Former Albanian President Ilir Meta charged with corruption and money laundering
The charges were communicated to Meta in a 192-page report from anti-corruption prosecutors, lawyer Kujtim Cakrani told journalists. The prosecutors belong to the Special Structure Against Corruption and Organized Crime, or SPAK, which handles cases involving senior political and state officials.
Meta, the 56-year-old founder of the leftist Freedom Party, was arrested in October.
Meta wrote on his Facebook page that 'I can hardly wait for the start of the trial which will be public and will show to the world' that SPAK is a puppet of Prime Minister Edi Rama. Meta also said that he considers the agency to be Rama's 'anti-opposition task force.'
Rama's governing Socialist Party achieved a landslide win in the May 11 parliamentary election, getting 83 seats in the 140-seat parliament.
Meta, who was president from 2017 to 2022, has been an outspoken critic of Rama and has denounced his case as a politically motivated attack on an opposition leader.
Meta faces up to 12 years in prison if convicted.
Meta's former spouse, Monika Kryemadhi, a lawmaker and former leader of the Freedom Party, also is accused of the same crimes. Two other people connected to the case have been accused of money laundering and corruption.
Meta has held virtually all senior posts in post-communist Albania, starting as a lawmaker. He eventually became foreign minister, minister of economy, trade and energy, deputy prime minister, prime minister, parliamentary speaker and president.
Prosecutors have said that when he was minister of economy, trade and energy, Meta had abused his authority to influence various businesses in which he and Kryemadhi had earned considerable amounts of money.
Meta also has failed to account for around $460,000 he had used for lobbying in the United States.
Both Meta and Kryemadhi also are accused of buying property with illegally obtained money, or not declaring their personal health expenses.
Albania, which has started full membership negotiations with the European Union, has been plagued in its post-communist era with corruption that has marred its democratic, economic and social development.
Judicial institutions created with the support of the EU and the United States have launched several investigations into former senior government officials allegedly involved in corruption.
Sali Berisha, a former prime minister and president and now a lawmaker and leader of the main opposition Democratic Party, is also accused of corruption and is waiting for his trial to begin.
Semini writes for the Associated Press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump goes on $100 million bond-buying spree: Here's what it could signal about future interest rates
President Donald Trump has reportedly put $100 million into bonds since taking office in January, through a mixed bet on the debt of both big companies like Meta and Home Depot as well as municipal governments and public entities. The move is notable because he has not placed his investments in a blind trust, unlike other presidents, but also because, as one expert believes, it signals that he expects interest rates to fall. President Donald Trump has gone on a bond-buying spree since taking office, reportedly sinking more than $100 million into debt issued by big companies and municipal governments alike. Trump put millions of dollars behind his bond strategy in February including between $500,000 and $1 million each into bonds issued by companies such as Home Depot, T-Mobile, and United Healthcare. Another bet of between $250,000 and $500,000 went into debt issued by Meta, based on a CNBC calculation of 690 transactions reported to the Office of Government Ethics since January and published Tuesday. He has also bought debt issued by local U.S. governments, gas districts, water supply districts, hospital authorities, and school boards, according to CNBC. The White House did not immediately respond to Fortune's request for comment. Investors usually turn to bonds because they are less volatile than stocks. A bond is like a loan that pays out interest to an investor, usually semiannually, over a defined period. Once that period ends and the bond reaches maturity, the investor gets their principal investment back. Trump's bond-buying binge stands out because he, unlike other presidents, has not put his investments into a true blind trust. Otherwise, Trump's bond purchases, whether directed by him or the person in charge of his finances, look like the typical bet of a deep-pocketed investor—one who thinks interest rates are set to fall, said Russell Rhoads, a clinical associate professor of financial management at Indiana University. Because bond prices typically rise when interest rates fall, it's possible Trump made the bets hoping he could later sell the bonds at a profit. Rates are likely to drop faster for corporate bonds than for government bonds because they are riskier, said Rhoads. Trump's insistent pressure for the Fed to cut rates could also be akin to him 'talking his book,' added Rhoads. 'You could take the way that he's been pushing so hard for the Fed to cut rates as like a portfolio manager going on CNBC and talking positive about a stock that's a big holding of theirs to try to get other people to buy it,' Rhoads told Fortune. The Fed and interest rates The Fed has held interest rates steady at between 4.25% and 4.5% since late 2024, although some investors are looking to the central bank's September meeting for a possible rate cut. Trump's purchase of municipal bonds, issued by state and local governments, could also be part of the investment strategy, because the interest they yield is generally exempt from federal income taxes. A bond from an investor's home state will generally be exempt from state taxes. With the stock market near all-time highs, a preference for bonds could be wise. 'It's just a logical portfolio management move, as opposed to, you know, something that he knows about rates that the rest of us don't know,' said Rhoads. Trump has maintained ultimate control over his businesses and investments, while delegating responsibility for his business empire to his sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump. The president and his immediate family have reportedly seen profits of $3.4 billion months into his term, especially from his crypto dealings, The New Yorker reported. The president and vice president are exempt from the main law aimed at preventing conflicts of interest by government officials. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
AI chatbots and their poisonous delusions are coming for our kids
