&w=3840&q=100)
Madhya Pradesh, France sign PoU to boost cultural, tourism ties for 3 years
This will make Madhya Pradesh a new centre of cultural and tourism cooperation between India and France, an official said. Chief Minister Mohan Yadav and French Ambassador to India Dr Thierry Mathou hailed the agreement and said it will further strengthen cultural relations between the two countries, which already share strong ties in multiple fields. The agreement, signed in the presence of Yadav at his residence 'Samatva' in Bhopal, seeks to strengthen long-term cooperation between France and Madhya Pradesh in the field of culture and tourism, the official said. The tripartite MoU was signed by French Ambassador Mathou, MP's Principal Secretary (Tourism and Culture) Shiv Shekhar Shukla and President of Alliance Francaise de Bhopal, Akhilesh Verma. The language institute, set up in Bhopal in 1983, is supported by the French embassy and has now more than 2000 students in its classes a year in the state capital. This agreement will be valid for three years and can be extended further with mutual consent. Speaking on the occasion, Yadav pointed out that relations between India and France have always been good and they become stronger under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has visited the European country multiple times since assuming office in 2014. Madhya Pradesh is ready for business relations with France along with cultural ties. The CM is expected to visit France next month, the official informed. Possibilities of mutual cooperation will be explored between India and France in industrial development, entrepreneurship and promotion of handicrafts, he said. "This MoU realizes our vision to establish Madhya Pradesh not only as India's cultural capital, but also as a progressive, global tourism and cultural centre. Artists of the state will get a global platform to showcase their kills and number of tourists coming from France and Europe will increase significantly," the official said. Expressing happiness over the partnership, Ambassador Mathou noted, "We are very happy to establish this important cooperation with the Government of Madhya Pradesh. France mainly works on tourism, security, environment and education." "This MoU will further strengthen the cultural relations between the two countries, which will open new opportunities in the field of art, education and tourism," he emphasised. Under the MoU, cultural programmes will be organised jointly, which include art festivals, music, dance, exhibitions, film screenings, food and other events related to culture, the official explained. A dedicated Indo-French cultural calendar will be prepared every year. Also, tourism promotional material of Madhya Pradesh will be translated into French language and special efforts will be made to attract tourists from the key European country, he maintained. Tourism sector officials and guides will be given training in French language and culture, he said. This agreement will provide a global platform to local artists, craftsmen, students and cultural organizations, and help establish a unique identity of Madhya Pradesh at the international level, the official said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
12 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.K. PM Starmer joins ‘Coalition of the Willing' talks over Russia-Ukraine conflict
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer joined a video call with European allies on Sunday (August 17, 2025) ahead of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's visit to the White House next week for talks with U.S. President Donald Trump over Russia's war. . Mr. Starmer was joined by French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz as hosts of the "Coalition of the Willing", after Mr. Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held a summit in Alaska in pursuit of peace on Friday (August 15, 2025). Mr. Starmer praised the American President's efforts, which he said had 'brought us closer than ever before to ending Russia's illegal war in Ukraine' and reiterated Europe's 'unwavering support' for Ukraine. 'His leadership in pursuit of an end to the killing should be commended. While progress has been made, the next step must be further talks involving President Zelenskyy. The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without him,' Mr. Starmer said in a statement issued by Downing Street. 'I welcome the openness of the United States, alongside Europe, to provide robust security guarantees to Ukraine as part of any deal.' Calling it 'important progress', he said it will be crucial in 'deterring Putin from coming back for more'. 'In the meantime, until he (Putin) stops his barbaric assault, we will keep tightening the screws on his war machine with even more sanctions, which have already had a punishing impact on the Russian economy and its people,' Mr. Starmer said. On Saturday (August 16, 2025), in a joint statement with Mr. Macron, Mr. Merz and other European Union (EU) leaders, Mr. Starmer welcomed Mr. Trump's debrief following his meeting with Mr. Putin which ended without any ceasefire agreement. 'As President Trump said 'there's no deal until there's a deal'. As envisioned by President Trump, the next step must now be further talks including President Zelenskyy, whom he will meet soon,' the leaders said. 'The Coalition of the Willing is ready to play an active role. No limitations should be placed on Ukraine's armed forces or on its cooperation with third countries. Russia cannot have a veto against Ukraine's pathway to EU and NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation). It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force,' they noted. It came as some media reports indicate that Mr. Putin expects Ukraine to withdraw from the Donbas region, parts of which Russia has attempted to occupy during the conflict. The Financial Times reported that the Russian President told Mr. Trump that he would freeze the conflict along much of the frontline if his demands were met.
Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
How Will the War in Ukraine End? Two Scenarios
The Trump-Putin summit in Alaska is over, and peace in Ukraine isn't yet nigh. But the two most likely endings to the Russian invasion are coming into view. Ukraine could lose land but survive as a secure and sovereign, if shrunken, nation state. Alternatively, it could lose both land and sovereignty, falling back into Moscow's sphere of influence. Which will come to pass—and when—is no clearer after Alaska, which disappointed hopes for a diplomatic breakthrough. Russian President Vladimir Putin brushed off the push by the U.S. and Europe for a cease-fire that would freeze the current front line, followed by talks about control of Ukrainian territories and guarantees for Ukraine's security. Instead, Putin signaled he would continue the war until Ukraine and the West are willing to satisfy Moscow's broader geopolitical aims. 'We are convinced that, in order for the Ukrainian settlement to be sustainable and long-term, all the root causes of the crisis, which have been repeatedly discussed, must be eliminated, all of Russia's legitimate concerns must be taken into account, and a fair balance in the field of security in Europe and the world as a whole must be restored,' Putin said after the summit. Russian President Vladimir Putin and President Trump arriving to address reporters on Friday in Alaska after their meeting. Putin said Ukraine's security also should be ensured—but past talks have shown the devil is in the details. His emphasis on 'root causes'—his standard shorthand for a litany of grievances about Ukraine's Westward-oriented political trajectory and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's expansion into central and Eastern Europe—show he hasn't given up his overarching goals of restoring Russian political sway over Ukraine, rebuilding Moscow's sphere of influence in Europe's east, and regaining the status of a global great power. That is what he went to war for in 2022. Russia's attempt to conquer Kyiv outright failed, and is likely beyond reach. Ukraine's still-tenacious defense is limiting Russia to marginal battlefield gains at a high cost. Ukraine's hopes of fully expelling the Russian invaders have also dwindled, given the stretched state of its own army. That leaves two plausible endings to the biggest war in Europe since World War II. Here is what they mean, and what they depend on. Partition with protection Ukraine's leadership has quietly come to accept that it doesn't have the military strength to get its borders back in full. Last week, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky indicated his willingness to negotiate about territory in video calls with President Trump and European leaders—after a cease-fire that freezes the current front line. Kyiv and European countries say they would never give legal recognition to Russia's gains, a step that would turn international law into an incentive for further conquest instead of a taboo against it. But they are signaling they would live with the reality of de facto Russian control. Ukrainian soldiers resting in a basement last month in their country's Donetsk region, keeping out of sight of Russian drones.A Ukrainian paramedic loaded a wounded soldier into an ambulance last month. The best-case scenario for Kyiv and its European backers is probably to limit Russia to what its forces already occupy, equivalent to about one-fifth of Ukraine's land. The Kremlin continues to insist that Ukraine retreat from areas that it claims as Russian but doesn't control—notably the Ukrainian-held part of the Donetsk region, where Ukraine holds a chain of fortified cities that Russia so far has been unable to conquer. But the biggest question is what happens to the other 80% of Ukraine. Kyiv and its European allies want to protect the future security and sovereignty of the remaining rump with a combination of strong Ukrainian military defenses and Western security assistance. A so-called 'coalition of the willing' led by the U.K. and France wants to deploy some of its own troops to Ukraine as a further deterrent against a future Russian attack. European leaders are hoping that the U.S. would join security guarantees for Ukraine, and they have been encouraged in recent days by Trump's apparent openness to it. Any possible U.S. role remains unclear, however. Such an outcome would bear a resemblance to the ending of the Korean War in 1953, which left the peninsula divided but South Korea shielded ever since, not least by American troops. For Putin, however, a Korea-style outcome would amount to a historic failure. He would hold 20% of Ukraine's land—swaths of it reduced to rubble—but lose the bulk of Ukraine for good, while watching Western troops protect a country he insists is a brother-nation of Russia. A Soviet poster at a theater in the abandoned city of Pripyat near Chernobyl, Ukraine, last month. Putin's reasons for such a climbdown might be that he fears the war is imposing unsustainable economic and political risks to Russia's internal stability—or that Russia couldn't cope with an escalation of U.S.