logo
Uncertainty grips family of Indian tech boss detained in Qatar

Uncertainty grips family of Indian tech boss detained in Qatar

Yahoo27-03-2025

Every week, JP Gupta's heart sinks when he hears his son cry on the phone.
The grim ritual began in January when Amit Gupta, a senior Indian technology officer in Qatar, was detained on charges that haven't been made public yet.
Almost three months on, his family in India say they still don't know what crime he is accused of.
"He is allowed to speak to us for just five minutes [a week] and all he says is: 'Dad, I have not done anything wrong', and then breaks down," his father says.
Amit Gupta is the country head for Indian technology company Tech Mahindra in Kuwait and Qatar. He moved to Doha, Qatar's capital, for work in 2013.
His father told the BBC that he was "picked up by Qatar state security department officials from a restaurant near his office on 1 January" without being given a reason.
Qatar's interior ministry has not responded to the BBC's questions on why Amit Gupta was detained.
The BBC has approached Tech Mahindra for comment.
A company spokesperson earlier said it was in close contact with the family and providing "necessary support" to them.
"We are also actively coordinating with authorities in both countries and adhering to the due process. Ensuring the wellbeing of our colleague is our top priority," the company said.
Tech Mahindra, an Indian software services and consulting company, operates across 90 countries including Qatar and has more than 138,000 employees.
The Indian government hasn't officially commented yet on Amit Gupta's case. But sources in the country's foreign ministry told the BBC that the Indian embassy in Qatar was "closely following the case".
"The mission has been in touch with the family, the lawyer representing Amit Gupta and Qatari authorities on a regular basis," the sources said. "Our embassy continues to provide all possible assistance in the matter.'
Amit Gupta's wife Aakanksha Goyal, however, says the government should do more to secure her husband's release.
She wrote a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's office, saying that her husband was "under immense mental pressure/trauma".
"Our frequent appeals to the concerned authorities in Doha have not yet yielded any positive response," she wrote.
The letter was acknowledged on 18 February and referred to India's foreign ministry but nothing has happened since then, Ms Goyal told the BBC.
"We have sought a meeting with Prime Minister Modi and Foreign Minister S Jaishankar. Until they intervene, we don't expect anything will happen," she said.
In February, Amit Gupta's parents travelled to Doha and managed to meet him with the help of Indian embassy there.
"When we saw him, he just hugged us and cried. He kept repeating that he had done nothing wrong," his father said, adding that his son hasn't been questioned by investigators in Qatar yet.
"If they have not found anything against him, he should be released," he said.
Hundreds of thousands of Indians live and work in Qatar. This is the second high-profile case of Indians being detained or arrested in Qatar to make headlines since 2022.
Last year, a court in the Gulf country released eight former Indian naval officers who had been sentenced to death. Neither Qatar nor India revealed the charges against the men, who were working for a private firm in Qatar. But media reports said the men were charged with spying for Israel.
The commuting of the death sentences was seen as a diplomatic triumph for Modi, whose administration shares a warm relationship with Qatar. In February, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, the Emir of Qatar, paid a state visit to India, accompanied by a high-level delegation. During the visit, the two countries elevated their relationship to a strategic partnership.
While Amit Gupta's anxious family wait anxiously, Ms Goyal says she is finding it hard to answer questions from their children, aged 11 and four.
"My children keep asking me what happened to their father. My son's birthday is in April and he is expecting Amit to be there as usual," she says.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tice denies Reform UK in chaos after Yusuf returns
Tice denies Reform UK in chaos after Yusuf returns

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Tice denies Reform UK in chaos after Yusuf returns

