Putin-Trump Ukraine summit: What's in the cards? – DW – 08/12/2025
Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump have agreed to meet in Alaska on August 15 to discuss the war in Ukraine. The meeting was announced shortly before Trump's ceasefire ultimatum was set to expire. Although experts doubt the summit will deliver any major breakthroughs, some factors could force Putin to agree to a ceasefire.
The upcoming meeting is the first time both leaders are coming together since US President Trump's reelection. In mid-July, Trump said he was disappointed with Putin over Russia's bombing of the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, but also said that he was "not done with him yet."
The White House and Kremlin announced the meeting after US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff visited Putin in the Kremlin on August 6, though it is unclear what exactly will be discussed in Alaska. We do know that the talks will focus on Ukraine, but the country itself will not be represented at the meeting. Washington and Moscow are not planning for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to attend the summit.
All experts DW interviewed about the upcoming summit expect it will primarily benefit the Russian president.
"Putin has always been keen to ensure that he and the US president — whoever holds that office — decide the fate of the world, and that corresponding images are broadcast around the world," Russia's former prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov told DW.
Russian exiled opposition politician Dmitry Gudkov told DW the Alaska meeting would provide a unique opportunity for Putin to shake hands with one of the leaders of the West.
"The mere fact that Putin has the chance to meet Trump is already a huge plus" for the Russian president, Gudkov said. "Trump is basically legitimizing a war criminal and allowing Putin to participate in negotiations with the West."
If it weren't for Trump, Gudkov said, no Western leader would be negotiating with Putin.
It became clear in late July that Trump was annoyed by Putin's unwillingness to end the fighting in Ukraine. Trump declared that he was no longer interested in talks with Putin and gave him an ultimatum of 50 days to find a peaceful solution to the Ukraine war, which he later shortened to just ten days. Experts told DW they believe that the realization that Trump is losing patience may have prompted the Kremlin to agree to the upcoming talks.
Kirill Rogov, a political analyst who heads the Russian-language online media outlet which publishes analyses by Russian scientists, says a number of factors may compel Putin to seek an end to the Ukraine war. Rogov points to the weakened Russian economy, the sluggish advance of Russian forces in Ukraine and secondary US sanctions that could harm Russia.
"Putin also hopes to extract the highest possible price for his approval at this moment. By the end of the year, Putin could be in an even worse position if it turns out that the Russian offensive has had little effect and the battlefield situation remains unchanged," Rogov said.
Further US sanctions could also cause Russia to lose India as a buyer of its crude oil, and force it to prepare for yet another offensive in Ukraine for the third year in a row.
Last week US news outlet published a report citing anonymous sources indicating that the Kremlin had realized that Steve Witkoff's Russia visit represented the last opportunity to reach an agreement with Trump. said the Kremlin may now offer an airspace ceasefire by way of a concession.
Gudkov, however, believes this approach, coordinated with the Trump administration, would primarily benefit Moscow rather than Kyiv. Gudkov said Ukraine has carried out "effective" counterattacks against Russia, which resulted in the temporary closure of Russian airports on numerous occasions. He said Ukraine had also struck weapons depots, military equipment and oil refineries in Russia.
This, he added, was important from a psychological point of view, making Russians understand the war is raging close to home, not far away, solely playing out on their televisions.
"If these [Ukrainian] air strikes stop, Putin will calmly continue his advance on land, where he has the advantage," Gudkov told DW.
Yet Russian President Putin may not face any serious consequences, even if both leaders fail to make any significant progress during the upcoming Alaska talks, says political analyst Rogov.
"Putin can count on Trump to be lenient with him because Trump's attitude toward Putin has always been special," Rogov told DW. "Trump always avoids situations where direct pressure is exerted on Putin. And every time pressure seems inevitable, Trump declares that a new opportunity to reach an agreement has risen and therefore no real pressure is needed." He cites talks between Putin and Trump against the backdrop of the expired ceasefire ultimatum as one such example.
Gudkov believes that there are no real means left to put pressure on Russia. For example, despite sanctions, hundreds of tankers continue to transport Russian oil across the world's oceans.
Gudkov thinks a quick ceasefire is more likely to result from domestic factors that could put pressure on the Kremlin rather than external factors. The longer the war lasts, Gudkov says, the harder it will be for Putin to sell it as a Russian victory.
