Anti-ICE protests planned in Rochester ahead of DC parade
ROCHESTER, N.Y. (WROC) — As immigrant-rights protests continue in Los Angeles, protests are spreading around the country, including in Rochester.
On Tuesday, a small group of people gathered on the Tryon Park Overpass with signs saying 'Hands Off Farm Workers' and 'Is Kidnapping Now Part of US Policy?' These protests have happened on multiple bridges in Monroe County.
LA police swiftly enforce downtown curfew as protests continue
One upcoming protest is the 'No Kings: Day of Defiance' at Twelve Corners in Brighton this Saturday. The protest will involve 'Six Marches…. One Message.'
'Everybody has power,' says Tom Slothower, a resident of Rochester for over 30 years. 'Everybody has an influence, whether it's good or bad, and the people in power right now are counting on us not exercising that power.'
Protests over immigration raids pop up across the US with more planned
The Brighton protest is happening on the same day as the military parade in Washington, DC, celebrating the 250th birthday of the Army and the 79th birthday of President Donald Trump, and Flag Day.
The group on the Tryon Bridge will be at the Brighton protest this weekend. Others are being planned across the region.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
9 minutes ago
- The Verge
Trump's protest threats raise surveillance alarms around his military parade
President Donald Trump's warning that protesters of Saturday's US military parade in Washington, DC, will be met with 'very heavy force' threatens to chill speech and underscores the need for protesters to take precautions around digital surveillance, privacy advocates tell The Verge. In remarks from the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump did not distinguish between peaceful and non-peaceful protesters. 'For those people who want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force,' Trump said. (Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later said, 'Of course, the president supports peaceful protests. What a stupid question.') 'No Kings' protests are set to take place in many cities across the country, but organizers specifically excluded DC from their plans to draw attention away from the parade, which also coincides with Trump's 79th birthday. It's impossible to predict with certainty whether surveillance tools — like facial recognition for identifying people in crowds, automatic license plate readers that track vehicles entering certain areas, cell site simulators that collect information on mobile phones, or geofence warrants that require tech companies to hand over information on all of the users present at a certain time in a given area — will be used by law enforcement to monitor protests. The White House, through an unsigned email from a general press office account, did not answer a question about whether the administration planned to deploy surveillance technologies, but it pointed to recent remarks about the protests by Trump and Leavitt. The DC Metropolitan Police pointed to remarks this week by Matt McCool, special agent in charge of the Secret Service's Washington field office, who said the agency and its partners would operate drones during the military parade. Even if it's not clear whether other surveillance tools might be used, experts say that it's prudent for demonstrators to assume they will be. Past government use of such technologies strengthens their reason for concern, as does Trump's recent deployment of military troops to Los Angeles in response to protests over Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids, an escalation made against Gov. Gavin Newsom's wishes. 'If we're talking about a president who is threatening heavy force in Washington, is already using heavy force in Los Angeles, I think it would be certainly unwise to rule out any potential surveillance uses,' says American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) senior policy counsel Chad Marlow. The Department of Homeland Security admitted to using drones to monitor Black Lives Matter protests in the wake of the murder of George Floyd by a white police officer in 2020. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) used geofence warrants in 2022 to seek information on Android users in the vicinity of an attempted arson at a police union headquarters in Seattle, which came amid protests over the police shooting of 29-year-old Black man Jacob Blake. This week in Los Angeles, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) confirmed it was flying Predator drones over the city for 'officer safety surveillance.' ICE's aggressive attempts to meet Trump's mass deportation demands, and the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles, raise even greater alarms, experts say. 'I've been helping to lead protests since I was in middle school, and I have never seen a moment of more chilling brutality, with the level of violence and militarization being directed at those exercising their First Amendment rights to dissent against President Trump's abuses of office,' says Albert Fox Cahn, founder and executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (STOP), sitting in front of his collection of copies of George Orwell's 1984. 'It really is taking us into uncharted territory, and I say that a full recognition that our starting point in this entire saga was an awful one.' 'There is damage there that can't be reversed' Surveillance data can be used to retaliate against protesters, and Marlow and Cahn both say that when law enforcement collects it, we usually don't find out until after the fact. Information on protesters' whereabouts and activities could be used against them, for example, to allege they engaged in crimes or assist a deportation — and some surveillance tools, like facial recognition, can cause false identifications, especially among people of color. The courts have so far blocked many attempted actions by the Trump administration. But Marlow warns that even if groups like the ACLU secure wins in court later on against the use of surveillance technology, some damage could already be done — including scaring people away from showing up to protest. 'There is damage there that can't be reversed,' he says. Protesters can take steps to limit their privacy risks. Those include wearing a face covering to weaken the efficacy of facial recognition technology, leaving your smartphone at home — or at least logging out of accounts in case it's seized — and writing down important phone numbers like emergency contacts and legal aid on your arm. The ACLU maintains a list of protesters' rights, and The Verge has a guide on how to secure your phone ahead of a protest. 'At a moment like this, we just don't know what the risks are as the rule of law in this country continues to erode' Marlow and Cahn note that these warnings might make some people reticent to exercise their First Amendment rights — but they're important to deliver anyway. 'As public interest lawyers, our role is to give people honest information. And in chilling moments, that data might make some unwilling to protest,' Cahn says. 'But the goal isn't to spread fear, and I think we also combat a lot of misinformation as well. But it's so important, not just to equip protesters with an understanding of what their rights are, with an understanding of what tactics help preserve their privacy, but with an honest assessment of the risks. And frustratingly, at a moment like this, we just don't know what the risks are as the rule of law in this country continues to erode.' It's because of this chilling effect that Cahn says 'protest surveillance is simply not compatible with freedom of speech. When you give the government the power to create a dossier of everyone who raises their voice in dissent, it's going to silence millions.'
