Rep. Nancy Mace suing Sullivan's Island businessman for defamation over social media posts
CHARLESTON COUNTY, S.C. (WCBD) – U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) is suing a Sullivan's Island businessman for defamation, claiming he knowingly spread false information about her in the weeks after she publicly accused him of being a sexual predator.
The businessman, Eric Bowman, was one of four men named in an explosive February 10 speech on the House floor during which detailed how she said she accidentally found evidence of 'rape, nonconsensual photos and videos of women and underage girls,' including herself. All four have publicly denied the allegations.
The complaint – filed May 12 in Charleston County — argues that Bowman has since retaliated against the congresswoman by posting 'objectively false statements' on his X (formerly Twitter) account in a 'calculated effort to portray her as unfit for public office to the voters of the first congressional district and the general public.'
'Bowman used his personal X account to repeatedly assert as objective fact, without any support, the blatant falsehood that Rep. Mace abused her position as a member of the House Veterans' Affairs Committee to illegally steer or influence the award of contracts with the VA to friends, associates, and political allies,' Mace's attorneys wrote.
The complaint includes multiple screenshots of posts from Bowman's alleged account, in which he suggests Mace has engaged in criminal activity.
News 2 has reached out to Bowman for comment and is awaiting a response.
Mace is seeking monetary damages of at least $7,500.
You can read the full complaint here:
Mace-v-BowmanDownload
This story is breaking and may be updated.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Legislative recap for Thursday, June 5
The dome of the Maine State House in Augusta. Sept. 5, 2023. (Photo by Jim Neuger/ Maine Morning Star) With a citizen-led campaign to impose voter ID requirements heading to the ballots, lawmakers discussed the issue at length Thursday before rejecting a legislative proposal mirroring the ballot initiative. Several Republican members of the Maine House of Representatives said if returning clothes and buying cigarettes requires photo identification, so should voting. They alleged rampant voter fraud by noncitizens, which Maine's Secretary of State has said is not the case. Democrats pushed back, saying Maine already has a robust system to prevent fraud, and that requiring voter ID would disadvantage students, seniors and people with disabilities. With a 72-69 vote, the bill, LD 38, was rejected. 'There is a fundamental difference between having to show an ID to buy alcohol or tobacco products or returning an unwanted item to a store,' said Rep. Kelly Noonan Murphy (D-Scarborough).'None of those things are sacred rights granted to us in the Constitution. And therefore, imposing barriers on that right … is un-American.' With papers shuffling between chambers this week, Maine Morning Star has compiled a slightly more pared down roundup again for Thursday, focusing on the biggest items of debates as well as legislation and issues that we've followed all session. Here's an overview of what happened Thursday. Both chambers have now passed an amended version of LD 1726, which seeks to improve planning for the future of the energy grid. The House supported it with a 75-69 vote, and the Senate followed suit passing the bill 19-13 Thursday afternoon. After LD 1928 squeaked through the House with a 72-70 vote, the Senate passed it 17-15. This bill would ban single-use plastic containers — such as mini shampoo bottles — at lodging establishments starting in 2030. Although Rep. Michael Soboleski (R-Phillips) said the well-intentioned legislation overlooks sanitation concerns and poses challenges for businesses, others praised it for its potential to chip away at plastic use in the state. 'A conservative estimate is that this bill could eliminate as many as 73 million single-use plastic bottles per year from Maine's waste stream as we struggle to recycle our way out of the catastrophe of microplastics, that is meaningful action,' said Rep. Vicki Doudera (D-Camden). Although the proposed net energy billing reform that could save ratepayers more than $65 million has yet to hit the floors, the Senate and House passed an amended version of LD 839, which would create a fund to offset transmission and distribution costs associated with the policy that would otherwise be passed onto ratepayers. Additionally, lawmakers backed a bill requiring internet providers to treat all broadband internet traffic equally, a concept commonly referred to as 'net neutrality.' LD 536 passed the House 79-66, while the Senate gave its approval Thursday. With a 74-67 House vote, both chambers supported LD 246, which asks courts to consider a sentence other than imprisonment for primary caregivers. Rep. Adam Lee (D-Auburn) said the bill is needed because 'the research is clear, children with incarcerated parents are more likely to face mental health challenges, exhibit behavioral problems, experience social isolation and suffer from economic hardship. These children are also more likely to perform poorly in school and have higher absentee rates.' With a 73-69 vote, the House also passed LD 1859, a bill that would offer regional hubs for childcare, which can serve as access points in communities, tailored to the needs of those families. The Senate approved it Wednesday. Both chambers have now rejected LD 1476, which sought to impose a new lodging fee to help fund homeless shelters in the state. A heavily amended version of LD 1787 passed in the Senate after the House gave approval Wednesday. The bill initially sought to allow candidates for district attorney, sheriff and county commissioner to participate in the Maine Clean Election Act, but the version now being considered was amended to increase the contribution limits for gubernatorial seed money donations. (Read more about other proposals related to changing Maine's clean elections here.) Legislation (LD 1900) to grant authority to certain Wabanaki Nations to develop tribal power districts and