
‘The death of creativity'? AI job fears stalk advertising industry
From using motion capture tech to allow the Indian cricketing star Rahul Dravid to give personalised coaching tips for children to an algorithm trained on Shakespeare's handwriting powering a robotic arm to rewrite Romeo and Juliet, artificial intelligence is rapidly revolutionising the global advertising industry.
Those AI-created adverts, for the Cadbury's drink brand Bournvita and the pen maker Bic, were produced by agency group WPP, which is spending £300m annually on data, tech and machine learning to remain competitive.
Mark Read, the chief executive of the London-listed marketing services group, has said AI is 'fundamental' to the future of its business, while admitting that it will drastically reshape the ad industry workforce.
Now Read has announced he is to leave at the end of this year, after nearly seven years as chief executive and more than 30 at WPP, as the company struggles to keep pace with its peers and also counter moves by big tech to muscle in to the AI-driven future of advertising.
For ad agencies, the upheaval originates from a familiar source. Over more than a decade, the Google and Facebook owner Meta successfully built tech tools for publishers and ad buyers that helped them to dominate online. Big tech hoovered up almost two-thirds of the £45bn spent by advertisers in the UK this year. Now, Mark Zuckerberg wants to take over making the ads, too.
The Meta boss is gearing up to unleash AI tools to allow advertisers to fully create and target campaigns on his social media sites, prompting fears of the 'death of creativity' – and widespread job cuts at agencies.
Last week it emerged that these tools are to be rolled out by the end of next year, with Zuckerberg describing the capability in a recent interview as a 'redefinition of the category of advertising'.
'You don't need any creative, you don't need any targeting, you don't need any measurement, except to be able to read the results that we spit out,' he said last month, in comments that appear to render much of the advertising industry obsolete.
Agencies of all sizes – and particularly the deep-pocketed international groups such as WPP, Publicis and Omnicom – are pouring investment into developing their own AI tools and working with tech companies such as Meta and Google. But the plan is meant to be to keep clients, not lose them.
'I think there is no doubt AI will disintermediate a large number of jobs,' says the chief executive of one big ad agency. 'Having said that, there are many agencies with big corporate clients that really could do with being slimmed down a lot. I can see staffing in areas like strategy, consumer insight and some conceptual roles being safe, but what will be really hit is those involved in production and the realisation of ideas.'
Big tech executives espoused the benefits of AI at the annual Enders Deloitte conference on the media and telecoms industry last week.
Stephan Pretorius, who described himself as 'WPP's AI guy' as he co-led a session with Meta, said that 'creativity, in its purest form, remains a human skill'.
He argued that AI does not equate to job cuts, but admitted that agencies need to restructure and advertising client relationships are changing.
'AI replaces tasks, it eliminates tasks, it doesn't eliminate jobs,' he said. 'A lot of what we used to get paid for is now getting automated and therefore our commercial models have to change, our team structures have to change. The way we are incentivised by our clients is changing. But that is the transition.'
Last month, WPP said there would be an undisclosed number of redundancies globally across WPP Media, formerly known as GroupM, which plans and buys billions of pounds of ad space for clients across digital and traditional media.
'You have a situation where the big holding companies are in a dilemma,' says another ad agency chief executive. 'Clients expect us to invest millions developing AI so they can cut their budgets because things can be done quicker and cheaper. Lots of clients are asking for fee reductions.'
So far the AI revolution does not appear to be having a big impact on the UK industry.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
There were a record 26,787 people employed in media, creative and digital agencies last year, according to the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising (IPA), the trade body for agencies that represent 85% of ad spend by clients in the UK.
The IPA has been measuring the size of the market since 1960, when there were 19,000 employees, hitting a low point of just under 12,000 in the early 1990s.
The amount spent on advertising has also grown exponentially, driven by the advent of the internet era, from just £60m recorded in the pre-TV era in 1938.
By 1982 the UK market was worth £3.1bn and this year it is forecast to cross £45bn, according to the Advertising Association/Warc, which has been publishing figures annually since 1980.
Agency bosses believe that for the biggest household name advertisers there is too much brand risk handing over the full creative process to AI, which for now at least does not have the capability to make top quality ads.
'You can often tell a [pure] AI piece of work a thousand yards away – glossy, very idealised and slightly plasticky looking,' says the chief of one creative agency. 'But that will change. You hear creatives saying that AI is never going to come up with something as brilliant as, say, a gorilla playing drums for Cadbury, but I am not so sure. AI will eventually become fine tuned enough to react to the quite left-field conceptual prompting.'
Since making the comments that the industry took to mean that Meta is seeking to supplant the role of agencies, Zuckerberg has tried to clarify that the AI tools are primarily expected to be used by small and medium-sized businesses.
'In the future, if you were working with a creative agency to make creative, you'll probably keep doing that,' he said at the Stripe conference, clarifying his position a week after making his initial comments about the scope of Meta's AI advertising plans. 'If you aren't and you're just hacking something together and throwing it into Meta's ad system, well now we're going to be able to come up with 4,000 different versions of your creative and just test them and figure out which one works best.'