-led sanctions. So far, though, most observers see little reason to think that is true. 'The Russian viewpoint at the moment is that this war isn't sustainable, but Ukraine is less sustainable, and by the time economic problems would force an end to the war, Ukraine will have lost,' said Janis Kluge, a Russian economy expert at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, a think tank in Berlin. Trump and other U.S. officials have suggested Washington could batter Russia's economy with a crackdown on its oil revenues, via punitive tariffs on Russian oil buyers, sanctions on banking transactions, banning Russia's shadow fleet of oil tankers and other measures. Most analysts say sanctions could be tightened but major effects would take time. And, short of Putin fearing for his own rule, it isn't clear at what point he would put economic strains ahead of his historical fixation with Ukraine and his determination to make Russia great again. Partition with subordination Russia's demands since its 2022 invasion have included shrinking the size of Ukraine's armed forces, limiting its weaponry and its supplies of Western armaments, and changing its political regime—including its constitution, its leadership, and its policies on language, history and national identity. The greatest danger for Ukraine isn't just losing its east and south. It is that what remains wouldn't be able to resist a third Russian invasion, following those of 2014 and 2022. The threat could force Kyiv to show deference to Moscow's wishes about its leadership and its policies at home and abroad. First responders covering the body of a factory worker killed in a Russian missile strike near Dnipro, Ukraine, in June. Such an outcome would turn the surviving rump of Ukraine into a Russian protectorate, amounting to a capitulation for a nation that wants to consolidate its democracy and integrate with Europe and the West. It is this, even more than the fields and towns of Ukraine's east, that Ukrainians are fighting to prevent. The battlefield remains the only way Putin could achieve such capitulation terms. Although Russia's forces continue to make only limited gains in terms of square miles, their main objective is to wear down Ukraine's army—and the country's will to fight. After 3½ years of relentless war, Ukrainian troops are tired, outnumbered and discontented with their own generals. But they continue to resist. And the nature of the war—with drones increasingly dominant—favors defense over attack. A Ukrainian soldier checking on a drone before a night mission in June. 'I don't see the Ukrainian army collapsing. But on a long enough timeline, we could get to a point where, if Ukraine fails to address its problems of force generation and force management, it might not be defeated on the battlefield, but it will grow increasingly exhausted,' said Michael Kofman, a military expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a Washington-based think tank. Russia's advantages in population, troop numbers and financial resources make its war effort look more sustainable than Ukraine's, most analysts say. 'But the history of this war is that Ukraine has proved adaptable and resilient,' Kofman said. Against the odds, Ukraine has so far found ways to prolong its resistance and keep the outcome open. Write to Marcus Walker at How Will the War in Ukraine End? Two Scenarios How Will the War in Ukraine End? Two Scenarios How Will the War in Ukraine End? Two Scenarios How Will the War in Ukraine End? Two Scenarios How Will the War in Ukraine End? Two Scenarios
Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
European leaders to meet on Ukraine as Zelenskiy prepares to face Trump
