logo
Alaska to take center stage at Trump-Putin summit

Alaska to take center stage at Trump-Putin summit

The Hill5 days ago
Alaska will take a rare step into the spotlight as it plays host to the high-stakes summit between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, creating a key backdrop for a meeting the administration hopes will open a path towards ending the Ukraine war.
The 49th state has usually taken a place on the periphery of U.S. national politics, especially in recent years. But the setting here is notable as Trump and Putin descend on the former Russian colony for a meeting the former has long sought as part of his promises to end the fighting in Eastern Europe.
Alaskans believe it is fitting that talks between the two nations will come to their shores.
'You can see the impact of Russian colonialism on Alaska to this day,' said Brandan Boylan, a political science professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
'If President Trump was going to host President Putin in the U.S. and it wasn't going to be at the White House, I'm actually not surprised it's here in Alaska given the very rich history that Alaska has between the two states,' Boylan said.
Despite its far-flung location, Alaska has played host to a number of key meetings throughout the years, headlined most recently by talks in 2021 between the Biden administration and Chinese officials that were punctuated by heated back-and-forths and angry words.
In 1984, former President Reagan met with Pope John Paul II in Fairbanks amid the push to defeat the Soviet Union. Former President Nixon also met with Emperor Hirohito of Japan in 1971 in Anchorage.
But the upcoming sit-down with Putin may take the cake as most high-profile given the lengthy history between Alaska and Russia. The first Russian settlers arrived in Alaska during the 18th Century, with the Russian Empire laying claim to it starting in 1732. Alaska eventually became part of what was known as Russian America in 1799.
Eventually, Alexander II sold Alaska to the U.S. for $7.2 million over fears that it would be conquered and taken over by the British. The sale was routinely mocked in Russian culture well into the 20th Century as Alaskan riches and natural resources only became clear in the years after.
Its roughly 50-mile proximity to Russia coupled with important roles on numerous fronts, including energy, puts Alaska in a prime spot to host the summit.
'No other place plays a more vital role in our national defense, energy security, and Arctic leadership,' Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy (R) wrote on X.
'It's fitting that discussions of global importance take place here. For centuries, Alaska has been a bridge between nations, and today, we remain a gateway for diplomacy, commerce, and security in one of the most critical regions on earth.'
The venue choice also makes sense on a number of other fronts. The International Criminal Court has a warrant out for Putin's arrest stemming from the Ukraine war, but the U.S. does not recognize the court.
The locale is also more straight forward for Putin as it means he does not have to fly through potentially perilous parts of European airspace.
'Alaska is a beautiful state that is geographically convenient for both parties. It was an appropriate venue for President Trump to accept President Putin's request to meet,' a White House official told The Hill.
How much of the two presidents Alaskans will be able to see beyond their aircrafts arriving and departing is unclear. The meeting is expected to take place at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, which would be out of view from onlookers and likely protesters.
However, the meeting also could have an outsize impact on Alaskans more broadly as sanctions placed on Russia have hit the state more acutely than numerous other states.
'The sanctions have not hurt Alaska directly, but the absence of communication and cooperation has,' said former Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell (R) in an interview.
Treadwell specifically pointed to the changes in Russian fishing practices in the Bering Sea due in part to the sanctions, which have led to fewer and fewer fish turning up in the Yukon River in recent years, as one example. He also noted that it's become more difficult for those in Alaska to enter Russia to visit family members in recent years.
Those practices won't change until relations are normalized, and that is impossible without an end to the war, Treadwell said.
'It's the tail wagging the dog in geopolitics for us to complain about it,' Treadwell said. 'But Alaskans here are happy here that the president is making a bold move with this guy to say, 'Hey, how do we figure out peace?' That hasn't happened.'
Boylan also pointed to the lasting signs of Russian influence across the state, particularly along the Aleution Islands and in southeast Alaska where Russian settlements stood. There are also a number of Russian Orthodox churches, as well as a small Russian diaspora community.
Notably, Putin's appearance in Anchorage will make him the first Russian leader to set foot in Alaska — a setting that was well received by top Moscow officials and the Russian state media.
Vladimir Dzhabarov, a Russian senator, labeled the venue choice 'very wise,' adding that it was 'very far from Ukraine.'
Yuri Ushakov, Putin's aide on foreign affairs, also said in an audio message shared by the Kremlin on Telegram last week that the meeting's setting is 'quite logical for our delegation to simply fly across the Bering Strait and for such an important and anticipated summit of the leaders of the two countries to be held specifically in Alaska.'
The big question, however, is what will eventually emerge from the meeting and whether it will be successful for Trump and the U.S. Little has been revealed about the talks outside of the city and that Trump and Putin plan to meet in a one-on-one setting.
Trump also downplayed expectations in recent days, saying that he is going to '​​see what [Putin] has in mind,' and will 'probably in the first two minutes … know exactly whether or not a deal can get done.'
That hasn't stopped some in the state from pondering the potential historical significance if it yields success and is a key step towards a conclusion of the war.
'I was joking earlier this week that if this actually ends up in peace, it would be nice to be known as the Alaska Accords — kind of like the Camp David Accords — or something like that, historically,' Treadwell said.
The former lieutenant governor did acknowledge a downside especially given Trump's previous sitdown with Putin — the 2018 meeting in Helsinki where he sided with the Russian leader over the FBI on whether the Kremlin meddled in the 2016 presidential election.
'I think that's a risk all of us are willing to take,' Treadwell said, pointing to the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 as an example. 'There's some people who think Kyoto was the best thing for the world in addressing climate change, and there's others who spit when they say the word 'Kyoto.''
'One way or another, Kyoto's still a beautiful city in a wonderful place to visit,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats need to start using AI to help save democracy
Democrats need to start using AI to help save democracy

