Video of Trump announcing ban on US Tesla production is manipulated
"Trump bans Tesla production in the USA," reads an Instagram post shared June 9, 2025.
It includes a video that appears to show Trump saying: "Today I am here to announce that I will be banning the production of all Teslas in the United States of America, effective immediately. As everyone knows, Elon stabbed me in the back a couple of days ago and went crazy on his platform, X."
Image
Screenshot of the false post taken June 18, 2025
The false clip surfaced after the pair's public falling-out, in which the tech billionaire criticised Trump's so-called "big, beautiful" spending bill on his X account and linked the president with disgraced financier and sex Jeffrey Epstein (archived link).
Trump fired back with threats to cancel federal contracts with Musk's companies and warned of "serious consequences" if he sought to punish Republicans who voted for the spending bill.
Musk later said he regretted some of his posts, saying they "went too far".
The video of Trump's supposed announcement of a Tesla production ban spread alongside similar claims on Facebook, X and Instagram.
A reverse image search on Google using keyframes from the false video shows a longer version was published June 8, 2025 on an Instagram called DangerousAi (archived link).
The caption says: "Donald Trump BANS Production of Tesla in USA after feud with Elon Musk."
Image
Screenshot comparison of the clip seen in the false post (L) and on the DangerousAi Instagram page
The creator regularly shares clips made with AI on Instagram, Facebook and YouTube (archived here, here and here).
His YouTube profile says they are "AI Parody Content", and that he creates the videos using "AI for the voiceover".
AFP found no credible reports that Trump has banned Tesla vehicle production in the United States.
false video appears to be based on footage from a May 30 press conference at the White House during which Trump thanked Musk for his work as outgoing head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (archived here and here).
AFP has debunked other AI-generated and manipulated content here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
SpaceX Starship explodes during routine test
The Starship 36 suffered "catastrophic failure and exploded" at the Starbase launch facility shortly after 11:00 pm (0400 GMT Thursday), a Facebook post by the Cameron County authorities said. A video shared with the post showed the megarocket attached to the launch arm, and then a flash and a towering, fiery explosion. Musk's Space X said the rocket was preparing for the tenth flight test when it "experienced a major anomaly while on a test stand at Starbase," without elaborating on the nature of the complication. "A safety clear area around the site was maintained throughout the operation and all personnel are safe and accounted for," Space X added on social media. "There are no hazards to residents in surrounding communities, and we ask that individuals do not attempt to approach the area while safing operations continue." The Starship was not scheduled for launch on Wednesday evening when the explosion occurred during a "routine static fire test," according to the Cameron County authorities. During a static fire, part of the procedures preceding a launch, the Starship's Super Heavy booster would be anchored to the ground to prevent it from lifting off during the test-firing. Starbase on the south Texas coast, near the border with Mexico, is the headquarters for Musk's space project. Megarocket Standing 403 feet (123 meters) tall, Starship is the world's largest and most powerful rocket and central to Musk's long-term vision of colonizing Mars. The Starship is billed as a fully reusable rocket with a payload capacity of up to 150 metric tons. The latest setback follows an explosion of a prototype Starship over the Indian Ocean in late May. The biggest and most powerful launch vehicle ever built had lifted off on May 27 from the Starbase facility, but the first-stage Super Heavy booster blew up instead of executing its planned splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico. The previous two outings also ended poorly, with the upper stage disintegrating over the Caribbean. But the failures will likely do little to dent Musk's spacefaring ambitions. SpaceX has been betting that its "fail fast, learn fast" ethos, which has helped it dominate commercial spaceflight, will eventually pay off. The company has caught the Super Heavy booster in the launch tower's giant robotic arms three times -- a daring engineering feat it sees as key to rapid reusability and slashing costs. NASA is also increasingly reliant on SpaceX, whose Dragon spacecraft is vital for ferrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in early May approved an increase in annual Starship rocket launches from five to 25, stating that the increased frequency would not adversely impact the environment. The decision overruled objections from conservation groups who had warned the expansion could endanger sea turtles and shorebirds.
