
Marcel Ophuls, filmmaker who forced France to face wartime past, dies aged 97
The German-born filmmaker, who was the son of legendary filmmaker Max Ophuls, died on Saturday at his home in southwest France of natural causes, his grandson Andreas-Benjamin Seyfert told The Hollywood Reporter.
Though Ophuls would later win an Oscar for Hotel Terminus, (1988), his searing portrait of Nazi war criminal Klaus Barbie, it was The Sorrow And The Pity that marked a turning point, not only in his career, but in the way France confronted its past.
Deemed too provocative, too divisive, it was banned from French television for more than a decade.
French broadcast executives said it 'destroyed the myths the French still need'.
It would not air nationally until 1981.
Simone Veil, Holocaust survivor and moral conscience of postwar France, refused to support it.
But for a younger generation in a country still recovering physically and psychologically from the aftermath of the atrocities, the movie was a revelation, an unflinching historical reckoning that challenged both national memory and national identity.
The myth it punctured had been carefully constructed by Charles de Gaulle, the wartime general who led Free French forces from exile and later became president.
In the aftermath of France's liberation in 1944, de Gaulle promoted a version of events in which the French had resisted Nazi occupation as one people, united in dignity and defiance.
Collaboration was portrayed as the work of a few traitors. The French Republic, he insisted, had never ceased to exist.
The Sorrow And The Pity, which was nominated for the 1972 Oscar for Best Documentary, told a different story.
Filmed in stark black and white and stretching over four and a half hours, the documentary turned its lens on Clermont-Ferrand, a provincial town at the heart of France.
Through long, unvarnished interviews with farmers, shopkeepers, teachers, collaborators, members of the French Resistance, even the town's former Nazi commander, Ophuls laid bare the moral ambiguities of life under occupation.
There was no narrator, no music, no guiding hand to shape the audience's emotions. Just people, speaking plainly, awkwardly, sometimes defensively.
They remembered, justified and hesitated. And in those silences and contradictions, the film delivered its most devastating message: that France's wartime story was not one of widespread resistance, but of ordinary compromise, driven by fear, self-preservation, opportunism and, at times, quiet complicity.
The film revealed how French police had aided in the deportation of Jews. How neighbours stayed silent.
How teachers claimed not to recall missing colleagues. How many had simply got by. Resistance, The Sorrow And The Pity seemed to say, was the exception not the rule.
It was, in effect, the cinematic undoing of de Gaulle's patriotic myth, that France had resisted as one, and that collaboration was the betrayal of a few.
Ophuls showed instead a nation morally divided and unready to confront its own reflection.
In a 2004 interview with The Guardian, Ophuls bristled at the charge that he had made the film to accuse.
'It doesn't attempt to prosecute the French,' he said. 'Who can say their nation would have behaved better in the same circumstances?'
Born in Frankfurt on November 1, 1927, Marcel Ophuls was the son of legendary German-Jewish filmmaker Max Ophuls, director of La Ronde, Letter From An Unknown Woman, and Lola Montes.
When Hitler came to power in 1933, the family fled Germany for France.
In 1940, as Nazi troops approached Paris, they fled again, across the Pyrenees into Spain, and on to the United States.
Marcel became an American citizen and later served as a US army GI in occupied Japan. But it was his father's towering legacy that shaped his early path.
'I was born under the shadow of a genius,' Ophuls said in 2004. 'I don't have an inferiority complex, I am inferior.'
He returned to France in the 1950s hoping to direct fiction, like his father.
But after several poorly received features, including Banana Peel (1963), an Ernst Lubitsch-style caper starring Jean-Paul Belmondo and Jeanne Moreau, his path shifted.
'I didn't choose to make documentaries,' he told The Guardian. 'There was no vocation. Each one was an assignment.'
That reluctant shift changed cinema.
After The Sorrow And The Pity, Ophuls followed with The Memory Of Justice (1976), a sweeping meditation on war crimes that examined Nuremberg but also drew uncomfortable parallels with atrocities in Algeria and Vietnam.
In Hotel Terminus (1988), he spent five years tracking the life of Klaus Barbie, the so-called 'Butcher of Lyon', exposing not just his Nazi crimes but the role western governments played in protecting him after the war.
The film won him his Academy Award for Best Documentary but, overwhelmed by its darkness, French media reported that he attempted suicide during production.
In The Troubles We've Seen (1994), he turned his camera on journalists covering the war in Bosnia, and on the media's uneasy relationship with suffering and spectacle.
Despite living in France for most of his life, he often felt like an outsider.
'Most of them still think of me as a German Jew,' he said in 2004, 'an obsessive German Jew who wants to bash France.'
He was a man of contradictions: a Jewish exile married to a German woman who had once belonged to the Hitler Youth; a French citizen never fully embraced; a filmmaker who adored Hollywood, but changed European cinema by telling truths others would not.