* European leaders to meet on Ukraine as Zelenskiy prepares to face Trump Leaders of France, Germany, Britain to host virtual meeting * Zelenskiy flies to Washington on Monday to meet Trump * Putin wants swathes of Ukraine land in peace deal, sources say * Trump met Putin in Alaska on Friday * Summit was 'clear win' for Putin, former top UK official says By Andrew MacAskill, Tom Balmforth and Andreas Rinke LONDON/BERLIN, - The leaders of France, Germany and Britain will try to shore up Ukraine's position on Sunday as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy prepares to meet Donald Trump in Washington with the U.S. leader pressing Kyiv to accept a deal to end the war. President Trump is leaning on Ukraine to strike an agreement after meeting Vladimir Putin on Friday in Alaska where, according to sources, the Russian president offered to relinquish tiny pockets of occupied Ukraine in exchange for vast swathes elsewhere. At face value, some of Putin's demands would be hugely difficult for Ukraine to accept, setting the stage for potentially fraught talks about ending Europe's deadliest war in 80 years, which has killed or wounded more than 1 million people. French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer will host a virtual meeting of the "coalition of the willing" - a grouping of allies of Kyiv - from 1300 GMT. European powers want to help set up a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelenskiy to make sure Ukraine has a seat at the table to shape its future. They also want robust security guarantees for Ukraine with U.S. involvement, and the ability to crank up pressure on Moscow if needed. "They will spell out what they consider essential in terms of security guarantees: what they can do themselves, what falls to the coalition of volunteers, and also what they expect from the United States," a European government official said. "Indeed, they expect a very robust commitment." One or more of the European leaders could also accompany Zelenskiy when he flies to Washington on Monday for his meeting with Trump. Trump said on Saturday that Ukraine should make a deal to end the war with Russia because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not". After the Alaska summit with Putin, Trump phoned Zelenskiy and told him that the Kremlin chief had offered to freeze most front lines if Kyiv ceded all of Donetsk, the industrial region that is one of Moscow's main targets, a source familiar with the matter said. Zelenskiy rejected the demand, the source said. Russia already controls a fifth of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk province, which it first entered in 2014. Trump also said he agreed with Putin that a peace deal should be sought without the prior ceasefire that Ukraine and its European allies have called for. That was a reversal of his position before the summit, when he said he would not be happy unless a ceasefire was agreed on. Zelenskiy said Russia's unwillingness to pause the fighting would complicate efforts to forge a lasting peace. "Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war," he said on X. Ukraine's air force said Russia attacked Ukraine overnight with 60 drones and one ballistic missile. It said it downed or jammed 40 of the drones. PREPARING FOR OVAL OFFICE MEETING Zelenskiy's last Oval Office meeting, in February, went disastrously, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance giving the Ukrainian leader a strong public dressing-down. Merz said he did not think Zelenskiy would face as difficult a time this time around, adding that Zelenskiy would talk on Sunday to European leaders who would help him prepare for the meeting. "We'll give a few good pieces of advice," he told German broadcaster n-tv. Merz told ZDF that while it was important that Europe stand united, the U.S. would for the time being continue to play the decisive role in the war. "The American president has the power both militarily and via appropriate sanctions and tariffs to ensure that Russia moves more than it currently does," he said. Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and has been gradually advancing for months. In his statement after the Alaska summit, Putin signalled no movement in Russia's long-held demands, which also include a veto on Kyiv's desired membership in the NATO alliance. Mark Lyall Grant, Britain's national security adviser during part of Trump's first term, said the summit was a 'clear win' for Putin because Trump dropped his previous call for an immediate ceasefire. However, he added that it was positive that there appeared to be some willingness from the U.S. to be involved in offering some security guarantees for Ukraine. "That is absolutely critical because apart from the issues of land swaps, which is a very complicated issue, the most important longer-term issue is the security guarantees for what is left of Ukraine, so Putin doesn't do what he normally does, which is have a time to rearm and come back for more at a later stage," he told Reuters. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
