Stormont Infrastructure Minister pressed over next steps after A5 setback
Mr Justice McAlinden said the proposed scheme breached elements of the Climate Change Act 2022.
There have been more than 50 deaths on the road, which links Londonderry with Aughnacloy in Co Tyrone, since 2006.
Liz Kimmins appeared at the Assembly for an urgent question on the situation on Tuesday afternoon.
She described to MLAs a 'hugely disappointing day' on Monday for her, as well as the families of those who have died on the road.
She said it had been a 'very detailed judgment' that her and her officials will 'take time to carefully consider in full, including any implications for the scheme and the department's next steps'.
'It was the first legal test for the Climate Change Act and for the Climate Action Plan, something that every department will now have to deal with the outworkings of,' she told MLAs.
'It's deeply regrettable that we have received this decision as we continue to see so many lives lost on this road, deaths that cause so much pain to families and tear our communities apart.
'It is undoubtedly the most dangerous road in Ireland, so my priority remains the safety and wellbeing of all road users, and I am determined that we will deliver the A5.
'Building the road will save lives, will create jobs, and will significantly reduce journey times between the north west and Dublin.
'So despite this setback, I'm determined to find a way forward that sees this road built to ensure that we save lives, and every single day of delay risks more avoidable heartbreak, and as infrastructure minister, I'm determined to ensure that a new A5 is delivered.'
Stormont Infrastructure Committee chairwoman Deborah Erskine put it to Ms Kimmins that the situation is an outworking of 'unrealistic and punitive climate targets'.
'Her party was joined by the SDLP and Alliance in imposing unrealistic and punitive climate targets despite the explicit warnings from the then agriculture and environment minister about the long-term impacts of those varied targets on other government departments, including the Department for Infrastructure,' the DUP MLA said.
'Will you now take responsibility for the real world impacts of virtue signalling that has led us to this point, and apologise for it and outline how you intend to solve this mess of which other parties and your party created here.'
Ms Kimmins responded saying it was 'not the time for point scoring'.
'Across the world people are taking action in terms of climate change and our responsibilities to deal with that,' she said.
'I think in the context of what we are talking about here today, I think it's important to remember the families who are impacted by this decision. This is not a time for point scoring, this is a time about looking for solutions. That's what I'm committed to doing, and that's what I'm determined to do.'
SDLP MLA Daniel McCrossan also criticised Ms Kimmins, contending she 'should have provided clarity on the immediate next steps for this life-saving project', instead of saying they will take time to consider the judgment in full.
'This is time she does not have, people's lives are at stake every day on the A5,' he said.
'The minister, her predecessor John O'Dowd, and the Department for Infrastructure must take responsibility for this latest delay.
'The SDLP Opposition has brought forward a proposal to amend the climate legislation to enable the A5 upgrade to proceed.
'We are willing to do whatever is necessary to make progress and get this road built. We now need to see the same urgency from the minister to deliver this project and save lives.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Taliban hands over Afghans on ‘kill list' to Iran
The Taliban is handing over three Afghans that it suspects of spying for Britain to Iran. The transfer follows a secret deal between the two Islamist regimes to cooperate in arresting people who worked with British forces in Afghanistan. The three are understood to have been included on a leaked list that contained names of Afghans who applied for asylum in Britain. It included soldiers who worked with the British Army, as well as intelligence assets and special forces personnel. British officials have now urged the Islamist regime to 'honour' a general amnesty that it announced in 2021 after taking over the country. Newspapers including The Telegraph were banned from revealing the leak under an unprecedented two year High Court super-injunction that was finally lifted in July, following a legal challenge. The handing-over of suspected British spies to Iran follows high-level negotiations between Taliban leadership and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) officials who flew to Kabul last week to formalise an intelligence-sharing arrangement. The agreement allows both governments to pursue individuals identified in the compromised British database. Senior Taliban officials said the suspected spies are being held in the Afghan capital, Kabul, and that their transfer to Tehran is awaiting approval from the interior ministry. Sources claimed that the men had been named in a leaked spreadsheet containing the details of 25,000 Afghans who applied to the British Government to be resettled out of Afghanistan. While it has not been possible to verify their identities, Iran wants to obtain the 'kill list' because it contains the identities of more than 100 MI6 agents and British special forces personnel. Iran seeks to use the suspected spies as leverage in ongoing negotiations with Western powers over its nuclear programme, while the Taliban hopes to secure diplomatic recognition of its government in exchange for the cooperation. So far, only Russia has officially recognised the Taliban as the legitimate rulers of Afghanistan since they returned to power four years ago. The Taliban has been holding at least 13 people said to be named on the leaked list at a house in Kandahar over the past few weeks. Taliban officials have shared their names with Iranian intelligence forces, who then selected three they believed worked as British agents during the two-decade US-led invasion of Afghanistan. 