situation is not working. "We saw chaos and despair at the distribution site, which is frankly masquerading as a humanitarian aid scheme. That's not what this is," she told Al Jazeera from New York. More than 54,000 people have been killed in Gaza since the war began Oct. 7, 2023. Israel retaliated for a Hamas attack on the same da in which about 1,200 people were killed and 250 taken hostage.

For these Trump voters, a rubber-stamp Congress is a key demand
For these Trump voters, a rubber-stamp Congress is a key demand

Boston Globe

time30 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

For these Trump voters, a rubber-stamp Congress is a key demand

Advertisement And they reserved their purest aversion for Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the solidly conservative former longtime party leader, whom they described alternately as an 'obstructionist' to Trump's agenda, a 'snake in the grass,' and a 'bowl of Jell-O' with no spine. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Their perspectives offered a striking contrast to the reception that many Republican lawmakers have confronted at raucous town halls throughout the country in recent months. The lawmakers have been grilled and booed by constituents at these events for supporting Trump's policies on tariffs, immigration and, most recently, the domestic policy bill that the GOP pushed through the House in May. And they help explain why most Republican lawmakers have put aside any reservations they may have on key issues and backed the president -- because a critical portion of their party's base is still demanding that they do so. Advertisement 'For loyal Trump voters, they're loving what they see as him 'doing something' and don't want congressional Republicans getting in the way of his agenda,' said Sarah Longwell, the anti-Trump Republican strategist who conducted the focus groups. 'And members of Congress have gotten that message loud and clear.' These voters represent only a piece of the electorate that Republicans must court in the run-up to midterm congressional elections in which their governing trifecta is on the line. Since Trump took office, GOP lawmakers have struggled to defend his executive actions and his efforts to dismantle the federal bureaucracy and unilaterally defund government programs, and to explain to their constituents why they are not doing more to challenge him. In Nebraska this past week, Representative Mike Flood faced an angry crowd grilling him on the Medicaid and food assistance cuts included in the domestic policy bill. And he admitted he had been unaware that the measure included a provision to limit the power of federal judges to hold people, including Trump administration officials, in contempt for disobeying court orders. But Longwell's sessions, videos of which were shared with The New York Times, were a reminder that there is still a powerful pull for Republicans to swallow whatever disagreements they may have with Trump and bow to what he wants. Since the beginning of this Congress, Speaker Mike Johnson, whose too-slim majority in the House leaves him little latitude to maneuver, has positioned himself less as the leader of the legislative branch and more as a junior partner to Trump. That stance is exactly what these voters, whom Longwell identified only by their first names and last initials to protect their privacy, said they liked about him. Advertisement Arthur M., a voter from Arizona, described Johnson as 'loyal,' adding, 'I'm not saying they should never have any other ideas of their own, but they certainly shouldn't have someone dissenting if you're trying to put an agenda through -- and that's what the Congress is.' Jeff B., a voter from Georgia, said Johnson always appeared to be 'in over his head.' But he did not see that as a negative. 'He's not the kind of guy like Mitch McConnell, who was pulling all the strings,' he said. 'He's struggling, and I think that's the way it's supposed to be. He looks like he's in over his head, and I think that's the way it's supposed to be.' The voters who participated in the focus groups, which were conducted May 16 and 19, had uniformly negative views of those House Republicans they viewed as 'rabble-rousers,' which they defined as anyone expressing an opinion that was not in sync with the White House. Jane H., a voter from Indiana, criticized her Congress member, Representative Victoria Spartz, an unpredictable lawmaker who often sides with the hard right, for being 'out of line' when she makes noises about opposing Trump's agenda. Gilbert W. from North Carolina held a similar view of Murkowski, who has routinely broken with her party to criticize Trump. 'Murkowski -- this woman's never found anything on the Republican side she really goes for,' he said, calling her a 'troublemaker.' In contrast, Allen K. from Arizona praised his Congress member, Representative Juan Ciscomani, for never making any waves. Advertisement 'Whatever Trump does, he'll say,' he said of Ciscomani, describing that as a positive. As for Senator John Thune, the new majority leader from South Dakota, he earned kudos mostly for not being McConnell. 'He's pressing Trump's agenda, it seems like,' Gilbert W. said. 'What else can you ask for?' Jane H., a three-time Trump voter, said, 'What I want to see is someone who will work hard and effectively to advance a conservative agenda, and to work closely with the White House to advance at this time Donald Trump's agenda. It's what the American people want, so that's what John Thune should be doing.' Many of the participants in the focus groups had only vague impressions of their own representatives, a reminder that to many voters, Congress remains a faceless institution of 535 mostly anonymous lawmakers about whom they don't have particularly strong feelings. That could help explain why most appeared to judge their elected officials almost exclusively according to how deferential they were to Trump, about whom they expressed potent -- and extremely positive -- sentiments. Asked for his opinions on Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill, Steve C., a voter from Michigan, said, 'I don't have an opinion on anyone specifically.' This article originally appeared in

Trump to meet with Germany's Merz in Washington next week
Trump to meet with Germany's Merz in Washington next week

The Hill

time30 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump to meet with Germany's Merz in Washington next week

President Trump is set to meet with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz next week in Washington, marking the first in-person meeting between the two leaders. Merz, the leader of the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), who was elected as Germany's leader in early March, is expected to visit Trump at the White House on Thursday, June 5, Germany government spokesperson Stefan Kornelius said Saturday in a press release. The discussions between the two countries' leaders will focus on bilateral relations between the two, along with discussions around the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, developments in the Middle East and trade policy, according to Kornelius. A White House official confirmed the meeting details to The Hill on Saturday. Merz, similar to Trump, has been pushing for a ceasefire deal in the more than three-year-long war between Russia and Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had a meeting with Merz on Wednesday in Berlin. There, Merz said that Germany will bolster its backing of Ukraine as part of a more than $5.5 billion agreement, including sending over more military equipment and increasing weapons manufacturing in Kyiv. Germany's chancellor has clashed with members of Trump's administration over the country's government marking the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party as an 'extremist' political entity. 'Germany just gave its spy agency new powers to surveil the opposition. That's not democracy—it's tyranny in disguise,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote earlier this month on social media platform X. 'What is truly extremist is not the popular AfD—which took second in the recent election — but rather the establishment's deadly open border immigration policies that the AfD opposes.' Vice President Vance piled on, accusing the government of trying to 'destroy' AfD, which also considers tech billionaire and Trump ally Elon Musk a strong supporter. Merz has pushed back on Trump administration's officials meddling in Germany's domestic politics. 'We have largely stayed out of the American election campaign in recent years, and that includes me personally,' Merz said in an interview with Axel Springer Global Reporters Network that was published on May 7. He added that he told U.S. officials that 'we have not taken sides with either candidate. And I ask you to accept that in return.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store