Los Angeles Times
17 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
GOP tax bill would cost poor Americans $1,600 a year and boost highest earners by $12,000, CBO says
WASHINGTON — The Republican tax bill approved by the U.S. House of Representatives would cost the poorest Americans roughly $1,600 a year while increasing the income of the wealthiest households by an average of $12,000 annually, according to a new analysis released Thursday by the Congressional Budget Office. Middle-income households would see a boost of roughly $500 to $1,000 per year under Republican President Donald Trump's tax bill, the CBO found. The cuts to the lowest-income households come from proposed cuts to social safety net programs including Medicaid and a food assistance program for lower-income people, known as Supplemental Nutrition and Assistance Program. The bill also proposes expanding work requirements to receive food aid and new 'community engagement requirements' of at least 80 hours per month of work, education or service for able-bodied adults without dependents to receive Medicaid. Some proposed tax breaks would be temporary, including a tax break on tips and overtime, car loan interest and a $4,000 increase in the standard deduction for seniors. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other Republicans have sought to discredit the CBO's analyses of the bill and say that the U.S. could head toward economic catastrophe if the measure is not passed. GOP Idaho Sen. Mike Crapo said during a Senate Finance Committee hearing on Thursday that the tax bill 'recognizes the solution to our debt crisis is not to tax Americans more, it is to spend less.' 'The legislation recognizes that extending proven tax reform is critical for working families,' he said. Administration officials have said the the cost of the tax bill would be offset by tariff income. Recently, the CBO separately estimated that Trump's sweeping tariff plan would cut deficits by $2.8 trillion over a 10-year period while shrinking the economy, raising the inflation rate and reducing the purchasing power of households overall. The CBO was established more than 50 years ago to provide objective, impartial analysis to support the budget process. It is required to produce a cost estimate for nearly every bill approved by a House or Senate committee and will weigh in earlier when asked to do so by lawmakers. The office's analysis released Thursday considers Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' in isolation, excluding the potential impact of the tariffs that Trump has imposed and paused on nations around the world. Democratic Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, who requested the CBO analysis released Thursday, said in a statement that 'this would be one of the largest transfers of wealth from working families to the ultra-rich in American history. It's shameful.' Hussein writes for the Associated Press.
