After a Tornado of False Starts, Educators Remain in the Dark on School Funding
When a federal judge temporarily halted President Donald Trump's freeze on federal grant funding just before 5 p.m. Tuesday, it offered a degree of clarity after a day of widespread confusion in the world of education.
Less than a day later, Trump appeared to rescind the Office of Management and Budget memo that set the funding 'pause' in motion.
But just 30 minutes after that, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took to X to …rescind the rescission. 'This is NOT a rescission of the federal funding freeze,' she posted. 'It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo.'
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
She described her post as an attempt to 'end the confusion.'
It didn't.
'For an administration that wants to make the argument that public education is dysfunctional and not serving our students well, they are amplifying and contributing to that narrative,' said Amy Loyd, CEO of All4Ed, a policy and advocacy organization. Until last October, she served in the Department of Education as assistant secretary for the Office of Career, Technical and Adult Education.
For now, it's unclear which programs will be affected as the new administration takes stock of spending it deems wasteful or contrary to the president's agenda. Those goals include freeing up funds for school choice, ending 'wokeness' and passing a tax cut package. Start-up funds for charter schools, school lunches, funding for homeless students and hundreds of other federal grants 'will be reviewed by department leadership for alignment with Trump administration priorities,' said education department spokeswoman Madison Biederman.
OMB said it spared major 'formula' grants, like Title I for low-income students, special education funding and Impact Aid to districts serving military families. While the administration said Head Start wouldn't be impacted, the preschool program is still listed among thousands to be reviewed.
The administration originally gave agencies until Feb. 7 to identify grants that advance, among other things, 'Marxist equity, transgenderism and green new deal social engineering policies.' Over several chaotic hours, district leaders and advocates tried to interpret whether their programs would be cut while coming to terms with the enormity of the president's actions.
'This is more than a typical partisan divide,' said Fatima Goss Graves, president and CEO of the National Women's Law Center. 'This is an unusual and unprecedented power grab and every member of Congress should be concerned.'
Related
Challenging the administration's pause on funding Congress had already appropriated, three associations sued Tuesday, asking for a temporary restraining order 'to maintain the status quo.' Just before 5 p.m., as the freeze was about to start, U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan granted the request, noting the 'specter of irreparable harm.'
Afterschool programs, food banks and organizations that arrange for children to be driven to cancer treatment centers are among those that would be impacted, said Rick Cohen, a spokesman for the National Council of Nonprofits, one of the groups that filed the complaint. Another plaintiff, Main Street Alliance, a network of small businesses, said its members include child care centers that serve low-income families using federal assistance so they can work.
For many leaders, Tuesday was a rollercoaster.
Just after lunch, Marvin Connelly, superintendent of the Cumberland County Schools in North Carolina, was trying to figure out how he'd handle a potential freeze on over $2 million in Impact Aid — funds that help make up for lost property tax revenue when there's a nearby military installation. A high-poverty district, Cumberland schools serve over 8,000 children of active service members stationed at Fort Liberty.
'We could really be in a grave situation,' he said. Less than two hours later, he learned the funds would not be affected.
Meanwhile Barbara Duffield, executive director of SchoolHouse Connection, which supports homeless students, was participating on a panel at a conference in Washington when some nonprofit leaders told her they were unable to access federal funds for homeless youth and families.
The effort to pause funding followed the president's first-day executive order that prohibits federal spending on diversity, equity and inclusion. On Thursday, the administration removed or archived hundreds of guidance documents, reports and training materials related to DEI and put staff members focusing on equity within the department on leave.
'Who knew dismantling could happen this quickly?' Ian Rowe, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute and the founder of a network of charter schools, told The 74. 'If these moves put America on a path to becoming a colorblind society, that is a very good thing.'
Many conservatives argue such programs amount to a form of illegal discrimination and waste money. Neera Deshpande, a policy analyst at the Independent Women's Forum, pointed to reporting that shows the Fairfax County Public Schools in Virginia spent $6.4 million to staff its equity office.
'What is that money accomplishing besides adding layers of bureaucracy to the school system, burdening teachers, and taking away time and money from schools that could be used for instructional purposes or even extracurricular activities for students?' she asked. 'Every dollar that is allocated toward DEI is a dollar that's not allocated toward … teacher salaries or arts programs or literacy support or sports.'
The reversal in priorities at the federal level has left some nonprofit leaders in a bind. When former President Joe Biden was in office, the director of a teacher apprenticeship initiative applied for a Department of Labor grant to help recruit a diverse pool of potential teachers. Now, he doesn't know whether that emphasis will hurt his application.
