US Film Ban Among Tariff Responses Considered by China
The global trade war sparked by Donald Trump's tariffs may hit the box office soon, as two public figures in China released a list of countermeasures reportedly being measured by the country's government that includes a possible ban on American-produced films.
The list was shared simultaneously on Chinese social media websites by Ren Yi, the widely followed grandson of former Guangdong communist party chief Ren Zhongyi, and Liu Hong, senior editor at the Xinhua News Agency. Bloomberg was among the first western news outlets to report on their posts.
Along with a film moratorium, other possible measures reportedly being considered include tariffs on soybeans and other U.S. agricultural products, a full ban on all U.S. poultry imports, and cutting off all support to the U.S. on fentanyl control.
In the hours since the posts were made, Xinhua has not published a report off of Hong's statement. Two insiders at a pair of Hollywood studio distribution offices also say that their studios have reached out to their contacts at the China Film Board, who have told them that they haven't received any change in guidance from the government.
China's theatrical industry has rapidly grown in recent years thanks to significant private and public investment in all aspects of production and exhibition. In doing so, the country has greatly reduced its box office dependence on Hollywood imports. In 2024, only three American films cracked the top 20 highest grossing films in China, with Warner Bros./Legendary's 'Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire' being the only top 10 entrant in eighth place with $132 million grossed.
This past weekend, another Warner/Legendary co-production, 'A Minecraft Movie,' topped the Chinese charts with a $14 million opening, ending the two-month No.1 reign of the record setting animated film 'Ne Zha 2,' which has grossed $2.14 billion almost entirely in China and now stands among the top 5 highest grossing films of all time.
Last week, Trump announced a minimum 10% tariff on all global imports with significant increases on other countries he believes are dealing unfairly with the U.S. on trade. That includes a 54% tariff on China that will begin at midnight tonight, with a threat from the president to increase that tariff to 104% if China chose to match that tariff rate against the U.S.
Distribution sources tell TheWrap that because movie theaters are a key part of commercial real estate as anchor businesses that support adjacent restaurants and shops, they are skeptical that China would move forward on a Hollywood film ban that could negatively impact those theaters even if moviegoer tastes have significantly shifted towards local fare.
And while most Hollywood franchises have had diminished returns in China since the pandemic, Disney/20th Century's 'Avatar: Fire and Ash' is expected to be a major moneymaker in that market. Disney, like the rest of Hollywood, only takes 25% of Chinese grosses per government regulation, but the 2022 film 'Avatar: The Way of Water' made $246 million in China, ranking fifth among all releases that year.
Disney has another film with potential to overperform in China with 'Zootopia 2,' which will be released in U.S. theaters on Thanksgiving weekend. The 2016 animated film inspired a section of Shanghai Disneyland that is exclusive among Disney's collection of theme parks, showing how popular the series has been in the country. At the start of 2025, users on the Chinese movie site Douban ranked 'Zootopia 2' as their most anticipated Hollywood film of the year, followed by 'Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning' and 'Avatar: Fire and Ash.'
Release dates for 'Zootopia 2' and 'Avatar 3' in China have not been set, but a release date for Disney's next movie, Marvel Studios' 'Thunderbolts,' has been set for April 30. Sources at Disney have confirmed that the film remains on schedule for that date.
The post US Film Ban Among Tariff Responses Considered by China | Report appeared first on TheWrap.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
3 minutes ago
- Business Insider
A YouTuber created a $75 grill scrubber to experience the challenges of making stuff in the US — and it sold out
A really nice grill brush will cost you about $25 at your local big box store, but YouTuber Dustin Sandlin is betting he can get customers to shell out three times that amount for a Made-in-America version. Sandlin traces his passion for US manufacturing to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, when he was bothered by the lack of American-made essential goods. "Everybody wanted N95 masks and face shields, and they couldn't get it," he said in a recent YouTube video. "This revealed to me how anemic our manufacturing capacity in America has become, because I was waiting on some billionaire to come save us, and it didn't happen." So began a yearslong deep dive into the challenges of making products in the US, which Sandlin documented for his series on YouTube called "Smarter Every Day." After working with John Youngblood, the owner of a local specialty grill accessories company, Sandlin got excited about the idea of developing a better scrubber. Sandlin and Youngblood wanted to produce it in the US with as many domestically sourced components as possible, and sell it at a retail price. In a video that went live Sunday and has since amassed more than 2 million views, Sandlin shares why he decided to get serious about US manufacturing, explains how he navigated the design process, and makes a sales pitch for viewers to buy it for themselves. On Tuesday, Youngblood told Business Insider the $75 scrubber has sold through its initial production run of several thousand units within a day, and his company is now taking pre-orders. "We're going to have a backlog for a while," Youngblood said. Most grill brushes are meant to be thrown away. This one isn't. Many lower-cost grill brushes aren't typically designed to last more than a year of use — grill-maker Weber recommends changing them after each grilling season. Another problem is that the bristles have been known to come off and can end up in grilled food. Sandlin and Youngblood found that welded chain mail — like