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Democrats need to start using AI to help save democracy

As American democracy unravels at the hands of President Trump and his enabling congressional and Supreme Court majorities, millions of Americans are desperate to identify whatever possible countermeasures remain to slow the country's descent into fascism. The outcome of the 2026 midterms is unlikely to produce meaningful change, even if the Democrats take control of the House. Without a cooperative Senate, it will be impossible either to pass legislation or secure a conviction on impeachment charges. Oversight hearings can bring public attention to things like rampant corruption, but the threats Trump poses to the rule of law and democracy are already well-known. The courts can only do so much. There's another emerging tool, however: artificial intelligence. Trump seems to understands the transformative power of AI. Last month, the administration announced an ' AI Action Plan ' for 'winning the AI race.' Among other measures, it promises to remove 'onerous Federal regulations that hinder AI development and deployment, and seek private sector input on rules to remove.' As part of this initiative, the General Services Administration and OpenAI announced earlier this month that the company will be 'providing ChatGPT to the entire U.S. federal workforce' under a 'first-of-its-kind partnership.' Participating agencies will pay a nominal cost of $1 each for the first year to enable federal employees to 'explore and leverage AI.' The company is also 'teaming up with experienced partners Slalom and Boston Consulting Group to support secure, responsible deployment and trainings.' Last week, the AI company Anthropic likewise announced it had struck the same deal with GSA to enable federal agencies' access to its Claude model. The Trump administration's effort to streamline the federal government with AI models makes some sense. Research has shown that generative AI — particularly large language models, which consume vast amounts of data to understand and generate natural language content — can enhance government efficiency in data processing, analysis and drafting, among other potential advantages. But AI systems also increase the risk of widespread government surveillance, personalized misinformation and disinformation, systematic discrimination, lack of accountability and inaccuracy. According to a recent academic paper, 'although many studies have explored the ethical implications of AI, fewer have fully examined its democratic implications.' Trump's alliance with OpenAI head Sam Altman goes back to start of his second term, when he announced a $500 billion joint venture with OpenAI, Oracle and Softbank to build up to 20 large AI data centers. Trump called the venture 'Stargate.' The deal's details are murky, including who will have access to Stargate and how it will possibly benefit taxpayers. Although a spokesman for OpenAI told Fox News Digital that 'Sam Altman sort of planted a flag on democratic AI versus autocratic AI,' let's not forget that Altman is not a government official or employee. As a legal matter, it is unclear whether these ' fast-tracked ' deals will fully comply with traditional oversight and procurement laws and procedures. No major AI company is currently approved under the Federal Risk And Authorization Management Program, for example, which is the process for authorizing the use of cloud technologies by federal agencies. According the GSA website, the program aims to ensure 'security and protection of federal information' by imposing strict cybersecurity controls to protect against data breaches, hacking and unauthorized access, and requiring ongoing monitoring and reporting. Given that the GSA is reportedly working on 'developing a separate authorization' for generative AI systems like ChatGPT and Claude, the potential threats to national security and private citizens' personal information are significant. The Trump administration's lack of transparency also risks creating a black-box government run by proprietary algorithms that the public cannot inspect — centralizing control over federal AI in two companies whose interests clearly lie in market dominance, not the public good. This is why these kinds of decisions are best made through established legal procedures — including the Federal Competition in Contracting Act (requiring fair and open competition), the Privacy Act of 1974 (limiting how agencies can collect and disclose personal data), the Federal Records Act (requiring the proper retention and archiving of public records) and the Administrative Procedure Act (requiring public comment and input into major policy decisions). For now, OpenAI has promised that its 'goal is to ensure agencies can use AI securely and responsibly. ChatGPT Enterprise already does not use business data, including inputs or outputs, to train or improve OpenAI models. The same safeguards will apply to federal use.' This promise from Altman's company is no substitute for actual legal standards enforced by the federal government. Whether AI tools embedded in federal government systems could one day be used to sway elections to favor Trump and his cronies is a vital question. For now, what's clear is that Democrats need to get into the AI game, and fast. A Democratic political action committee called the National Democratic Training Committee recently unveiled on online course entitled 'AI For Progressive Campaigns,' which is designed to teach candidates how to use AI to help create social media content, draft speeches, craft voter outreach messaging and phone-banking scripts, conduct research into their constituencies and opponents, and develop internal training materials. The founder and CEO of the group, Kelly Dietrich, stated that 'thousands of Democratic campaigns can now leverage AI to compete at any scale.' This effort, although laudable, does not go far enough to capitalize on AI's potential to help outmaneuver authoritarianism in the U.S. There's much more that might be done, including using AI to educate citizens on the benefits of democracy, how institutions work and the facts underlying important issues; to create large-scale, moderated public deliberation and consensus around divisive issues; to detect and alert the public to manipulated media, thus combatting misinformation and disinformation and fostering public trust in an alternative to Trump; and to create and implement effective messaging strategies for alternative visions for the future of the country. AI could be American voters' best friend, not their enemy. It just needs to be asked.