'I hope they can strike a balance with sanity here,' said the man, who asked not to be named to keep from jeopardizing the grant. 'I'm not going to talk about the diversity part, but we still have a significant crisis in the teacher pipeline. We have to attract individuals into this profession.'
With more than 2,600 programs targeted for potential review, it's unclear which might ultimately be left on the chopping block.
But at least one Republican said the National School Lunch Program shouldn't be off limits. On CNN, Georgia GOP Rep. Rich McCormick suggested low-income students shouldn't depend on schools for meals. The program, which costs roughly $17 billion, provides free and reduced-price meals for over 28 million children during the school year and extends services through the summer with the help of parks, recreation centers and other community organizations.
'You're telling me that kids who stay at home instead of going to work at Burger King, McDonald's, during the summer, should stay at home and get their free lunch instead of going to work?' he asked. 'I think we need to have a top-down review.'
Other advocates noted that while federal funds make up only about 10% of a district's operating budget, some school systems rely on those dollars more than others. In 2023, AASA, the School Superintendents Association, created a map showing that overall, federal funds account for a larger share of district budgets in GOP-led states, mainly those in the South and West.
'Any conversation about federal funding levels — whether a cut in overall level or a proposal to freeze access — requires us to be very honest about the role of federal dollars in local school districts, and to be candid about the facts of who … is more reliant on federal dollars,' said Noelle Ellerson Ng, associate executive director for advocacy governance at AASA.
Responding to news reports that the president had rescinded the freeze memo, Leavitt, the press secretary, posted that the president's executive orders nonetheless 'remain in full force and effect.'
Ng doesn't know where that leaves the nation's schools, but she's run out of patience. Regarding Leavitt's post, she asked, 'Did it attempt to end confusion, or add a layer for today?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
4 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Elon Musk's public dispute sparks interest in Tesla from short sellers
Last week, a social media post from Elon Musk caused many people to stop what they were doing and look down at their phones. Even for the Tesla (TSLA) CEO, known for his controversial and bold opinions, what they saw seemed surprising. Musk had previously announced plans to cease his political spending. But only a few days later, he accused Trump of having direct ties to notorious criminal Jeffrey Epstein and alleged that without his help, the Republican president would not have won last year's election. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Since then, Tesla has been in the spotlight, as the dispute between two of the world's most powerful men continues. While TSLA stock initially plunged on news of the argument, it has since regained some of its momentum. Even as shares slowly trend upward, though, experts speculate that short sellers may regard the Musk-Trump fallout as an opportunity to bet against the stock. Over the past few months, Musk's behavior has sparked a global backlash against Tesla's brand, causing sales to fall across the U.S. and Europe. This clear indication of consumer sentiment toward him has caused some financial experts, including Tesla shareholder and fund manager Ross Gerber, to call for him to step down. Related: Elon Musk company reveals major leap forward When Musk announced that he would be stepping back from his role with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), TSLA stock surged, and some investors speculated that the company's troubles were over. But now his falling out with Trump has generated further uncertainty. When a prominent company starts showing signs of weakness or instability, short sellers are likely to start closing in. So far, Tesla's recent declines have been highly profitable for those willing to bet against it. The Wall Street Journal reports that as TSLA stock plunged last week, short sellers pocketed up to $4 billion, noting: Betting against an industry-leading company like Tesla will always carry some risk, regardless of how bleak its prospects may appear. But experts see a case for shorting TSLA stock, provided investors understand its volatile nature, which includes surging unexpectedly. "I think Musk dragged Tesla into a political spectacle," Galileo FX CEO David Materazzi tells TheStreet. "That creates perceived instability. Short sellers don't need real damage, just the illusion of it. Volatility invites them in. When the CEO becomes the story, the stock turns into a target." Financial education platform First Information's CEO Vince Stanzione holds a short position in TSLA. He says his reasons are "business not personal," however, citing the company's high valuation and questionable market share over the feud between Musk and Trump. More Tesla News: The 'anti-Tesla' gives American buyers more good newsAnalyst sets eye-popping Tesla stock price targetElon Musk's feud with Trump is hurting an unexpected investment "The P/E ratio is over 100 and growth the last few years has been near zero," he says of Tesla. "The bulls will say you're paying for the future and Elon Musk's brilliance, and I am not disputing that Tesla could have some future hits in the pipeline, but Elon Must is very good at promising "jam tomorrow" which never seems to materialize, or if and when it does, it's not the flavour he promised." Stanzione also raises a concern regarding Tesla's foray into robotics, something on which Musk has hinged a lot of the company's prospects. This part of Tesla's business just became more complicated due to the abrupt departure of one