logo
Cable's civic-minded C-SPAN looks for help as streaming takes a toll

Cable's civic-minded C-SPAN looks for help as streaming takes a toll

C-SPAN, the nonprofit outfit that has brought live gavel-to-gavel congressional coverage to cable TV viewers for decades, is feeling the squeeze faced by the rest of the TV business.
As consumers drop their traditional cable and satellite TV subscriptions for streaming platforms, C-SPAN's main funding source is shrinking. The trend poses a threat to one of the rare media institutions that has bipartisan political support, including a fan in the Oval Office.
'It's not a sustainable situation,' said C-SPAN Chief Executive Sam Feist said in an interview.
C-SPAN stands for Cable-Satellite Public Affairs Network, and therein lies the problem. The service is supported by cable and satellite operators who have seen their customer base steadily decline as consumers move to streaming platforms that now account for half of all TV viewing, according to recent data from Nielsen. C-SPAN, which reached around 100 million pay TV homes in 2015, is now down to 51 million households.
The contraction has led to a significant loss in revenue for C-SPAN, which has never sold advertising. C-SPAN took in $46.3 million in 2024, down 37% from $73 million in 2015, and is now running a deficit.
C-SPAN is not a glamorous TV operation. There are no high-priced anchors or slick studio sets. But it does need funding for the 30-plus camera crews that cover every moment the House and Senate are in session, think tank panels, town halls and other political events in Washington and around the country. C-SPAN uses its own cameras in the Capitol, enabling the service to catch the action when government-operated audio and visual equipment is cut off.
Feist said C-SPAN can fill its budget gap if companies that run smaller bundles of TV channels — such as Google's YouTube TV and Walt Disney Co.'s Hulu Live TV — would agree to carry its feeds. Around 20 million households subscribe to such online subscription platforms, known as virtual multichannel video program distributors, which stream broadcast and cable channels.
It's a big ask. Subscription streaming TV services are under pressure to keep their prices low so they can remain a cheaper alternative to a cable or satellite package. Every new channel increases the cost of a subscription.
C-SPAN is currently in discussions with Hulu and YouTube to get carriage.
'We are continuing to work with C-SPAN to find an approach that could support further access to their civic content,' a YouTube representative said. 'We are proud that a large amount of C-SPAN's content is available to viewers on the YouTube main platform, where it is accessible to everyone for free and generates advertising revenue for C-SPAN.'
C-SPAN was launched in 1979 when cable TV providers were looking to get in the good graces of local government officials who determined which companies would wire their communities.
Offering a civic-minded channel devoted to displaying democracy in action helped smooth the path for the pay TV industry's expansion. C-SPAN went on to become a familiar brand that brought goodwill to cable and satellite companies, which have financed the service ever since.
But the C-SPAN legacy is not so meaningful to the upstart streaming services that have a growing number of customers who have never had a traditional pay TV subscription.
The stars of C-SPAN have started to weigh in. On June 2, the Senate passed a bipartisan resolution recognizing the anniversary of C-SPAN2, the channel devoted to the chamber's sessions. The resolution said that live coverage of the proceedings needs to be accessible on all platforms.
C-SPAN also has support from the country's most prominent TV viewer — President Trump. In recent months, Trump has posted on social media how he watches the channel in the overnight hours when highlights of the previous day, including his own press events, are presented.
While cable news channels such as CNN and MSNBC often dither over how much time they should devote to covering Trump's rallies and public events, C-SPAN presents them in their entirety as a matter of course. The Trump White House communications office has praised the approach, which has remained consistent through all modern presidencies.
While some streaming outlets carry congressional proceedings, Feist notes that C-SPAN is still the only service that offers every event live over its three channels, even when they occur simultaneously. That was the case for the confirmations of FBI Director Kash Patel, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Feist, who is the former Washington bureau chief of CNN, said the neutral approach of C-SPAN has added value in a media environment where outlets now cater to the partisan leanings of their audiences. He cited an Ipsos poll that shows the political breakdown of its audience as 30% Democrat, 30% Republican and 36% independent.
'It matches the demographic of the country,' Feist said. 'I think it puts us in a unique space in this ecosystem.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Superbabies' Startup Seeks Funds for Controversial Gene Editing Push
'Superbabies' Startup Seeks Funds for Controversial Gene Editing Push