the material of a medieval knight's armor — was highly effective at cleaning grill grates without breaking. There was one problem: "We could only find it in China." After a few tries, the team managed to find a US supplier who could make about 2,000 units a month and a supplier in India to augment the rest. Attaching the chain mail to a handle proved to be another adventure. Sandlin said the average one-inch industrial bolt costs around 9 cents when imported, but that jumps to 38 cents for versions made in the US. "Most machine shops I talked to directly, they said, 'Yeah, we can't even get the material for the price of the finished bolts that you're getting from a foreign supplier,'" Sandlin said. Then there was the process of making injection-molded parts to provide support and flexibility, which required machining custom tools and dies (the metal forms that shape a material) for shops to use in production. "This is the moment where this whole experiment came into focus for me," Sandlin said. "I realized at that moment we're screwed." American manufacturing has exported the smart part of making stuff The reason for Sandlin's pessimism is that many of the shops he spoke with send tool and die design files to China to be made and imported for use in US production lines. "I don't want my intellectual property in China, I want to make it here," he said. "And they said, 'Good luck.'" The problem illuminated by this episode goes far beyond a seemingly simple grilling accessory. "We're screwed as a nation if we can't do the intelligent work of tool and die: making the tools that make the things," Sandlin said. "We have flipped it. We are now to the point where the smart stuff is done somewhere else." Sandlin and Youngblood eventually found US suppliers for all of their custom components. They're working to get every piece sourced here. The video shows two instances where Sandlin was surprised by the apparent country of origin being different from what he says he was led to believe: The first batch of knobs arrived in packaging stating they were made in Costa Rica rather than the US. Several boxes of chain mail (ostensibly from India) had markings that suggested they were instead from China. "I'm shocked," Sandlin said. "It's pretty weird to set out to try to make a thing completely in America and to find out towards the end of the process that you made something in China anyways." Sandlin says he's not interested in having America be the dominant world player — he wants more opportunities for people here to have good jobs that allow them to take care of their communities. "If you are ever, ever in a position to make a decision about where your thing is manufactured, take a second and consider making a little less profit, maybe in order to invest in your local community," he said.
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2 Growth Stocks to Stash and 1 to Question
Growth is a hallmark of all great companies, but the laws of gravity eventually take hold. Those who rode the COVID boom and ensuing tech selloff in 2022 will surely remember that the market's punishment can be swift and severe when trajectories fall. Deciphering which businesses can sustain their high growth rates is a challenge for even the most seasoned professionals, which is why we started StockStory. On that note, here are two growth stocks expanding their competitive advantages and one climbing an uphill battle. One-Year Revenue Growth: +25.3% Founded in 2009 by enterprise software veteran Tom Seibel, (NYSE:AI) provides software that makes it easy for organizations to add artificial intelligence technology to their applications. Why Does AI Fall Short? 15.5% annual revenue growth over the last three years was slower than its software peers Extended payback periods on sales investments suggest the company's platform isn't resonating enough to drive efficient sales conversions Historical operating margin losses point to an inefficient cost structure stock price of $25.72 implies a valuation ratio of 7.4x forward price-to-sales. Dive into our free research report to see why there are better opportunities than AI. One-Year Revenue Growth: +32.3% Founded in 2014 and named after the dreaded first day of the work week, (NASDAQ:MNDY) is a software-as-a-service platform that helps organizations plan and track work efficiently. Why Is MNDY a Good Business? ARR trends over the last year show it's maintaining a steady flow of long-term contracts that contribute positively to its revenue predictability Software is difficult to replicate at scale and results in a best-in-class gross margin of 89.5% Strong free cash flow margin of 30.4% enables it to reinvest or return capital consistently is trading at $305 per share, or 12.7x forward price-to-sales. Is now a good time to buy? Find out in our full research report, it's free. One-Year Revenue Growth: +20% Founded in 2010 and named for a combination of 'docs' and 'proximity', Doximity (NYSE: DOCS) is the leading social network for U.S. medical professionals. Why Should DOCS Be on Your Watchlist? Billings have averaged 23.5% growth over the last year, showing it's securing new contracts that could potentially increase in value over time Well-designed software integrates seamlessly with other workflows, enabling swift payback periods on marketing expenses and customer growth at scale DOCS is a free cash flow machine with the flexibility to invest in growth initiatives or return capital to shareholders At $58.44 per share, Doximity trades at 19x forward price-to-sales. Is now the right time to buy? See for yourself in our comprehensive research report, it's free. Market indices reached historic highs following Donald Trump's presidential victory in November 2024, but the outlook for 2025 is clouded by new trade policies that could impact business confidence and growth. While this has caused many investors to adopt a "fearful" wait-and-see approach, we're leaning into our best ideas that can grow regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate. Take advantage of Mr. Market by checking out our Top 5 Growth Stocks for this month. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Comfort Systems (+782% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today for free.
