
Ireland needs multi-functional farms with biodiversity benefits. But how can they be supported?
'We lived off the land for centuries and then we lived off oil for a few decades which was an aberration in our history. Now, living off the land will be the new normal again,' says Dr Wouter van Winden, chief fermentation scientist at the multinational firm DSM-Firmenich.
He was speaking at the Finding Common Ground festival at the RDS in Dublin recently. At the event, policymakers, academics, farmers and landowners spoke about finding new opportunities for, and more value from, Irish land.
It took place against the backdrop of the Land Use Review, phase two of which has been completed. When it is made public, the review will offer suggestions on future land use in Ireland. Phase one, completed in 2023, gave baseline figures on current land use in terms of the types of agriculture, forestry and associated areas.
The bigger picture involves a realisation that land can no longer be seen solely in terms of food production, but instead with multiple roles in an interconnected system.
READ MORE
This system will place value on good water and air quality, as well as reducing carbon emissions. It will be geared towards helping biodiversity thrive while bringing socioeconomic benefits from land use alongside production of food.
The future of farming will see an emphasis on reducing waste. Photograph: Ulrich Müller
Land has multiple potential uses when you consider the broader bioeconomy in which value can be extracted at various stages of food production. Every part of the process, including farmyard manure, offers the possibility of an income stream.
'This multifunctional land use includes farm land with biodiversity and climate benefits, but we need private and green finance to fund the transition,' said Prof Mark Scott, of University College Dublin's School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy.
Prof Scott, who chaired the technical group for the review, says change is needed at scale because current land use will undermine both biodiversity and the economy.
Phase two will inform the Government's climate-action plans to achieve emissions reductions in the areas of land use, land-use change and forestry. This is in the context of potential EU fines for overshooting our agricultural emission targets. There is also a need for climate adaptation to protect our rural landscapes from the effects of climate change.
Prof Scott added that as so much land is owned by farmers, rural communities must be central to managing change in the long term. 'We need to give farmers certainty about how they use their own land,' he said. 'Deciding about land-use goals should be a social process rather than a top down technological process.'
At the festival, Dr David Styles, associate professor in agri-sustainability at the University of Galway, presented a number of future scenarios. They included maximising livestock protein within environmental constraints (i.e. specialising in dairy with significantly less beef farming) and a focus on cattle and nature through extensive rather than intensive grazing.
Ireland is way behind on its forestry-planting targets
He also emphasised a focus on pigs, poultry and protein crops (all of which have lower emissions than cattle farming), with grass in clover to reduce fertiliser input and a bioeconomy focus with plant protein, willow and energy.
'We have a very productive land bank but if we used less land for animals and animal feed, we could bring down phosphates and ammonia levels,' said Dr Styles. 'We could produce more protein with half the land, so business as usual isn't necessarily the way forward for food security. Business as usual is very negative with a 2050 lens.'
Dr Styles suggests a well-designed bioeconomy could deliver well for both the Irish economy and environment.
'In the fourth scenario, farmers could grow protein crops (peas and beans) and grass for biorefineries, which produces high-value animal feed as a replacement for imported soyabean,' he says. 'They could also grow willow on marginal land as a feedstock for bioenergy plants producing energy, which could compensate for residual agricultural emissions.'
He talks up the importance of farmers engaging in honest and open conversations about future land-use policy. 'Farmers could be more prosperous. We need to know what fits together for resilience in an uncertain future.'
Dr Styles also suggests that 16,000 hectares of forestry be planted annually from 2030 onwards. Currently, about 2,000 hectares is planted annually, which is about one-quarter of the current target.
Paul O'Brien is a sheep and tillage farmer in Co Kilkenny as well as South Leinster regional chairman of the Irish Farmers Association. He is concerned about the expectations being placed on farmers.
'We are asked to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, increase biodiversity, change our land use and participate in wind and solar energy production, but where is the funding going to come from for all this?' he says.
Mr O'Brien stresses the need to compensate farmers in the event of new policies failing. In this context, he mentioned ash dieback disease, which damaged the majority of ash trees planted by farmers in recent years.