recognize the authority for child support enforcement passed the House 75-67 on Wednesday and Senate 20-12. There was also bipartisan support for LD 1886, which would extend the current penalties applied when a motor vehicle violation results in death to violations that result in serious bodily harm. Lawmakers killed a proposal (LD 1461) to prohibit school boards from adopting a mask mandate unless directed by a health agency. So far, the Legislature has only supported modest refinements to the state's paid family and medical leave. That approach continued Thursday, when two more bills looking to amend the program were rejected. LD 1169, which would allow employers to get a refund for any premiums paid into the state's plan if they are approved to use a private substitute plan, was voted down 73-68 by the House and 18-14 by the Senate. Both chambers also rejected LD 1400, which looked to exempt certain public school employees from the program. And the Senate cast a final enactment vote for LD 588, which would give agricultural employees the right to engage in certain concerted activity, which includes talking about wages, working conditions and other employment matters with other employees or the employer. (Read more about that here.) After the Senate narrowly voted it down, the House passed LD 1535, which would require the Public Utilities Commission to gather a group of municipal, police and fire officials to discuss the high electricity usage related to illegal cannabis grows in the state. During discussions Wednesday, Sen. Craig Hickman (D-Kennebec) said the Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee is carrying over legislation into the next session that could provide a more comprehensive approach, including this sort of study. The Senate insisted on its original vote Thursday night. Leaving it in limbo, the House did not again take up LD 810, the bill seeking to modify the law born out of a 2021 referendum question requiring the Maine Legislature to approve any new high-impact transmission lines. It fell shy of passage in the House with lawmakers voting 72-75 before ultimately killing the bill under the hammer. However, the Senate passed the bill 18-16 Wednesday. During an evening session, the Senate rejected LD 1036, which would prohibit landlords from refusing to rent to tenants solely because they rely on programs such as General Assistance or housing vouchers. Since the House passed the proposal 72-70 on Wednesday, the lower chamber will need to take it up again. Sen. Chip Curry (D-Waldo) said this is an important issue, but asked the Senate to reject the measure simply because the Judiciary Committee is carrying a similar bill into the next session to allow more time to work on it. Although the House rejected LD 1236 earlier in the day on Thursday, the Senate voted 22-10 in favor of its passage after a failed 16-16 vote to reject the bill and impassioned floor speeches about the importance of addressing the presence of fentanyl in the state. The amended version of the bill seeks to create a Class A crime for aggravated trafficking of fentanyl when it results in an overdose. While no one refuted that fentanyl poses a crisis, Curry said the state can't incarcerate its way out of it. Senate Minority Leader Trey Stewart said he supports a multipronged approach to solving the substance use crisis including access to treatment and other supports, but argued that this bill could bolster that. The Senate advanced two bills that aim to support mobile home park residents in purchasing their parks. (Read more about that here.) Maine is one step closer to joining its New England peers who all have so-called food waste bans on the books now that the Senate has approved a slightly amended version of LD 1065. The bill would prohibit significant generators of food waste, which could include schools, hospitals, food producers and others, from disposing of food waste if they are close to a facility that could compost or otherwise dispose of the waste. The House passed a bill (LD 1078) expanding access to needle exchange programs in a 74-65 vote. The bill would allow certified programs to operate additional locations within the same county. (Read more about our syringe service program coverage here). SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Axios
30 minutes ago
- Axios
Medicaid work rules' bureaucratic nightmare
Republicans insist that Medicaid work requirements will weed out people who shouldn't be on the safety net program's rolls in the first place. The reality is that the red tape and bureaucratic hoops to jump through will have far broader effects, according to health policy experts. Why it matters: Coverage losses stemming from work rules will be a key focus in the Senate this month as lawmakers debate the sweeping GOP budget bill that contains the most significant changes to Medicaid in the program's history. What's inside: The bill, which passed the House in May, includes a new federal requirement for those ages 19 to 64 to work or participate in 80 hours of community engagement per month to keep their Medicaid coverage. The requirement was supposed to take effect in 2029, but the House Freedom Caucus insisted the timeline be moved up to Dec. 31, 2026 — which would generate around $50 billion more in savings per year. Senate Republicans, even the more moderate members, have expressed support for the work requirements, including moving up the timeline. The White House contends that 4.8 million able-bodied adults are choosing not to work and said this week that work requirements "will strengthen the system to better help those most in need of assistance." House GOP leadership this week also cited recent statistics from the American Enterprise Institute that state Medicaid recipients who don't report working say they spend 4.2 hours watching TV and playing video games (compared with 2.7 hours for recipients who work). State of play: Most able-bodied Medicaid recipients work full or part time. Some states have already imposed work requirements, resulting in thousands of people either losing their coverage or finding it very difficult to sign up. Arkansas implemented a work requirement