He is survived by his wife, Regine, their three daughters and three grandchildren.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
41 minutes ago
- The National
Richard Hermer backs down after comparing Tories and Reform to Nazis
Richard Hermer KC, who is Attorney General is the UK Government's top legal officer, made the comparisons during a speech at the Royal United Services Institute on Thursday. Speaking about the 'role of the law and the international rules-based order', Hermer said Labour's approach was the 'rejection of the siren song, that can sadly, now be heard in the Palace of Westminster, and in some spectrums of the media, that Britain abandons the constraints of international law in favour of raw power'. READ MORE: Gerry Adams wins €100k in libel trial as jury finds BBC 'did not act in good faith' He went on: 'This is not a new song. The claim that international law is fine as far as it goes, but can be put aside when conditions change, is a claim that was made in the early 1930s by 'realist' jurists in Germany most notably Carl Schmitt, whose central thesis was in essence the claim that state power is all that counts, not law. 'Because of the experience of what followed in 1933, far-sighted individuals rebuilt and transformed the institutions of international law, as well as internal constitutional law.' Schmitt was a prominent Nazi theorist and supported the rise of Adolf Hitler during the 1930s. Hermer's words have been widely read as an attack on Nigel Farage and Reform UK, although prominent Conservatives have also openly called for the UK to retreat from international legal agreements such as the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Tory leader Kemi BadenochThe current Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, has herself stopped short of calling for the UK to leave the ECHR. However, she suggested the UK would have to leave the convention if it stops the country from doing 'what is right'. Farage has said he would get rid of the ECHR, and told ITV in April that 'we have to get back the ability to decide, can we really control our borders'. Right-wing UK newspapers and media outlets have also supported calls to leave the ECHR. READ MORE: 'Unacceptable': SNP call out BBC over by-election programme On Friday, Hermer's spokesperson said the Labour minister regretted making the comparison to Nazi Germany. 'The Attorney General gave a speech defending international law, which underpins our security, protects against threats from aggressive states like Russia and helps tackle organised immigration crime,' they said. 'He rejects the characterisation of his speech by the Conservatives. He acknowledges, though, that his choice of words was clumsy and regrets having used this reference.'


Spectator
42 minutes ago
- Spectator
Lord Hermer is preposterously wrong about international law
Lord Hermer KC has done it again. Delivering RUSI's annual security lecture this week, the Attorney General set out to 'depolarise' the debate about international law, before promptly comparing those who are open to withdrawal from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) with Carl Schmitt, the notorious German jurist who joined the Nazi party in 1933. If Lord Hermer's intention truly was to lower the political temperature, and to help to broaden the base of support for the government's approach to international law, his speech must be judged a failure. Perhaps his choice of words was simply clumsy, as he has since said, although the text as a whole suggests otherwise. The Attorney's speech mentions Schmitt, and a Schmittian approach to the rule of law, four times, linking him not only to the Nazis but also to Putin's aggression against Ukraine.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Elon Musk 'was taking so much ketamine it battered his bladder'
According to a new report, the Tesla owner's ketamine usage impacted his bladder - amid claims that he was carrying around pills in a box on the US campaign trail Billionaire Elon Musk was allegedly taking so much ketamine it battered his bladder, according to a new report. The SpaceX and Tesla boss said on Wednesday he was ending his stint at the White House after establishing himself as one of President Donald Trump's closest allies. He said he was spending too much time away from his businesses. It is now being reported that Musk was using so much of the legal drug ketamine that it began to affect his bladder, and also carried around a box for the drugs. According to the The New York Times, insiders said he was using drugs far more than people knew. It reportedly went beyond occasion use and travelled with a box that had around 20 pills. Among these was the stimulant Adderall, according to an alleged photo of the box and people who have seen it. The report says it is unclear if Musk, 53, was taking drugs while he was in the White House this year. It comes after Musk has had a string of bizarre incidents, including an occasion where he was accused of doing a Nazi salute. The report continues that he spends hours on end playing video games and binge eating. In 2024, Musk said he took a "small amount" of ketamine every two weeks to deal with low moods. He said: "If you've used too much ketamine, you can't really get work done, and I have a lot of work." But it is alleged he has been using it daily and mixing it with other drugs. Ketamine has been formally approved by the Food and Drug Administration for medical use but only as an anaesthetic, and doctors can prescribe it for depression. On Thursday, Musk his silence amid an alleged "falling out" with Donald Trump, following his exit from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). It comes after the billionaire admitted he was "disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases" in a CBS interview set to air in full on Sunday (June 1), in which he discussed the president's self-proclaimed "Big, Beautiful Bill". Musk had previously led the Trump administration's initiative to cut wasteful expenditure in his DOGE role and was frequently seen alongside the president during his election campaign and initial days in office. When questioned about Musk's critique of the bill - which narrowly passed with a 215-214 vote - Trump informed reporters at the White House on Wednesday that his party simply "had to get it through the House", adding: "I'm not happy about certain aspects of it, but I'm thrilled by other aspects of it."