logo
Investigation launched into White House aide's timecard

Investigation launched into White House aide's timecard

Daily Mail​4 hours ago
Donald Trump's controversial adviser Corey Lewandowski (pictured) is facing an investigation from the White House for allegedly 'gaming the system' by undercounting his work hours. Lewandowski, Trump's 2016 campaign manager and longtime confidant, is reportedly using other employee badges to avoid swiping his own at government buildings so he can work without being clocked in.
Moreover, the MAGA loyalist prefers not to leave a digital paper trail on government systems by refusing to use his government email or phone number for official business, according to a report by Axios. 'We're hearing that Corey's doing everything — failing to swipe in, working from home, whatever — to undercount his days,' an anonymous White House official told Axios. 'It's fair to say his work is being watched now,' the official continued.
Lewandowski works at the Department of Homeland Security as a special government employee. That means he does not have to submit financial disclosure forms nor stop his private business dealings. However, special government employees are limited to 130 days every year of unpaid work.
The Axios report indicates Lewandowski is working beyond his limited hours as DHS Secretary Kristi Noem's de facto chief of staff. According to the Axios report, four unnamed White House officials claimed Lewandowski has likely exceeded his allowed workdays as a temporary employee. 'Mr. Lewandowski's time is kept by a career DHS employee who submits the paperwork on a bi-weekly basis,' a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told the Daily Mail. 'He has served 69 days.'
The White House Counsel's Office sent out a government-wide memo on July 3 reminding special government employees of their work limitations. The memo also included guidance for how to calculate workdays. An official with the White House told the Daily Mail that the memo was issued government-wide and 'not directed to any special individuals.' However, according to the Axios report, after releasing the memo, counsel for DHS and the White House had discussions regarding Lewandowski's employment at DHS.
Lewandowski's employment at DHS has been filled with alleged controversies and scandal. In the past, Lewandowski and Noem, who are both married to others, have both denied rumors they are romantically linked. Regardless, the rumors swirling around the pair ultimately led to Trump blocking Noem from hiring Lewandowski as her chief of staff, according to multiple reports.
Despite Trump's rejection, Lewandowski has reportedly ignored protocol by introducing himself as Noem's chief of staff on at least one occasion. Lewandowski's proximity to Noem has made some DHS officials hesitant to move against him. 'Everybody's scared [expletive]' of Lewandowski, an anonymous former DHS official told Axios. 'The feeling is that if they go up against Corey, they're going to lose. And I would have to say they're right.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pam Bondi names DEA administrator as 'emergency' DC police chief
Pam Bondi names DEA administrator as 'emergency' DC police chief

BBC News

time23 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Pam Bondi names DEA administrator as 'emergency' DC police chief

Washington DC is suing the federal government over its takeover of the police force, after US Attorney General Pam Bondi named the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as the district's "emergency police commissioner".The city's attorney general, Brian Schwalb, wrote on X that the US government had illegally declared a takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and was "abusing its temporary, limited authority under the law". The lawsuit asks a judge to void Bondi's order and stop the DEA head from "assuming any position of command within MPD". President Donald Trump on Monday declared he would use federal law enforcement to crack down on crime in Washington. He has since sent in hundreds of National Guard members and other federal agents to clear homeless encampments, run checkpoints and otherwise bolster law enforcement, citing a 1970s law known as the Home Rule Act that allows him to use MPD for "federal purposes" that he "may deem necessary and appropriate."Late Thursday, Bondi wrote in an order that DEA Administrator Terry Cole would assume "all of the powers and duties" of local Police Chief Pamela Smith. The chief "must receive approval from Commissioner Cole before issuing any further directives to the MPD", according to the order. Almost immediately, Washington DC Mayor Muriel Bowser and Schwalb struck back, saying the order was "unlawful" and telling Smith she did not have to follow it. In the last few days, armoured vehicles have lined up near monuments and other tourist sites, and drivers have been stopped on a popular nightlife corridor. Officials have said that, altogether, 800 troops are expected to be deployed to the district, as well as 500 federal law enforcement agents, such as the a Democrat, has said there is no emergency and Trump's "unnecessary and unprecedented" move is an "authoritarian push". Speaking on Fox News on Thursday to announce her appointment of Cole, Bondi said federal officers had made 156 arrests and seized 27 firearms this week. Trump has said crime has worsened in Washington DC, but analysis by BBC Verify suggests a different trend. Violent offences fell after peaking in 2023, and in 2024, they hit their lowest level in 30 years, according to figures published by DC police. They are continuing to fall, preliminary data for 2025 crime overall has fallen 26% this year compared to the same point in 2024, and robbery is down 28%, according to the police department.

