
Police Department brass accused Mayor Brandon Johnson's budget office of ‘systemically' delaying paychecks
Police Department Deputy Director Ryan Fitzsimons emailed multiple officials in Johnson's budget office June 2 to alert them of the department's overdue A-forms, paperwork required to process paychecks for new hires and promotions. After following up the next day to confirm that police recruits were not getting their first paychecks, he sent an additional message June 10 saying Johnson's budget office was purposely sitting on the forms.
'Given that we discussed at length via email and on our meeting on May 8th the need for timely approval of A-Forms, it would appear that OBM is pursuing a pattern of practice to delay the approval of A-Forms with the functional result of not paying employees on time and delaying compliance with the Consent Decree,' Fitzsimons wrote. 'What is OBM's plan to systemically approve or deny A-forms?'
The unusually contentious email noted, 'CPD is committed to paying our employees on time. It is one of our most basic requirements as an employer and is also required by law. OBM's delay to sign A-Forms is exposing the City to increased legal risk along with diminished morale and increased attrition of our recruits.'
A joint statement last week from the mayor's office, the Office of Budget Management and Chicago police acknowledged that about 60 police academy recruits saw late paychecks, along with six Chicago Fire Department employees. The response cast the snafu as an 'administrative' error that has since been rectified.
'We acknowledge that administrative delays affected recently hired and promoted employees, and we have taken corrective steps to ensure the payments were made,' the statement said. 'The City is continuing to evaluate ways to improve internal systems — such as A-form processing and hiring workflows — with a goal of reducing administrative delays and supporting public safety staffing needs.'
While the city said the lag was less than a week, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 7 President John Catanzara noted the 54 recruits who started in May only got their first paycheck last month after he spoke with WMAQ-Ch. 5 to sound the alarm. And former city Inspector General Joe Ferguson, who has authored reports on the city's complicated hiring process, argued 'you shouldn't have that situation at all.'
'It appears to be just another manifestation of the general practice in which OBM is actually closely holding their hand on the checker in order to find nickels, dimes, dollars for costs,' Ferguson, now president of the Civic Federation, said. 'It's beyond my imagination to even come up with something (that) looks like … from the perspective of liability and responsibility, a practice that takes this budgetary control mentality to a new extreme.'
Johnson is not the first mayor accused of employing budgetary tricks with A-forms in times of austerity. The budget office has traditionally leaned on slow-walking filling vacancies as one of its few tools to free up money, and the city ended 2024 with a $161 million deficit and expects a more than $1 billion gap next year.
But delaying A-forms for entire academy classes or police supervisors who have already begun their new roles is an atypical move, Catanzara said.
'We are talking about a guy who bragged about being on payment plans with utilities and not paying his own water bill for years, so I guess it shouldn't be anything new,' Catanzara said, a reference to Johnson paying off thousands in outstanding water and sewer bills during his 2023 campaign. 'There was always some little one-offs here and there, but they were literally one person had an issue, and it was dealt with. This is mass incompetence.'
Fitzsimons' email exchange also revealed that the Police Department is now under a hiring freeze until September 'to assist OBM in managing expenses,' which Catanzara said was also the union's understanding. The city and Police Department did not address questions about the pause in new recruits.
The Police Department has historically exceeded its annual spending plan thanks to runaway overtime and misconduct settlement costs.
'No, it's not acceptable,' the mayor told reporters when asked about public safety expenditures blowing past budgeted costs by $207 million last year. He blamed police overtime spending on large events and said 'some innovative element' has to happen to drive those numbers down.
In his June 2 email, Fitzsimons also asked Johnson budget officials Jonathan Ernst and Joseph Sacks for the status of A-forms for three other groups: youth employment, civilian employees and promotions.
It is unclear how Johnson's team responded. For the last category, which concerns officers being promoted to sergeants and lieutenants, Fitzsimons warned, 'These A-Forms are directly tied back to paragraphs 249 – 264. Promotions have already occurred and members have begun to grieve.'
The paragraphs he was referring to concern the federal consent decree that the Police Department has been under since 2019. The court order was meant to reform Chicago police after the murder of Laquan McDonald, but progress has lagged, including within the section on recruitment and promotions cited by Fitzsimons.