AFP
an hour ago
- AFP
S. Korean population and ballot figures used to resurface baseless election fraud claims
"Choo Mi-ae was elected representative in Hanam-A district through voter fraud," declares the Korean-language caption of a graphic shared in a Facebook post on June 16, 2025. Choo, a six-term lawmaker and former justice minister, during the April 2024 general election (archived link). The post, however, questions the legitimacy of the vote. Superimposed text on the graphic reads: "You call this a country? A nation ruled by bandits!" It then lists purported voting figures from the district's Shinjang 1-dong "Total population: 6,950. Number of eligible voters: 6,467. Number of votes cast: 7,179." Image Screenshot of the false Facebook post, captured on June 17, 2025 The same graphic alleging voter fraud in , and has resurfaced since centre-left candidate Lee Jae-myung's resounding victory in South Korea's June 3 presidential election (archived link). "The problem is that the People Power Party chooses to ignore voter fraud, so what is the point of this evidence," read a comment on one of the posts. Another said: "It is evident that Choo Mi-ae's election was fraudulent." Official data from the South Korean government and the country's election watchdog, however, shows the figures used in the graphic are inaccurate. Population and voting data Information from the Ministry of Interior shows the total population of Shinjang 1-dong at the time of the April 2024 general election was 6,902 -- not 6,950 as claimed in the falsely shared graphic (archived link). According to South Korea's National Election Commission (NEC), the number of eligible voters in Shinjang 1-dong during the April 2024 general election was 7,179 -- not 6,467 (archived link). The NEC data also shows 4,719 votes were cast -- not 7,179. "Even if the number of ballots cast had exceeded the population of the neighbourhood, that would not constitute evidence of fraud," an NEC spokesperson told AFP on June 17. South Korea allows voters to cast their ballots outside their district of residence during early voting (archived link). "This means that non-residents can legally vote in a different area from where they reside, causing the number of votes cast in the district to exceed the number of residents," the spokesperson said. This misunderstanding has become a recurring theme in South Korean elections, especially among groups alleging electoral fraud. The NEC issued a statement on June 1 in response to separate allegations of election fraud in Buan County in the North Jeolla province, saying the number of votes corresponds to the total number of electors who cast their votes at ballot stations in the county, "not just those who reside in the area" (archived link). AFP has debunked multiple false claims alleging voter fraud in South Korean elections.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Trump says he ‘may or may not' attack Iran
US President Donald Trump said Wednesday he was still deciding whether to join Israel's strikes on Iran, claiming Tehran now wants talks at the White House but may have waited too long. Trump added that he would hold his second Situation Room meeting in two days with his national security team as he left the world guessing about whether he would order military action. "I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do," Trump told reporters at the unveiling of one of two giant new flagpoles at the White House. "I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate." He added that "the next week is going to be very big" when it comes to determining Iran's fate. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected his demands for an unconditional surrender and warned the United States of "irreparable damage" if it intervenes. But Republican Trump, who faces opposition from the isolationist wing of his support base to joining any more foreign wars, later insisted that he hadn't yet made up his mind. "I have ideas as to what to do, but I haven't made a final (decision)," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "I like to make the final decision one second before it's due, because things change. Especially with war." Trump appeared to be in no hurry to reach what would be one of the most consequential decisions of his presidency – spending more than an hour dealing with the installation of his new flagpoles. Trump also had mixed messages for Iran's leadership. A day after saying Khamenei was an "easy target", Trump told AFP in the Oval Office that a change of leadership in Tehran "could happen". 'Grovel at the gates' He suggested he was losing patience with Iran and repeated his surrender call. "That means I've had it, okay? I've had it. I give up, no more. We go and blow up all the nuclear stuff." But at the same time, Trump said that Iran was reaching out to try to reach a deal on its nuclear program to end the conflict with US ally Israel. "They want to come to the White House, I may do that," Trump said. He added however that it was "very late to be talking.... There's a big difference between now and a week ago". Iran denied it had offered to send officials to Washington. "No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House," Iran's mission to the UN said in a post on X. Trump had favored diplomatic route to end Iran's nuclear programme, seeking a deal to replace the agreement he tore up in his first term in 2018. But since Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched strikes on Iran six days ago Trump has moved in behind the key US ally and is now weighing whether to use US military power against Tehran too. Trump noted that the United States is the only country with "bunker buster" bombs capable of taking out Iran's Fordow nuclear plant "but that doesn't mean I'm going to do it at all". The US president said he had told Netahyahu to "keep going" with Israel's offensive against Iran, adding that they were speaking every day. "He actually offered to help mediate, I said 'do me a favor, mediate your own. Let's mediate Russia first, okay? You can worry about this later," Trump said.
