Harvard is no longer the dream school; here's what is
The Brief
A 2025 survey by The Princeton Review reveals MIT now tops the list as the most desirable "dream college," pushing Harvard to No. 2.
The survey, conducted with over 7,000 high school students, highlighted other popular schools like Stanford, Princeton, and Yale in the top 10.
Despite interest in top colleges, nearly 98% of applicants said they were concerned about the cost, with nearly half saying financial aid was "extremely" necessary.
A new report reveals Harvard University is no longer considered the ultimate "dream" school among current college applicants.
The 2025 report by The Princeton Review surveyed more than 7,000 students from high school students from all 50 states who were applying to college.
This year, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ranked as the top spot of most desirable colleges, according to the survey. Harvard fell to No. 2.
The 10 schools most named by students surveyed this year as their "dream college" were:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Harvard College (MA)
Stanford University (CA)
Princeton University (NJ)
Yale University (CT)
Columbia University (NY)
New York University
University of Michigan – Ann Arbor
University of Pennsylvania
University of California – Los Angeles
What they're saying
"We are truly grateful to the 235,000+ applicants and parents that have participated in our College Hopes & Worries survey over the years," said Rob Franket, the editor-in-chief of The Princeton Review. "Their feedback on their application experiences has provided important insights not only for our company but for all who are dedicated to helping students identify and gain admission to their 'best fit' colleges."
Despite the results, the ability to pay for the college was a top concern among students and parents.
By the numbers
Nearly all the respondents (98%) indicated they were planning to apply for financial aid. When asked how necessary financial aid would be to pay for college, nearly half (48%) chose the answer "Extremely" while 29% chose the answer "Very."
Dig deeper
Earlier this year, WalletHub released its 2025 rankings of the best US colleges and universities.
RELATED: Here are the best colleges in the US for 2025
The study analyzed over 800 higher education institutions across 30 different metrics, including student selectivity, cost, faculty resources, and career outcomes.
Top universities like Princeton, Yale, and Harvard continued to dominate, while smaller colleges like Swarthmore and Hamilton also made their mark. MIT ranked fourth on the list.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Why Great Leaders Embrace Hard Conversations
Giving Ongoing Feedback Direct feedback is often avoided by managers at all costs. But the great leaders know it's the foundation of trust and respect. Great managers don't avoid the hard stuff. They know that respect is built through honesty, not avoidance. When feedback is clear, timely, and presented from a place of care, it becomes a catalyst for growth-not a source of fear. Many managers, like me, have learned this lesson the hard way. Early in my career, during my performance review, my manager said, 'You're not meeting my expectations, although I'm not sure I ever told you what they were.' Stunned, I sat there thinking, 'She went to Harvard, where perhaps they taught mindreading, whereas I had attended Northeastern University where such a course was not offered. This conversation was the beginning of the end of our relationship. I immediately began searching for a new job and swore that if I were ever in a leadership position, I would communicate my expectations upfront and provide my people with continuous feedback—a promise I kept. Before entering what may be a difficult conversation, great managers pause to consider the other person's perspective. They ask questions like: They approach the conversation with clarity and compassion. I can still recall the smirky look on my manager's face, as she confessed that she wasn't sure she had ever told me about her expectations. The best managers practice difficult conversations, like the one my manager was facing, to ensure they come across as caring. They are: Rather than taking full control of the conversation, effective managers ask questions and listen deeply. By doing so, they are often able to uncover the root causes of a situation and are better able to come to a mutual agreement as to how to best move forward. They check for understanding and ask the other person to share their view. By doing so, they are able to have a two-way dialogue, rather than a one-sided conversation that likely will result in little more than both parties nodding their heads. Effective communicators understand that difficult conversations can get heated. Great managers notice when the tone of a conversation starts to boil. They're not afraid to pause or reschedule if things get too charged. They acknowledge feelings and show empathy, which helps retain trust even when the message may be tough to hear. Great leaders don't save all feedback for annual review time. They make courageous conversations a regular part of work life. This normalizes feedback and prevents surprises, making each interaction a dialogue and something not to be feared. After the conversation, great managers summarize next steps, check for understanding, and follow up to support progress. They show that feedback isn't a one-off event to be feared. It's an ongoing commitment to growth. Managers who excel at direct feedback don't lose their people—they earn their trust. They create a culture where people feel valued and safe to grow, which is why these people have no plans to go away anytime soon.
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
Bryan Seeley is charged with enforcing college sports' new rules. What's his plan?