Dr Andrew Kelly from EnvEcon environmental consultancy firm suggests Ireland needs to engage strongly if the European Commission decides to develop an emissions trading system for agriculture. Such a development would, in essence, be the equivalent to a carbon tax on agriculture emissions.
'The emissions trading scheme for energy companies has generated investment in renewables,' he said. 'There are different types of farms and levels of profitability and some farmers won't be viable in the future, just like some businesses fail.'
Prof Yvonne Buckley of Trinity College, co-chair of the All-Island Climate and Biodiversity Research Network, said at the event: 'To be agile in the future and to make money from land, we need diverse landscapes. Healthy ecosystems are at the heart of this. We need to protect the ones we have and restore degraded ones.'
She accepted the case for farmers getting payments for ecosystem services on their land.
Climate activists at a demonstration in Dublin focused on nature restoration. Photograph: Stephen Collins/Collins Photos
Dr James Moran, lecturer in ecology and biology at Atlantic Technological University in Galway, believes 30-year planning for land use is essential. 'We need to start working together on future policy and we need to consider the interlinked challenges of biodiversity, water quality, food and health of humans and animals,' he said.
Dr Moran acknowledges that in more recent years, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has moved from a food-first approach to one that 'protects nature and water in a liveable climate'.
He said: 'All other EU policies on climate, nature, soil, water need to be integrated into CAP now and we have to transform our land system. Business-as-usual is not an option and a national land-use framework will need to be implemented at regional and local level.'
Niamh Garvey, senior policy analyst with the National Economic and Social Council, says scaling up would give more farmers a sense of what future land use might look like. He also points to the importance of lengthening many of the European Innovation Partnerships and EU Life Programme projects that have proved inspirational.
Patrick Barrett, agricultural inspector at the Department of Agriculture, suggests that the biotechnology and food sectors could eventually come together.
He said: 'The Government will need to support investment in cluster-type developments where one company's waste is another's feedstock and the agrifood sector will be part of this, supplying feedstocks and energy to anaerobic digesters and biorefineries.
'For farmers, foresters, fishers to get more value from what they produce, this sidestream of products needs to be unlocked. This is as much a cultural journey as anything else.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Ireland will have to commit substantial funds to arms procurement whether it approves or not
All they talk about in Brussels these days is defence. And with a sense of urgency and common political will that is a product of real fear that the EU itself is existentially threatened . A fear that the threats from Russia to Ukraine – regarded, as one senior European Commission official put it, as a 'de facto member state' – and Vladimir Putin 's wider ambitions against former Soviet states now part of the union are serious. And that the US can no longer be relied on for military support or even nuclear deterrence. The talk is all of meeting new Nato targets of raising defence spending to between three and five per cent of GDP. Russia, member states are warned, has been massively expanding its military-industrial production capacity with an estimated spending in 2024 of 40 per cent of the federal budget and up to 9 per cent of its GDP (up from 6 per cent in 2023) on defence, a commitment only possible in an autocratic state impervious to public sentiment. Ireland, despite its new commitment to bolster its army, remains the poorest performer in the EU class at 0.5 per cent this year. Member states' defence spending has grown by more than 31 per cent since 2021, reaching 1.9 per cent of the EU's combined GDP or €326bn in 2024, almost double the amount spent in 2021. Not enough, however; now a target of €800 billion in the next few years is being discussed. A measure of how seriously the debate is being taken has been the union's willingness with unprecedented speed to raise its sacrosanct fiscal rules, allowing member states to break debt limits to expand their military spending . READ MORE The thrust is now being driven by the EU White Paper on Defence Preparedness 2025, published recently. It was the subject of a well-attended debate this week in the Institute for International and European Affairs, which turned inevitably to the issue of Ireland's own national preparedness and its role next year in steering the EU presidency discussions. Centre stage will be the roll-out of the white paper proposals to revitalise states' military capacity and transform national defence industries to break reliance on foreign, notably US, imported weapons. A new defence financing initiative, Safe, will see the European Investment Bank raise €150 billion to lend to the private sector on condition 65 per cent of loans are for European-produced weapons. Ireland is not planning to dip into the fund, but Minister of State for Defence Thomas Byrne told the meeting that, in the spirit of 