
Knowledge Nugget: Lok Sabha deputy speaker — What you must know for UPSC Exam
Take a look at the essential events, concepts, terms, quotes, or phenomena every day and brush up your knowledge. Here's your knowledge nugget for today on Lok Sabha deputy speaker.
(Relevance: The topic of Speaker and Deputy Speaker is highly relevant for the UPSC exam. Previously, various questions have been asked on these topics. For instance, in this year's prelims, a question was asked on the office of Speaker. Thus, it becomes essential to be aware of these constitutional offices, especially when they are in the news.)
Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Tuesday (June 10) urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to urgently initiate the process of electing a deputy speaker of the Lok Sabha, underlining the ongoing delay in the matter despite constitutional provisions for it. In a letter to PM Modi, Kharge pointed out that each Lok Sabha, from the first to the sixteenth, had seen the appointment of a deputy speaker in both Houses of Parliament, adding that it had also been a 'well-established convention' to appoint the person from among the members of the principal Opposition party.
'However, for the first time in independent India's history, this position has remained vacant for two consecutive Lok Sabha terms. No Deputy Speaker was elected during the Seventeenth Lok Sabha, and this concerning precedent continues in the ongoing Eighteenth Lok Sabha,' Kharge pointed out. In this context, let's know about the post of the deputy speaker of Lok Sabha.
1. Article 93 of the Constitution of India states that 'The House of the People shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the House to be respectively Speaker and Deputy Speaker'.
2. The Constitution does not specify a time frame for making the appointments. It is this gap in the provision that allows governments to delay or avoid appointing a Deputy Speaker.
However, constitutional experts have pointed out that both Article 93 and Article 178 use the words 'shall' and 'as soon as may be' – indicating that not only is the election of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker mandatory, it must be held at the earliest.
3. According to Article 95(1), the Deputy Speaker performs the duties of the Speaker if the post is vacant. The Deputy Speaker has the same general powers as the Speaker when presiding over the House. All references to the 'Speaker' in the Rules are deemed to be references to the Deputy Speaker as well for the times when he or she presides.
P.D.T. Achary wrote in the opinion piece for The Indian Express, 'The history of the office of Deputy Speaker goes back to the Government of India Act of 1919, when he was called Deputy President, as the Speaker was known as the president of the Central Legislative Assembly. Although the main functions of a Deputy Speaker were to preside over the sittings of the assembly in the absence of the Speaker and chair the select committees, etc., the position was considered necessary to share the responsibility of running the House with the Speaker and guide the nascent committees.'
1. The Deputy Speaker is elected from among the Lok Sabha members by a simple majority of members present and voting.
2. The election of the Deputy Speaker usually takes place in the second session, even though there is no bar on having this election in the first session of the new Lok Sabha or Assembly. But the election of Deputy Speaker is generally not delayed beyond the second session unless there are some genuine and unavoidable constraints.
3. In the Lok Sabha, the election of Deputy Speaker is governed by Rule 8 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha. According to Rule 8, the election 'shall be held on such date as the Speaker may fix'. The Deputy Speaker is elected once a motion proposing his or her name is carried. Once elected, the Deputy Speaker usually continues in office until the dissolution of the House.
4. Under Article 94 the Speaker or Deputy Speaker 'shall vacate his office if he ceases to be a member of the House of the People'. They may also resign (to each other), or 'may be removed from office by a resolution of the House of the People passed by a majority of all the then members of the House'.
As per Rule 9 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, 'at the commencement of the House or from time to time, as the case may be, the Speaker shall nominate from amongst the members a panel of not more than ten Chairpersons, anyone of whom may preside over the House in the absence of the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker when so requested by the Speaker or, in the absence of the Speaker, by the Deputy Speaker.'
1. Article 178 contains the corresponding provision for the Speakers and Deputy Speakers in the state Assemblies. It says, 'Every Legislative Assembly of a State shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Assembly to be respectively Speaker and Deputy Speaker thereof, and, so often as the office of Speaker or Deputy Speaker becomes vacant, the Assembly shall choose another member to be Speaker or Deputy Speaker, as the case may be.'
2. Article 179 talks about the 'Vacation and resignation of, and removal from, the offices of Speaker and Deputy Speaker ' in state legislative assembly. It says, the Speaker or Deputy Speaker 'shall vacate his office if he ceases to be a member of the House of the People'. They may also resign (to each other), or 'may be removed from office by a resolution of the House of the People passed by a majority of all the then members of the House'.