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

'Superbabies' Startup Seeks Funds for Controversial Gene Editing Push

(Bloomberg) -- A California-startup focused on genetically editing human embryos — a step toward creating so-called designer babies — is raising money as many of Silicon Valley's ultra-rich turn their attention to one of the most controversial technologies in medicine. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts Commuters Are Caught in Johannesburg's Taxi Feuds as Transit Lags Bootstrap Bio, created about 18 months ago, is working on technology to change the DNA in an embryo, according to two people familiar with the company and one of its investors. Altering those cells to make genetically modified children is intended to eliminate inherited diseases or enhance desirable traits, which can be passed on to future generations. Scientists and ethicists said the technology known as 'germline editing' is unproven and potentially dangerous. It could have grave consequences if a flaw is introduced into a days-old embryo, with the changes affecting every cell and stage of development. If the technology does work, they fear it could usher in a new era of eugenics and foster further inequality. 'When you're messing with the safety of babies, you want to be pretty confident,' said Hank Greely, a Stanford University law professor and bioethics expert. 'We have no idea what would happen to the babies who are edited.' Experts would be especially concerned if the efforts are conducted in private laboratories without public access, oversight, review or protection, said Laurie Zoloth, a professor of religion and ethics at the University of Chicago. 'There are safer ways to avoid having a child with a genetic disease than trying to build one from scratch as if it's some sort of commodity that you put together with cool parts,' she said. Chief Executive Officer Chase Denecke and Chief Technology Officer Ben Korpan founded Bootstrap Bio after writing a viral essay using the pen names GeneSmith and kman on LessWrong, a forum popular in Silicon Valley. The essay was about about gene editing adults to make them smarter. Subsequent Reddit posts by Gene_Smith discussed the work, and Denecke — using his own name — spoke about it in an interview on YouTube. Denecke declined to comment. Korpan didn't respond to multiple requests for interviews or comment for this story. Genetic Pivot Follow up posts from Gene_Smith on Reddit detailed changes in the company's focus, including Bootstrap Bio's switch from working on gene editing the DNA of adults to plans for the genetic modification of reproductive cells. Gene_Smith said the company hired a chief science officer, opened a lab and pivoted its work, and was planning to raise seed funding earlier this year. 'When we started looking at the timelines involved to solve all the problem required for adult enhancement, it started looking like superbabies might ironically be a faster route (it's definitely simpler),' according to one Reddit post. Among Bootstrap Bio's early investors are Simone and Malcolm Collins, a couple known for advocating for higher birth rates to stave off 'demographic collapse.' The Collinses have been linked to billionaire and fellow pronatalist Elon Musk and criticized for allegedly promoting eugenics, a label they've rejected. The pair said they would consider using germline editing for some of their own embryos to minimize health risks for future children, said Simone Collins, who lost her bid for a Pennsylvania state House seat last year. 'We're going to be on that as soon as we can be,' she said, declining to specify how much the couple invested in Bootstrap Bio. 'I know that people are afraid of unforeseen knock-on effects and stuff, but being able to completely, for all future descendants, remove a risk — that's huge.' The Collinses, who refer to themselves as entrepreneurs, suggested they're less concerned about reaping financial gains from their investment in Bootstrap Bio. 'We just want them to succeed in helping people,' Simone Collins said. 'That's our investment philosophy.' Safety Regulations While even laboratory work on germline editing is highly regulated in the US, researchers have been making progress on the technology. Still, it's not ready for prime time, said Paula Amato, researcher and professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the Oregon Health and Science University. 'It's still not considered safe,' Amato said. No studies involving germline editing or genetic engineering on embryos have been disclosed on the US database tracking clinical trials. Dieter Egli, a scientist who uses the technology in his highly regulated lab at Columbia University, said more research is needed. 'Then you can ask the question, is this a technology that's sufficiently safe and effective to be used in a clinical context?' Egli said. 'That's a broader discussion.' Legal Issues Chinese researcher He Jiankui was sentenced to three years in prison and a lifelong ban from working in reproductive technology after he claimed to create the first gene-edited babies in 2018. The alteration of embryos of twin girls to allegedly reduce their risk of developing HIV was deemed an illegal practice of medicine by a Chinese court. He plans to relocate to Austin to continue working on embryonic genetic editing in a new lab, according to his posts on X this month. He said he's not interested in working with Silicon Valley investors, who he said are interested only in immortality. — Jiankui He (@Jiankui_He) June 20, 2025 Companies are required to get permission from the US Food and Drug Administration before testing novel medicines or using new technology on people. Federal law prohibits the agency from accepting any application involving genetic edits to reproductive cells, including embryos, said I. Glenn Cohen, a law professor and bioethics expert at Harvard University. There is, however, no outright ban on editing reproductive cells in the lab when done using private funding. Bootstrap Bio's future business plans, some of which have been given to investors and detailed in the YouTube interview with Denecke, included a plan to begin human trials in 2026 or 2027 in Honduras, a place where the company could potentially avoid US regulations. It's unclear if the timeline was part of the company's original focus on adult gene editing or the genetic modification of reproductive cells, and if those goals remain in place. In May, an international group of scientific societies called for a 10-year moratorium on the practice. 'There's vast, complex challenges with germline editing,' said Tim Hunt, chief executive officer of the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine, who co-authored the call for a moratorium. 'It's also unclear what is the burning medical need.' Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags How to Steal a House Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Google is primed for significant gains ahead. Using options to capture the potential pop
Google is primed for significant gains ahead. Using options to capture the potential pop