The closest Bryan Seeley has been to working in college sports was spending 40 hours a week covering them for the Daily Princetonian during his days as an undergraduate at the Ivy League school. Now, the longtime head of investigations for Major League Baseball is about to step into a brand-new role, leading a brand-new organization, which could make him one of the most powerful people in college sports. Advertisement On Friday night, Seeley, 46, was named the chief executive officer of the College Sports Commission, the enforcement agency launched by the wealthiest and most powerful conferences to oversee and implement the system that will allow direct payments from NCAA schools to athletes for the first time. The formal announcement of the CSC and Seeley's hiring came about two hours after a federal judge approved the $2.8 billion settlement of a trio of antitrust lawsuits facing the NCAA and major college conferences. A self-described lifelong college sports fan, Seeley brings more than a decade of experience in compliance, enforcement, investigations and policy-making at MLB, along with eight years with the U.S. Department of Justice and a law degree from Harvard. He said he was drawn to the job by the opportunity to shepherd college sports through a period of transition and into a new era. 'I view this as an area where I can really add value,' Seeley told The Athletic on Sunday in his first interview since a press release announced his hiring. College sports has a long history of inconsistent enforcement and skirting rules to gain a competitive advantage. The NCAA will still oversee rules related to academics and eligibility, but systems installed to regulate the revenue-sharing cap schools must adhere to, evaluate fair-market value of name, image and likeness deals between athletes and third parties and monitor roster limits will be under the purview of Seeley and the CSC. He will report to a board made up of the power conference commissioners. 'I think this is a good, new starting point. So whatever existed beforehand does not need to be what exists going forward,' Seeley said. 'Culture doesn't change overnight. I don't expect that to happen overnight, but I do think that the schools that have signed on to the settlement want rules and want rules to be enforced. Otherwise they wouldn't have signed on to the settlement. I think student-athletes want a different system. So I think there is a desire for rules enforcement. There's a desire for transparency.' Advertisement Seeley doesn't have an official start date, but there is no time to waste. Universities can begin directly sharing revenue with college athletes starting July 1. The clearinghouse for evaluating third-party NIL deals for athletes worth at least $600, run by accounting firm Deloitte, goes live Wednesday. Schools in power conferences are expected to sign formal agreements to abide by rulings made by Seeley and outside arbitrators. 'I haven't been given assurances of anything, but I do know from my read on this, there is buy-in from the institutions,' Seeley said. Seeley built the investigations unit at MLB, staffed with lawyers and former law enforcement officers. 'During his time at MLB, Bryan demonstrated unparalleled integrity, a commitment to fairness, and the ability to navigate complex challenges with precision and care,' Major League Baseball commissioner Rob Manfred said in a statement. 'I have no doubt he will bring the same level of excellence to the College Sports Commission. College sports will greatly benefit from Bryan's expertise and vision.' Seeley's first task at CSC is to again build a staff. 'These are going to be more private-sector investigations, right?' Seeley said. 'We don't have subpoena power. We don't have search-warrant power. I've operated in that system for over a decade, so I'm well-suited to continue to do that with college sports.' He added, 'I think I'm one of the few people in the country who's probably led investigations into salary-cap circumvention, and so in terms of the subject matter, at least for part of this, I have a lot of experience.' MLB teams do not operate under a hard salary cap, but there is one for the league's international amateur talent acquisition system. One of the most prominent cases Seeley investigated came in 2017, when the Atlanta Braves were found to have circumvented international amateur signing rules over a three-year period. Braves general manager John Coppolella received a five-year ban for his role in the violations. In a separate investigation, Seeley's group found the Boston Red Sox had also cheated in the international amateur market. Punishment in that case was handed down in 2016. Advertisement While the highest levels of college sports are becoming more similar to professional sports, Seeley pushed back on the notion that the power conferences are trying to create another pro league. 'College sports is its own unique thing, and what makes college sports great needs to remain,' Seeley said. 'Some of the system we're going to bring for enforcement is a system that has been used in the pro sports world, but it's been used in other worlds, too. … But I don't view this as the professionalization of college sports. Working with schools and working with student-athletes is going to be quite different than working with professional sports teams and professional athletes.'
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Going out to eat is getting more expensive everywhere. It's worse in Boston.