"At some point, Russians won't care whether Ukraine is in NATO or how this war ends — they will only care about it ending," Gudkov said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
EU plan to penalize Israel still stalled amid famine warning – DW – 08/13/2025
A proposal to restrict Israeli access to some EU funds over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is going nowhere for now. Germany is among those blocking the move. Two weeks after the European Commission laid out a plan to impose first-of-their-kind penalties on Israel, the proposal remains stalled due to disagreements among the bloc's members. Germany is among the hold-outs asking for more time to review, European Union (EU) diplomats told DW. Without Berlin's backing, the plan is unlikely to advance. "Humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached unimaginable levels, with famine unfolding before our eyes," the EU's executive warned on Tuesday. In a bid to pressure Israel to change course, it proposed barring Israeli startups from accessing part of a pot of EU research funding known as "Horizon Europe" in late July. That marked a shift in the EU's approach: the first time the bloc moved to back a year and a half of critical words with action. "With its intervention in the Gaza Strip and the ensuing humanitarian catastrophe, including thousands of civilian deaths and rapidly rising numbers of spreading extreme malnutrition specifically of children, Israel is violating human rights and humanitarian law and thus is in breach of an essential principle of the EU-Israel cooperation," the European Commission wrote in its proposal on July 28. Belgium's foreign minister Maxime Prevot had floated August 13 as a possible date for adoption if consensus was reached, but EU sources told DW there was little shift in positions at a virtual meeting of EU ministers on Monday. That means for now, there's no green light. To kick in, the EU plan needs support from a so-called qualified majority of the bloc's 27 member states, a system under which more populous countries' views carry most weight. Israel's foreign ministry called Brussels' proposal to restrict funds "regrettable," and claimed any such punitive measures would only serve to "strengthen Hamas" — something the bloc refutes. The stall in EU action has drawn outrage from campaigners and human rights watchdogs, which have long accused the bloc of failing to use potential leverage. "The fact that the EU cannot even agree on the smallest step is a disgrace. The bar is on the floor, and yet the EU and some EU countries are still managing to trip over it," Oxfam's Bushra Khalidi told DW. The internal divisions keeping action on pause are nothing new. Ever since the Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023, the bloc has been united in its condemnation of the militant group — classed as a terrorist organization by the EU — and in its call for the release of Israeli hostages. But that's where the unity ends. Every word in every statement on Europe's ties with Israel has been fiercely debated ever since. The schism among EU members now centers on whether and how to respond to an EU review which found Israeli actions in Gaza — from restricting aid entry to targeting journalists — likely amount to a breach of the deal that governs EU-Israel trade and ties. In a leaked letter seen by DW, Israel blasted the EU investigation as a "moral and methodological failure" based on biased evidence, but the bloc sticks by its findings. Now Spain, often seen as a fierce critic of the Israeli government, is calling for the entire EU-Israel pact to be suspended. Other EU members including the Netherlands and Sweden — traditionally seen as less critical of Israel — want to freeze the trade element of the deal. The move would make it more difficult and expensive for Israeli firms to export to the EU, Israel's top trading partner. Germany on the other hand views itself as having a historic responsibility toward Israeli security, due to its Nazi past and its systemic murder of six million Jews during the Holocaust. Though Berlin is holding out on the first EU-level measures, Chancellor Merz announced last week that Germany would halt exports of arms "that can be used in the Gaza Strip"by Israeli forces, signalling a shift in tone. The EU says its priority is get aid flowing into Gaza in the face of a deepening humanitarian crisis — and after threatening sanctions, the bloc announced what appeared to be a breakthrough last month. "Significant steps have been agreed by Israel to improve the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip," EU top diplomat Kaja Kallas said a July 10 statement on the so-called "common understanding" — which Germany also helped broker. But weeks on, many EU capitals say this falls far short. With proposals for action caught in institutional deadlock, EU officials continue their words of condemnation. "I call for the immediate release of all Israeli hostages by Hamas & Islamic Jihad," EU crisis management chief Hadja Lahbib said on August 3, adding that she also calls "on Israel to end its starvation of Gaza and to allow for an effective delivery of humanitarian aid at scale."