1. The Deputy Chairman is a constitutional position created under Article 89 of the Constitution, which specifies that Rajya Sabha shall choose one of its MPs to be the Deputy Chairman as often as the position becomes vacant. The office becomes vacant either by resignation or removal from office or when the Rajya Sabha member's term gets over.
2. The Deputy Chairman is the one position that is elected solely by members of Rajya Sabha. It is a critical position not just because s/he steps in when there is a vacancy in the office of Chairperson/Vice President but also because s/he plays a critical role in ensuring the smooth running of the House.
Consider the following statements: (UPSC CSE 2018)
1. The Speaker of the Legislative Assembly shall vacate his/her office if he/she ceases to be a member of the Assembly.
2. Whenever the Legislative Assembly is dissolved, the Speaker shall vacate his/her office immediately.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
(Sources: 'Concerning precedent continues': Kharge urges PM Modi to begin process to elect Lok Sabha deputy speaker, Decode Politics: What is the Deputy Speaker's role and how often has it been an Opposition MP?,
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – Indian Express UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for May 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨
Roshni Yadav is a Deputy Copy Editor with The Indian Express. She is an alumna of the University of Delhi and Jawaharlal Nehru University, where she pursued her graduation and post-graduation in Political Science. She has over five years of work experience in ed-tech and media. At The Indian Express, she writes for the UPSC section. Her interests lie in national and international affairs, governance, economy, and social issues. You can contact her via email: roshni.yadav@indianexpress.com ... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Birthday snub? Trump's military parade faces mass Republican no-show amid rising tensions
As US President Donald Trump prepares to organise a grand military parade in Washington, D.C. to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Army on June 14, which also coincided with his 79th birthday, many of his Republican allies in Congress have opted out and decided not to attend the event, as per a report. Most GOP Lawmakers Say No to the Parade Politico's survey of 50 GOP lawmakers showed that just 7 of 50 Republican lawmakers said that they intended to attend Trump's parade, as per Daily Beast. Notable figures such as Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Majority Whip John Barrasso, and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, will not be attending, according to the report. ALSO READ: Iran Israel war: Netanyahu on the verge of attacking Tehran's nuke sites, Houthis warn U.S - latest news by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Most Expensive Cars In The World Undo Rand Paul Criticizes Parade's Style Kentucky junior senator Rand Paul shared that he was not a fan of 'goose-stepping soldiers in big tanks and missiles rolling down the street,' and added, 'So if you asked me, I wouldn't have done it. We were always different than the images you saw of the Soviet Union and North Korea. We were proud not to be that,' quoted Daily Beast. Personal Commitments Take Priority According to the report, many lawmakers return to their families and districts on weekends instead of spending time in Washington. While many lawmakers said that they were not going to the event because they had prior commitments, reported Daily Beast. Live Events Senator Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma said that it is his anniversary this weekend, and 'I choose to be married,' as quoted in the report. Even Senators Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Rick Scott of Florida and House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris have also planned to not attend the event, which is expected to cost up to $45 million, as per Daily Beast. Some Republicans Will Still Attend However, some Republicans have shown enthusiasm to attend the event on the weekend like the Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene, who said, 'Yes, of course, I'm going to be there for the 250th anniversary of the Army,' quoted Daily Beast. As per the report, some members from the House will also make an appearance, Byron Donalds, Cory Mills, Elise Stefanik, Rich McCormick, John McGuire, and Lisa McClain. FAQs How many Republicans are attending? Out of 50 surveyed GOP lawmakers, only 7 confirmed they plan to attend. How much will the parade cost? It's expected to cost up to $45 million, as per Daily Beast report.


Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Beed caste atrocity shows we are still far away from achieving caste equality
Written by Neeraj Bunkar On June 4, a chilling incident in Beed district, Maharashtra, again laid bare the persistent scourge of caste-based violence in India. Vaibhav Khandagale, a Dalit man, was brutally assaulted by a mob of 10–12 'upper caste' Maratha men, some of whom were his classmates and supposedly friends. The attack, driven by casteist hatred, was not just an assault on Vaibhav's body, but also an affront to the principles of equality enshrined in our Constitution. The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, enacted on September 11, 1989, was designed to protect marginalised communities from caste-based discrimination and violence. It defines atrocities as 'offences' committed against Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) by non-SC/ST individuals, including acts like physical assault, humiliation, and the denial of rights. Section 3(1)(r) of the Act, cited in the FIR registered by Vaibhav in Beed, addresses intentional insults or intimidation meant to humiliate SC/ST members in public view, punishable with imprisonment from six months to five years and a fine. Section 3(1)(s) covers abuses using casteist slurs, while Section 3(2) (va) enhances penalties for offences under the Indian Penal Code (now Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023). The FIR, registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023 (Section 119(1) for causing hurt, Section 333 for cheating, and Section 351(2) for criminal force), alongside SC/ST Act provisions, reflects the gravity of the incident. However, the response from local authorities raises serious concerns about the Act's enforcement. Vaibhav's brother, Dhananjay, according to reports, alleges that the police delayed registering the FIR, forcing the family to wait hours at the Shirur Kasar police station. Even after persistent pressure, the police initially resisted including critical BNS sections related to attempted murder. Shockingly, a counter-complaint was reportedly filed by the wife of the main accused, falsely alleging theft and threats by Vaibhav's family. This case mirrors broader trends documented by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). In 2022, India recorded 57,582 cases of atrocities against SCs, up from 50,291 in 2020. Maharashtra alone reported 2,743 cases in 2022, a steady rise from 2,569 in 2020. Uttar Pradesh topped the list with 15,368 cases, followed by Rajasthan (8,752) and Madhya Pradesh (7,733). In Maharashtra, however, the conviction rates for these crimes remain alarmingly low, undermining the Act's purpose. For SCs, the conviction rate was a mere 8.8 per cent in 2018, dipping to 7.2 per cent in 2019, rising slightly to 11.8 per cent in 2020, then falling again to 10.7 per cent in 2021 and 8.9 per cent in 2022. For STs, the rates were similarly dismal: 11.3 per cent in 2018, 11.9 per cent in 2019, 12.5 per cent in 2020, 11.8 per cent in 2021, and 12.8 per cent in 2022. By the end of 2022, 14,504 cases involving crimes against SCs and 4,149 against STs were still pending trial in Maharashtra, reflecting a backlog that delays justice for victims. The Act mandates robust mechanisms like Special Courts and Special Public Prosecutors to ensure speedy trials (Sections 14 and 15). It also prohibits anticipatory bail (Section 18) and mandates state governments to provide legal aid and rehabilitation (Section 21). Yet, Dhananjay's account of delayed police response, insensitive officers, and hospital negligence in initiating a medico-legal case highlights a gap between the law's intent and its execution. The Beed incident also exposes the social and political pressures that undermine justice. The Act's provisions for externment (Section 10) and forfeiture of property (Section 7) could deter such intimidation, but their application remains rare. The collective silence of 200 villagers during the assault further illustrates the social boycott faced by Dalit families. The SC/ST Act remains a vital shield for India's marginalised, but its effectiveness hinges on impartial enforcement and societal change. Without systemic reforms — stronger police accountability, proactive legal aid, and widespread awareness — the Act risks remaining a paper promise, leaving countless Vaibhavs vulnerable to the enduring shadow of caste. The writer is a research scholar at Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom


India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
"He is the only PM who tells lies, entire India knows this": Karnataka Minister Ramalinga Reddy
Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], June 12 (ANI): Backing Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge's criticism of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Karnataka Minister Ramalinga Reddy on Thursday said the PM is known for making false claims and 'entire India knows this.' Speaking to reporters, Minister Reddy said, 'He is the only PM who tells lies. Entire India knows people are liars. Why do you give prominence to those people?' Responding to a question on the recent stampede incident in Bengaluru, Reddy said it would not be appropriate to comment at this stage as an official investigation is underway. 'Already, an inquiry is going on. It's better not to comment on it now,' the minister said. Meanwhile, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge had earlier sharpened his attack on Prime Minister Modi, marking the completion of 11 years of the BJP-led government at the Centre. Drawing from his decades-long political experience, Kharge alleged that he had 'never seen a Prime Minister who lies so much.' The Congress President said that he had been in politics for 65 years and alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had been deceiving the youth and securing votes by luring the poor. Kharge added, 'I had been saying this in Parliament for a long time, and I had never seen a Prime Minister who lied so much, made so many mistakes, trapped people, deceived the youth, and took votes by misleading them. I had been in politics for 65 years. He lied about everything, and not a single promise was implemented.' Furthermore, the Congress President highlighted that PM Narendra Modi did not respond whenever he was questioned on issues such as demonetisation, MSP, or unemployment. 'When we asked him, he did not have any answers--whether it was about demonetisation, unemployment, or MSP. There were so many such issues. He never told the people that he had misled them. He just kept making one statement after another and claimed that his 11 years were over,' Kharge added. (ANI)