Israel far right presses Netanyahu for decisive win against Hamas
Twenty-two months into the war in Gaza, Israel is gripped by a yawning divide, pitting those calling for an end of the conflict along with a deal for the release of the hostages against others who want to see Hamas vanquished once and for all.
The debate has only intensified after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's security cabinet announced plans Friday to expand the conflict and capture Gaza City.
While thousands took to the streets in Tel Aviv Saturday night to protest the cabinet's decision, far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich posted a video online, slamming Netanyahu's decision on Gaza as half-hearted.
"The prime minister and the cabinet gave in to weakness. Emotion overcame reason, and they once again chose to do more of the same -- launching a military operation whose goal is not decisive victory, but rather to apply limited pressure on Hamas in order to bring about a partial hostage deal," Smotrich said.
"They decided once again to repeat the same approach, embarking on a military operation that does not aim for a decisive resolution."
The far-right members of Netanyahu's cabinet, including Smotrich, have maintained considerable influence in the premier's coalition government throughout the war -- with their support seen as vital to holding at least 61-seats for a parliamentary majority.
National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, also of the far right, told Kan radio on Sunday: "It is possible to achieve victory. I want all of Gaza, transfer and colonisation. This plan will not endanger the troops."
In Tel Aviv, demonstrators held up pictures of hostages still in Gaza, calling on the government to secure their release.
"We will end with a direct message to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: if you invade parts of Gaza and the hostages are murdered, we will pursue you in the town squares, in election campaigns and at every time and place," Shahar Mor Zahiro, the relative of a slain hostage, told AFP.
- Wave of condemnation -
Amid the back and forth in Israel, the cabinet's decision to expand the war in Gaza has touched off a wave of criticism across the globe.
On Sunday, the UN security council is set to meet to discuss the latest development.
Foreign powers, including some of Israel's allies, have been pushing for a negotiated truce to secure the hostages' return and help alleviate a humanitarian crisis in the Strip following repeated warnings of an unfolding famine taking hold.
Despite the backlash and rumours of dissent from Israeli military top brass, Netanyahu has remained firm.
In a post on social media late Friday, Netanyahu said "we are not going to occupy Gaza -- we are going to free Gaza from Hamas".
The premier has faced regular protests over the course of the war, with many rallies calling for the government to strike a deal after past truces saw hostages exchanged for Palestinian prisoners in Israeli custody.
Out of 251 hostages captured during Hamas's 2023 attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the military says are dead.
Israel's offensive has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, figures the United Nations says are reliable.
Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel -- which triggered the war -- resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
15 hours ago
- Observer
Palestinian resistance is legally justified
Israel's decision to reoccupy Gaza after October 7 marks the most dramatic shift in Middle East policy since the Arab Spring. As someone who has observed this conflict for decades, I believe this decision represents not just a tactical response but a fundamental abandonment of containment strategy that creates new legal realities justifying the Palestinian resistance under international law. The October 7 operation must be understood within 17 years of blockade that transformed Gaza into what UN Special Rapporteur Michael Lynk described as 'an open-air prison.' The deliberate closure of political avenues for Palestinian liberation — from Oslo's collapse to international acceptance of indefinite occupation — created conditions where violent resistance became, for many Palestinians, the only remaining option. The legal framework is unambiguous. Under international law, specifically Article 1 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, peoples fighting colonial domination and foreign occupation have the right to self-determination, including through armed struggle when other means prove ineffective. While some states contest this interpretation, the principle remains embedded in international legal frameworks precisely because it reflects occupied peoples' fundamental right to resist their oppressors. Israel's reoccupation represents a complete policy reversal. Previous operations — Cast Lead in 2008, Protective Edge in 2014, Guardian of the Walls in 2021 — aimed at degrading Hamas capabilities whilst maintaining blockade and limited engagement. Current reoccupation signals Israeli recognition that containment has fundamentally failed. Israeli officials now speak openly of 'eliminating Hamas' and establishing long-term military control. These objectives require permanent occupation rather than periodic operations. This shift transforms the legal landscape, strengthening the case for legitimate resistance. International humanitarian law's principles of distinction and proportionality apply to all parties, including resistance movements. However, these same principles demand scrutiny of Israel's reoccupation strategy, which has demonstrably failed both tests. By systematically targeting hospitals, schools and water treatment facilities, Israel violates Article 147 of the Fourth Geneva Convention — acts constituting war crimes. The International Court of Justice's recent advisory opinion confirms that prolonged occupation with settlement