
Concerns swirl about potential closure of Weiss hospital, which will lose Medicare funding this weekend
Dr. Manoj Prasad, the head of the company that owns the hospital, and other hospital officials did not respond to requests for comment Thursday. But three hospital staffers, who asked to remain unnamed, told the Tribune that they'd been told the hospital would close at 7 a.m. Friday.
The Uptown hospital's hallways were mostly empty Thursday morning. The emergency waiting room was deserted, and some of the offices and waiting rooms had signs reading 'permanently closed.' A white folding table at the entrance of Weiss held four flyers with instructions for patients about how to get medical records, ask billing questions and find their doctors at other locations.
A man wearing scrubs walked through a hospital entrance Thursday morning carrying cardboard boxes.
'It's devastating,' said Marianne Lalonde, an Uptown resident and past president of the Lakeside Area Neighbors Association, of the possible closure. 'It serves a population that is really in need. I think people are really going to struggle to find care and especially more vulnerable populations are going to struggle.'
Worries about closure follow news last month that the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services planned to terminate Weiss from the Medicare program Aug. 9, which is this Saturday. The federal agency issued a public notice, at the time, saying that the Uptown hospital would lose its ability to participate in Medicare because it was out of compliance with rules related to nursing services, physical environment and emergency services.
The notice did not elaborate on specific problems, but it came after the Illinois Department of Public Health conducted an on-site investigation at the hospital in June in response to complaints of high temperatures after air conditioning equipment at the facility failed, according to a state health department memo obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.
The state health department found temperatures as high as nearly 89 degrees in the hospital's intensive care unit and nearly 87 degrees in the emergency department, according to the memo. At the time, the hospital moved all of its inpatients to West Suburban Medical Center in Oak Park and other hospitals because of the heat, according to a previous news release from the hospital.
The air conditioning was supposed to be fixed by the end of June, according to the state memo. The air conditioning appeared to be working again Thursday, at least in parts of the hospital.
The state health department said in a statement Thursday that no patients were currently housed at Weiss. The department said it was continuing 'to monitor developments around the status of Weiss Memorial Hospital.'
The Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services confirmed Thursday that if the hospital loses Medicare funding, it will also lose Medicaid dollars, under federal regulations and state law.
It would be difficult for any hospital to keep its doors open without Medicare and Medicaid funding, and especially so for Weiss. In 2023 about 88% of Weiss' inpatients and nearly 67% of its outpatients were on Medicare or Medicaid, according to the Illinois Health Facilities and Services Review Board.
This week, a number of local elected officials and community organizations wrote a letter to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services asking for an eight-week extension and a reevaluation of conditions at Weiss before the hospital's Medicare participation is terminated to give the hospital more time to become compliant with the agency's standards.
'Our communities stand to lose not only a critical healthcare provider, but also a key employer and stabilizing force in the Uptown neighborhood,' they wrote in the letter. Signers included Ald. Angela Clay, 46th; Rep. Kelly Cassidy, D-Chicago; Rep. Hoan Huynh, D-Chicago; and Sen. Mike Simmons, D-Chicago, among many others.
The elected officials said in the letter that they've convened emergency meetings with leaders at Weiss, the state and city health departments and officials from the mayor's office, among others, to help find solutions.
'It's been a critical safety net hospital for working families and seniors and communities of color, immigrants and refugees, and so we want to make sure that this hospital is here to stay,' Huynh told the Tribune.
Ruth Castillo, with the Lakeside Area Neighbors Association, said that if the hospital closed, it would be 'heartbreaking.'
'It's such an important resource for the community,' she said. 'There are so many neighbors that are on Medicare and Medicaid. They won't have a resource (that's) walking distance or a short bus ride away.'
She said, however, she thought years ago that something like this might happen. The hospital has gone through a series of ownership changes in recent years. A previous owner, California-based Pipeline Health, agreed several years ago to sell a Weiss parking lot to a developer, angering community members who worried, in part, that it was the beginning of the end for Weiss.
'A hospital that has a future plan is not going to sell the last bit of land that it has to develop,' Castillo said.
Pipeline later sold Weiss and West Suburban Hospital in Oak Park to a new company called Resilience Healthcare led by Prasad, who touted, at the time, his ability to turn around struggling hospitals.
'Over the past 30 years I've had the privilege of leading numerous health care organizations and have rescued a number of challenged facilities,' Prasad told the Health Facilities and Services Review Board in 2022 as he sought to buy Weiss and West Suburban.