When Trump tariffs hit French barrels and corks, California's winemakers feel the squeeze
When Trump tariffs hit French barrels and corks, California's winemakers feel the squeeze

The Guardian

time23 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

When Trump tariffs hit French barrels and corks, California's winemakers feel the squeeze

Kory Burke, a small producer of high-quality wines in central California, never believed that tariffs on imports from France or Italy could help boost his business. But he knew for sure they would be a big hindrance as soon as Donald Trump announced late last month that he was slapping a 15% levy on all goods from the European Union. 'The first email I received was from my cork provider,' Burke recalled. 'He said he'd take on 2% of the additional cost of importing corks from Europe, but I would have to absorb the other 13%. Then my barrel supplier got in touch, pushing me to put in my orders as fast as possible because every new French barrel coming across the Atlantic after the tariffs was going to come with a $100 or $150 fee.' Every one of these messages was a gut punch for Burke's five-year-old family-run business, Dresser Winery, which sits on an idyllic hillside outside Paso Robles and specializes in big, bold reds. Burke sent a note out to his wine club members earlier this year telling them he did not plan on increasing prices for the fall shipment, but he realized he could no longer honor the commitment. 'If we do that,' he said flatly, 'we have to shut the business down.' It turns out even US wine producers are heavily reliant on foreign components – everything from French oak barrels, which give the wine a buttery, vanilla finish in contrast to the much less appealing brown sugar taste of American oak, to glass bottles and corks and the wine-making equipment itself. 'Every single product we use, from our pumps to the de-stemmer, comes with instructions written in six languages,' Burke explained. 'Could we produce some of these things here? Sure, but it would take three years to get production up and running, and that's not the way the specialization has been.' As another producer from Paso Robles, Paul Hoover of Still Waters Vineyards, put it: 'The only thing in my bottles made in America is the wine.' Ostensibly, Trump's tariffs on imported goods are supposed to give a competitive boost to American entrepreneurs like Burke and Hoover. But the theory does not really apply to the wine business – not only because so many of the materials used to make California wine come from overseas, but also because people do not buy wine based on price alone. 'It is a fundamental misunderstanding of wine drinkers and the wine marketplace,' the National Association of Wine Retailers said in a blistering statement in response to the 15% tariff announcement. 'Champagne is not sparkling wine. Bordeaux is not simply cabernet sauvignon or merlot … America's independent fine wine retailers understand better than most that when an American wine drinker asks for red Burgundy, they do not substitute Oregon pinot noir when the Burgundy is out of their price range or unavailable. They simply don't make a purchase.' Burke echoed this sentiment, saying he had to control his reaction recently when a Trump supporter came to his winery and told him he must be excited about the business opportunities the tariffs will create. 'People aren't buying my bottles because of tariffs on French wines, that's for sure,' he said. 'If anything, I'm competing against other Californian and American wines. With European wines, it's not a real competition at all. They're very different regions, very different products.' California wines are far from the cheapest because of the high cost of land and labour in the Golden state. For that reason, many producers live or die by the quality of what they make and the sort of subtle distinctions that come from varietals grown in a particular microclimate, or in a particular soil, or aged in a particular barrel. Price still matters, because fine wines are a discretionary spending item, and if the economy or people's personal finances are struggling it is often one of the first things that consumers stop buying. The National Association of Wine Retailers, an industry lobby group, said it was worried about tariffs generally, not just on wine, because inflation and an uncertain business climate would hurt its members' bottom line just as much. 'The increased costs of living that will result from the recently enacted tariffs, along with the significant increase in prices for wines … will only push down consumption further, thereby harming the American wine industry to a degree from which many of its participants will not recover,' the group said. In Paso Robles, which has seen an explosion in the number of wineries over the past two decades to about 250 and has become a major weekend tourist hub for wine lovers from San Francisco and Los Angeles, some of the harmful effects are being felt already. Joel Peterson, executive director of the Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance, said international orders were drying up as the reverberations from Trump's trade war echo around the globe. 'We have wine sitting in a warehouse that is specially labeled for the Canadian market that producers can't sell,' Peterson said. 'We've had no orders from the UK since Trump's so-called Liberation Day in April. People are scared to order those wines.' Domestic retailers say they have not seen significant price increases kick in yet – for either domestic or European wines – but are already starting to struggle simply because of the uncertainty created by the White House's constantly shifting messages on where and at what rate it intends to impose tariffs. 'We're not in a recession but it's what I call a recess market,' said Jim Knight, co-owner of the Wine House in Los Angeles, which specializes in small-label boutique wines from the United States and around the world. 'People have money, they're just not spending it … If the president made a decision and stuck with it, we could plan for it. But we haven't been able to plan for it.' Knight's business has a particular problem with high-end French wines it bought in advance years ago – right after the grapes were harvested – and presold to customers with an anticipated 10% mark-up. When tariffs on European wines were briefly at 10% earlier this year, Knight was looking at his entire profit being wiped out, since tariffs are imposed when goods arrive in the United States, not when they are purchased. Now, at 15%, he's looking at taking a loss that might force him to lay off workers or otherwise shrink his business. For now, he is letting the wine sit in a temperature-controlled storage unit in France and hoping Trump might still bend to pressure from the industry to create a tariff exception for wines and spirits. An industry initiative called Toasts not Tariffs has been lobbying the White House hard to do exactly that. More broadly, Knight said he was worried that small European producers would no longer offer their limited production to the US market, and that some of the specialist importers, the ones who love the same smaller label wines he does, will go out of business. 'Importers of wine from the European Union are American businesses too,' he remarked. That helps explain why a US distributor of European wines and spirits, VOS Selections of New York, has been the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Trump's tariffs – a case that led to an initial ruling against the administration in the court of international trade at the end of May. Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University who has spearheaded the suit, said the nature of the wine business was a vivid illustration of the harm that tariffs can do. 'Many of the wines our client imports simply cannot be produced in the United States because of differences in climate, soil and other factors,' he said. 'We're not benefiting American industry, we're damaging it and hurting consumers.' Not every wine producer sees the economic outlook as uniformly gloomy. Hoover, of Still Waters Vineyards, said the cost of storing and transporting wine was a greater burden than the price of corks or bottles – particularly for California producers who have too much inventory on their hands following a post-Covid boom-and-bust cycle. He said he was relieved at a drop in fuel prices in recent months and saw opportunities if they fell further. He was modestly hopeful, for example, that he could tap into sales opportunities on the east coast where he was previously priced out. 'Before the tariffs, a boat coming from Europe could deliver wine to the east coast more efficiently than I could getting it across the United States on a truck,' he said. 'Let's see how that looks going forward. Energy costs are the key to this. Let's hope the tariffs don't monkey that up.' One of the main reasons that people in the wine business do not believe the tariffs will benefit domestic producers, as the White House is promising, is that they have seen this scenario play out before, during Trump's first term as president. In 2019, the administration imposed a 25% tariff on most European wines, among other products, in retaliation for European subsidies on Airbus passenger jets. Trump said at the time that the relatively low price of French wines was unfair to California producers, but no evidence emerged that the tariff did anything to redress that perceived unfairness. 'It did not increase my domestic wine sales at all,' Knight said.