of its leaders. Related: Heavily shorted AI stock is rapidly climbing the Fortune 500 "Unless robotaxis start showing up en masse by the end of this year, then investors will keep selling," states Stanzione. "I am very bullish on robotics. It's something I have been investing in for over a decade, especially in medical and military uses, however, Tesla is not the only game in town." He names rivals such as Hyundai Motor Group and Boston Dynamics, both of which are making notable advances in the robotics field that could threaten Tesla's progress. Chief Analyst Dan Buckley also highlights the potential valuation problem, stating "Tesla short sellers may see their edge in the long-term mismatch between its ~$1 trillion valuation and the current reality of its business – i.e., nearly all auto-based revenue – and the uncertain viability of its highly speculative emerging tech bets." That said, Buckley advises investors considering a Tesla short to "treat political feuds as a volatility amplifier rather than a directional signal" and highlights the importance of caution when betting against such an unpredictable stock. Related: Billionaire fund manager, skeptical of AI, backs shocking stock The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Miami Herald
4 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Fed official revamps interest-rate cut forecast for rest of this year
America, we need to chill out. Raphael W. Bostic, president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, wants us all to be patient when it comes to possible interest rate cuts in 2025. There's just a tad too many unknowns in the U.S. economy right now, including inflation numbers plus trade wars and tariffs, he said in a June 3 essay. The Federal Reserve's dual mandate targets low inflation and unemployment. These goals are often at odds because higher interest rates lower inflation but increase job losses, while lower interest rates lower unemployment but increase inflation. Post-pandemic, many express the same concern: interest rates on small business loans, consumer credit cards, and home mortgages are too high. Bloomberg/Getty Images Unfortunately, market participants remain downbeat about interest rate cut chances despite President Trump's multiple escalating demands directed at Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. The May jobs data from the Labor Department were slightly higher than expected but down from April. Unemployment is 4.2%, historically low, but up from 3.4% in 2023. Related: Billionaire fund manager sends strong message on Fed Chair Powell's future Absent a big uptick in unemployment, Fed watchers' attention is firmly on inflation. The Fed's unofficial goal is core inflation (inflation minus volatile energy and food prices) of 2%. PCE inflation is the Fed's favored measure. In April, core PCE was 2.5%. Inflation remains somewhat above the Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC) target, and the labor market shows signs of slowing but is still broadly stable, Bostic said in his essay. "As of April, we had not yet seen clear signs of tariffs boosting inflation, though research by economists, including ours here at the Atlanta Fed, suggests we might see upward pressure on prices over the coming weeks," he wrote. Related: Looming inflation data may rock interest rate cut forecasts In a conference call with reporters, Bostic said it's "a tough call" whether the Fed would be cutting rates right now if all the trade uncertainty were out of the picture. He added that he's "very cautious about jumping to cuts at this point." In May, Bostic told reporters he was modeling for just one single interest rate cut this year. Bostic pointed to unsettled trade policy and Trump's tariffs as adding to economic gloom in April and May. And the congressional action on the Trump's "One Big, Beautiful Bill" has an unknown impact on future regulatory and fiscal policy. "There is a great deal of uncertainty out there, making it quite difficult to forecast the economy with confidence. Given that, I continue to believe the best approach for monetary policy is patience,'' Bostic wrote. "As the economy remains broadly healthy, we have space to wait and see how the heightened uncertainty affects employment and prices. So, I am in no hurry to adjust our policy stance,'' he concluded. The May CPI numbers will be released at 8:30 a.m. on June 11. TheStreet Pro's Chris Versace says the rate may be higher than expected despite lower gas prices. "We also have to wonder if Bostic's comment helps lay the groundwork for the Fed's upcoming set of economic projections that it will publish alongside its next policy decision on June 18,'' Versace said. Related: Veteran fund manager revamps stock market forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Associated Press
4 minutes ago
- Associated Press
US Rep. McIver indicted on federal 'charges from skirmish at New Jersey immigration center
NEWARK, N.J. (AP) — U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver was indicted Tuesday on federal charges alleging she impeded and interfered with immigration officers outside a New Jersey detention center while Newark's mayor was being arrested after he tried to join a congressional oversight visit at the facility. Acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba announced the grand jury indictment in a post on X. 'While people are free to express their views for or against particular policies, they must not do so in a manner that endangers law enforcement and the communities those officers serve,' Habba said. McIver, a Democrat, had been charged in a complaint by Habba last month with two assault charges stemming from the May 9 visit to Newark's Delaney Hall — a 1,000-bed, privately owned facility that Immigration and Customs Enforcement uses as a detention center. McIver disputed the allegations as baseless and defended her presence at the facility as part of her authorized role as a member of Congress.