Oireachtas broadcast workers call for pay parity and better working conditions
The team of around 20 manage the live broadcast of all Dáil, Seanad, and committee proceedings ensuring they are all accessible to the public.
However, the team said they are currently being paid half the standard industry rate for comparable roles and are calling on the Government and the Oireachtas Commission to take action to ensure they are "treated with the fairness and respect we deserve".
The workers report earning around €12,000 per year.
"The Oireachtas sits only about 100 days a year. Outside of those days, we have no income and often rely on social welfare," the group said in a statement.
We receive no retainers, paid holidays, pensions, healthcare, or income protection — unlike many public workers in the same building.
As they are privately contracted, recesses and election cycles can leave some workers without work for weeks or months, with those who work on committee session having been without work since the general election was called in November until this week.
The Oireachtas broadcast contract, worth over €7m, was awarded to Pi Communication in 2020.
Aontú senator Sarah O'Reilly told the Seanad that Pi Communications are paid to roster staff, as all cameras and equipment belong to the Oireachtas.
The contract with Pi Communications is up for renewal this year and the broadcast workers are calling for pay parity with industry standards, to be integrated into the civil service, "with proper contracts, year-round pay, and access to pensions and career progression".
Previous efforts to engage with Pi Communications through their trade union did not result in offers that were acceptable to the workers.
"With political will, this can be resolved—quickly and fairly. We uphold democratic transparency every day," the broadcasting team said.
It is time we were treated with the fairness and respect we deserve.
Ms O'Reilly said that the Government has a duty of care to ensure that workers are treated fairly.
"Not only are people being subjected to unfair work conditions but it is costing the Oireachtas and therefore the taxpayer more money to employ these workers through a private contract than it would be employ them directly," Ms O'Reilly said.
"There is no point in us standing up and delivering grand speeches on the importance of workers rights when there are people working hard only a few rooms over trying to get by on €12,000 per year."
Footage captured by the Oireachtas team is regularly picked up and used by Irish and international broadcasters, as well as by political parties for use on their own social media. It is also archived for public record.
The workers raised additional issues that they would like to see addressed including no access to a dedicated HR department as employees of an external contractor, access to just one toilet cubicle for 35 staff members, and lack of access cards for some staff to access areas of Leinster House.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Letters: The scale of destruction and death by Israeli action is impossible to justify
Many believe the killings are intentional, despite the excuses or lies used by Israel to justify its killings. They regard it as the Israeli state's way of stopping the flow of on-the-ground news that captures the horrifying spectacle we see on our TVs each and every day. How can the intentional targeting of 1,400 medical staff, working in hospitals in Gaza, since the October 7 attacks by Hamas and its proxies, be justified? Where is the justification for the targeted killing of 61,430 people and over 200 who have starved to death, or those who have been killed in the process of trying to get food? While we need to see the end of Hamas and its militant comrades, with the release of hostages, how can America or those who supply weapons to Israel justify so much death and destruction? While we have condemned atrocities on both sides of this conflict, with a hamstrung and ineffective UN Security Council incapable of doing anything to stop this conflict, and an America under Donald Trump a willing participator that supplies weapons to this genocide, who will be held to account when this war is finally over? Christy Galligan, Letterkenny, Co Donegal The Tricolour is a symbol of unity between the green and orange – be proud of it Darragh McManus's piece 'Other countries fly their flags without embarrassment – it's time we did so too' (Irish Independent, August 11) is timely. The original Tricolour, handmade by a group of French-Irish women – descendants of the Irish Wild Geese – was presented to Thomas Francis Meagher in 1848. The tragedy of the Irish Tricolour emanated in 'political' hatred in the aftermath of the Civil War and the 1926 split in Sinn Féin. Post 1922, there