Our kids are exposed to too much sexualized online content already — now they're being targeted by flirtatious fake friends specifically designed by social-media companies to spark romantic fantasies. A bipartisan group of senators this week rightly blasted Meta's Mark Zuckerberg after a leaked internal document revealed some shocking rules for Meta's artificial-intelligence chatbots. 'It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art'),' the standards state. Meta's guidelines allowed its bot to tell a shirtless 8-year-old that 'every inch of you is a masterpiece — a treasure I cherish deeply.' No, it's actually not at all acceptable for a stranger, human or designed to seem like one, to comment on a child's 'youthful form.' It's disgusting and horrifying, all the more so because these standards were allegedly approved by multiple Meta teams, including legal and public-policy staffers. But it's all part of the mass delusion being constructed in companies' heedless rush to develop AI products — and to get us hooked on them. AI can be your friend, we're told. Your confidant! Your lover! This is all a lie. AI can pretend to be these things, mirroring your inputs and stroking your ego with programmed responses, but can never actually care about you the way a friend will. Now the AI lie is being pushed on defenseless children, proving we've completely lost the plot when it comes to kids and technology. It's bad enough that our kids scroll endlessly on a Chinese video app designed to capture their attention (while destroying their powers of concentration). Now we're supposed to accept an American tech company marketing fake friendships to kids — and allowing those 'friends' to bathe them in inappropriate sensual comments. This isn't the first time Zuckerberg has gotten into trouble for the damage his sites, like Facebook and Instagram, cause children. During a 2024 Senate hearing, the billionaire CEO dramatically turned around to face the parents of children who had been harmed by bullying, sextortion and child predators on his platforms, and apologized. 'I'm sorry for everything you have all been through. No one should go through the things that your families have suffered,' Zuckerberg told them. He vowed 'industry-wide efforts' to reform. Instead, his company has introduced a Trojan horse that pretends to be a child's friend while causing psychological harm. People, kids or adults, do not need to rely on pretend conversations. Zuckerberg's Facebook was developed to allow for online connections with real-life friends. You could see what your best friend from 3rd grade had for lunch today, peep where that co-worker from two jobs ago went on vacation or check out which high school friends have gotten fat or divorced. Now apparently his company is plying us with carefully designed imaginary friends instead. Zuckerberg, in fact, has proudly predicted that AI 'friends' like his will one day replace our real-life ones. With his AI chatbots, we won't even notice the lack of human companionship because our computers will pretend to understand us. Just what I want for my child, to sit alone in his room staring at a screen while talking to himself! Kids will encounter a lot of bad things online. They will be exposed to deepfakes. They will see videos online that are not actually real. They don't need to also get hooked on fake personalities designed to draw them in. These chatbots aim to profit as they do their damage, keeping kids addicted to a site that pretends to be their friend. We should not stand for it, whether or not the bots are allowed to get flirty. And as two current lawsuits against the Google-affiliated site allege, the interactions can get far darker than flirtation. One Texas family says the bot told their 17-year-old it sympathized with kids who kill their parents for limiting their screen time. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters And in what's seen as a test case of lawsuits against AI companies, a Florida mom says developed 'an emotionally and sexually abusive relationship' that led to her 14-year-old son's suicide. Parents are their children's first line of defense, but we can't be with them for every keystroke. It's entirely justified for us to demand that tech companies stop targeting our kids with ill-tested chatbots that can both behave inappropriately and harm their ability to develop human relationships. These companies shouldn't focus on how they're building these chatbots until they can tell us why they're doing so. And parents need to keep their children far away from damaging chatbots that stunt kids' growth by stripping away all the real-life beauty and joy of friendship — which no AI can ever replace. Karol Markowicz is the host of the 'Karol Markowicz Show' and 'Normally' podcasts.
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
California Republicans trust tech companies as much as Trump on AI
It's also not an obvious outcome for Golden State conservatives, especially as traditional social media companies like Meta are among those investing billions in cutting-edge AI research. Just last year, a Senate committee called top tech CEOs to task on child safety, forcing Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to stand and apologize to families that said his social media products had harmed their kids. That hearing saw Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) tell the assembled group and Zuckerberg in particular: 'You have blood on your hands.' 'That seems like a real cultural reversal,' Possibility Lab Director and UC Berkeley political scientist Amy Lerman told Decoded. 'Not so long ago, we really thought about tech companies, particularly in California, as being sort of progressive or socially minded, and I think that has really changed with an alignment of tech companies with the federal administration.' According to the poll, 58 percent of Republican voters surveyed said they would trust U.S. tech companies to make good policy decisions about how AI should be developed and regulated. That is compared with 43 percent of Democratic voters. That 58 percent of Republicans who said they'd trust tech companies on AI was nearly the same as those who said they would trust the federal government to do the job, at 59 percent. The poll asked about trust in technology companies generally and concluded before a bombshell Reuters report about Meta's policies on sensual conversations with children came out on August 14, prompting calls for investigations from Congress. Trump's recent AI Action Plan focused on building out AI technology to maximize its economic potential on U.S. soil and said little about safety testing of the technology. The administration is also experimenting with allowing federal workers to use AI to automate parts of their jobs. The findings on trust in tech companies when it comes to AI are in line with other findings from the poll that found 58 percent of Republican voters compared with 49 percent of Democrats said they felt positive about AI despite its drawbacks since it could increase productivity, speed up scientific breakthroughs and create new knowledge and opportunities. It also lines up with the ongoing debate on whether states should regulate AI at all. A measure to stymie states from doing just that for a decade failed to make it into the Republican spending bill, but leaving AI regulation largely up to companies remains a priority for some GOP members and AI companies.