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Names Stallone, Strait Among Kennedy Center Honorees
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday named "Rocky" star Sylvester Stallone and country music great George Strait among the recipients of the Kennedy Center Honors, as he pursues a controversial overhaul of the storied arts venue. Since returning to office in January, the Republican leader has declared war on what he calls "woke" viewpoints espoused in the nation's cultural institutions, including a fresh probe of content at several Smithsonian museums. The Kennedy Center, a living monument to the late John F. Kennedy that opened in 1971, has long enjoyed bipartisan support but has been in the president's crosshairs, and he appointed himself board chairman in February. "We have completely reversed the decline of this cherished national institution," Trump told reporters at the stately white marble complex overlooking the Potomac River. "We ended the woke political programming." Also receiving the Kennedy Center Honors, one of the nation's highest arts awards for lifetime achievement, will be disco diva Gloria Gaynor, rock band KISS and British actor Michael Crawford, known for Broadway's "Phantom of the Opera." Trump announced he himself would host the awards gala, which usually takes place in early December and is later broadcast on CBS. "I did not insist, but I think it will be quite successful," he said. He also joked that he wanted an honor himself but was "never able to get one." Stallone, who at 79 is the same age as Trump, is a three-time Oscar nominee: for best actor and screenplay for the 1976 classic boxing flick "Rocky," and for best supporting actor, again in the Rocky Balboa role, in the 2015 follow-up "Creed." Trump called Stallone a "great actor." He is also a major Trump supporter and one of the president's "Hollywood ambassadors" along with Jon Voight and Mel Gibson. In November 2024, at a post-election event at Trump's Mar-a-Lago compound in Florida, Stallone called him "the second George Washington." Strait, 73, is one of the best-selling musicians of all time, with more than 120 million records sold. He is known for huge hits like "All My Exes Live in Texas" and "Amarillo by Morning." "He's a good looking guy. Hope he still looks like that," Trump quipped. Gaynor, 81, is the singer behind the monster disco anthem "I Will Survive." KISS, formed in the 1970s in Trump's hometown New York City, gained fame with its shock rock performances and outlandish black and white face paint. "They work hard, and they're still working hard," the US president said. Crawford, 83, made his mark on British television in the 1970s before achieving international success by originating the title role in Andrew Lloyd Webber's musical "Phantom of the Opera," thrilling audiences with his powerful tenor voice. "I think he's one of the greatest talents I've ever actually seen," Trump said Wednesday. In his first term, from 2017 to 2021, the Republican president skipped the Kennedy Center Honors gala because some of the artists receiving awards criticized him or said they would not attend in his presence. The Kennedy Center is home to the National Symphony Orchestra and also offers theater, opera, comedy and other productions. Many artists associated with the center, including opera singer Renee Fleming and musician Ben Folds, have cut ties with the institution since Trump took the reins. Others including comedian Issa Rae canceled performances. The producers of smash hit historical musical "Hamilton" opted to cancel a scheduled 2026 run, citing the end of "neutrality" at the center. "We're restoring the Kennedy Center as the premier venue for performing arts anywhere in the country, anywhere in the world," Trump said. "It was being run down, money wasn't being spent properly. They were building things they shouldn't have built that nobody wanted instead of taking care of the great gem that it is." The Smithsonian Institution, which runs a vast network of museums, said it was reviewing a White House letter announcing a probe of content aimed at removing "divisive or partisan narratives." Among the museums targeted are the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the National Museum of the American Indian, the letter said. Country music legend George Strait, seen in 2017, will receive the Kennedy Center Honors AFP Donald Trump (L) greets Sylvester Stallone at an event at Mar-a-Lago in November 2024; the actor has been a stawlwart supporter AFP Singer Gloria Gaynor is the disco diva behind 'I Will Survive' AFP KISS founding members Gene Simmons (L) and Paul Stanley perform in 2012; they will be honored at the Kennedy Center AFP British actor Michael Crawford will receive a Kennedy Center Honor AFP
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
What Ukrainians expect of the Putin-Trump summit – DW – 08/13/2025