was little official teaching of the origins, or symbolism, of the national flag in local museums or libraries. Its description varied according to the tutor, some refusing to accept the 'Orange' – opting for Green, White and 'Yellow'/ 'Gold' due to ingrained misunderstanding of the symbolism. Mr McManus's points out: 'The whole point of our flag's design, after all, was to promote reconciliation, not division: orange and green, the white of peace between them.' Politicians of all parties allowed the Irish national flag to be usurped by the murdering PIRA post 1970, instead of taking ownership of the flag and all it symbolises. We are all proud of the aeons of history of the island of Ireland; it is time every Irish person took complete ownership of a great symbol with pride. To do so would create a genuine reason for a united Ireland; a genuine reason that requires truth, decency and respectful acceptance of each citizen of the four provinces. Declan Foley, Melbourne, Australia A Putin win signals that borders are negotiable if you use enough brutality Your editorial warns of the dangers in sidelining Ukraine in any territorial negotiations ('Throwing Ukraine under the bus is not a legitimate solution', August 11, Irish Independent). History shows us that once a precedent is set, others are quick to exploit it. The world learnt this in 1938, when ceding the Sudetenland to Hitler in the name of peace only emboldened his appetite for conquest. Within a year, Poland was invaded and Europe was engulfed in war. To reward aggression by granting land is to signal to every autocrat that borders are negotiable if you bring enough force to bear. If Ukraine is carved up under diplomatic cover, the next decade will see a rise in opportunistic invasions – not only in Europe, but in regions where old disputes lie dormant, waiting for a signal that the strong may once again take from the weak. Enda Cullen, Tullysaran Road, Co Armagh Presidential hopefuls remember: the office is supposed to be impartial The programme that aired on TG4 last Sunday night discussing president Patrick Hillery's tenure over his two terms in office showed the principles regarding impartially that the next president should uphold. Mr Hillery was asked by taoiseach Garret FitzGerald of Fine Gael to dissolve the Dáil and call a general election in January 1982 when the budget failed to be passed. He refused to speak to several high-ranking politicians within the main opposition party, Fianna Fáil, who wanted to persuade him to not call a general election in order for it to try to form a government. As Mr Hillery was a former Fianna Fáil politician, I am sure he was under severe pressure to speak to his former party members. He showed great respect for the impartially of the office in calling a general election. We will hear a lot over the coming few months regarding the personalities and political ideologies of the citizens looking to become the next president, but once elected the president is bound by the Constitution. Eamonn O'Hara, Manorcunningham, Co Donegal Bureaucracy suffocates democracy and does so at great cost to the taxpayer By definition, 'democracy is a system of government where the power is held by the people'. The reality is that democratic values of public engagement have been replaced in recent years by a complicated maze of bureaucracy. Elected governments have farmed out the role to EU regulations and directives to unelected civil servants, who in turn act on the promptings of government-funded NGOs and vested interests who in turn profit from government investment. Local democracy has become redundant. Bureaucracy is the real thief of democracy and taxpayers' money; it creates a multiplicity of laws and regulations, which bamboozles the average citizen. It breaks one of the most basic rules of the law – that 'the law must be clear and precise'. It must be understandable to all who are bound by it. In Ireland's case, the president, who is the last signature on every bill brought into law, should keep this in mind. That would ensure that our courts are not taken up by petty squabbling among barristers and judges as to meaning of laws passed. It's often too costly for the average citizen to challenge any law or get justice, but not for those with deep pockets. Nuala Nolan, Bowling Green, Co Galway
Business Post
5 hours ago
- Business Post
Jack Chambers: Risk-averse civil service will not be protected
Business Post subscribers can read: • The government's new 'crisis mindset' to speed up infrastructure delivery • Why a €300m Amazon project collapse has become a warning shot for Ireland's competitiveness Jack Chambers has fired a warning shot at Irish civil servants, telling state agencies and departments they will not be 'defended or protected' if they ...