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

Google is primed for significant gains ahead. Using options to capture the potential pop

Alphabet (GOOGL) stands out as a compelling opportunity leveraging its dominant position in search, advertising and cloud services. With AI innovations and Google Cloud driving future revenue growth, its valuation positions GOOGL for significant upside. With implied volatility offering attractive premiums, this setup presents a compelling case for adding bullish exposure in a tech-driven market using options. Trade timing The timing for adding bullish exposure to GOOGL is optimal, as the stock recently broke above its $165 resistance level and recently pulled back to its $165 support. This has been coupled with a recent outperformance relative to the S & P 500 and offers an attractive risk-to-reward profile for adding long exposure. Fundamentals GOOGL trades at a compelling valuation compared to its industry, supported by superior growth and profitability metrics, reinforcing its investment appeal. Forward PE ratio: 17x vs. industry average 19x Expected EPS growth: 13% vs. industry average 13% Expected revenue growth: 11% vs. industry average 12% Net margins: 31% vs. industry average 9% Bullish thesis Market leadership and financial strength: GOOGL dominates search, advertising and cloud services, with Q1 2025 revenue up 12% year over year and Google Cloud growing 28%. AI and cloud growth drivers: Gemini 2.5 serves 1.5 billion monthly users and boosted ad revenues, while Google Cloud's 270 million paid subscriptions (YouTube, Google One) diversify income streams. Stock repurchases: A $70 billion stock repurchase and a 5% dividend hike to 21 cents per share, suggest strong management confidence. Timing: The pullback after a breakout above its $165 resistance level provides an optimal timing with strong risk to reward for upside exposure. The trade With the IV Rank of 22%, options are relatively inexpensive, and I'm buying an Aug 15 $165/$185 call vertical @ $7.28 debit. This entails: Buying the Aug 15 $165 call @ $9.90 Selling the Aug 15 $185 call @ $2.62 The maximum reward is $1,272 if GOOGL is above $185 at expiration. The maximum risk is $728 if GOOGL is below $165 at expiration. The breakeven point for this trade is $172.28. View this Trade with Updated Prices at OptionsPlay. This strategy positions you to benefit from GOOGL's leadership in AI and cloud growth, aligned with its fundamentals and timing using a call vertical with a strong risk/reward ratio. With its dominant position in tech, this trade offers a compelling opportunity to capture upside potential as the S & P 500 targets all-time highs and beyond. DISCLOSURES: None. All opinions expressed by the CNBC Pro contributors are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC UNIVERSAL, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet or another medium. THE ABOVE CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY . THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSITUTE FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE OR A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY ANY SECURITY OR OTHER FINANCIAL ASSET. THE CONTENT IS GENERAL IN NATURE AND DOES NOT REFLECT ANY INDIVIDUAL'S UNIQUE PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. THE ABOVE CONTENT MIGHT NOT BE SUITABLE FOR YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. BEFORE MAKING ANY FINANCIAL DECISIONS, YOU SHOULD STRONGLY CONSIDER SEEKING ADVICE FROM YOUR OWN FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. Click here for the full disclaimer.