Are Ukrainian experts and politicians optimistic about the upcoming talks between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska? Or do they doubt there will be a real breakthrough? Soon after the August 15 meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska was announced, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy put out a video warning against excluding his country from the talks: "Any decisions made against us, any decisions made without Ukraine, are decisions made against peace. They will not work." Many Ukrainians share this view, according to a survey conducted by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) in late July and early August. "Ukrainians remain open to negotiations and making difficult decisions," Anton Hruschezkyj of KIIS told DW. "The absolute majority, however, continues to reject demands for [Ukrainian] surrender." According to the survey, 76% of Ukrainians reject Russia's "peace plan" and the idea of making concessions to Russia. At the same time, 49% oppose the US peace plan that entails security guarantees for Ukraine from European countries but not from the US, recognizes Crimea as part of the Russian Federation, maintains Russian control over Ukraine's occupied territories, and lifts sanctions against Russia. Ukrainians do not rule out that the upcoming negotiations between Putin and Trump, which will not have Ukrainian or European representatives present, will be aimed at forcing Ukraine to capitulate. "The Russians never changed their negotiating stance and will not do so as long as they do not suffer serious military and political defeats," Volodymyr Horbach of the Ukrainian Institute for Northern Eurasia Transformation (INET) told DW. The fact that Trump is talking to Putin without first pressuring Russia to change its stance shows that this approach is doomed to failure, Horbach says. "The Russians will stick to their position and want to offer a ceasefire in return for Ukraine's de facto surrender, in other words, fulfilling Russian demands. So calling this concessions is very naive," Horbach said. The analyst does not regard the upcoming Putin-Trump talks as a disaster, but says they signal an "alarming trend" as Trump is "legitimizing Russian war criminal Vladimir Putin, which is unacceptable to Ukraine and Europe." Horbach said he sees "no possibility of implementing any real, practical outcomes of these negotiations in the context of the Ukrainian-Russian war. The proposals that Putin may make will satisfy neither Ukraine nor the European Union." He added that "Trump will have to maneuver, he will not be able to force Ukraine and its European partners to accept Putin's terms." Ukraine was in a similar situation in March 2025, says Dmytro Levus, who heads the Ukrainian Meridian Social Research Center. At the time, Donald Trump believed that the war could be quickly ended by negotiating with Russia and enforcing a peace agreement based on Ukraine's surrender. Lifting sanctions on Russia, however, proved impossible, as most of them had been imposed by the Europeans, Levus said. He believes that after this Alaska meeting, the US and Russia will once again have to face reality — Ukrainian forces continue defending their country and Ukrainian's European partners will not unconditionally accept and implement any deal agreed between Putin and Trump. "Ukraine's position, as stated by Zelenskyy, is clear and correct: the [Ukrainian] constitution does not allow for the ceding of [Ukrainian] territory," Levus told DW. "That is why I do not expect anything meaningful to come out of the Alaska meeting." Iryna Herashchenko, one of the leaders of Ukraine's opposition European Solidarity Party, says the Putin-Trump meeting represents a challenge for the entire international security system. She explains that it would signal to the whole world that violence can go unpunished if Russia, the aggressor, is rewarded for its attack on Ukraine, for annexing parts of the country and for committing war crimes. That is why Herashchenko says recognizing Russian occupation is a red line that must not be crossed. "This would pave the way for new wars, not only in our region," Herashchenko said on Telegram. "That is why all negotiations should be conducted with the participation of Ukraine and the EU, with strict security guarantees, international monitoring, and provisions for sanctions." Anything else would not bring peace, but only lead to new war. Danylo Hetmantsev of Ukraine's rulingServant of the People party takes a more positive view of the upcoming talks, saying the summit will finally reveal Russia's stance. "If there are once again attempts at 'diplomatic maneuvering' instead of productive negotiations at the meeting, this will likely lead to the imposition of tough American sanctions, including on Russia's allies, who will have to pay for supporting the aggressor, which they will not like," Hetmantsev said on Telegram. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video At the same time, Ukrainian experts do not rule out that the US will once again try blackmailing Ukraine into accepting unacceptable conditions after the Putin-Trump summit. Kyiv-Mohyla Academy lecturer and Ukrainian Prism think tank researcher Oleksandr Kraiev believes that Trump could threaten to halt arms deliveries to Ukraine. "But [weapons] deliveries are already sporadic and unsystematic, so it won't be as much of a shock as when Trump first announced something like this," Kraiev told DW. He believes the summit will be purely held for the "sake of talks," as neither side has any real idea of how the war should end. "There could be a joint statement on continuing the talks, but that's all," Kraiev said.