Reform UK's deputy leader Richard Tice has insisted the party knows "exactly what it is doing" following a 48 hours in which its chairman Zia Yusuf resigned, before returning in a different role. On Thursday, Yusuf dramatically quit, saying in a social media post that trying to get the party elected was not "a good use of my time". However, two days later he said he would be coming back to lead the party's unit tasked with identifying spending cuts at councils, which is inspired by the US Department of Government Efficiency. Tice told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg that chairing the party was "a tough, brutal job" and Yusuf was "essentially exhausted" after 11 months in the role. "It's a massive job, and as we were growing incredibly fast - essentially that job was too much for one person, so we're reorganising. "I'm delighted that Zia is staying with the party and he's going to be focusing on our Doge unit." Reform to begin Musk-style audits of councils Yusuf announced his initial decision to quit in a social media post but did not expand on his reasons for leaving. However, it came shortly after he criticised Sarah Pochin - Reform's newest MP - who used her question at Prime Minister's Question to ask if the government would ban the burka, a veil worn by some Muslim women that covers their face and body. Asked about Pochin's intervention on X, Yusuf - who is a Muslim - said: "Nothing to do with me. Had no idea about the question nor that it wasn't policy. "Busy with other stuff. I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do." Announcing his decision to return to the party on Saturday, Yusuf said his initial resignation was "born of exhaustion" following "11 months [of] hard work and exhaustion". Party leader Nigel Farage said Yusuf had been subject to "pretty vile abuse" adding: "He overreacted to it and he admits himself it was a mistake." The Liberal Democrats said Reform UK were playing "musical chairman" while Labour characterised the events as a "humiliating hokey-cokey". Asked if it made the party look chaotic, Tice said: "No, we know exactly what we're doing." He continued: "Zia was essentially exhausted because he'd been working 24/7 for the last 10 or 11 months voluntarily. "There's high pressure, it's a big, tough, brutal job chairing a fast growing political party. But it's great news he's with us, on we go." The party is expected to appoint a new chairman and deputy chairman next week.

Gerry Adams's lawyer to pursue chatbots for libel
Gerry Adams's lawyer to pursue chatbots for libel

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Gerry Adams's lawyer to pursue chatbots for libel

The high-profile media lawyer who represented Gerry Adams in his libel trial against the BBC is now preparing to sue the world's most powerful AI chatbots for defamation. As one of the most prominent libel lawyers in the UK, Paul Tweed said that artificial intelligence was the 'new battleground' in trying to prevent misinformation about his clients from being spread online. Mr Tweed is turning his attention to tech after he recently helped the former Sinn Fein leader secure a €100,000 (£84,000) payout over a BBC documentary that falsely claimed he sanctioned the murder of a British spy. The Belfast-based solicitor said he was already building a test case against Meta that could trigger a flurry of similar lawsuits, as he claims to have exposed falsehoods shared by chatbots on Facebook and Instagram. It is not the first time tech giants have been sued for defamation over questionable responses spewed out by their chatbots. Robby Starbuck, the US activist known for targeting diversity schemes at major companies, has sued Meta for defamation alleging that its AI chatbot spread a number of false claims about him, including that he took part in the Capitol riots. A Norwegian man also filed a complaint against OpenAI after its ChatGPT software incorrectly stated that he had killed two of his sons and been jailed for 21 years. Mr Tweed, who has represented celebrities such as Johnny Depp, Harrison Ford and Jennifer Lopez, said: 'My pet subject is generative AI and the consequences of them repeating or regurgitating disinformation and misinformation.' He believes statements put out by AI chatbots fall outside the protections afforded to social media companies, which have traditionally seen them avoid liability for libel. If successful, Mr Tweed will expose social media companies that have previously argued they should not be responsible for claims made on their platforms because they are technology companies rather than traditional publishers. Mr Tweed said: 'I've been liaising with a number of well-known legal professors on both sides of the Atlantic and they agree that there's a very strong argument that generative AI will fall outside the legislative protections.' The lawyer said that chatbots are actually creating new content, meaning they should be considered publishers. He said that the decision by many tech giants to move their headquarters to Ireland for lower tax rates had also opened them up to being sued in Dublin's high courts, where libel cases are typically decided by a jury. This setup is often seen as more favourable to claimants, which Mr Tweed himself says has fuelled a wave of 'libel tourism' in Ireland. He also said Dublin's high courts are attractive as a lower price option compared to London, where he said the costs of filing libel claims are 'eye-watering'. He said: 'I think it's absurd now, the level of costs that are being claimed. The libel courts in London are becoming very, very expensive and highly risky now. The moment you issue your claim form, the costs go into the stratosphere. 'It's not in anyone's interest for people to be deprived of access to justice. It will get to the point where nobody sues for libel unless you're a billionaire.' Meta was contacted for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Palantir's H-1B Hiring Sparks Fears Over Sensitive U.S. Data Access
Palantir's H-1B Hiring Sparks Fears Over Sensitive U.S. Data Access

