Letters: SNP has taken 18 long years to steer Scotland to success
He ends his statement saying 'Centred on delivery, providing hope, it is a programme that seeks what is best for Scotland, a Programme for Government that gets our nation on track for success'.
On track for success? This surely begs the question what on earth have this hapless SNP administration being doing for the last 18 years – and clearly demonstrates they have achieved no success in any domestic policy area at all.
Richard Allison, Edinburgh.
Read more:
No need to drink on our trains
I note that, with the usual fanfare, the First Minister has announced that peak rail fares are to be scrapped from September.
Bearing in mind that the Scottish Government only recently saw fit to end the peak fare deal, it is hard not to see the latest move as electioneering.
Any joy at this change of heart, however, must surely be tempered by the news that, at the same time, the alcohol ban is to be lifted. Why is it necessary for alcohol to be consumed onScotRail trains when it is widely available at all departure points?
Alcohol consumption on public transport leads, at best, to low-level anti-social behaviour and noise, to the detriment of the greater number of travellers who are happy to refrain. Surely a missed opportunity?
David Edgar, Symington, Biggar.
A Promise that must be fulfilled
Outlined in the Scottish Government's Programme for Government is the Children and Young People (Care) Bill.
This legislation aims to further support The Promise, produced by the Independent Care Review in 2020, and which is Scotland's pledge to care-experienced children and young people that they will grow up loved, safe, and respected.
As a coalition, along with others, we have been advocating for care-experienced individuals, who often face complex situations alone, to have the right to lifelong, independent advocacy.
This will ensure that care-experienced individuals are aware of their rights and can make informed decisions about their lives.
With the Promise Bill now part of the legislative landscape, it is time for this fundamental right, as committed to in The Promise itself five years ago, to be enshrined in law.
Too many individuals are currently missing out on the advice and support they desperately need, often when they need it most.
Scotland has an opportunity to lead the way, and the Bill provides the opportunity to deliver action on advocacy.
The Scottish Children's Services Coalition, Edinburgh: Kenny Graham, Falkland House School; Lynn Bell, LOVE Learning; Stephen McGhee, Spark of Genius; Niall Kelly, Young Foundations.
This pledge will surely be broken
John Swinney has made a remarkable promise to tackle the 8am doctors' appointment chaos by promising 100,000 more appointments to be made available to ease the logjam. I would ask, if he can do this, why did he not do it 10 years ago?
The simple answer is that this is just another election promise that won't be kept by the SNP, to add to the many broken promises made by them but never achieved.
Many doctors have already condemned this promise as completely unachievable as the resources are simply not there.
Dennis Forbes Grattan, Aberdeen.
SNP addicted to headlines
Smoke and mirrors. John Swinney promises 100,000 new GP appointments. Scotland's population is in excess of five million, therefore, in context, this is not a big number.
Reducing rail fares also just means a bigger bill for the taxpayer if ScotRail fails to make a profit.Once again, the SNP love the headlines but don't like the details and it is the details that matter.
Dr Gerald Edwards, Glasgow.
Life in England's cultural shadow
I can't agree with Neil Mackay's assessment of Scottish values in the context of a United Kingdom ('Trump and Farage prove there is such a thing as Scottish values', May 5). Scotland does not have a good track record of wealth generation and financial competence, going all the way back to 1707 and the Darien scheme entered in to with England. This was effectively a bail-out and the price was independence.
Following that humiliation, we have become used to living in the cultural shadow of England having our history, language and culture measured against an English standard. Our historical progress since 1707 has just been a matter of following England's example.
Scottish culture has been crudely stereotyped, portrayed as quaint and romantic, a pastiche of kilts, clans and bagpipes and somehow suspended in a distant past which no longer relevant.
The result has been a legacy of resentment and why many of us believe that greater control over our own politics would foster a more confident and self-assured culture.