policies violates international law. This makes reoccupation a clear breach of Article 43 of the Hague Regulations. A Palestinian woman walks inside the damaged Islamic University of Gaza, where she shelters, in Gaza City. - Reuters From a moral perspective, when occupying powers systematically violate international law, resistance becomes not just legally permissible but morally imperative. The human consequences of these legal violations are devastating. According to UN agencies, 1.9 million Palestinians have been displaced, 70 per cent of hospitals are non-functional and 90 per cent face acute food insecurity. This represents what international legal scholars increasingly recognise as weaponising basic necessities to facilitate reoccupation and long-term control. The economic dimension reveals equally calculated destruction. Sara Roy's seminal research on Gaza's 'de-development' demonstrates the systematic dismantling of Palestinian economic capacity to create dependency. Gaza's fishing fleet was reduced from 15,000 to 4,000 workers through Israeli restrictions. Agricultural exports providing sustainable livelihoods have been banned or severely restricted. Reoccupation eliminates remaining economic independence to ensure Palestinian dependency on Israeli-controlled aid and governance. This constitutes collective punishment that international law explicitly prohibits, further justifying resistance. Perhaps most troubling is international acquiescence to reoccupation. This undermines the very legal frameworks justifying the Palestinian resistance. Why is Ukrainian resistance to the Russian war celebrated as heroic while the Palestinian resistance to Israeli reoccupation condemned as terrorism? The United States provides Israel with $3.8 billion annually in military assistance, funding reoccupation operations against Palestinian civilians. European Union trade agreements continue despite the bloc's own determination that Israeli settlements violate international law. Such policies make Western governments complicit in legitimising reoccupation whilst undermining institutions that recognise resistance rights. Despite overwhelming disadvantage, the Palestinian resistance demonstrates remarkable resilience, reflecting their cause's legal legitimacy. Hamas and other factions have developed sophisticated defensive capabilities challenging reoccupation forces. Their tunnel networks represent ingenuity of people exercising internationally recognised rights to resist renewed subjugation. This resistance enjoys growing regional solidarity, demonstrating that the 'axis of resistance' will not accept reoccupation. It bears emphasising that while resistance is legally justified, civilian protection remains paramount for all parties. International solidarity offers hope for supporting legally justified resistance. From university campuses to trade unions, the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement gains momentum whilst South Africa's International Court of Justice case signals growing institutional recognition that the Palestinian resistance deserves international support. However, symbolic solidarity is insufficient. The international community must impose comprehensive sanctions on Israel, end military cooperation, and refuse recognition of reoccupation administration whilst explicitly acknowledging the Palestinian resistance rights. Only decisive action can prevent consolidation of illegal occupation and create conditions for genuine peace based on justice rather than domination. The world's response will determine whether international law is a shield for the oppressed or a tool for the powerful. The question is whether the world will stand with the occupier or with the occupied.
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
5 journalists killed in Israeli strike: Report
Al Jazeera said two of its correspondents, including a prominent reporter, and three cameramen were killed in an Israeli strike on their tent in Gaza City on Sunday. The Israeli military admitted in a statement to targeting Anas al-Sharif, the reporter. The attack was the latest to see journalists targeted in the 22-month war in Gaza, with around 200 media workers killed throughout the conflict, according to media watchdogs. "Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif has been killed alongside four colleagues in a targeted Israeli attack on a tent housing journalists in Gaza City," the Qatar-based broadcaster said. "Al-Sharif, 28, was killed on Sunday after a tent for journalists outside the main gate of the hospital was hit. The well-known Al Jazeera Arabic correspondent reportedly traveled extensively from northern Gaza." The channel said that five of its staff members were killed during the strike on a tent in Gaza City, listing the others as Mohammed Qreiqeh, along with camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, and Moamen Aliwa. Al-Sharif was one of the channel's most recognisable faces working on the ground in Gaza, providing daily reports in regular coverage. Following a press conference by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday, where the premier defended approving a new offensive in Gaza, al-Sharif posted messages on X describing "intense, concentrated Israeli bombardment" on Gaza City. One of his final messages included a short video showing nearby Israeli strikes hitting Gaza City. With Gaza sealed off, many media groups around the world, including AFP, depend on photo, video, and text coverage of the conflict provided by Palestinian reporters. Media watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said in early July that more than 200 journalists had been killed in Gaza since the war began, including several Al Jazeera journalists. International criticism is growing over the plight of the more than two million Palestinian civilians in Gaza, with UN agencies and rights groups warning that a famine is unfolding in the territory.