Meta and Google have always considered that they have 'democratised' advertising by enabling the long tail of millions of small businesses that do not have the financial wherewithal to run TV ad campaigns, or employ an ad agency to run campaigns.
'That is the smokescreen they always use,' says the ad agency boss. 'When they first emerged as new ad channels decades ago it was all about small businesses, and now they take nearly two-thirds of all UK ad spend.'
In the noughties as big tech grew increasingly powerful Sir Martin Sorrell, who built WPP into the world's biggest ad group and is now chief executive of S4 Capital, labelled Meta and Google 'frenemies' – meaning they can be seen as a partner and as a competitive threat to agencies.
Two decades on, the rise of AI in advertising is the latest technological development forcing the industry to once again adapt to survive.
'Meta's new promise to 'auto-generate your ad in seconds' is the clearest sign yet that the production sausage-factory is about to be fully mechanised,' says Patrick Garvey, the co-founder of the independent agency We Are Pi. 'It's not the death of agencies. It's the death of outdated agency models.'
He is supportive of small businesses benefiting from the changes, but says Meta's approach to AI is akin to the 'fast food of advertising'. For traditional companies in adland, it could be a difficult meal to stomach.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


FF News
35 minutes ago
- FF News
We're Helping Founders in Financial Services Accelerate Their Potential
One of our initiatives as a firm is to work with founders and business leaders in financial services to accelerate their ability to have an impact. That is why this month, we were pleased to announce that the Fintech Forward Programme – in collaboration with EY – is open for applications. This accelerator programme is designed to empower exceptional start-up founders and business leaders who are developing solutions that have the potential to redefine financial services. For more information or to apply, visit here . Applications are now open for the 12-week in-person and virtual programme for individuals who meet the following criteria: Applying technology to create scalable solutions within financial services. Have a live product demonstrating market traction, with annual revenues not exceeding £1 million. Show a commitment to making a positive impact on individuals and/or businesses in the UK. Are dedicated to active participation in the programme. Successful applicants will gain access to expert mentorship from bank executives, tailored workshops with industry specialists, such as a two-day offsite at J.P. Morgan's technology centre in Glasgow, and opportunities to showcase their business to potential investors and commercial partners. Participants will also have the opportunity to take part in a sponsored trip to Slush in Helsinki, one of the world's most founder-focused events. To help ensure there are no barriers to participation, the Programme includes travel, accommodation and other related expenses for participants. The Fintech Forward Programme is part of JPMorganChase's broader efforts to unlock the potential of the innovation economy, recognizing the challenges facing underserved individuals and entrepreneurs who can be overlooked for investment or have unequal access to essential resources. Veronique Steiner , Head of EMEA Innovation Economy & Head of EMEA E-Commerce, Technology, Media and Telecom at J.P. Morgan Payments, says, 'At J.P. Morgan Payments, our north star is to improve the payments ecosystem and transform the movement of information, money, and assets. We're actively encouraging applications from founders or business leaders who are overcoming obstacles to growing a business, including a lack of proximity to funding and networks, and are addressing the needs of underserved consumers, businesses or communities.' Alumni of the programme will benefit from a unique network of peers and an ongoing connection with JPMorganChase, fostering continued growth, innovation and new commercial opportunity. Companies In This Post JP Morgan Chase


Reuters
37 minutes ago
- Reuters
US State Department cable says agency using AI to help staff job panels
WASHINGTON, June 9 (Reuters) - The U.S. State Department will use an artificial intelligence chatbot to help it select the people who will perform annual reviews of promotions and moves, according to a cable issued Monday and reviewed by Reuters. The cable said that StateChat, an in-house chatbot which works using technology from Palantir and Microsoft, will be employed to pick foreign service officers for participation on the Foreign Service Selection Boards, the annual evaluation panels which decide whether and how to promote and shuffle around State Department employees. In a statement, a department spokesperson said the evaluations themselves "will not be done by AI." The boards, whose role is governed by the 1980 Foreign Service Act, play a critical role in the State Department's personnel promotion decisions, managing the annual process by which diplomats and others jump from one professional grade to the next. By statute, the boards are meant to include "a substantial number of women and members of minority groups." The State Department has been using StateChat since last year to transcribe notes, draft emails, and analyze diplomatic cables. Last week the agency's acting chief data and AI officer, Amy Ritualo, told a Palantir conference, opens new tab that StateChat had about 40,000 users across her agency. The program's role in the human resources process, however, has not previously been disclosed. Last month the State Department abruptly postponed the boards, and previously selected members received emails saying their services were no longer required. Monday's cable said that StateChat's technology would instead be used to "perform unbiased selection" for the boards based on employees' internally adjudicated skill codes and grades. That list would then be screened - for example for disciplinary and security issues - before being used to create the panels. There was no mention of female or minority representation. President Donald Trump's administration has repeatedly attacked what Republicans refer to as "DEI," a catch-all term covering work protecting civil rights, fighting discrimination, and boosting diversity. The American Foreign Service Association, which represents State Department employees, did not directly comment on the use of AI but said it was seeking clarification from agency leadership about how it intends to comply with its legal obligations around women and minority group representation. Palantir and Microsoft didn't immediately return messages. Although the deployment of AI by officials precedes Trump's reelection in 2024, his administration has aggressively expanded its use since his return to power. Last month Reuters reported that tech tycoon Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service was expanding its use of the AI chatbot Grok across the U.S. federal government. In April, Reuters reported that Trump administration officials had told some U.S. government employees that DOGE was using AI to monitor at least one federal agency's communications for hostility to the president.


