logo
A new Texas law could have wider effect on how food products are made, experts suggest

A new Texas law could have wider effect on how food products are made, experts suggest

The Hill12 hours ago

(NEXSTAR) – A new law in Texas could have a significant influence over how foods are presented — or even manufactured — in the rest of the country.
Texas Gov. Gregg Abbott signed into law hundreds of bills last week, including one concerning a requirement for food manufacturers to disclose the use of any of 44 food additives through a 'prominent and reasonably visible' label on the packaging. These additives include artificial dyes, certain enzymes, molecularly altered oils, and additives banned in other countries, among other ingredients.
'WARNING: This product contains an ingredient that is not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom,' the label would read, according to the language of SB 25.
The bill had previously passed through the Texas legislature as part of a 'Make Texas Healthy Again' initiative. But it may very well have implications far outside of Texas, if food manufacturers end up deciding to label or revamp their products for the market as a whole, according to Jennifer L. Falbe, an associate professor of Nutrition and Human Development at UC Davis.
'It is encouraging to see bipartisan support for food industry reform,' Falbe, who recently co-authored a study on the effectiveness of front-of-package labels, told Nexstar. 'Policies in a large state like Texas can have ramifications for the rest of the country.'
Speaking with the Washington Post, Scott Faber of the Environmental Working Group said there was 'no question' that such a law would influence how food companies do business in the rest of the U.S.
'When a state as big as Texas requires a warning, that will have an impact on the entire marketplace,' he told the outlet.
Even still, it may take years to learn how the new law ends up influencing how food companies label or manufacture their products in Texas and beyond. According to the language of the bill, the warning labels would only apply to 'a food product label developed or copyrighted on or after January 1, 2027.'
As noted by Stat, the entire requirement could also be moot if the federal government introduces its own legislation regarding food labeling before 2027.
There's also another potential problem with the law: The language surrounding the additives may be inaccurate.
A review cited by the Associated Press found that almost a dozen of the 44 additives listed are in fact allowed in some of the foreign regions where the label required by the Texas law claims they're not, while several are allowed in all of them. And others, like Red Dye No. 4, are already banned in the U.S.
'I don't know how the list of chemicals was constructed,' Thomas Galligan, a scientist with the Center for Science in the Public Interest, told the Associated Press. 'Warnings have to be accurate in order to be legal.'
Falbe says the warning also does little to deter food manufacturers from limiting sodium or sugar, even if they end up removing any offending additives from the ingredients list.
'To the extent that sugary and salty products also contain the additives in the Texas law, the warning could drive healthier choices in the near term. But they may also incentivize food companies to replace a limited set of additives to avoid labeling, without fundamentally improving the quality of foods and beverages,' says Falbe.
'For example, a sugary soda that has a coloring agent replaced with another is still a soda — it is still going to increase disease risk. Same with a sugary cereal or a salty soup.'
Falbe's study, published this month, indicates that consumers would more accurately assess the nutrition profile of a given food if it had clearer front-of-package labeling highlighting the saturated fat, sodium and added sugar content. And that's also what she believes the federal government should be pushing food manufacturers to include.
'Front-of-package warning labels indicating high amounts of added sugars, sodium, and saturated fat increase consumer knowledge, help people make healthier choices, and nudge the food industry to make healthier products,' Falbe said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thousands set up street blockades in Serbia after arrests of protesters

time3 hours ago

Thousands set up street blockades in Serbia after arrests of protesters

BELGRADE, Serbia -- Thousands of people Sunday set up street blockades in Serbia, angry over the arrest of anti-government protesters who clashed with police at a massive rally a day earlier demanding early elections. Protesters put up metal fences and garbage containers at various locations in the capital Belgrade, also blocking a key bridge over the Sava river. Protesters in the northern city of Novi Sad pelted the offices of the ruling populist Serbian Progressive Party with eggs. Serbian media said similar protest blockades were organized in smaller cities in the Balkan country. Protesters on Sunday demanded that authorities release dozens of university students and other protesters who were jailed for attacking the police or for allegedly plotting to overthrow the government at the rally Saturday in Belgrade. Tens of thousands of people attended the rally held after nearly eight months of persistent dissent that has rattled populist President Aleksandar Vucic. Protesters also declared the current populist government 'illegitimate' and laid the responsibility for any violence on the government. Clashes with riot police erupted after the official part of the rally ended. Police used pepper spray, batons and shields while protesters threw rocks, bottles and other objects. Police said on Sunday that 48 officers were injured while 22 protesters sought medical help. Out of 77 people detained, 38 remained in custody Sunday, most of them facing criminal charges, said Interior Minister Ivica Dacic. At least eight more people were detained during the day, the prosecutors said. Vucic earlier Sunday announced the arrests at a press conference, accusing organizers of the rally of inciting violence and attacks on police, urging legal prosecution. He also criticized "terrorists and those who tried to bring down the state,' singling out University of Belgrade's head dean, Vladan Djokic, who was among the protesters. 'There will be more arrests,' Vucic said. 'Identification of all individuals is underway.' Anti-government protests started after a renovated rail station canopy collapsed in November, killing 16 people. Many in Serbia blamed the tragedy in the northern city of Novi Sad on corruption-fueled negligence in state infrastructure projects. Vucic has repeatedly rejected the student demand for an immediate snap vote instead of regular elections planned for 2027. 'Serbia won. You cannot destroy Serbia with violence,' Vucic said Sunday. 'They consciously wanted to spur bloodshed. The time of accountability is coming.' Critics say Vucic has become increasingly authoritarian since coming to power over a decade ago, stifling democratic freedoms while allowing corruption and organized crime to flourish. He has denied this. Serbia is formally seeking European Union entry, but Vucic's government has nourished its relations with both Russia and China.

