
Scottish housing emergency one year on: 'There is no credible plan'
But child poverty cannot be tackled without ending child homelessness. And the latest Programme for Government fails to offer either a plan or the investment to do so.
It is now clear: there is no credible plan to deliver 110,000 homes and no serious effort to cut the number of households stuck in temporary accommodation. We need a Programme for Housing. What we got was a Programme for Homelessness.
Read more on Scotland's Housing Emergency:
Despite systemic failures in homelessness services across Scotland, there is no commitment to ramp up social housebuilding, no expanded budget, and no real investment in services to prevent more people falling into homelessness.
Politicians are failing in their duty. They look away as wave after wave of families fall through the cracks. We know what it means for families to live in overcrowded, unsafe homes - to be unable to host a friend, to live in fear, to be isolated. We now have evidence of the profound harm this does to children's development and mental health, casting a shadow long into their future.
We don't need more excuses. We need a Housing Emergency Action Plan - with clear, concrete targets, proper funding, and a genuine commitment to affordable, secure, permanent homes. Not a plan that shuffles people from one crisis to another.
As the Scottish General Election approaches, every political party has a choice to make continue treating housing as a second-tier issue or rise to the challenge and put it where it belongs - at the centre of the agenda.
Voters have power, too. We can demand more. We can ask the hard questions. We can refuse to accept that this is the best Scotland can do. Because everyone deserves more than just a roof over their head. Everyone deserves safety, stability, peace.
It has been a year. If our politicians won't treat the housing emergency like the emergency it is, then we must.
It is time to say: enough is enough. If those in power won't act, then it's up to all of us to speak out, stand up, and fight for the right to a home.
Alison Watson is a director at Shelter Scotland.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
This tidal wave of illegal migration can only be stopped by deterrence
What is the Government proposing to do about housing asylum seekers, in view of this week's court ruling that a migrant hotel in Epping, Essex, should be closed? It is possible that the interim judgment will be overturned, but that should not be taken by the Home Office as a signal to carry on as before. Indeed, ministers have said they will stop using hotels, but only by 2029, which is of no use to local people concerned about the sudden incursion of mostly young men into their neighbourhoods. With the number of migrants crossing the Channel at record levels and seemingly little prospect of removing those already here, this is a problem that can only get worse. If the High Court ruling is upheld, other councils will doubtless use the planning laws to close down hotels to avoid protests by local people. The case in Epping revolved around the failure to apply for a change of use from a hotel to a semi-permanent hostel. This alleged unlawful use had affected what is known as 'amenity' – that is, the generally-understood quality of an area or community. This set of circumstances must have been replicated across the country and is now a green light for others to stage protests in a bid to get a similar result. Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, writing in The Telegraph, said the 12 councils controlled by his party would mount similar legal challenges, and he urged people to stage protests at asylum hotels to persuade their local authorities to take similar action. There are currently some 30,000 asylum seekers in around 200 hotels. Others are in temporary accommodation and some in disused military barracks. But there are clearly not enough places to cope with the continuing influx. It is not good enough for ministers to claim they are bearing down on the smugglers or seeking return agreements with other countries. The biggest problem remains the pull factor bringing migrants to our shores. If they know they can be picked up a few miles off shore and brought to Britain, where they will be put up in a hotel, that is an incentive to find the money to pay the gangs. If, as an alternative to hotels, the Home Office allows asylum seekers to jump the queue for social housing that will be an additional magnet and will further antagonise local people. The key policy ambition must be deterrence, yet Labour has done nothing since taking office to put migrants off coming. Until it does, this crisis can only deepen.