Walking out of an oyster bar in the North End last week, Allison Feeney, 35, said her meal — though 'fantastic'— was 'definitely more expensive than it should be.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'The dining experience is a central and integral part of my life and something I love to do, so I'm happy to make the investment,' she said. 'But sometimes it's a little bit of a sticker shock.' Advertisement It's not just the oysters, which cost Feeney nearly $4 apiece that night ( The surge in prices is evident across the North End, where one restaurant's $33 bowl of rigatoni is up $5 in the past two years, and another's rack of lamb, which sold for $58 in 2022, has skyrocketed by $20. And it's a microcosm of the whole region, where the cost of eating away from home has outpaced the national average. Advertisement Restaurants said it's not that they're making more money; quite the opposite, they point to rising prices as a reflection of the high cost of buying food, paying staff, and keeping their doors open. 'It's a really frightening time,' said Jen Ziskin, executive director of Massachusetts Restaurants United, a trade group for independent eateries. 'We're trying to figure out, how can we do this differently? How can we run our businesses differently? Because the numbers used to work, and they're just not working anymore.' The steady increase comes amid rising labor costs and supply chain instabilities. Last month, Fitch Ratings Nationwide, menu prices at full-service restaurants were up 4.3 percent over the past 12 months, according to April CPI data. Limited-service prices climbed 3.4 percent. That hasn't stopped people from eating out. Last week, North End restaurants were bustling with tourists and families marking graduation season and enjoying the summer weather. But even with the festive air, some diners couldn't shake the notion their wallets were lighter than celebrations past. 'Even [at] the lower, middle-tier ones where you just go in and pick up something, it's gotten really expensive,' said Brad Davis, 56, celebrating his daughter's graduation from MIT. The rising cost of eating out is in part fueled by the uncertainty surrounding the Trump administration's wide-ranging tariffs on foreign imports. Though most of those tariffs have been put on pause, they have restaurateurs worrying about what will happen to the price of French cheese and Mexican tomatoes. Advertisement 'Businesses that sell stereos or carpets, if they're buying from a different country, they might be able to hold on to that product until this all gets figured out,' said Will Gilson, executive chef and culinary director of the Cambridge Street Hospitality Group. 'Because it's nonperishable, it can sit in a warehouse ... But with restaurants, we can't stockpile meat or produce or fish — these are things that we are ordering almost every day." Because restaurants are limited in what they can do to insulate themselves from tariffs — even those that haven't actually taken effect yet — they have to look at what they can control: the bill. Customers entered Cafe Bonjour at Temple Place in Boston. Barry Chin/Globe Staff If restaurants have to pay more for their inventory — not just food items, but also items such as paper goods and to-go boxes — that's 'not going to make my rent cheaper, it's not going to make labor cheaper,' Gilson said. The choice for many restaurateurs is to either absorb the losses or pass the increases on to the consumer. That, Gilson stressed, is a last resort for any restaurant. Owners like himself are well aware of the consequences. 'Every time you raise your menu prices, we see people order less, spend less, and dine less,' he said. 'People oftentimes eat with their eyes first: looking at a menu and deciding if it's a place they want to go to, and if they can afford to get as many of the things on the menu as they want.' Advertisement That much is borne out by the data: a James Beard The same survey found that 91 percent of respondents raised menu prices at some point last year, a jump from 81 percent in 2023. Some restaurants have turned to alternative ways of recouping their margins. Sometimes, that means cutting back on portion sizes or meal offerings. If the price of beef goes up, Gilson said, he might lower the price of a strip steak from $50 to $40 — but serve it 'a la carte,' with fries and asparagus as separate add-ons rather than sides. That's changed the way that diners are looking at their meals. 'Things that are add-ons, like, truffles, no,' said Feeney. 'I kind of think the upsell on that is not worth it.' Less often, that means a surcharge on all items using a particular ingredient. That's what Gilson said he did with That method can't work with everything. If the wholesale price of poultry had been as affected by bird flu as the price of eggs, he mused, he would have had to make a difficult decision. 'We serve an amazing chicken here; we pay top dollar for it; it spends 24 hours in brine,' he said. 'But I can't compete with the grocery store selling it as a loss leader at 10 bucks.' Advertisement A whole rotisserie chicken with sides of spiced cauliflower and farmers' farro at Gilson's Amba Cafe in Cambridge. Ken McGagh for The Boston Globe That means that some dishes have to go by the wayside. 'I remember [early] in my career bringing in wild European turbot,' said chef Chris Coombs. 'That was a fish that was pricey then, but you could probably get it on the plate for $40 or $50. Now, I think I'd probably have to serve it at 120 bucks, 130 bucks. So it comes down to what people are willing to pay for their food.' Coombs, who runs Deuxave, Boston Chops, and Bosse, among other restaurants, said price increases are gradually hollowing out the local dining scene. 'It's prohibitive for anyone who makes less than $200,000 a year to be able to go out to dinner regularly in the city of Boston,' Coombs said. 'All the people who make $125-to-$150,000 a year, that used to be able to go out three or four nights a week, now they can only afford to go out one night a week.' As prices go up, more and more diners are 'trading down,' he said, opting for cheaper, fast casual options rather than mid-tier sit-down restaurants. 'People are finding other ways to still spend what they're comfortable spending,' he said. 'Whether it's drinking less alcohol, getting cocktails instead of wine, getting one appetizer instead of two.' That's not to say that everyone is tightening their budget. There's still a reliable group of diners that are 'flush with cash, and they don't care what anything costs,' according to Coombs. 'But I can tell you for certain, there's a finite number of those people,' he added. Camilo Fonseca can be reached at