The Scottish elite effectively capitulated to the English in the 1707 Act of Union and this one 'choice' has evolved into a pattern of behaviour to become a kind of habituated self-subjugation. This, like self-censorship, is a chosen pre-emptive suppression done to avoid something worse. Political Stockholm syndrome?
When institutionalised to a sufficiently general habit it becomes 'instinctive' and appears as natural or normal – in our case, the canny, circumspect people that the Scots are when they are not being uncouth English-hating savages (depending on your point of view).
This is the single ideological focus of the independence seekers, with no agreed plans for life after freedom whether it be currency, EU membership, borders or any of the other continuously unanswered questions.
At the end of the day, after 318 years it would be nigh-on impossible – not to say catastrophic – to attempt to untangle our relationships with England at a practical level merely to recover our self-esteem and atone for the sins of our fathers.
Accepting the constitutional situation as it is there is ample scope to prosper within the UK. A starting or reset point might be to exchange the current and tiresome blame-and-confrontation approach for one of co-operation and mutual respect. Some of my best friends are English!
Keith Swinley, Ayr.
Seceding from a Farage-led UK
It is being predicted that Nigel Farage could take power in Westminster - and this, ironically, on the anniversary of VE Day. Independence for Scotland has never been more important and if the UK elects a right-wing populist regime we cannot afford to wait for permission from the UK to vote for independence. Our government must declare our independence in the event of a Farage government in the UK.
David Currie, Tarland
Fast-changing landscape
The survey showing how far Reform UK has come in recent years '(Poll: Reform UK could be main opposition to SNP in Holyrood', May 7) is a warning to every mainstream politician.
I dislike all that Nigel Farage stands for but reluctantly concede that he is more relatable than other party leaders. It is not difficult to see why many disaffected voters warm to him. The political landscape changes so quickly and we can only hope that the main parties can by next May have re-appraised their public appeal and keep Farage out.
D Matthews, Glasgow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
29 minutes ago
- Times
Homeowners could pay new property tax instead of stamp duty
Homeowners with properties worth more than £500,000 could have to pay annual property taxes under radical plans to replace stamp duty. The Treasury is reportedly considering a proportional property tax in the budget this autumn, according to The Guardian. Rather than paying stamp duty (which ranges from 2 per cent on the purchase price between £125,000 and £250,000, through to 12 per cent on the portion of the price above £1.5 million) anyone buying a home worth more than £500,000 would face an annual tax. For years there have been calls to overhaul stamp duty, which raised £13.8 billion for the Treasury in the 2024-25 tax year but has been criticised for putting homeowners off moving. There are no firm details to the proposal, but it was reported that the Treasury was looking at suggestions from the centre-right think tank Onward, which would involve homeowners with properties worth more than £500,000 paying a 0.54 per cent annual tax on any value above £500,000. Professor Tim Leunig from the London School of Economics, who came up with the proposals last August, said: 'The way Britain taxes households is both impractical and unfair. Stamp duty raises transaction costs, preventing people from moving for new job opportunities, and undermines growth.' Any home worth more than £1 million would pay 0.81 per cent on the portion of its value over that threshold. Onward's proposals were that the new tax would not be applied retrospectively but would be paid by anyone who bought a home after it was introduced. The 5 per cent stamp duty surcharge for additional homes would remain and those owners would not pay annual levies. Leunig also proposed scrapping council tax and replacing it with a 0.44 per cent annual property tax levied by local authorities on house value between £800 and £500,000 (a maximum of £2,196 a year). Then you would pay 0.54 per cent on the portion above £500,000 to the government, instead of stamp duty. Someone with a £650,000 home would pay £3,006 a year — 0.44 per cent of £499,200 (the maximum £2,196) to their council and then another £810 a year to the government. • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts Treasury officials are reportedly considering a local property tax 'in the medium term' according to the Guardian, while replacing stamp duty could come earlier. The campaign group Fairer Share is calling for the abolition of stamp duty and council tax and for them to be replaced with a flat 0.48 per cent annual property tax. Andrew Dixon from Fairer Share said the reported plans would be a 'step in the right direction'. 