'Blindfolded and put on plane to Kabul' A senior Taliban official in Kandahar said: 'The names of those in the house were sent to Tehran after the IRGC officers' visit, and they then responded that they believed three of them were spies and wanted them.' He added: 'On Saturday, the three were blindfolded, taken from the house, and put on a plane to Kabul.' The Taliban's decision to share the database followed internal deliberations within its leadership in Kandahar. A second senior Taliban official in Kabul said some faction members opposed cooperation with Iran because of Tehran's mistreatment of Afghan refugees. However, the prospect of Iranian diplomatic recognition ultimately swayed the decision. The agreement between the IRGC and the Taliban has deepened divisions between the Taliban administration in Kabul and top clerics in Kandahar. Ministers in Kabul such as Sirajuddin Haqqani, the Taliban interior minister, argue that the Taliban should be seeking bargaining chips against Britain rather than sending 'valuable assets' to Tehran. He is in conflict with the Taliban establishment in Kandahar over his hardline views and a crackdown on women in recent months. The Taliban official in Kabul told The Telegraph that the interior minister is not satisfied with the handing-over of the three alleged British spies, saying: 'I don't even think Haqqani himself is happy about it as he's in conflict with the supreme mullah.' He added: 'When an order comes from Kandahar, [Haqqani] has no choice but to say yes. 'Haqqani wants to use them against the West, but the supreme mullah and the people are more focused on gaining recognition from as many countries as possible, even if it means cooperating with Iranians.' The Islamic Republic's foreign ministry attacked The Telegraph on Tuesday over its coverage of the leaked list, branding reports of the fact that the IRGC were meeting the Taliban an attempt to 'divert the public from the genocide happening in Gaza'. The security breach happened when a Royal Marine accidentally emailed the complete database to Afghan contacts in Britain instead of sending a limited extract. The spreadsheet included names, telephone numbers and email addresses of Afghan soldiers, government workers and family members who had applied to relocate under the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy following the Western military withdrawal in August 2021. The Government imposed a super-injunction in September 2023 preventing media coverage of the data breach, which has been described as one of the most damaging intelligence leaks in recent history. Johnny Mercer, the former veterans' minister who served in Afghanistan, called the leak 'gut-wrenching'. Taliban officials told The Telegraph that the British cover-up of the list was pointless because it already possessed all the victims' details. The total relocation programme for Afghans could cost up to £7bn of taxpayers' money. The leaked database has created ongoing security risks for thousands of Afghans who assisted British forces during the war. Some individuals identified in the documents are believed to have fled to Iran to escape Taliban reprisals, only to face arrest by Iranian authorities. Several people whose names appeared on the leaked list have been arrested by Iranian border forces in recent days, The Telegraph understands. 'Focus on British spies' An Iranian official said: 'Many were released because they were only former Afghan soldiers, while others are being held for further checks. The focus is just on British spies.' The cooperation agreement between the Taliban and Iran represents a shift in regional dynamics. Both governments, isolated by international sanctions and lacking widespread diplomatic recognition, appear to be leveraging their shared hostility toward Western intelligence operations to strengthen bilateral ties. The agreement follows threats from Britain, France and Germany to impose crippling economic sanctions if Iran does not resume nuclear talks by the end of August 2025. Under a 2015 deal, Iran received relief from years of trade and banking restrictions in return for limits on its nuclear enrichment programme to prevent weapons development. That deal is due to expire on Oct 18. The Taliban's control of Afghanistan since August 2021 has enabled the group to access government records and pursue former collaborators with international forces. The regime has previously been accused of conducting reprisal killings against Afghans who worked with Western militaries, despite initial promises of amnesty. IRGC, designated as a terrorist organisation by the United States, has historically operated extensive intelligence and proxy networks across the Middle East. A Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office spokesman declined to comment, but it is understood that the British Government has urged the Taliban to honour its 2021 commitment to an amnesty for Afghans who worked with Western forces. A Taliban official told The Telegraph in July: 'There may be a general amnesty in place, but spies cannot escape justice.'
Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
Is the Blair-Cameron consensus on education over?
GCSE results day has brought a mixed picture; the pass rate has fallen, yet the regional gap has reduced and the gender gap is the narrowest it has ever been. Isabel Hardman and Sir Nick Gibb, former Conservative schools minister, join James Heale to discuss education policy, how changing cultural expectations may be helping the gender gap and why Labour seem determined to attack the Conservatives' record on education. In Nick's words, is Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson a 'more political figure than education figure'? Plus: how the recent High Court ruling over migrant hotels could spark a crisis for the government as more councils, including Labour-controlled ones, seek an end to the policy. Produced by Patrick Gibbons.
STV News
3 hours ago
- STV News
How many asylum seekers are housed in hotels in Scotland?
A total of 1,573 asylum seekers are housed in hotels in Scotland, according to newly published data. The numbers have increased in recent months – mirroring a rise across the UK – but is lower than the peak reached in September 2023 under the Tories. The figures come just days after a court ruled that more than 100 asylum seekers currently staying at a hotel south of the border should be removed from the accommodation after a council brought a legal case. The High Court judgment has led to ministers bracing for further legal challenges from councils across the country and pressure on the Government as to where else they can house asylum seekers. Falkirk Council is among those considering the implications of the ruling. Data is not released on the number of hotels in use, but it is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023, which Labour said it had now reduced to fewer than 210. Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available. Here is a full list of the latest available data showing the number of asylum seekers housed temporarily in hotels across Scotland, by local authority. Council Asylum Seekers in Hotels (June 30) Asylum Seekers in Hotels (March) Change (March to June) Aberdeen 364 300 +64 Aberdeenshire 312 250 +62 Angus 0 0 0 Argyll and Bute 0 0 0 Clackmannanshire 0 0 0 Dumfries and Galloway 103 69 +34 Dundee 0 0 0 East Ayrshire 0 0 0 East Dunbartonshire 0 0 0 East Lothian 0 0 0 East Renfrewshire 0 0 0 Edinburgh 162 153 +9 Falkirk 92 79 +13 Fife 0 0 0 Glasgow 0 0 0 Highland 0 0 0 Inverclyde 104 104 0 Midlothian 0 0 0 Moray 0 0 0 Na h-Eileanan Siar 0 0 0 North Ayrshire 0 0 0 North Lanarkshire 0 0 0 Orkney 0 0 0 Perth and Kinross 192 171 +21 Renfrewshire 66 61 +5 Scottish Borders 0 0 0 Shetland 0 0 0 South Ayrshire 0 0 0 South Lanarkshire 90 86 +4 Stirling 0 0 0 West Dunbartonshire 0 0 0 West Lothian 88 79 +9 Home Secretary Yvette Cooper insisted Labour's actions in the past year in increasing returns of failed asylum seekers, cutting asylum costs and the backlog, as well as plans to overhaul what she described as the 'failing' asylum appeal system, are all 'crucial steps to restoring order and putting an end to the chaotic use of asylum hotels that we inherited from the previous government'. But shadow home secretary Chris Philp accused Labour of having 'lost control of Britain's borders', claiming 'hotels would already be gone' if the Conservatives were still in power. The Refugee Council praised Labour for 'bringing the asylum system back from the brink of collapse', saying quicker asylum decisions 'means refugees can begin to rebuild their lives sooner, and the use of costly hotels can be ended faster'. Amid hotel protests, campaigners including Rape Crisis and Refuge have warned conversations about violence against women and girls are being 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' which they argued fuels divisions and harms survivors. More than 100 women's organisations have written to ministers to say they 'have been alarmed in recent weeks by an increase in unfounded claims made by people in power, and repeated in the media, that hold particular groups as primarily responsible for sexual violence'. They added: 'This not only undermines genuine concerns about women's safety, but also reinforces the damaging myth that the greatest risk of gender-based violence comes from strangers.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