Irish Examiner
8 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: Ireland must take action on this escalation in racist attacks
The recent spate of attacks on members of the Indian community in Ireland has rightly shocked Irish people unused to experiencing the naked hatred illustrated by such behaviour. On Monday, Tánaiste and foreign affairs minister Simon Harris met members of the 80,000-strong Indian community in Ireland to express his horror and disgust at recent attacks but the unease within that community at the outbreaks of violence against them is palpable and growing. While he tried to assure them that as the attacks are racially motivated, they will not be allowed to continue, his words may not stem the reputational damage being caused to Ireland. The attacks have left a data scientist, a taxi driver, and a sous chef with, respectively, a broken cheekbone, 12 stitches, and in need of hospital treatment. That was bad enough, but when a soon-to-be tech worker was beaten, stabbed, robbed, and partially stripped in Tallaght, newly anti Indian sentiments took on a more sinister tone. And when a six-year-old Irish Indian girl was attacked by a group of boys twice her age in Waterford last week, the matter became even more grave. The reaction in India itself has been swift and sharp. Rarely does Ireland feature much in the Indian media, but these attacks have attracted much press attention and, according to the Department of Foreign Affairs, caused 'damage' to the State's reputation there. What we have witnessed in recent weeks is an alarming escalation in the frequency and brutality of attacks on Indian people and it must not be tolerated. That Indians, or any other race for that matter, in Ireland have become fearful for their safety is not acceptable. Irish authorities must act decisively, rapidly, and visibly to prevent any normalisation of hate crimes such as those we have witnessed, otherwise our reputation as a safe and hospitable society risks losing credibility. Another new low for Israel Much as the horror of what has been unfolding in Gaza in recent weeks, where it has become normal for crowds of starving Palestinians to be routinely shot at and killed by members of the Israel Defence Forces (IDF), the deliberate targeting of journalists was another new low. The killing of Al Jazeera news anchor Anas Al-Sharif and four members of his team brought the number of Palestinian journalists killed in the conflict to 186, of whom 178 were Palestinian reporters killed by Israel. Award-winning journalist Anas al-Sharif was one of five Al Jazeera staff killed by an Israeli drone strike on their tent in Gaza on Sunday. Picture: Al Jazeera/AP Although these figures are piffling by comparison with the horrifying numbers of civilian deaths, reporting on the conflict has, over the course of the 22-month Israeli onslaught on the 2.3m people in Gaza, become a deadly business. With no foreign journalists allowed to enter the territory by Israel to report independently, coverage has been left to Palestinian journalists who are under the same threat of personal targeting and must endure the same conditions as other civilians. Anas Al-Sharif was the recipient of Amnesty International Australia's Human Rights Defender Award in 2024 for his 'resilience, bravery, and commitment to press freedom while working in the most dangerous conditions'. It was not just dangerous for him. His father was killed, his house bombed, he was under continual threat of being targeted by the IDF. Those Palestinian journalists who have braved the Israeli onslaught have to endure aerial bombing, drone attacks, shootings, and forcible relocation. They face the same daily scramble for food and water supplies — not to mention accommodation — as everyone else in the territory. National Union of Journalists Dublin broadcasting branch chairwoman Emma O'Kelly, centre, with NUJ members including general secretary Seamus Dooley, right, at a rally on Dublin's O'Connell St protesting Israel's killing of journalists in Palestine. Picture: Niall Carson/PA The accusation from Israel that Mr Al-Sharif was a Hamas operative can be considered as little other than another cheap shot from an administration in Tel Aviv trying desperately to justify its increasingly genocidal intentions. In his last post from Gaza, Mr Al-Sharif decried the world's failure to stop the 'massacre'. Sadly, he is now just another number in the litany of the dead. What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Ukraine should not be left out of talks Donald Trump's shadowy diplomacy is once more in danger of leaving Ukraine on the outside looking in, when he meets with Vladimir Putin in Alaska next Friday to discuss ending a war the Russian president started. Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy cannot be left outside the proposed Alaska talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. File picture: Heinz-Peter Bader/AP What is widely understood, at this point of the conflict, is that ending it is fully in the US president's hands, but his unwillingness to impose the necessary sanctions on Moscow up until now suggests the Alaska talks will end up being a diplomatic coup for the Kremlin. Already, Trump's shift from frustration with Putin's intransigence on stopping deadly air raids on Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities, to wanting to sit down and talk through conditions for ending the conflict, appear to have dealt the winning cards to Putin. The softened White House rhetoric on sanctioning Russia to a punitive degree has not eased Moscow's increasingly vituperative stance on Ukraine being included in the Alaska summit. What Russia wants is a deal on its terms — agreed to by Washington and Moscow, and imposed on Ukraine. That the significance of a trilateral meeting is being actively downplayed by Moscow underscored the importance both warring factions attach to meeting Trump first, and the perceived benefits such a situation would confer. Russia has, since Trump's election, pressed for a US-Russia deal to end the war on their terms and deliberately cold-shouldering both Ukraine and the rest of Europe. The worry now is that, for all his talk of 'disgusting' air raids on Ukraine and his description of Putin as 'crazy', Trump has yet to put any pressure at all on Russia. Damage after a Russian strike in Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, on Wednesday. Picture: Ukrainian Emergency Service/AP The fear is that Ukraine will be sidelined from the Alaska summit and Putin, yet again, will walk away with an agreement which will not deliver any kind of just, sustainable, or lasting peace. The Trump administration cannot allow that to happen. If Putin manages to keep Trump on the negotiating merry-go-round, it will not be in America's best national interests, nor those of Kyiv.