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction
Five months after President Donald Trump was sentenced without penalty in the New York hush money case, his attorneys will square off again with prosecutors Wednesday in one of the first major tests of the Supreme Court's landmark presidential immunity decision. Trump is relying heavily on the high court's divisive 6-3 immunity ruling from July in a long-shot bid to get his conviction reviewed – and ultimately overturned – by federal courts. After being convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, Trump in January became the first felon to ascend to the presidency in US history. Even after Trump was reelected and federal courts became flooded with litigation tied to his second term, the appeals in the hush money case have chugged forward in multiple courts. A three-judge panel of the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals – all named to the bench by Democratic presidents – will hear arguments Wednesday in one of those cases. Trump will be represented on Wednesday by Jeffrey Wall, a private lawyer and Supreme Court litigator who served as acting solicitor general during Trump's first administration. Many of the lawyers who served on Trump's defense team in the hush money case have since taken top jobs within the Justice Department. The case stems from the 2023 indictment announced by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, who accused Trump of falsely categorizing payments he said were made to quash unflattering stories during the 2016 election. Trump was accused of falsifying a payment to his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to cover up a $130,000 payment Cohen made to adult-film star Stormy Daniels to keep her from speaking out before the 2016 election about an alleged affair with Trump. (Trump has denied the affair.) Trump was ultimately convicted last year and was sentenced without penalty in January, days before he took office. The president is now attempting to move that case to federal court, where he is betting he'll have an easier shot at arguing that the Supreme Court's immunity decision in July will help him overturn the conviction. Trump's earlier attempts to move the case to federal court have been unsuccessful. US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, nominated by President Bill Clinton, denied the request in September – keeping Trump's case in New York courts instead. The 2nd Circuit will now hear arguments on Trump's appeal of that decision on Wednesday. 'He's lost already several times in the state courts,' said David Shapiro, a former prosecutor and now a lecturer at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. And Trump's long-running battle with New York Judge Juan Merchan, Shapiro said, has 'just simmered up through the system' in New York courts in a way that may have convinced Trump that federal courts will be more receptive. Trump, who frequently complained about Merchan, has said he wants his case heard in an 'unbiased federal forum.' Trump's argument hangs largely on a technical but hotly debated section of the Supreme Court's immunity decision last year. Broadly, that decision granted former presidents 'at least presumptive' immunity for official acts and 'absolute immunity' when presidents were exercising their constitutional powers. State prosecutors say the hush money payments were a private matter – not official acts of the president – and so they are not covered by immunity. But the Supreme Court's decision also barred prosecutors from attempting to show a jury evidence concerning a president's official acts, even if they are pursuing alleged crimes involving that president's private conduct. Without that prohibition, the Supreme Court reasoned, a prosecutor could 'eviscerate the immunity' the court recognized by allowing a jury to second-guess a president's official acts. Trump is arguing that is exactly what Bragg did when he called White House officials such as former communications director Hope Hicks and former executive assistant Madeleine Westerhout to testify at his trial. Hicks had testified that Trump felt it would 'have been bad to have that story come out before the election,' which prosecutors later described as the 'nail' in the coffin of the president's defense. Trump's attorneys are also pointing to social media posts the president sent in 2018 denying the Daniels hush money scheme as official statements that should not have been used in the trial. State prosecutors 'introduced into evidence and asked the jury to scrutinize President Trump's official presidential acts,' Trump's attorneys told the appeals court in a filing last month. 'One month after trial, the Supreme Court unequivocally recognized an immunity prohibiting the use of such acts as evidence at any trial of a former president.' A White House spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. If Trump's case is ultimately reviewed by federal courts, that would not change his state law conviction into a federal conviction. Trump would not be able to pardon himself just because a federal court reviews the case. Bragg's office countered that it's too late for federal courts to intervene. Federal officials facing prosecution in state courts may move their cases to federal court in many circumstances under a 19th century law designed to ensure states don't attempt to prosecute them for conduct performed 'under color' of a US office or agency. A federal government worker, for instance, might seek to have a case moved to federal court if they are sued after getting into a car accident while driving on the job. But in this case, Bragg's office argued, Trump has already been convicted and sentenced. That means, prosecutors said, there's really nothing left for federal courts to do. 'Because final judgment has been entered and the state criminal action has concluded, there is nothing to remove to federal district court,' prosecutors told the 2nd Circuit in January. Even if that's not true, they said, seeking testimony from a White House adviser about purely private acts doesn't conflict with the Supreme Court's ruling in last year's immunity case. Bragg's office has pointed to a Supreme Court ruling as well: the 5-4 decision in January that allowed Trump to be sentenced in the hush money case. The president raised many of the same concerns about evidence when he attempted to halt that sentencing before the inauguration. A majority of the Supreme Court balked at that argument in a single sentence that, effectively, said Trump could raise those concerns when he appeals his conviction. That appeal remains pending in state court. 'The alleged evidentiary violations at President-elect Trump's state-court trial,' the Supreme Court wrote, 'can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal.'
