
Trump moves to start deep-sea mining in international waters
ADVERTISEMENT
Although expected, Trump's executive order on 'unleashing' America's offshore critical minerals and resources means the US is poised to extend the global scramble for critical minerals like lithium and rare earth metals to the high seas, while the majority of countries are still negotiating rules on how to ensure mining is done safely and without potentially massive environmental destruction.
'The United States faces unprecedented economic and national security challenges in securing reliable supplies of critical minerals independent of foreign adversary control,' runs the preamble to the president's 139th executive order since taking office in January. China is specifically named later in the document.
The
order
, published on Thursday, requires government officials to assess 'private sector interest and opportunities for seabed mineral resource exploration, mining, and environmental monitoring in the United States Outer Continental Shelf; in areas beyond national jurisdiction; and in areas within the national jurisdictions of certain other nations that express interest in partnering with United States companies on seabed mineral development'.
The scale of Trump's ambition goes well beyond that of Norway, which last year announced its own plans – now shelved after a backlash by environmentalists – to open up swathes of its Arctic territorial waters to exploration by mining firms.
Related
Oslo defends seabed mining plans amid concerns over environmental impact
On the day the US president signed the executive order, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre – who has said a last-minute parliamentary block on his government's seabed mining ambitions was merely a postponement – was in Washington for two-way talks with on Ukraine and trade.
Fast-track for exploration
Trump has instructed US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick to 'expedite the process for reviewing and issuing seabed mineral exploration licences and commercial recovery permits in areas beyond national jurisdiction under the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act'.
This, as Euronews reported earlier this week, would mean the US using a little-known domestic legislation dating from the 1980s to sidestep ongoing talks within the UN's International Seabed Authority (ISA), which has agreed a moratorium pending the completion of ongoing negotiations on the Mining Code setting out safety and environmental protection standards.
Related
Critical raw materials set to be a key lever in global trade war
'This is a clear case of putting mining companies' greed over common sense,' said Katie Matthews, chief scientist and senior vice-president at the global campaign group Oceana. 'Any attempt to accelerate deep-sea mining without proper safeguards will only speed up the destruction of our oceans.'
This was echoed by the Washington-based group Ocean Conservancy, whose vice-president Jeff Watters noted that areas of the US seafloor subject to test mining 50 years ago have yet to fully recover. Moreover, the move by the Trump administration could trigger a destructive rush to secure minerals that have been dubbed the new oil. 'By unilaterally pursuing mining in international waters in defiance of the rest of the world, the Administration is opening a door for other countries to do the same,' he said.
The executive order follows a warning from ISA secretary-general Leticia Carvalho last month that 'any unilateral action would constitute a violation of international law'. However the US is not among the 169 countries plus the EU who have ratified the overarching United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
The move by Washington came the same day that the European Commission tabled a proposal to incorporate into EU law the more recent Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction' Agreement (BBNJ), also know as the High Seas Treaty, which seeks to establish huge marine protected areas (MPAs) in the high seas in line with the 2022 Kunming-Montreal Agreement biodiversity.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
The 100 ways Elon Musk allegedly benefited from Trump's White House
A new report published by a prominent American senator's office this week sheds light on how the first 130 days of US President Donald Trump's second term may have benefited Elon Musk, the world's richest man. Democratic senator Elizabeth Warren's office compiled a 14-page document using a combination of media reports, White House statements, and think tank research to identify over 100 occasions where Musk's companies and his own personal wealth benefited during his time with the unofficial Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). A statement on Warren's website describes the report as a list of actions where Musk or White House officials "broke ethics norms and precedent or may have violated laws regarding federal employees' participation in matters in which they have a financial interest," while benefiting Musk's business concerns. The report alleges that these actions have increased Musk's personal wealth by "at least" $100 billion (€85.4 billion) and wiped out a potential additional $2.37 billion (€2.07 billion) in business liabilities from Musk's record. Warren's report comes in the wake of a very public fallout this week between Trump and Musk, who left his role at DOGE earlier this month. Warren's report claims that Musk had conflicts with "at least 70 per cent" of the government departments that his new role came after. The report claims that President Trump fired the USAID Inspector General, who was set to inspect Musk's satellite company Starlink for its role in providing services to Russia in its ongoing war against Ukraine. In one of the most controversial moves of his early presidency, the report claims that Trump then tried to shut down USAID in light of this pending investigation. Trump then announced a pause of US foreign development assistance programmes through USAID, creating a $60 billion (€55.3 billion) funding gap. Among the USAID cancellation repercussions is some non-profit funding to Ukraine that the EU told Euronews in February that it will not be able to meet the gap. Warren's report also claims that Starlink either struck deals or is negotiating deals with at least a dozen countries, largely in Asia and Africa, 'amid threats of tariffs'. Regulators "have taken no public action on their investigations" in more than 40 federal agency matters regarding Musk's companies "for several months or more," the report continued. Many of the stalled investigations highlighted in the report were focused on Tesla, Musk's electric vehicle company. Citing NPR reports, Warren said that Trump fired the Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in the first round of DOGE cuts after it received over 300 consumer complaints about Tesla. Pending investigations and audits from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and Labor Department's Office of Federal Contract Compliance into Tesla were shut down by the Trump administration, the report continued. