Coke's shift to cane sugar would be expensive, hurt US farmers
NEW YORK (Reuters) -A possible move by Coca-Cola , and other beverage and food industries, to use cane sugar instead of corn syrup as a sweetener would be difficult and expensive to implement, while mostly negative for farmers in the United States.
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that Coca-Cola had agreed to use cane sugar in its beverages in the country after his discussions with the maker of the top soda pop brand.
Backed by the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) social movement, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been pushing for changes in ingredients used by the food and beverage industry, claiming the proposed substitutes are healthier.
The company already sells Coke made from cane sugar in other markets, including Mexico, and some U.S. grocery stores carry glass bottles with cane sugar labeled "Mexican" Coke.
In response to Trump's comment, Coca-Cola said "more details on new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range will be shared soon.'
PepsiCo also said on Thursday it would use sugar in its products like Pepsi beverages if consumers want it.
Industry analysts, however, said changes in the formulation of the rest of the Coke sold in the U.S., and other beverages and candies, would involve significant adjustments to companies' supply chains, since corn syrup and sugar come from different producers. It would also involve changes to product labeling, and cost more.
"Food and beverage industries started to use corn syrup in the U.S. in the past because of costs. It is cheaper than sugar," said Ron Sterk, a senior editor at SOSland Publishing, an information provider for the ingredients industry in the U.S.
He said the beverage industry uses 55% High Fructose Corn Syrup, or 55HFCS, while bakers use 42% HFCS.
The Corn Refiners Association said the complete elimination of high fructose corn syrup from the U.S. food and beverage supply would cut corn prices by up to 34 cents a bushel, resulting in a loss of $5.1 billion in farm revenue.
"The resulting economic shockwave would lead to rural job losses and significant economic consequences to communities across the country," CRA said.
Agricultural processors such as Archer-Daniels-Midland and Ingredion, two of the largest HFCS producers, grind corn at mills dotted around the Midwest farm belt to produce corn sweetener and other goods like ethanol biofuel. Shares of both companies fell on Thursday.
ADM is estimated to ship 4 billion to 4.5 billion pounds of high fructose corn syrup every year, accounting for roughly 6% to 7% of projected 2026 earnings, said analyst Heather Jones of Heather Jones Research.
"If Coke were to shift the entirety of its HF55 usage to cane, the cost increase would very likely exceed $1 billion given the current price gap between HF55 and cane sugar and the probability of very large price increases for the latter," Jones said in a research note.
To produce one pound of HFCS, the industry uses around 2.5 pounds of corn, so a large shift in corn syrup use in the U.S. would hurt demand for the cereal, hurting corn growers, while probably boosting imports of cane sugar since there is not enough produced in the U.S. to satisfy American consumers' sweet tooth.
SUGAR DEFICIT
Around 400 million bushels of corn is used annually to make corn syrup for drinks and other food products, representing around 2.5% of U.S. corn production, according to U.S. government data.
The U.S. produces around 3.6 million metric tons of cane sugar per year, half of that in Trump's home state of Florida, compared with around 7.3 million tons of corn syrup.
Trump's ongoing trade wars, however, would make it difficult to cover the deficit, sugar analyst Michael McDougall said.
"It will most likely come from Brazil," he said, referring to the world's top cane sugar producer, "but Trump just hit Brazil with a 50% import tariff."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Fed is concerned. This economist explains exactly why.
KPMG US chief economist Diane Swonk joins Market Domination with Josh Lipton to discuss what the Federal Reserve is concerned about when it comes to price stability and tariffs. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The president fired the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Friday after the agency published a negative jobs report.
Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers had choice words for President Donald Trump after he fired his stats boss over an abysmal jobs report. Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), on Friday after the agency released its July jobs report showing that the economy added a mere 73,000 jobs—far below the White House forecast of 109,000 jobs. BLS also revised its job numbers down for May and June by 258,000. Trump accused McEntarfer of having 'RIGGED' those numbers 'to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.'
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Could Buying a Tesla Still Save Car Owners Money in 2025?
Tesla may have been responsible for ushering in the era of widespread electric vehicle (EV) adoption, but it certainly hasn't been resting on its laurels. The company has taken some hits over the year with vehicle sales on the decline. If you factor in the controversial public figure that is the company's CEO, Elon Musk, then you know investing in a Tesla has become a hot button issue. Find Out: For You: Still, Tesla remains a leading name in the EV space, renowned for its performance and strong warranty options. For those interested in making the switch to electric, there's a lot to consider when it comes to whether or not a Tesla can save you money. EV Tax Credits vs. One 'Big Beautiful Bill' Act President Donald Trump signed an executive order to eliminate the federal EV mandate at the beginning of 2025, though some EV tax credits remained in place. However, they now have an expiration date for vehicles purchased after September 30, 2025. This change is due to the recent passage of Trump's tax reform, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB), which accelerates the end date of this incentive. If you are still privy to the tax credit, here are some key takeaways: For the first half of the credit ($3,750), a new EV needs to meet certain restrictions regarding the vehicle's critical battery minerals. A certain percentage of the minerals need to have been sourced from the U.S. or any country with which the U.S. holds a free trade agreement. The second half of the credit kicks in if a certain percentage of battery components were manufactured or assembled in those same countries. Finally, to be eligible for any credit, any new EV or plug-in hybrid must see final assembly take place in North America. Concerning the Tesla Cybertuck, those who purchase a new model (single- and dual-motor models) can expect the full $7,500 federal tax credit until it expires. All trim packages of the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y are eligible for the full tax credit as well, as is the all-wheel-drive Tesla Model X. Read More: Tesla's Referral Program Can Help Save Money Per CleanTechnica, those interested in driving away from a Tesla showroom with a brand-new EV could save a bundle by taking advantage of the company's referral program. By utilizing a referral code, buyers can shave $500 off a Tesla Model Y — excluding the Launch Series — or $1,000 off the purchase of a Cybertruck, Model S or Model X. Those interested in the Model 3 can save $2,500 in this fashion. As a bonus, the referrer also receives a $500 credit to spend with the automaker. Save Money on Total Gas or Fuel As TopSpeed detailed, drivers who purchase a 2025 Tesla Model Y long-range rear-wheel drive could save nearly $5,000 on gas over five years. You can also see savings in other models. If you compare the Tesla Model S to the relatively fuel-efficient Toyota Camry, you may find cost savings that a Tesla driver could see. For example, if a Camry were driven 15,000 miles a year with an average gas price of $3.39 per gallon, a driver would spend $1,589 in gas. With a Tesla Model S, a driver would spend only $555 due to the lower electric charge cost of $0.037 per mile. Caitlyn Moorhead contributed to the reporting for this article. More From GOBankingRates Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered Upper Class in 2025 This article originally appeared on Could Buying a Tesla Still Save Car Owners Money in 2025? Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data