Improving the supervisor-to-officer ratio has been a goal of Johnson's and is part of ensuring compliance with the consent decree. Fitzsimons reminded Johnson's budget officials in his email that the department had to brief the judge overseeing the mandate that month on A-form approvals.
The city and CPD joint response did not answer questions on how many police supervisors saw their raises lag as a result of problems with the A-forms.
The youth employment A-forms were needed to fill two Police Department jobs, while the civilian A-forms focused on staff that would help implement the consent decree, per Fitzsimons' email. He said Johnson's 2024 budget, which civilianized about 400 sworn positions, netted $8 million in savings and the department wants to hire more consent decree staff as a result.
During the past budget cycle, Johnson landed in hot water with police reform advocates and the Illinois attorney general for proposing a spending plan that nixed 162 consent decree vacancies. He later restored them.
Figures provided by the budget office show that of the total 439 Police Department positions tied to the consent decree, 222 remain vacant. Some of the largest gaps are in the training officer and victim specialist roles, which are 57% and 50% vacant, respectively.
'CPD remains focused on filling both sworn and non-sworn vacancies while maintaining compliance with the consent decree,' the joint city-Police Department statement said. 'We are continuing to assess resource allocations and hiring procedures across departments to ensure operational continuity and to address the evolving demands of public safety and reform implementation.'
Meanwhile, Chicago Fire Fighters Union Local 2 President Pat Cleary said three ambulance commanders, 15 engineers, 44 lieutenants and 29 captains temporarily suffered incorrect paychecks too. The budget office confirmed six Fire Department employees were paid late but did not address whether supervisors did not receive updated paychecks after being promoted.
Ferguson said the promise of Johnson's first budget, which was lauded by policing and fiscal experts for converting sworn positions to civilian ones to cut spending, fell flat because of bureaucratic snags such as this recent A-form problem. He doesn't blame the freshman mayor for inheriting a sluggish hiring process that often takes several months, but Johnson's budget office isn't doing itself any favors, he said.
'There's this game going on in which OBM is managing (A-forms) purely for purposes of other budgetary needs that are not known to anybody, and for which there is no transparency,' Ferguson said. 'One hand is holding back the other hand in what is an octopus-like structure, and this does not serve any of us well.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Mike Johnson Pushes Back on Trump's Ghislaine Maxwell Pardon Talk
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson has pushed back against the possibility of pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell, the imprisoned former girlfriend of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, after President Donald Trump refused to rule it out. "Not my decision, but I have great pause about that, as any reasonable person would," Johnson told Kristen Welker when asked about the possibility of a pardon during an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday. Newsweek has contacted Johnson's office and the White House for comment via emails sent outside regular business hours. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, right, is seen with President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 22, 2025. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, right, is seen with President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 22, 2025. Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images Why It Matters Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence in federal prison after being convicted of helping Epstein sexually abuse underage girls. She has appealed her case before the Supreme Court, which has not decided whether it will take up the case. Maxwell was questioned by the Department of Justice last week as the Trump administration continues to face pressure to release the government's files on the investigation into Epstein, after the Justice Department and FBI said in a July 7 memo that Epstein did not have a list of clients and that no additional records would be released to the public. Questioned by reporters on Friday, Trump did not rule out the possibility of pardoning Maxwell and noted that he was "allowed to do it." Epstein died by suicide behind bars in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. What To Know Asked if Johnson would support a pardon or commutation for Maxwell, he deferred to Trump. "Well, I mean, obviously that's a decision of the president," Johnson said. "He said he had not adequately considered that. I won't get it in front of him. That's not my lane. My lane is to help direct and control the House of Representatives and to use every tool within our arsenal to get to the truth." Asked again if he was open to a pardon or a commutation, he said: "If you're asking my opinion, I think 20 years was a pittance. I think she should have a life sentence at least. "I mean, think of all these unspeakable crimes…It's hard to put into words how evil this was, and that she orchestrated it and was a big part of it, at least under the criminal sanction, I think is an unforgivable thing. So again, not my decision, but I have great pause about that as any reasonable person would." What People Are Saying Asked if he would consider pardoning Maxwell, Trump told reporters on Friday: "I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about." Maxwell's lawyer David Markus said she has endured "terrible, awful conditions for five years." He added: "We just ask that folks look at what she has to say with an open mind, and that's what Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has promised us, and everything she says can be corroborated, and she's telling the truth." Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche wrote on X on Thursday: "Today, I met with Ghislaine Maxwell, and I will continue my interview of her tomorrow. The Department of Justice will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time." Asked if he would support a pardon or commutation for Maxwell, Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who is pushing for the Epstein files to be released, said on Meet the Press on Sunday: "You know, that would be up to the president. But if she has information that could help us, then I think she should testify. Let's get that out there. And whatever they need to do to compel that testimony, as long as it's truthful, I would be in favor of." What's Next Johnson sent lawmakers home early for a month-long break on July 22 before a vote on releasing the files related to Epstein could take place. The House will reconvene in September. Meanwhile, Trump is likely to continue facing questions about Epstein and whether he is considering a pardon or commutation for Maxwell.


Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: So is City Hall hiking property taxes or ruling them out?
There's going to be a Chicago property tax increase. Fooled ya'. Might the corporate head tax be revived instead? Yes. No. Wait! Chicago will impose a 'progressive revenue' solution to be named later. Say what? Mayor Brandon Johnson and the city's chief financial officer, Jill Jaworski, really didn't seem to have their stories straight last week as they sought to prepare Chicagoans for the difficult budget debate to come in the fall. First, Jaworski, speaking July 22 at a Bloomberg News event, said 'it was likely' the mayor's budget would include a proposed property tax increase alongside budget cuts in order to close an estimated $1.1 billion deficit for 2026. Asked about Jaworski's comments, Johnson at first didn't rule out a such an increase and, as per usual, blamed his predecessors for Chicago's budgetary woes. But on Thursday, two days after Jaworski's remarks, the mayor was singing a different tune. 'I will not be proposing a property tax increase in my budget,' he said, seemingly categorically. Seemingly. He said, as he has done many times in the past, that he would 'work hard to find progressive revenue' to help balance the city's books. Johnson didn't specify what progressive tax policies he would propose other than to say, 'the ultimate goal is to challenge those with means in this city, and quite frankly in this state, to pay their fair share.' Stop us if you've heard this one before. As Johnson prepared to take office following his surprise election win in 2023, progressive groups supporting his candidacy floated hundreds of millions in new taxes, with ideas ranging from a tax on financial trades to the reinstitution of the per-employee head tax on businesses and many others. Most of those new taxes would have needed, and would still need, state approval, and Gov. JB Pritzker along with numerous lawmakers quickly shot down the Johnson tax-bonanza agenda. For good reason, too. A state with such lagging economic performance as Illinois can't afford to be driving away more wealthy and middle-class people and businesses. Then Chicago voters themselves in 2024 rejected a Johnson-backed referendum to dramatically hike the tax on sales of property above $1 million, which likely would have raised apartment rents and further constricted our wheezing commercial real estate industry. So here we are. We're well past the halfway point of Johnson's term, and he's still knocking at the 'progressive taxation' door. We'll reserve judgment until we see precisely what the mayor has in mind. Maybe he and his team have devised some new plan not yet proposed (and rejected) that's worthy of consideration. We won't hold our breath. But it doesn't instill confidence that the mayor himself had to walk back his top financial aide's comments on property taxes a few days after she made them. Perhaps Jaworski was just floating a trial balloon, and Johnson got an earful in the two days between her remarks and when he effectively told reporters she'd spoken out of turn. Property tax hikes right now are a political third rail. Johnson found that out in the most humiliating way possible last year when the City Council unanimously rejected his budget, including a proposed $300 million property tax increase that broke one of Johnson's most noteworthy campaign promises. Attempts to win council support for a smaller hike went nowhere as well, and Johnson and aldermen patched together a budget at the eleventh hour with a hodgepodge of fee increases, business taxes and fines. So is a property tax hike in what is shaping up to be a more brutal budget year than last year's high-wire act really off the table? We don't know. But forgive us if we're skeptical that Johnson's cleanup of Jaworski's property-tax bombshell will be the last word on the subject.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mike Johnson says Ghislaine Maxwell coming clean on Epstein case would be ‘a great service to the country'
Speaker Mike Johnson called on Jeffrey Epstein's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, to come clean and told Americans that he "hoped" she could be trusted as he faces the growing uproar around the White House's handling of the investigation. Johnson appeared Sunday on NBC's Meet the Press, where moderator Kristen Welker asked him point-blank if the convicted sex-trafficker girlfriend of Epstein could be trusted to accurately testify about the crimes she and Epstein committed. Epstein was awaiting prosecution for sex trafficking underage girls after a previous conviction on similar charges when he died in federal custody. Maxwell has been thrust back into the spotlight as the MAGA base has grown frustrated with President Donald Trump and his administration's shutting down of the so-called Epstein files release. Last week, a top Department of Justice official met with Maxwell about the case. "Well, I mean, look; it's a good question. I hope so," Johnson told Welker in