How Europe got tough on migration
How Europe got tough on migration

Boston Globe

time5 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

How Europe got tough on migration

Advertisement Procaccini's party, Brothers of Italy, is now very popular in Italy. Its leader, Giorgia Meloni, is the country's prime minister. And Procaccini is a chair of the European Conservatives and Reformists group, a big force in the European Parliament. Across the political spectrum in Europe, leaders, right and left, are pushing a tougher line on migrants lacking permanent legal status. The shift has not set off the same turmoil that President Trump's immigration crackdown has stirred in the United States, but it is already being seen as entrenched and profound. In nations across the European Union, centrists are joining staunch conservatives to roll back protections in an effort to make it easier to deport migrants lacking permanent legal status. Denmark's 'zero' refugee policy has become a model other leaders want to replicate. European Union officials are working on new rules that would help to send asylum-seekers to third countries. The bloc struck a recent deal to deploy agents in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which is not an EU member, to better police borders. Advertisement Some of those ideas have previously met with criticism from European Union officials. 'There is now this really broad consensus among almost all political camps ," said Martin Hofmann, an adviser at the International Center for Migration Policy Development. 'We will be tougher, we will be stricter. " The shift has steadily built with the voter backlash that helped fuel nationalist, far-right, and populist parties after Europe took in more than 1 million Syrians, Iraqis, Afghans, and others seeking asylum a decade ago. Migration picked up again, though less drastically, just after the peak of the coronavirus pandemic. But since then, the number of migrants arriving has fallen. They declined about 20 percent in the first five months of 2025, after a sharp decline last year, according to preliminary data collected by Frontex, the European Union's border agency. At the same time, expulsions have slowly increased. But migration along some routes remains significant. Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the bloc's executive arm, emphasized in a recent letter to political leaders that arrivals from Libya into Greece are surging, and said that Europe must 'insist on strengthening border management.' Hofmann said that because anti-immigrant sentiments are often a proxy for wider frustration with a perceived lack of opportunities, high costs of living, and a loss of social status, a drop in migrant arrivals alone was unlikely to blunt the issue's potency. In his view, policies that seem to be working to stem immigration are likely to retain their appeal and continue to gain momentum. That includes offshoring asylum requests, which the European Commission is exploring. Advertisement Not long ago, when the British government proposed sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda, the Council of Europe's commissioner for human rights said the plan was another representation 'of an ongoing trend towards externalization of asylum and migration policy in Europe,' which he said was 'a matter of concern for the global system of protection of the rights of refugees.' Now, the policy of offshoring asylum requests has become a signature of Meloni, who has tried to hold asylum-seekers in Albania while their cases are processed. Though Italian judges have blocked her effort for now, von der Leyen called it 'an example of out-of-the-box thinking.' Now the European Union is seeking to redirect applicants to third countries while it works to streamline the deportation process for asylum-seekers whose applications have been rejected. The depth of the change was on full display last month when Mette Frederiksen, the Social Democratic, left-leaning Danish prime minister, stood alongside the staunchly conservative Meloni in Rome to support tougher migration rules. Frederiksen, whose country has relatively few asylum requests, has for several years overseen one of Europe's most restrictive policies. Others are now seeking to adopt a similar approach. Chancellor Friedrich Merz of Germany, the center-right leader of Europe's largest economy, this month called Denmark a 'role model' on migration policy. Meloni and Frederiksen presented an open letter in which they argued that the European Convention on Human Rights, the 75-year-old cornerstone for the protection of human rights in Europe, 'posed too many limitations on the states' ability to decide whom to expel from their territories.' Advertisement It was also signed by leaders from Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland. Germany has now instituted checks on its land borders, a step that opponents, including some of its neighbors, have criticized as undermining the commitment of EU members to free movement within the bloc. The Polish government suspended asylum rights as migrants have massed at the border with Belarus, which is outside the European Union. Poland argued that Russian and Belarusian officials were deliberately encouraging migration in a bid to destabilize Europe. Some worry that the shift in tone around migration could harm newcomers who remain in Europe. In recent Polish presidential elections, the nationalist candidate won by running in part on a 'Poland first, Poles first' tagline. The shift in tone is striking even to those who have long been proponents of tougher measures. A decade ago, when Australia barred migrants trying to enter the country by sea from resettlement and sent asylum-seekers to Papua New Guinea, rights groups said the policy provoked human rights violations. The European Union was also critical, said Alexander Downer, an Australian former foreign minister. 'They used to give me lectures all the time about how naughty we were,' Downer said. 'Von der Leyen has embraced it now.' This article originally appeared in

Senator Thom Tillis Will Not Seek Another Term After Voting Down Trump Bill
Senator Thom Tillis Will Not Seek Another Term After Voting Down Trump Bill

Newsweek

time7 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Senator Thom Tillis Will Not Seek Another Term After Voting Down Trump Bill

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who voted against the President Donald Trump-backed "Big Beautiful" spending bill last night, has announced he will not seek reelection in a Sunday statement, according to the Associated Press. Newsweek has reached out to Tillis' press office for the statement via email on Sunday. "In Washington over the last few years, it's become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species," he said in a statement obtained by the AP. The two-term Republican congressman's announcement comes the day after he voted against Trump's spending bill and was subsequently called out by the president. Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" represents his signature domestic policy initiative, combining massive tax cuts with significant spending on border security and defense while implementing substantial cuts to social safety net programs. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which is nonpartisan, estimates the House's version would add $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficit over the next decade, though Republicans dispute this calculation. The bill's passage would fundamentally reshape federal spending priorities and tax policy, affecting millions of Americans across income levels. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store