Salty tastes, serious risks: how cutting back on salt can save your life
The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends consuming no more than 5 grams of salt per day, roughly a teaspoon.
Image: Monicore/Pexels
Salt is the secret ingredient that brings our favourite meals to life.
From the comforting aroma of a potjie stewing on the fire to the irresistible bite of ikota, South Africans love flavour, and salt often takes centre stage.
But behind the savoury delight lies a silent threat that could be putting your health and even your life at risk.
This May Measurement Month, health experts are calling on South Africans to take a closer look at their salt consumption.
Hypertension (high blood pressure) is one of the leading health challenges in the country, yet many remain unaware of its dangers.
A large proportion of those with hypertension in SA remain undiagnosed, with estimates ranging from 46% to 50% unaware, according to the Heart and Stroke Foundation, leaving them vulnerable to serious health complications.
But what does salt have to do with this? A lot.
Studies show that excessive salt intake is a major contributor to high blood pressure, which, in turn, significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), SA's second leading cause of death.
But behind the savoury delight lies a silent threat that could be putting your health and even your life at risk.
This May Measurement Month, health experts are calling on South Africans to take a closer look at their salt consumption.
Hypertension (high blood pressure) is one of the leading health challenges in the country, yet many remain unaware of its dangers.
A large proportion of those with hypertension in SA remain undiagnosed, with estimates ranging from 46% to 50% unaware, according to the Heart and Stroke Foundation, leaving them vulnerable to serious health complications.
But what does salt have to do with this? A lot.
Studies show that excessive salt intake is a major contributor to high blood pressure, which, in turn, significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), SA's second leading cause of death.
Experiment with herbs, garlic, ginger, basil, and paprika to add flavour without relying on salt.
Image: ArtHouse Studio/Pexels
Here are five lifesaving reasons why reducing your salt intake may be the best health decision you make this year.
Reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases
Eating too much salt raises your blood pressure, putting strain on your heart and blood vessels.
Over time, this can lead to severe complications like heart attacks and strokes, two of the most common causes of death worldwide.
In SA, CVD remains a leading cause of mortality. And the numbers don't lie: high blood pressure is responsible for nearly 13% of all deaths globally.
By cutting back on salt, you can lower your blood pressure and, with it, your risk of heart disease, such as heart attack, stroke, heart failure, and various conditions like arrhythmias and heart valve problems( basically any heart problems).
Reduce the risk of kidney disease
Our kidneys play a crucial role in filtering excess fluids and waste from our blood.
Too much salt disrupts this process, causing your body to retain water, which puts added pressure on your kidneys.
Over time, this can lead to kidney damage or even kidney failure.
Protect your bones from osteoporosis
Excessive salt intake increases calcium loss through urine, which can lead to reduced bone density over time.
This increases the risk of osteoporosis, a condition where bones become brittle and prone to fractures.
For many South Africans, especially women over 50 years, who are at higher risk, a low-salt diet combined with calcium-rich foods like dairy, leafy greens, and fortified cereals can help maintain strong, healthy bones.
Reduce your risk of stomach cancer
Research has linked high salt consumption to an increased risk of gastric cancer.
Salt damages the stomach lining and can contribute to the growth of harmful bacteria, such as Helicobacter pylori, which is known to cause stomach ulcers and, in some cases, cancer.
Given that stomach cancer often develops silently and is diagnosed at advanced stages, prevention is crucial.
Opting for fresh, whole foods rather than heavily processed, salty snacks is a simple yet effective way to lower your risk.
Improve your overall quality of life
High blood pressure, driven by excess salt, doesn't just increase the risk of life-threatening conditions, it can also reduce your overall quality of life.
Symptoms like early morning headaches, nosebleeds, irregular heart rhythms, and vision changes can disrupt your daily routine.
Left unmanaged, hypertension can lead to chronic fatigue, cognitive decline, and even dementia.
The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends consuming no more than 5 grams of salt per day, roughly a teaspoon.
Yet, studies show that most adults consume double this amount, often without realising it.
Hidden salts in processed foods like bread, instant noodles, and sauces are major culprits.
How to start reducing your salt intake: Check the sodium content in packaged foods and opt for low-sodium alternatives.
Preparing meals from scratch gives you control over how much salt goes into your food.
Experiment with herbs, garlic, ginger, basil, and paprika to add flavour without relying on salt.
Swap processed foods for wholesome foods like fresh fruits, nuts, or unsalted popcorn.
Taste before you add salt.
SA has made strides in addressing this issue; in 2013, it became the first African nation to pass legislation regulating sodium levels in processed foods. Setting limits for bread, margarine, and other staples.
While this legislation has helped reduce overall sodium consumption, the fight isn't over.