The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Councils consider legal bids as ministers face Epping hotel ruling aftermath
Councils across England are considering legal challenges as the Government scrambles to draw up contingency plan for housing asylum seekers set to be removed from a hotel in Epping, Essex. Ministers are now bracing for further legal challenges from councils after Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary injunction by the High Court on Tuesday. The ruling blocks asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in the Essex town, and current residents must be removed by September 12. On Wednesday, some Conservative and Reform UK-led authorities said they were looking at their options to take similar action. Conservative-run Broxbourne Council in Hertfordshire has said it was taking legal advice 'as a matter of urgency', while Tory-run East Lindsey District Council in Lincolnshire said officers are investigating and 'will take appropriate action'. Reform UK-led councils, West Northamptonshire Council and Staffordshire County Council, also said the authorities would look at the options available after the High Court ruling. Ian Cooper, leader of Staffordshire County Council, said: 'The control and protection of our country's borders is a national issue, but the impact of central government policy is felt in communities across Staffordshire.' It comes as Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has indicated that councils run by his party will consider their own legal challenges. However, a number of these councils do not have responsibility for planning permission, which may limit their ability to launch legal challenges. Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel after it had been at the centre of protests in recent weeks. The demonstrations came after an asylum seeker, who was staying there, was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. He denies the charge and is due to stand trial later this month. The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'. Reacting to the ruling on Wednesday, security minister Dan Jarvis told Times Radio: 'We're looking at a range of different contingency options following from a legal ruling that took place yesterday, and we'll look closely at what we're able to do.' Asked whether other migrant hotels have the proper planning permission, Mr Jarvis said: 'Well, we'll see over the next few days and weeks. 'Other local authorities will be considering whether they wish to act in the same way that Epping (Forest) District Council have. 'I think the important point to make is that nobody really thinks that hotels are a sustainable location to accommodate asylum seekers. 'That's precisely why the Government has made a commitment that, by the end of this Parliament, we would have phased out the use of them.' On Wednesday shadow home secretary Chris Philp also pressed ministers not to re-house the asylum seekers at the Bell Hotel into other hotels or flats 'sorely needed by young people'. In a letter to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, Mr Philp wrote: 'Up and down the country people are furious about the number of illegal migrants being housed in hotels – which rose in the nine months following the election under Labour. 'People are also concerned that you are now moving people from hotels into apartments and other accommodation which is sorely needed by young people here who are struggling under this Labour Government.' The Conservative MP also called for an emergency Cabinet meeting to set up plans to deport migrants crossing the Channel on arrival. Meanwhile Mr Farage has called for peaceful protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers to put pressure on local authorities to take the same route as Epping Forest. Writing in The Telegraph, he said: 'Now the good people of Epping must inspire similar protests around Britain. 'Wherever people are concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels and who are free to walk their streets, they should follow the example of the town in Essex. 'Let's hold peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels, and put pressure on local councils to go to court to try and get the illegal immigrants out; we now know that together we can win.' The latest Home Office data showed there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. New figures – published among the usual quarterly immigration data release – are expected on Thursday, showing numbers in hotels at the end of June. Figures for hotels published by the Home Office date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023 when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels.


The Herald Scotland
10 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Green MSP calls to block Palestine Action prosecutions
Mr Greer highlighted the case of a 78-year-old man in Scotland repeatedly visited by police after being arrested for wearing a t-shirt reading: 'Genocide in Palestine. Time to take Action.' The Labour Government placed Palestine Action on the same list as ISIS and Al-Qaeda earlier this summer, triggering hundreds of arrests across the UK. Last week alone, nearly 500 people were detained at Westminster protests, many for carrying placards supporting the group. Mr Greer has urged First Minister John Swinney to use the Criminal Justice Modernisation Bill to press the Lord Advocate to issue prosecution guidance, similar to measures taken on drug consumption facilities and prison overcrowding. READ MORE: John Swinney demands action from UK to bring Gaza students to Scotland No arrests at rally after 'Plasticine Action' video emerges No 10 warns against funding Palestine Action after Sally Rooney cash pledge Mr Greer told The Herald: 'Wearing a t-shirt isn't terrorism. The UK Government's attempt to silence pro-Palestine protests is a disgusting crackdown on dissent. That's why I'm calling on the Scottish Government to take every step available under devolved powers to undo this cowardly decision from Westminster. 'The independence of the Lord Advocate must be respected. But there are plenty of examples where they have set common-sense policies following the clear will of our Government and Parliament. "The safe drug consumption facility in Glasgow came after years of pressure across Scotland and was only possible thanks to the Lord Advocate issuing non-prosecution guidance which prevents arrests. Just last year she came to Holyrood to set out revised prosecution guidance in the face of capacity issues in the prison system. 'I am calling on the First Minister to use the Criminal Justice Modernisation Bill, currently going through Parliament, to set out Parliament's clear desire that the Lord Advocate to issue sensible guidance and end the ludicrous scenes we have witnessed of Police Scotland officers arresting peaceful pensioners for the 'terrorism-related offence' of wearing t-shirts and holding signs opposing the genocide in Gaza. 'This is a farcical waste of police and court time and it is obviously not in the public interest. We cannot overturn the ban on Palestine Action here in Scotland, but we can at least make sure it isn't enforced to this ludicrous extent. 'Of course people are disgusted by Israel's brutality and feel compelled to take action and call out the UK Government's complicity. No matter how hard Labour Ministers try, they cannot hide from the fact that they have enabled this genocide through the supply of arms, intelligence and military training to Israel. They certainly cannot shut down dissent and protest against their own actions. 'People across the country oppose this genocide and are desperate for the UK Government to end its support for Israel's disgusting actions. They also expect the Scottish Government to defend their right to peaceful protest.' International groups including Amnesty International and the UN's human rights chief have criticised the proscription, calling it a misuse of counter-terror laws. The Crown Office has been contacted for comment.