'principles-based pragmatism', we might yet do so. Ireland will also have charge of brokering a deal on the next seven-year budget (the Multiannual Financial Framework, or MFF). The process always severely stretches member-state solidarity and will particularly test them this time, with a huge increase in collective defence spending being proposed. That, at a time when all are cash-strapped, will require a massive breach of the one per cent of EU GDP budget spending ceiling, or as Prof Brigid Laffan warned, 'tough trade-offs' on long-standing policy areas. Like agriculture. Ireland cannot stand on the sidelines. It will necessarily have to commit substantial funds to arms procurement as a net contributor to the MFF, like all others, whether or not it approves. [ Parlous state of Defence Forces once again laid bare Opens in new window ] The EU white paper bears a remarkable resemblance in its scope and thrust to the paper produced in Ireland in 2022 by the Commission on the Defence Forces and which prompted our own commitment to major upgrading of the Defence Forces. The white paper, the EU Commission's senior defence official, Guilaume de la Brosse, insists, is not about redefining EU defence policy 'but about the specificities of member states, serving national agendas', and both starting a discussion about preparedness and capabilities and pointing to a way in which the needs may be addressed more efficiently, collectively and individually. The white paper projects are all 'voluntary'. Like the Irish commission's silence on neutrality's merits, it is not saying European collective defence must take a particular form, but that if you want a capability to deter aggression then this is how to do it – and it is best done collectively, ensuring interoperability and as little duplication as possible. [ Poll shows Ireland's attachment to neutrality is strong but nuanced Opens in new window ] Critical to getting both imperatives through will be important changes in the nature of defence discussions throughout the EU – not least in Ireland, where the debate has largely been confined to political and policy circles. Both the Taoiseach and the Tánaiste have engaged strongly, echoing common EU-wide concerns, but public opinion remains largely indifferent, albeit clinging to vague, often contradictory notions of 'neutrality'. There is often an unwillingness to acknowledge the need to upgrade our defensive capacity or even a need for it. A fundamental challenge remains a public unwillingness to perceive real new vulnerabilities or threats to ourselves – like to our vital undersea cable networks or to cyber attacks, or threats to the territorial integrity of our European partners – as urgent and requiring radical action. Although sympathetic to their plight, and generously receptive of refugees, Irish voters have yet to recognise that their problem is our problem, a real threat to our union, and to develop a real sense of obligation to fellow members of the union arising from our membership of this huge 'peace project'. From a narrow national perspective, as Minister Byrne acknowledged, 'working together is the only way forward'. This debate urgently needs to expand beyond Dáil Éireann's narrow confines.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Irish universities earned more than €830m from student housing since 2015
Irish universities have made more than €830 million from student accommodation over the last 10 years. An analysis of the financial accounts for Ireland's main universities shows the income from student accommodation has nearly doubled since 2015 as third-level institutions have hiked fees and invested in new accommodation blocks. The analysis assessed accounts from University College Dublin (UCD), Trinity College Dublin, University of Limerick (UL), University of Galway, Dublin City University (DCU), Maynooth University and University College Cork (UCC). Universities made €117.6 million from student accommodation in 2023. In 2024, excluding DCU which has yet to publish its 2024 accounts, universities made €113.5 million from their residences. If DCU maintained the same level of income from its residences as in 2023, the figure would surpass €125 million. READ MORE UCD made the most from student accommodation during the 10-year period, bringing in €288.5 million. Ireland's largest university made €42.8 million in its financial year ending September 30th, 2024, slightly down from its record income of €43.98 million the year prior. The south Dublin college, which has accommodation at both of its campuses, made €20.15 million from residences in 2015. It has since significantly increased the number of student beds it offers. It had around 2,500 beds available to students in 2015, but expanded that to 4,070 by 2023 as part of its residential masterplan. UCD shelved plans to build 1,254 student apartments on its campus in 2022. The development was deemed no longer viable due to inflation in construction costs, The Irish Times reported. The project will be partially constructed due to funding from the State, which will allow 493 of those beds to be developed. At the same time, UCD has increased its on-campus rental fees on an annual basis, with costs at the university's Merville accommodation increasing from €6,358 in 2015 to €7,843 last September. Universities also point out that their accommodation is now being used as summer accommodation for tourists