Lindt mulls making Swiss chocolate in US to swerve Trump tariffs
Lindt mulls making Swiss chocolate in US to swerve Trump tariffs

Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Lindt mulls making Swiss chocolate in US to swerve Trump tariffs

Swiss chocolate maker Lindt & Sprüngli is considering making its popular Easter bunnies in the US in an attempt to limit the damage of Donald Trump's trade war. The chocolatier – based in Kilchberg near Lake Zurich – is exploring plans to spend as much as $10m (£7.4m) on making its chocolate figurines in the US, in a move that would avert tariffs imposed on European imports. The chocolates are all currently made by Lindt in Germany, meaning shipments to the US are subject to a 15pc tariff following a EU-US trade deal signed last month. Lindt owns a manufacturing plant in New Hampshire that is already under expansion. The US is a critical market for Lindt, worth almost $850m in annual sales according to company filings. The possible shift comes as the company is already grappling with the soaring cost of cocoa, which has pushed up the price of its goods for customers. The prospect of Lindt manufacturing more chocolate in the US, first reported by Bloomberg, may prove controversial because of the perception that American-made chocolate is worse than products made in Britain and Europe. A Lindt & Sprüngli spokesman said: 'We are continuously working to make our production and internal supply chains more efficient, taking into account the current situation around tariffs. 'This includes reviewing which products are manufactured at which production sites and for which markets.' Lindt is also looking at manufacturing chocolate for the Canadian market in Europe instead of Boston in the hopes of avoiding Canadian tariffs imposed on the US, Bloomberg added. Founded in 1899 following a merger between Swiss chocolatiers Chocolat Sprüngli and Rodolphe Lindt, Lindt is today one of Europe's best-known chocolate brands. It posted annual sales of 5.5bn Swiss francs (£5bn) in 2024. It already manufactures its chocolates in many countries across the world – although some of its products, including its Lindor chocolate bars, are only made in Switzerland. Much of its dark chocolate comes from France, while its nutty chocolate bars are made largely in Italy. The latest revelations demonstrate the extent to which Mr Trump's trade war has rocked European companies. Lindt's home country of Switzerland has been hit with a particularly high tariff of 39pc owing to its high trade deficit with the US. This has already hammered key Swiss export industries, such as its lucrative luxury watch trade.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store