Air Force chief of staff to retire after only two years in role
Air Force chief of staff to retire after only two years in role

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Air Force chief of staff to retire after only two years in role

The Air Force's chief of staff, Gen. David Allvin, will retire this November after serving only two years of his four-year term, the service has announced, making him the latest senior military officer pushed out under the Trump administration. The Air Force revealed the surprise move in a Monday statement, noting that Allvin had 'announced plans today to retire effective on or about Nov. 1.' The release did not name a successor to be the Air Force's highest-ranking uniformed officer, adding that Allvin will continue to serve until one is confirmed by the Senate. 'I'm grateful for the opportunity to serve as the 23rd Air Force Chief of Staff and I'm thankful for [Air Force Secretary Troy Meink], [Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth] and President Trump's faith in me to lead our service,' Allvin said in a statement. 'More than anything, I'm proud to have been part of the team of Airmen who live out our core values of integrity, service and excellence every day as we prepare to defend this great nation.' The statement did not give a reason for Allvin's abrupt retirement plans, but The Washington Post reported that he was informed last week that he would be asked to retire as Hegseth wanted to go in another direction with the Air Force. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Hill. Allvin's looming departure follows a string of firings of other senior military officers in Trump's second term, including Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. CQ Brown — who also did not serve his full four years — Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti, Coast Guard Commandant Adm Linda Fagan, and a slew of others serving in less prominent roles. Allvin, who became Air Force chief of staff in 2023 after service as the vice chief of staff since November 2020, is a career mobility pilot with thousands of hours flying aircraft throughout his 39-year career. In February 2024, Allvin and other Air Force officials revealed a sweeping reorganization plan in a bid to prepare the U.S. for a fight against China. But Hegseth a year later ordered the Air Force to hold off on its changes to the service and its structure. In addition, the Pentagon chief has differed with Allvin on the future of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.

Newsom account knocks Dana Perino over criticism of posts: ‘They still don't get it'
Newsom account knocks Dana Perino over criticism of posts: ‘They still don't get it'

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Newsom account knocks Dana Perino over criticism of posts: ‘They still don't get it'

A social media account run by the press office of Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) knocked Fox News anchor Dana Perino after she criticized the Democrat's press strategy. 'ALMOST A WEEK IN AND THEY STILL DON'T GET IT,' the governor's office wrote Monday on social platform X in response to a segment on Fox's daytime table talk program 'The Five.' During the segment, Perino, who served as a top White House aide during former President George W. Bush's administration, said Newsom and his team 'have to stop at with the Twitter thing.' 'I don't know where his wife is,' she continued. 'If I were his wife, I would say you are making a fool of yourself, stop it.' Newsom's press account has in recent days made a series of posts mocking President Trump and his administration, writing in all caps — the president's signature style — and attacking Fox News and its hosts directly. A recent example came amid the redistricting battle that has spread across the U.S. after Texas Democrats fled the Lone Star Stat e to avoid voting on a map that could give Republicans up to five additional House seats in next year's midterms. Newsom pressed Trump to pull back the GOP efforts. 'DONALD TRUMP, THE LOWEST POLLING PRESIDENT IN RECENT HISTORY, THIS IS YOUR SECOND-TO-LAST WARNING!!! (THE NEXT ONE IS THE LAST ONE!),' Newsom's press office posted on X. 'STAND DOWN NOW OR CALIFORNIA WILL COUNTER-STRIKE (LEGALLY!) TO DESTROY YOUR ILLEGAL CROOKED MAPS IN RED STATES.' California Democrats unveiled legislation Monday to move forward with their own redistricting plan to counteract the Texas moves. The governor's pushback on Trump comes amid speculation he could be eyeing a run for president in 2028. 'He's got a big job as governor of California but if he wants an even bigger job, he has to be a little bit more serious,' Perino said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store