response. "I hope that she would want to come clean." "I hope she's telling the truth. She is convicted, she's serving a 20-year sentence for child sex trafficking. Her character is in some if she wants to come clean now, that would be a great service to the country. We want to know every bit of information that she has." The House Oversight Committee voted this week to issue a subpoena for Maxwell after the Justice Department announced its own plans to speak with her. Agency officials did so for nine hours between Thursday and Friday, after making a statement seeming to confirm that her testimony hadn't been aggressively sought before. Some have called Maxwell to testify and suggested she should be given a pardon for sharing what she knows about the Epstein case. She was convicted of sexual abuse against minors and sex trafficking for helping Epstein carry out crimes. Johnson touted the Oversight subpoena favorably Sunday, casting it as evidence that GOP leadership supported efforts aimed at transparency. The Trump administration turned speculation about Epstein's death and the so-called 'Client List' of his co-conspirators into a raging wildfire in early July. The Justice Department and FBI published a joint memo explaining that future releases from the files would not take place, and that the list of Epstein's accomplices was not found. Epstein was rumored to have cultivated personal relationships with many powerful men and institutions. Critics of the president have alleged that a cover-up is in the works regarding the Epstein files. Democrats have hammered the president for his reversal, and a pair of scoops from the Wall Street Journal have reported on the president's connections to Epstein, to Trump's fury. The newspaper reported the contents of a message allegedly penned by Trump to Epstein as part of a 50th birthday celebration in 2003, including allusions to a shared 'secret' between them. Trump firmly denied authoring the note, and sued the Journal and its reporters in response. A second article from the Journal days later reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi informed Trump in May that he was mentioned in the Epstein investigation multiple times, but it was not clear in what context. The White House called that story 'fake' and has repeatedly insinuated that Democrats including Joe Biden tampered with evidence while Trump was out of office. Being mentioned in the files does not mean wrongdoing, and hundreds of names are reportedly included. The lead GOP co-sponsor behind a House resolution that would force the Justice Department to release the entirety of its collected evidence related to Epstein said Sunday that his push was to help the convicted pedophile's victims and would only grow stronger in the coming weeks. Earlier on the same network, Rep. Thomas Massie appeared alongside the resolution's lead Democratic co-sponsor, Rep. Ro Khanna, as the two promoted a resolution that would force Attorney General Pam Bondi to release 'all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials' related to the Epstein and Maxwell investigations. Massie told Welker that 'the release of the Epstein files is emblematic of what Trump ran for' and explained that the president's MAGA base expected results. 'There seems to be a class of people beyond the law, beyond the judicial all thought that when Trump was elected, he would be the bull in the china shop and break that all up,' said Massie. Massie went on to say that the Trump administration had lost his trust on the issue after publicly supporting transparency around the investigation, then doing an abrupt about-face. The administration is now calling on its supporters to move on from the issue and focus on hashing out issues with the 2016 'Russiagate' investigation instead of Epstein. Top administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, also spent months calling for the very releases the Justice Department says it won't authorize. 'People who were allegedly working on this weren't sincere in their efforts,' Massie said. 'Somebody should ask Speaker Mike Johnson, why did he recess Congress early so that he didn't have to deal with the Epstein issue?' 'Politics is the art of the doable. There's enough public pressure right now that we can get 218 votes and force this to a vote on the floor,' said Massie. He also firmly rejected a DOJ memo explaining the administration's position against further releases of information from the Epstein files, despite the very public promises of Bondi and others to do the opposite. In the memo, agency officials said that explicit imagery involving children was 'intertwined' throughout the files collected by the Justice Department. Some have said the files should not be released to protect sex-abuse victims of both Maxwell and Epstein. 'That's a straw man [argument],' Massie responded on Sunday, after Welker read part of the memo. 'Ro [Khanna] and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names would be redacted, and that no child pornography will be released.'