WBEZ and the Chicago Sun-Times first reported news of the hospital's potential closure.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Direct primary care provides medical treatment the old-fashioned way
Because of the way health care has evolved in the United States over the past 80 years, it is extremely complex and now involves employers, the government, and various insurance companies. Yet, health care is simply an economic activity, albeit where the activity between a provider and a patient is the most personal interchange an individual will ever have. However, because of the complexity, the vast majority of patients in the U.S. don't completely control their medical finances and, in many cases, their medical decisions. Almost 90 percent of Americans have their health care provided through their employer or the government via Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare. Likewise, health insurance companies often dictate what medical procedures or medications are allowable. Direct primary care (DPC) changes that entire dynamic. There are some minor variations, but in its simplest form, DPC is a contract between a patient and a primary care physician. The patient usually pays a fixed amount of money per month and then has unlimited access to the medical provider for routine types of care. There is no insurance or government involvement. Most practices limit the overall number of DPC patients they will accept. From the patient's standpoint, DPC offers real continuity of care and allows the provider to develop a meaningful relationship with the patient. From the primary care provider's perspective, there is an opportunity to really get to know their patients, there is an average savings in overhead of around 40 percent, and the provider has the ability to practice medicine without interference from any third party. The number of DPC practices is growing, going from 100 in 2009 to over 2,500 in early 2025. A patient in a DPC practice still needs to have a major medical or catastrophic health insurance policy to cover hospitalizations or other large medical expenses. In this case, insurance functions as it should to pay for infrequent, unpredictable events rather than day-to-day medical expenses. Half of all Americans receive their health insurance through their employer or their spouse's employer. To save costs, there is growing interest among employers to utilize DPC for their employees. Likewise, there have been DPC practices that limit themselves to the Medicaid entitlement population with initial success. Seniors in the Medicare program have the ability to access DPC as well. Although attempts have been made by state insurance commissions to classify DPC as health insurance and to then regulate it, these attempts have been unsuccessful. By any definition, DPC is clearly not any type of insurance. Health care costs and expenses continue to increase in the U.S. Direct primary care is an excellent tool to hold costs down, while giving patients more control over their health care decisions and dollars, and giving providers more freedom to practice medicine without third-party interference. Dr. Roger Stark is a visiting fellow with Mountain States Policy Center, an independent research organization based in Idaho, Montana, Eastern Washington and Wyoming. Online at A retired surgeon, Dr. Stark has authored three books including 'Healthcare Policy Simplified: Understanding a Complex Issue,' and 'The Patient-Centered Solution: Our Health Care Crisis, How It Happened, and How We Can Fix It.'
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
A Furious MAGA Voter's Post Breaking Down The "Ridiculous" Cost Of Their Diabetes Medicine Due To Donald Trump's Tariffs Is Going Viral
A Facebook post written by a self-proclaimed MAGA voter who says she and her partner can no longer afford their imported medications due to Donald Trump's tariffs is going viral. At the start of the post, the MAGA voter expressed her anger with President Trump and his ongoing tariff war that has increased the prices of imported goods in the US. She said, "He should take his tariffs and shove them up his ass!" She then broke down the cost of her and her partner's medications in the US, which amounts to over $500 for each of them with Medicare. She said they'd been buying their medications from Canada or the UK to save money.... But that changed when the Canadian company purportedly increased its prices by $80-100 per month to offset Trump's tariffs. "I voted for Trump, I truly wish I had not making America Great Again, but he sure is making it more expensive," she wrote. In response to the posts, people had a range of opinions, with some defending President Trump... "You can't blame the president for the high drug pricing," one person commented on the original post. "It is not Trumps fault you cannot figure this out," another wrote. While others blamed the original poster for her voting decisions... "If you cannot afford your medications, why would you vote for any Republican ever??? The Democratic platform has been lowered costs for healthcare FOR DECADES," one user questioned. "I wish I had more sympathy. That went away in Nov. They are getting exactly what they voted told them this time was different," another person wrote. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.


Buzz Feed
17 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
MAGA Voter Regrets Vote Due To Rising Medication Prices
A Facebook post written by a self-proclaimed MAGA voter who says she and her partner can no longer afford their imported medications due to Donald Trump's tariffs is going viral. At the start of the post, the MAGA voter expressed her anger with President Trump and his ongoing tariff war that has increased the prices of imported goods in the US. She said, "He should take his tariffs and shove them up his ass!" She then broke down the cost of her and her partner's medications in the US, which amounts to over $500 for each of them with Medicare. She said they'd been buying their medications from Canada or the UK to save money.... But that changed when the Canadian company purportedly increased its prices by $80-100 per month to offset Trump's tariffs. "I voted for Trump, I truly wish I had not making America Great Again, but he sure is making it more expensive," she wrote. In response to the posts, people had a range of opinions, with some defending President Trump... "You can't blame the president for the high drug pricing," one person commented on the original post. "It is not Trumps fault you cannot figure this out," another wrote. While others blamed the original poster for her voting decisions... "If you cannot afford your medications, why would you vote for any Republican ever??? The Democratic platform has been lowered costs for healthcare FOR DECADES," one user questioned. "I wish I had more sympathy. That went away in Nov. They are getting exactly what they voted told them this time was different," another person wrote. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.