Many South Africans still exceed the recommended daily intake, highlighting the need for continued public awareness and individual responsibility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
NGO highlights mental health support for men with prostate cancer
A prostate cancer diagnosis can take its toll on men's mental health. That's according to mental health advocacy organisation, the South African Federation for Mental Health (SAFMH). July marks Men's Health Month, which raises awareness of preventable health problems in men and boys. SAFMH is marking the month under the theme 'Prostate cancer and men's mental health'. Prostate cancer is the most common cancer affecting men around the world. This was recently highlighted when former US President Joe Biden announced his diagnosis in May. About 1 in 15 South African men will be diagnosed with the condition at some point in their lifetime, according to the 2022 National Cancer Registry. However, if detected early, the cancer can be treated and overcome. According to SAFMH, research increasingly highlights the importance of mental healthcare for patients with the condition. In fact, men with the diagnosis have a higher risk of developing mental health conditions. Cancer patients commonly experience anxiety and depression. Men with prostate cancer may also experience treatment side effects that impact on sexual health. In turn, that can negatively affect mood and relationships. In an article, SAFMH shared the experience of David, a patient who faced the condition. He described the impact of the diagnosis on his mental health: 'What if the medication didn't work? What if I suffered the same fate as my friend's father? I went from feeling angry to feeling uncertain, which led to a feeling of desperation.' Encouragingly, however, research indicates that long-term mental health support for men with the diagnosis could assist with increasing their life expectancy. David encourages men with prostate cancer to seek professional mental health support, and to communicate openly with their loved ones. He said: 'Be willing to discuss and communicate your feelings, fears, and physical condition openly with your loved ones and your therapist. That is the only way for them to understand what you are going through, and that makes it easier for them to adjust and assist you with coping with the cancer. He added: 'Most importantly, do not lose hope. Take it one day at a time, be kind to yourself and to those around you. Stick to your treatment plan even if it is hard…In the end, it's worth it!' SAFMH highlights the following organisations for South Africans facing a prostate cancer diagnosis: CANSA: offers resources and support options Cancer Alliance: resources and support groups For general mental health support, you can contact the South African Depression and Anxiety Group (SADAG) hotline on 0800 567 567. Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 0211. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
NHI is fiscally impossible, says the Health Funders Association
The Health Funders Association (HFA) has described the National Health Insurance (NHI) Act as fiscally impossible and has tabled a hybrid funding model that will enable private healthcare providers to provide services in tandem with the NHI. The HFA, accounting for 46% of the private healthcare market and representing 21 medical schemes and three administrators, this week became the latest entity to legally challenge the NHI for undermining the right of medical aid members to choose how to access health services. HFA commissioned an independent study released this week which found the NHI required substantial tax far beyond South Africa's fiscal capacity. 'What's more, the proposed model offers no guarantee of improved outcomes, while restricting the mechanisms that currently drive quality and innovation in health care,' said the FHA. Commenting on the report, HFA CEO Thoneshan Naidoo said South Africa needs a healthcare system that delivers equitable, quality care for all. 'However, in its current form, and without private sector collaboration, the NHI Act is fiscally impossible and operationally unworkable, and threatens the stability of the economy and health system affecting everyone in South Africa,' he said. Naidoo said the NHI Act centralises control of all healthcare financing in a single, state-run fund, removing the ability of medical schemes to offer cover for healthcare services reimbursable by the NHI. 'We continue to advocate for a more inclusive, hybrid funding model that incorporates medical schemes in NHI. We believe such a model would expand access to care while protecting the rights of all South Africans,' said Naidoo. The NHI, which introduces universal health coverage, has been challenged in court by Solidarity, the Board of Healthcare Funders, the South African Private Practitioners Forum, the Hospital Association of South Africa and the South African Medical Association. Foster Mohale, the health spokesperson, on Friday confirmed the department had received court papers. 'This is case number six. We have an evolving court process and we'll allow that process to take its course,' said Mohale. FHA commissioned a report by Genesis Analytics, which showed that personal income tax will need to increase from the current average rate of 21% to an average of 46% of income, pushing marginal tax rates in the lowest income bracket from 18% to 41%, and in the highest bracket from 45% to 68%. The Genesis model also considered a scenario of pooling existing healthcare expenditure, citing that personal income tax would need to increase from its average of 21% to 31%. At the same time, medical scheme members would face a 43% reduction in the level of healthcare services relative to what they currently received. 'In simple terms, the equation for medical scheme members therefore becomes 'Pay 1.5 times more tax for 43% less healthcare'. Such tax increases are fiscally impossible, particularly given South Africa's narrow personal income tax base of 7.4-million tax payers,' said the FHA.