U.S. regulators are circling after Tesla's Robotaxi launch included unexpected behavior and potentially broken traffic laws
U.S. regulators are circling after Tesla's Robotaxi launch included unexpected behavior and potentially broken traffic laws

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

U.S. regulators are circling after Tesla's Robotaxi launch included unexpected behavior and potentially broken traffic laws

Tesla's Robotaxi launch event in Austin Sunday got rave reviews from analysts, but also led to several attendees posting videos of Tesla vehicles behaving unexpectedly. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reached out a day later, and said it 'will take any necessary actions to protect road safety.' The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) contacted Tesla a day after its Sunday Robotaxi launch after videos online showed the company's autonomous vehicles acting erratically and possibly violating traffic laws. The launch, which was mostly limited to invited Tesla investors, analysts, and influencers, gave the public its first look at Tesla's Robotaxi technology, which is an 'unsupervised' version of its already available Full Self-Driving (Supervised) tech. Tesla first revealed the company's Cybercab and larger Robovan in a splashy event at the Warner Bros. studio in Burbank, Calif. last October. But Sunday's launch in Austin, Texas, was the biggest development in nearly a year (and arguably a decade) of Tesla CEO Elon Musk touting Tesla's Robotaxi ambitions, reportedly despite internal warnings claiming the Cybercab may never be profitable. The event garnered rave reviews by some Tesla analysts, including Wedbush's Dan Ives. 'Going into it, we expected to be impressed but walking away from it, all there is to say is that this is the future,' he wrote in a note. Still, videos taken by attendees Sunday showed Tesla's vehicles driving erratically and in some cases violating traffic laws and safe traffic practices, despite the presence of a 'safety monitor' in the front seat. In one video taken by Tesla investor Rob Maurer, the vehicle he is traveling in hesitates at an intersection and enters a lane meant for cars traveling in the opposite direction. The car then appears to break traffic laws by crossing a double solid yellow line before entering a left turn lane. A honk can be heard in the video. In another video posted to YouTube by Ed Niedermeyer, author of Ludicrous: The Unvarnished Story of Tesla Motors, one of the Robotaxis 'brakes hard' after passing stopped police vehicles that weren't in its immediate path. 'The fact that it came nearly to a stop twice on public roads is downright unsafe,' wrote Niedermeyer in the video description. These incidents, along with others posted to social media, led the NHTSA to reach out to Tesla Monday, the federal agency confirmed. 'NHTSA is aware of the referenced incidents and is in contact with the manufacturer to gather additional information. NHTSA will continue to enforce the law on all manufacturers of motor vehicles and equipment, in accordance with the Vehicle Safety Act and our data-driven, risk-based investigative process,' the agency wrote in a statement to Fortune. The agency clarified that it does not 'pre-approve new technologies or vehicle systems,' but rather certifies that vehicles meet its safety standards and follows up on possible safety defect incidents. 'Following an assessment of those reports and other relevant information, NHTSA will take any necessary actions to protect road safety,' the agency wrote. The NHTSA has a separate existing investigation open into crashes involving Tesla vehicles using Full Self-Driving (Supervised) technology. Tesla did not immediately respond to Fortune's request for comment. Tesla has not responded publicly to the Sunday incidents, but prior to the launch, Tesla responded to NHTSA's questions about its Robotaxi program, reported electric transportation and sustainable energy outlet Electrek. The company has reportedly asked the NHTSA to keep its responses confidential, according to the outlet. The NHTSA's most recent reach out to Tesla does not mean it has opened an investigation, said Jason Turchin, a Florida-based product liability lawyer who has previously worked with vehicle cases. Still, the company should be on alert following the incidents. If the issue escalates further, Turchin said the NHTSA has broad authority to enforce a recall or impose fines on the company. 'What it sounds like is that they're in the phase right now, of like, 'we're watching you. We're aware of this potential, and we need reassurance that this is not the case,'' he told Fortune. Turchin said he hopes the NHTSA and federal government take advantage of the recent Tesla incidents as well as the general increase in self-driving vehicles to craft regulations that deal with their production and use. Still, Craig Melrose, a former vehicle production engineer at Toyota and now global managing partner of advanced technologies and mobility at consulting agency HTEC, said the NHTSA reach out to Tesla may be a positive development. 'Regulatory agencies like NHTSA exist to ensure standardization and the adoption of best practices across the industry, so their involvement can be a positive signal, especially if this is simply a proactive review,' Melrose told Fortune. This story was originally featured on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store