in 2018 that lasted less than a year and left 18,000 fewer people covered, or about 25% of the eligible population, per KFF. A court eventually ruled the program violated Medicaid law. Work requirements began in Georgia as part of a Medicaid expansion in June 2023, and as of January, only 6,500 adults had enrolled — a fraction of the 25,000 the state expected would sign up in the first year, KFF says. New Hampshire also tried to launch work requirements but stopped after a month, after only 8,000 of the 25,000 people subject to the requirement had complied. The Congressional Budget Office this week estimated that 4.8 million people could become uninsured by 2034 due to the Medicaid work requirements measure in the reconciliation bill. How it works: States would have to build systems to track all of the enrollees and their work statuses, likely adding significant costs to their program budgets. Then, enrollees would have to contact states, which could be required as often as once a month, to show that they're working or participating in another eligible activity like caretaking. Enrollees would have to submit paperwork proving a disability, substance abuse disorder or other criteria to qualify for an exemption. One concern is that the envisioned system doesn't account for informal arrangements, such as whether a person is paid in cash for domestic work, seasonal jobs in agriculture or even being self-employed. It also assumes that covered people would be aware of the work requirements and would try to comply. What they're saying: "The experience in Arkansas was that the people who lost coverage because of the work requirements for the most part became uninsured," said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the Medicaid program at KFF. "There was no increase in the share of those working." "In all of these states, we see time and again that the people hurt include workers who are supposed to be exempt, including people with disabilities who are supposed to be exempt," said Leonardo Cuello, a research professor at the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families. The bottom line: Work requirements don't appear to encourage people to work, and the large savings in the budget bill are likely to appear because of people losing their health coverage. "The argument is that this is about waste, fraud and abuse. That's not how this bill produces savings," said Ben Sommers, a health economist at Harvard who studies work requirements. "These are savings from kicking eligible people out of Medicaid who should have that coverage, who need it for their health care, because they can't navigate this big bureaucratic mess that the bill creates," he said.
New York Times
37 minutes ago
- New York Times
Counting Up the Potential Costs of the Trump-Musk Rift
Can the alliance be fixed? The world was riveted on Thursday when President Trump and Elon Musk clashed — repeatedly, bitterly and sometimes pettily — online and in the Oval Office, in a dramatic rupture of their alliance that many believed was inevitable. There were signs of a cool down on Friday. There's a lot at stake in Musk and Trump making amends, including for Musk's businesses, his rivals and perhaps Republicans' fortunes. No matter what happens, one of the most consequential political alliances in decades may be irrevocably damaged. The highlights: After days of Musk assailing the Republican budget bill, a centerpiece of Trump's economic agenda, the president let loose on Thursday: 'I'm very disappointed in Elon,' he said, adding that he would have won Pennsylvania in the 2024 election without the Tesla chief's millions. Things then got more heated: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote on X. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Musk responded that he was prepared to decommission the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft that NASA uses to get astronauts to the International Space Station, though he later backed off. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!,' Trump added. Musk claimed that there were references to Trump in government documents about the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk wrote. Observers of all political persuasions weighed in. 'BBB actually stands for Big beautiful breakup,' the conservative activist Laura Loomer wrote on X, referring to the Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Democrat of New York, said, 'The girls are fighting, aren't they?' (It's an allusion to a meme.) Even Kanye West weighed in: 'Broooos please noooooo 🫂 We love you both so much.' Tempers appear to be cooling. Responding to a plea for peace by the billionaire Bill Ackman, Musk responded, 'You're not wrong.' But news reports were contradictory about whether the two will speak on Friday; Trump told ABC's Jonathan Karl that he's 'not particularly' interested in talking with Musk. The consequences of a failed truce are gigantic: Tesla's stock price plunged 14 percent on Thursday, wiping out over $150 billion from its market cap, its worst-ever one-day performance. Beyond the loss of the E.V. subsidies the Republican bill would eliminate, investors feared that Trump regulators could crack down on Tesla's robotaxi efforts. The prospect of SpaceX losing even some of its government contracts would hurt. (That possibility likely delighted rocket rivals including Jeff Bezos of Blue Origin and Kelly Ortberg of Boeing.) Meanwhile, what if Musk followed through on the decommissioning of the Dragon spacecraft — or even disabled the U.S. government's access to the Starlink internet service? Could a drawn-out fight mean that Trump would somehow hamstring xAI even as he champions other American artificial intelligence companies? Sam Altman of OpenAI was probably feeling relieved that Musk wouldn't be able to interfere in his ambitious initiatives. Republican leaders may also be hoping that a détente might lead to Musk dialing down his attacks on their budget bill. That said, the billionaire still appears dead set against the legislation: 'If America goes broke, nothing else matters,' he wrote on X on Friday. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