Mail & Guardian
2 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
Close the global healthcare gap: Solutions for a more equitable future
Newborn children in sub-Saharan Africa are 14 times more likely to die within the first month than those in high-income regions such as Australia and New Zealand. Despite decades of advancements, healthcare disparities remain a pressing global concern. Established markets benefit from sophisticated health systems, yet billions of people in low- and middle-income countries still lack access to basic medical services and medical advancements. This inequality can be found in various areas, including access to medication and general healthcare. Considered action must be taken by both public and private agencies to bridge this chasm and create sustainable, equitable healthcare systems that serve patients as effectively in emerging markets as they do in more established parts of the world. In emerging markets, however, infectious diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis (TB) and HIV/Aids continue to be of the utmost concern and child mortality rates vary significantly between emerging and established countries. According to the World Health Organisation, the global under-five mortality rate dropped by 59% from 1990 to 2023, but the disparities remain. Newborn children in sub-Saharan Africa are 14 times more likely to die within the first month than those in high-income regions such as Australia and New Zealand. Treatable diseases in emerging markets continue to claim higher mortality rates than should be expected, because of financial barriers, supply shortages and limited access to trained professionals, resulting from geographical and cost factors. About half the world's population lacks essential health services, leaving billions of people vulnerable to preventable conditions. The World Health Organisation has predicted that, by 2035, there will be a shortage of 12.9 million health workers and this paucity could be most pronounced in lower-income countries because more attractive pay levels will attract medical personnel to higher-income countries. These countries would also be better placed to produce such graduates. Aid organisations based in high-income countries are, however, making great strides in assisting emerging markets, by providing essential supplies, funding and expertise, to facilitate greater access to medication, and fortify the health infrastructure of these regions. The Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria has, for example, has saved over 65 million lives since its inception in 2002, by achieving a 61% reduction in combined death rates from these diseases. In 2023 alone, the fund supported 25 million people by providing antiretroviral therapy for HIV. They also enabled treatment for 7.1 million TB patients and distributed 227 million mosquito nets, in their quest to reduce malaria infections. Facilities in lower-income countries are fewer in number, poorly equipped and are not likely to exist in rural areas with lower population density. This leaves many patients having to travel long distances for treatment. In contrast, people in high-income countries are closer to hospitals, which are also better equipped. It's noteworthy that higher-income countries invest up to 60 times more per capita in healthcare than lower-income countries do. These financial constraints often force individuals in emerging markets to pay for their care out of their own pockets, which can lead to economic hardship and perpetuate cycles of poverty. Expanding universal health coverage is therefore vital. Countries such as Thailand have successfully implemented universal health coverage policies and these have dramatically reduced financial burdens while improving public health outcomes. Effective governance is critical to strengthening healthcare systems. Of the $7.5 trillion spent globally on health each year, it has been estimated that $500 billion is lost to corruption. In fact, the amount of healthcare funds stolen each year is more than enough to achieve health coverage for all. Tackling these issues through transparency and stronger policy frameworks, including stringent auditing, will significantly improve medical service delivery. Innovative technology-driven solutions also offer us a promising avenue to narrow disparities. Telemedicine has revolutionised healthcare in underserved regions, allowing remote consultation and diagnosis, particularly in areas where medical professionals are scarce. And mobile health (or 'mHealth'), which uses smartphones, has enabled community health workers to track immunisations, disseminate health information and report and track outbreaks. Portable, lower-cost diagnostics have proven to be a further gamechanger. Rapid diagnostic testing devices allow for the immediate diagnosis and treatment of malaria, HIV and TB, although desirable market penetration has yet to be achieved. And then there's artificial intelligence, which is making its presence felt in all fields of human endeavour. AI-powered health-management information systems have different functions — operational, informational and decision-making — which sometimes conflict, but this reflects real-world conditions, where different sectors have to compete for resources. It does, however, give a clear picture of the 'state of play' of a country's health system, which would allow its government to strengthen its healthcare strategy. There is the caveat, however, that internationally agreed recommendations be put in place to avoid possible innate AI bias. Of course, at the foundation of all such progress is the need for infrastructural development. Expanding health worker education is vital and we need to develop initiatives which focus on task shifting, where lower-cadre workers are trained to handle medical tasks, enhancing healthcare delivery efficiency. Community health workers are proving particularly effective in preventative care, offering localised and accessible health support. To make lasting improvements, public-private partnerships must also be used. Many countries have successfully engaged private firms to manage hospitals, expand telehealth networks and supply medication under government contracts. These partnerships inject essential energy, resources, innovation, efficiency and, importantly, accountability into public health systems. Closing the healthcare gap requires a comprehensive, multi-sector approach — one which, fortunately, is already underway. Government investment in universal health coverage, healthcare infrastructure, trained professionals and technological advancements is essential. With the right strategies and private-public commitment, a future where healthcare is accessible and equitable for all can become a reality. All interested parties must, however, exert and maintain the pressure and interest that's required to move all involved bureaucracies forward. Our plan for some imagined tomorrow needs to be replaced by viable action for a literal tomorrow. Asgar Rangoonwala is the senior vice-president of Johnson & Johnson EMEA emerging markets.