USA Today
21 minutes ago
- USA Today
Army Sec: $40 million parade on Trump's birthday a 'Once-in-a-lifetime opportunity'
Army Sec: $40 million parade on Trump's birthday a 'Once-in-a-lifetime opportunity' Show Caption Hide Caption Armored tanks arrive in DC for Trump's military birthday parade As Washington, D.C. prepares for the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, armored tanks have begun to arrive ahead of Saturday's celebration. WASHINGTON — The Army's $40 million parade Saturday to celebrate its 250th anniversary is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to showcase the service, Army Secretary Dan Driscoll told USA TODAY. That it also falls on President Donald Trump's birthday, and that he'll preside over the tanks and troops that rumble and march past him from a specially built reviewing stand? Simply coincidence. 'Unless soldiers 170 years before he was born somehow timed that date,' Driscoll in a June 12 interview. Driscoll talked about the parade and who's expected to attend (invitations almost certainly have been extended to Mark Esper and Mark Milley, top former officials who clashed with Trump, he said). Driscoll also addressed the deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles over the objection of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, and the No. 1 threat to his soldiers – cheap, lethal drones. Planning for the Army's 250th birthday began before Driscoll became the civilian leader of the Army on February 25, he said. A longstanding tradition for armies, a military parade was deemed a natural way to highlight the Army's strength and service to the America. 'I think sometimes the media gets in its own way in telling stories,' Driscoll said. 'The coincidence that the president's birthday is on this date that occurred 250 years ago, and that we the Army want to tell this story, is I think going to be backed up. The reason we are spending this money, the reason we are so excited about it, I think we'll be backed up by recruiting data in the months ahead. 'This is not intended to be performative. We sincerely believe this is a once-in-a-generation opportunity.' The parade, which includes potential damage to streets in Washington, D.C. from armored vehicles including 38, 70-ton Abrams tanks, will range in cost from $25 million to $40 million. The televised parade will reach a broad audience of Americans and spur some of them to serve, Driscoll said. 'We believe that so many Americans are excited about this and will tune in,' Driscoll said. 'And it will quantitatively fill up our recruiting pipeline for the years to come. We think it is absolutely worth the investment.' Driscoll said he believed with near certainty that Esper and Milley had been invited to attend the parade. The Army, a spokesman for Milley and the White House have not confirmed that. Esper is the former Army secretary Trump promoted to Defense secretary and then fired in November 2020 after he lost the election. Esper incurred Trump's wrath for urging restraint in deploying the military against protesters. Milley, a retired Army general, its chief of staff and the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff also lost Trump's favor after apologizing for appearing in uniform near Trump after law enforcement officials forcibly cleared racial justice protesters from Lafayette Square, near the White House, so Trump could walk across it. The parade features dozens of armored combat vehicles, helicopters, vintage warplanes, thousands of soldiers in uniforms from the Revolutionary War to the present, horses, two mules and a dog. More: Soldiers excited (and nerve wracked) to drive tanks in DC military parade The procession will highlight the 'robustness and incredible talent of our soldiers,' Driscoll said. He hopes that Americans 'feel pride and honor' when they watch the parade. 'This is their Army,' he said. In 2017, during his first term, Trump wanted to hold a military parade, but Pentagon officials were leery of appearing to politicize the armed forces. Then-Defense Sec. Jim Mattis said he would 'rather swallow acid,' according to 'Holding the Line,' a book by his former speechwriter Guy Snodgrass. That Army, through its National Guard troops, is engaged at Trump's order in helping protect federal buildings and Los Angeles and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials as they continue their crackdown on migrants expected of being in the country illegally. The deployment of thousands of National Guard troops to is justified and was approved by the voters who elected Trump. Trump, Driscoll said, is doing exactly what he said he'd do during the campaign. 'Our system was designed for exactly these moments,' Driscoll said. 'The reason we have presidential elections, the reason so many Americans turned out in November to support our president, Donald J. Trump, was for exactly these kinds of moments. If you look at the four-year period when President Trump was out of office, I think the American people didn't want violence in their communities.' The National Guard soldiers deployed to Los Angeles are talented, well trained and 'excited' about being there, Driscoll said. The Department of Homeland Security has asked the Pentagon for more than 20,000 additional National Guard troops for law enforcement support for its immigration crackdowns. More: Trump wants 20,000 troops to hunt, transport immigrants. Cost estimate: $3.6 billion Driscoll said he hasn't been briefed on the request but that the Army is ready to operate inside U.S. borders in legally appropriate ways. 'If the president feels, in consultation with the rest of the administration leadership, that is the best use of our National Guard, the Army stands by to support,' Driscoll said. Rising risk from drone warfare On a separate issue, Driscoll talked about what he considers to be the top lethal threat to soldiers. Cheap, weaponized drones have become the weapon of choice in the war between Russia and Ukraine. Driscoll wants the Army to lead the Pentagon's effort to counteract drones. 'It's the number one thing we talk about every single day,' Driscoll said. Ukraine stunned Russia with a drone attack on its strategic warplanes. 'That should send fear into the hearts of armies around the world,' Driscoll said. 'A solution that was tens of thousands of dollars and pretty cleverly done over six months with very little signature to catch. It took out multiple billions of dollars of equipment, and that threat is real, and that threat is one that is being faced by every country.' Is the Pentagon better prepared than Russia for such an attack? 'I don't know,' Driscoll said. 'Hope so.'