and international students. A spokesman for DCU said a significant portion of the revenue from its student residences is generated 'during the summer months, when undergraduate beds are not occupied, when we charge full commercial rates' to visiting students, academics and tourists. The full set of data is not available for DCU, which took in €12.45 million from its student accommodation in 2023. The north Dublin college is planning to add an additional 405 new beds with Government funding. UL has nearly 3,000 student beds across eight student villages on campus. In terms of finances, it takes in the second highest of any university from its student accommodation. Its consolidated accounts record UL as having taken in €23.5 million from its student accommodation in its 2024 financial year. In the past decade, it has generated close to €160 million from student accommodation. Trinity has recorded income in excess of €117 million from its student residences over the decade-long period. [ UL returns €12.4m surplus a year after soured property deals drag it into the red Opens in new window ] UCC's revenue from student accommodation stood at €12.8 million last year, with €81.6 million coming in the past decade. University of Galway recorded €14.5 million last September, from a total of nearly €74 million since 2015. Maynooth University recorded the lowest income of the universities in the 2023-24 financial year, at €6 million. This was also the case in the multi-year period, when it took in just over €47 million. Maynooth combined income from residences and catering in its 2015 and 2016 accounts. During the Covid-19 pandemic, university income from student accommodation was hit heavily. Across the board, revenue dropped nearly 30 per cent, from €93.7 million in 2019 to €67.4 million in 2020. Revenue fell further the next year, dropping to €54.6 million in 2021 before it rebounded to more than €100 million for the first time as university students returned to campus.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
More smaller apartments and studios could be built under plans being considered by Government
Moves which could mean greater numbers of smaller apartments, including studio apartments, built are being considered by Government and are likely to be finalised in the coming weeks. The proposals, being discussed at the highest level of the Coalition, are among efforts to make building apartments more attractive for investors and developers in a bid to increase the supply in urban areas, according to several people familiar with the discussions. Rules governing size, insulation, requirements for dual aspect in many apartments, corridor lengths, high-spec finishes and the need to have balconies are all cited as reasons for runaway cost inflation in the price of apartments, and all are likely to be examined. [ Dublin studio flats 27% smaller than current limit get go-ahead Opens in new window ] There is agreement among senior Government figures that design standards for apartments have risen so high that they have driven costs of construction to a level that has made them unaffordable. READ MORE In addition, the mix of apartments required in developments is being discussed, with Government figures understood to favour allowing more and smaller apartments, including more studio apartments, and fewer large apartments. Government sources were adamant that things like energy ratings, disability access and fire safety would not be affected under any package of changes that could be agreed, but outlined a range of other apartment design stipulations which the industry has protested add cost to development. [ 'I grew up in an apartment in another country. I bought an apartment in Dublin and had to get out after a year' Opens in new window ] Sources stress that they are not talking about building standards – these are produced by technical experts in construction and cover things like fire safety. Instead, they are discussing possible changes in apartment standards, which are set by planners. 'We need to change the viability equation for them,' said a Coalition source. Will rent reform make building apartments viable? Listen | 40:12 Some Government officials say that while balconies in a one-bedroom apartment are a useful amenity, they can also drive up the cost of construction and contribute to affordability issues for first-time buyers, leaving them unable to access the housing market. Tánaiste Simon Harris previously signalled an openness to the idea of revisiting apartment design standards, and it is understood that he again indicated they would be considered during a meeting of the Fine Gael parliamentary party last week, alongside plans to overhaul the remit of the Land Development Agency. [ Has Fingal County Council found a solution to our housing crisis? Opens in new window ] However, any move to revisit standards is likely to face some criticism. Orla Hegarty, assistant professor at the UCD School of Architecture, said that previous efforts to address affordability through changing design standards had proven unsuccessful. She said there was a risk of 'poorer quality housing for the very long term, for a very short-term balancing of the books'. It comes off the back of moves last week to overhaul the rental sector, including expanding rent pressure zones nationally, allowing more frequent resetting of rents, and improving some tenant protections.