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Palantir's H-1B Hiring Sparks Fears Over Sensitive U.S. Data Access

Palantir Technologies, the surveillance giant under growing scrutiny for its ties to the Trump administration, employs scores of foreign workers even as it helps compile vast amounts of sensitive data on Americans. Palantir sponsored 78 foreign workers in 2024 — the most recent year for which data is available — and has sponsored 263 workers under the program since 2020, The H-1B Salary Database indicates that about half of these roles are for AI and software engineering positions, placing foreign nationals in critical technical roles at a company now reportedly embedded in the core operations of U.S. federal agencies. Nationals from India and China receive the most H-1B visas of any country's workers. USCIS data reveals that during fiscal year 2023, 72% of H-1B visas were issued to Indians, while 12% went to the Chinese. The database disclosures stand in stark contrast to recent revelations from The New York Times, which reported on May 30 that Palantir has become the centerpiece of an ambitious effort by the Trump administration to centralize federal data on American citizens. The reporting detailed how Palantir's Foundry platform is being adopted across agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Health and Human Services, and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), enabling the administration to merge disparate databases that contain financial, medical, and immigration records. The Times reported that Palantir, co-founded by Peter Thiel and led by CEO Alex Karp, received more than $113 million in federal contracts under the Trump administration, not including a new $795 million Department of Defense award. Former employees and privacy advocates voiced concern that the company — already entwined with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Pentagon — is facilitating the construction of what critics describe as a potential 'national citizen database.' The concerns are compounded by the company's international footprint and foreign staffing. Palantir lists between 1,000 and 5,000 employees on LinkedIn, with most external estimates placing its global headcount at just under 4,000. The company maintains a presence on every inhabited continent — including operations and staff in Asia and Europe, according to LeadIQ. A recent Business Insider Africa report also confirmed that Palantir provides artificial intelligence tools to foreign militaries, including those of Israel and Ukraine. The firm held its first 2025 board meeting in Tel Aviv and has partnered with the Israeli Ministry of Defense to support ongoing war efforts. The optics of such international entanglements have not gone unnoticed among former staff. In a letter obtained by NPR and published May 5, thirteen former Palantir employees condemned the company's expanding work with the Trump administration, particularly its $30 million deal with ICE to develop a system capable of tracking migrant movement in near real-time. 'Early Palantirians understood the ethical weight of building these technologies… These principles have now been violated and are rapidly being dismantled at Palantir Technologies,' the ex-employees wrote. The former employees also warned that the software they helped build could now be used for surveillance targeting immigrant families, journalists, and political dissenters. The New York Times further detailed internal dissent among employees disturbed by the firm's proximity to Trump's political agenda. Some engineers reportedly raised red flags about inadequate security practices among Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staff — a Trump-aligned task force spearheading the data initiative, many of whom previously worked at Palantir or companies funded by Thiel. Despite public concerns, Palantir has emphasized that it acts only as a data processor. In a 2020 blog post, the company The White House declined to comment for the Times story but pointed to President Trump's executive order mandating that federal data silos be eliminated in favor of cross-agency access. Supporters argue the plan increases government efficiency and saves taxpayer money. However, critics — including civil liberties lawyers — have warned that concentrating this data creates new risks of abuse. Mario Trujillo of the Electronic Frontier Foundation told the Times, 'If people can't trust that the data they are giving the government will be protected, it will lead to a crisis of trust.' The Dallas Express contacted Palantir to ask whether H-1B workers are processing sensitive American data; a company spokesman did not return a comment by the time of publication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store