BBC News
38 minutes ago
- BBC News
Homeowners warned over green energy scammers
Homeowners need stronger protections against rogue traders and scammers capitalising on green energy schemes, according to Scotland's consumer Scotland warned that more people were likely to be targeted as the country transitions to low or zero-emissions heating over the next two has called on both Scottish and UK governments to ensure stronger regulation of the industry including accreditation for traders and a streamlined complaints a new report the consumer body highlighted scams involving spray foam insulation have already increased by 42% in 2023. Craig McClue, head of investigations for Consumer Scotland, said: "When we looked at this sector, in particular, we realised that Scotland has climate change targets to be net zero by 2045 and that is going to drive demand for low carbon heating technologies and insulation products."We found that, historically, there have been a lot of scams and unfair trading, and we heard evidence from our enforcement partners about just how prevalent these problems are."When you realise more than two million households are soon going to enter this sector, the risk is very real that consumers can face scams and unfair trading."He added: "We've heard strong evidence about particular egregious traders who have been targeting vulnerable consumers in Scotland."They suggest a loft surveys and suggest they make immediate decisions to get insulation, which proves unsuitable for the home, creates damp, and leads to mould."We then hear these same traders return under a new guise to take the spray foam insulation out. It is almost like a life-cycle scam."The Consumer Scotland report recommendations include better resources for enforcement bodies to tackle rogue trading and mandatory accreditation for all traders in the sector to increase consumer Ghibaldan, chief executive of Consumer Scotland, added: "The transition to net zero is one of the defining challenges of modern times."For many households, this currently means navigating a complex and unfamiliar sector often at significant cost. This journey must be made simpler, safer, and fairer."Our recommendations will help ensure consumers are empowered, protected, and supported through every stage of the transition, from initial decisions to installation protections and action to resolve complaints." 'Unfair trading practices' Fiona Richardson of Trading Standards Scotland added: "Scams, mis-selling and rogue trading continues to damage trust in the green home heating market."If consumers are to play their part in the transition to net zero, they must be protected from unfair trading practices and given the necessary confidence to engage in the sector."A UK government spokesperson said: "Allegations of fraud are taken very seriously and for UK wide schemes there is a dedicated Ofgem team working on counter fraud and whistleblowing."A Scottish government spokesperson said it welcomed the report "which highlights the need for a change to clean heating as part of Scotland's commitment to achieving net zero".They added: "It is vital people feel assured that any work carried out to decarbonise their heating is done to a high standard and represents good value for money."That's why we have been working with the UK government and Ofgem on the introduction of new consumer standards for heat network consumers – such as fair pricing and reliable supply – which will be introduced in January 2026." 'I've been a sucker... I should've known better' "I committed the cardinal sin," said David Adams, 87, a widower who lives alone in Glasgow."Someone chapped my door and I let them in."In late 2023, a representative of a company called Smarter Insulation Ltd appeared at his front door asking to talk to him about spray foam explained: "There was quite a lot going on about government grants for people. It seemed to be the thing to do, we were all getting very conscious of emissions, insulation and all the rest of it."The chap went up into the loft and took a test. He said there was damp in the air and this spray foam insulation would help."They had a good looking brochure and it all looked legit."He paid around £5,300 for the work, but a fortnight later he received a phone call from a company called the Roofing Advisory Service (RAS).In documents seen by BBC Scotland News, it warned him of "mis-selling of spray foam insulation by certain companies" and that his home was at risk from damp in the roof space and "potential issues with mortgageability and insurability in the future".In the end, he paid a further £2,750 to have insulation removed by a third company just a month was only after he paid that Mr Adams contacted Trading Standards and Advice Direct Scotland, but he remains £8,000 out of added: "You just think, 'I've been a sucker'… That's why I haven't taken any steps to get my money back."I should've known better." BBC Scotland News spoke with another spray foam customer who paid more than £5,000 to FastFoam Limited, which has the same director as Smarter later paid another firm to remove the spray foam product several weeks later at a total cost of more than £8, is an active proposal to strike off both FastFoam Limited and Smarter Insulation from the companies contacted by BBC Scotland News, a spokesman for Smarter Insulation and Fastfoam blamed RAS as being rogue sellers. He said: "Both customers mentioned have been contacted by a fraudulent company that emerged after members of our sales team departed to work with RAS."We have provided the details of numerous individuals and customers who have been contacted by RAS to Trading Standards' investigative team."Smarter and FastFoam have now ceased trading."I deeply regret that customers have had to endure such a poor experience while purchasing insulation."The BBC has been unable to reach RAS for Standards Scotland confirmed that RAS, both Smarter Insulation and FastFoam, and the company that removed Mr Adams' insulation are all currently being investigated.