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
Gazans mourn six journalists killed by Israeli strikes
GAZA: Gazans gathered on Monday for the funeral of five Al Jazeera staff members and a sixth reporter killed in an Israeli strike, with Israel calling one of them affiliated with Hamas. Dozens stood amid bombed-out buildings in the courtyard of Al Shifa hospital to pay their respects to Anas al Sharif, a prominent Al Jazeera correspondent aged 28, and four of his colleagues, killed on Sunday. A sixth journalist, Mohammed al Khaldi, who worked as a freelance reporter, was also killed in the strike that targeted the Al Jazeera team, according to the director of Al Shifa Hospital, Dr Mohammed Abu Salmiya. Their bodies, wrapped in white shrouds with their faces exposed, were carried through narrow alleys to their graves by mourners, including men wearing blue journalists' flak jackets. Israel confirmed it had targeted Sharif, whom it says affiliated with Hamas, saying he "posed as a journalist". Al Jazeera said its employees were hit in a tent set up for journalists outside the main gate of a hospital in Gaza City. The four other staff members killed were Mohammed Qreiqeh, also a correspondent, and cameramen Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa. Sharif was one of the channel's most recognisable faces working on the ground in Gaza, providing daily reports on the now 22-month-old war. The UN human rights agency on Monday condemned Israel's targeted killing of six journalists in Gaza as a "grave breach of international humanitarian law". The office of UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk said on X that the Israeli military had targeted a tent housing five staff from Qatari broadcaster Al Jazeera. "Israel must respect and protect all civilians, including journalists," Turk's office added, noting that at least 242 Palestinian journalists have been killed in Gaza since the war started in the Palestinian territory in October 2023. "We call for immediate, safe and unhindered access to Gaza for all journalists," it said. Journalists (CPJ) called in July for his protection, accusing Israel of a "pattern" of labelling journalists militants "without providing credible evidence". It said the Israeli military had levelled similar accusations against other journalists in Gaza earlier in the war, including other Al Jazeera staff. Al Jazeera called the attack that killed Sharif "a desperate attempt to silence voices exposing the Israeli occupation", as it described Sharif as "one of Gaza's bravest journalists". It also said it followed "repeated incitement and calls by multiple Israeli officials and spokespersons to target the fearless journalist Anas Al Sharif and his colleagues". Reporters Without Borders says nearly 200 journalists have been killed in the war so far. International reporters are prevented from travelling to Gaza by Israel, except on occasional, tightly controlled trips with the military. The strike on the journalists came with criticism mounting over Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's decision to expand the war in the Gaza Strip. The security cabinet voted last week to conquer the remaining quarter or so of the territory not yet controlled by Israeli troops, including much of Gaza City and Al Mawasi, the area designated a safe zone by Israel where huge numbers of Palestinians have sought refuge. Notably, the plans caused Germany, a major weapons supplier and staunch ally, to suspend shipments to Israel of any arms that could be used in Gaza. Australia said it would join a growing list of Western nations in recognising a Palestinian state. Despite the diplomatic reversals, Netanyahu remained defiant. "We will win the war, with or without the support of others," he told journalists on Sunday. The United Nations and humanitarian agencies have condemned the planned expansion. "If these plans are implemented, they will likely trigger another calamity in Gaza," UN Assistant Secretary General Miroslav Jenca told the Security Council on Sunday. UN agencies warned last month that famine was unfolding in the territory, with Israel severely restricting the entry of aid. Israel's offensive has killed at least 61,430 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, figures the United Nations says are reliable. — AFP