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in charge of investigating market manipulation, limited staff authority to launch investigations as the body was investigating Tesla's potentially false claims about self-driving vehicles. In a similar vein, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) laid off workers in DOGE cuts while it investigated Tesla crashes caused by the car's 'full self-driving' and remote control features. Trump's administration also administered cuts and slowed down the work of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) and Fish and Wildlife Services (FWS) after these agencies launched investigations into SpaceX, Tesla and xAI Musk's artificial intelligence (AI) company behind chatbot Grok, for environmental violations. During his time at DOGE, Musk was able to put in motion or sign several government contracts worth billions of dollars for SpaceX, his space technology company based in Texas. Trump's announcement of the Golden Dome project to guarantee security for the US, along with an initial $25 billion (€22 billion) investment, had already pegged SpaceX as a frontrunner for the project. The White House is now also reportedly calling for 13 per cent more spending for the Department of Defense, with SpaceX "considered likely to be the top recipient" of this funding, while the report alleges the company has already made over $7 billion (€6.15 billion) in contracts. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is expected to subsidise SpaceX's broadband services in a reversal of a previous decision to give the company $900 million (€790 million). Musk also helped handpick many of the administration's key personnel, including the initial selection of SpaceX investor Jared Isaacman as NASA's top administrator and putting Michael Guetlein, a former SpaceX fellow, at the head of the Golden Dome missile program. These picks also influenced a potential contract with the Pentagon where SpaceX would be paid to "transport military cargo around the globe". The report also alleges that DOGE infiltrated the Treasury Department's Federal Payment System, which could give Musk the financial information of competitor companies that have been awarded contracts.

LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
A vital summit on protecting the ocean
In just a few months, environmental protection has become the target of so many attacks that the simple fact that the third United Nations Ocean Conference (UNOC) is bringing together nearly 60 heads of state and government in Nice (southern France) from June 9 to 13 deserves recognition. Following the November 2024 agreement in Baku during the 29 th Conference of the Parties (COP) on climate, and then the deal made at the COP on biodiversity in Rome at the end of February, the resilience of multilateralism – itself facing a crisis – has once again been demonstrated. However, expectations should be tempered by the modest objectives of the conference, given the many threats to the planet's blue lung, which absorbs 25% to 30% of the CO 2 released by human activities. The problems are well known: acidification caused by global warming, various forms of pollution and overfishing, to name just a few. Unlike a COP on climate change, the UNOC will not end with an agreement to measure the level of countries' commitment to ocean preservation. Above all, this conference aims to keep up the momentum for a cause that concerns all of humanity. France will use this opportunity to push for the long-delayed ratification of the high seas treaty, adopted in 2023, which is intended to protect biodiversity in international waters. The participants' determination regarding marine protected areas within exclusive economic zones – over which coastal states exercise sovereign rights – will also be closely watched. Short-term thinking One absence will weigh heavily on the conference: that of the United States, which, since Donald Trump's return to the White House, has embodied an exaggerated form of anti-environmental reaction. This stance is fueled by a narrow-minded nationalist resentment and a deliberate obscurantism aimed at silencing science and its unavoidable findings. The latest attack on the ocean came from the Oval Office on April 24, when a presidential order was signed paving the way for deep-sea mining beyond national jurisdictions. This move represents a renewed offensive against the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the International Seabed Authority. This body, which the US does not recognize, is struggling to develop a mining code for oceans under pressure from extractive interests. Short-term thinking is the main driver of the threats facing the ocean. The scourge of plastic pollution, which will be addressed at the Nice conference, is becoming ever more prominent. The same applies to bottom trawling, which highlights the dilemma between the need to protect biodiversity and the economic and social costs involved. This dilemma is one of the reasons environmental defenders have suffered a string of setbacks in France, within the European Union and around the world. Relentlessly working to overcome it has never been more imperative.


Local France
3 hours ago
- Local France
France's Macron to visit Greenland
Macron's office said he had been invited to visit on June 15 by the territory's prime minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen and Danish leader Mette Frederiksen. The three will hold talks focused on North Atlantic and Arctic security, climate change, the energy transition and the supply of critical minerals, the French presidency said. The visit will contribute to fostering "European sovereignty" and was aiming at "strengthening cooperation" with Greenland, it added. READ ALSO: Norway 'in solidarity' with Greenland and Denmark after US threats Frederiksen called the visit "a concrete testimony of European unity" in a statement. "It has been uplifting to see the strong international support for Greenland and the Kingdom in the difficult foreign policy situation in recent months," she said. Danish and Greenlandic leaders have insisted that the autonomous territory, where a majority are in favour of independence in the long term, must decide its own future, and have repeatedly said Washington "will never get Greenland". Macron will travel on to Canada after the Greenland visit to participate in a G7 summit.