'We look forward to working closely with the government to deliver long-overdue reform — creating a modern property tax system that supports local services, reflects real property values, and shares the burden more fairly across homeowners,' he said. The Times reported in May that 83 per cent of homeowners in England would pay less under a 0.48 per cent annual property tax than they did under the council tax system. The biggest losers would be those in London and the south east according to the estate agency Hamptons. House prices in those areas have gone up the most since April 1991, when council tax bands were set based on property values. Dixon said: 'By taxing property transactions, stamp duty discourages homeowners from moving — be it an older couple downsizing or a growing family upsizing. Removing it would lead to a more effective use of housing.' Some 85 per cent of homeowners in England and Wales were 'under-occupiers' with one or more spare bedrooms, according to a survey of more than 4,300 by Barclays. Of those, 73 per cent were over 45, and 37 per cent were over 65. The proportion of homebuyers who were 45 or older has fallen from 45 per cent in the 2015-16 tax year to 39 per cent in 2023-24, according to the estate agency Savills. Some 41 per cent of 2,000 homeowners aged over 55 polled by the estate agency Jackson-Stops said they would downsize within two years if stamp duty was reduced or removed. David Fell from Hamptons said: 'Who is better off will come down to how closely the government chooses to follow any recommendations. But I think in response to the general principle, the shift would probably cut the cost of buying the most expensive homes, but add to the annual cost of ownership, particularly given the artificially low levels of council tax charged by many places that have the most expensive house prices. 'The impact of a change to the system would probably depend on the level at which the rates were set, and the length of time it takes for the higher ownership charges to outweigh existing stamp duty and council tax bills.' The Treasury said it did not comment on speculation about the budget.
Rhyl Journal
2 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Government working ‘at pace' to bring Gazan children to UK for medical care
Sir Keir Starmer's official spokesperson said a cross-government task force is 'up and running', but warned that it is a 'sensitive and complex process'. His comments come after the BBC reported that the first group of critically ill and injured Gazan children, said to be between 30 and 50 patients, will be arriving 'in the coming weeks'. It is understood that the children will come from hospital with family members via a third country, where biometric data will be collected, and that some may enter the asylum system after completing treatment. The Number 10 spokesperson said: 'We're not going to get into a running commentary on numbers or the exact process. 'Exact numbers are going to depend on clinical need and various factors.' He added: 'We continue to take all those plans to evacuate more children from Gaza, who require urgent medical care in the UK and specialist treatment. 'Obviously, it's sensitive and it's a complex process, and the wellbeing of patients and their families is our top priority. 'There's a cross-government task force working together to deliver this new scheme and we'll obviously provide an update as and when we've got them.' The spokesperson continued: 'There's a task force up and running to deliver this (as soon) as possible. 'Patients will obviously be assessed on a case-by-case basis, some will be brought to the UK if that's the best option for their care. 'We obviously continue to provide significant support in the region as well, for evacuations within the region, to support people desperately in need of care. 'And that is on top of the significant aid that we're providing to the region to address the ongoing humanitarian crisis.' He said the Government will give updates on the plans 'as and when we can', but said: 'We are working at pace to deliver it.' More than 50,000 children are estimated to have been killed or injured in Gaza since October 2023, according to Unicef. A small number of children have so far been brought to the UK for specialist medical care via an initiative by Project Pure Hope, and they are being treated privately. The Government's plans, coordinated the Foreign Office, Home Office and Department of Health, is set to see children treated by the NHS. Last month, a cross-party group of 96 MPs wrote a letter to the government urging them to bring sick and injured children from Gaza to the UK, warning that they are at risk of imminent death due to the 'decimation' of the healthcare system. Labour MP Rachael Maskell, who signed that letter, has insisted that there must be 'no delay'. She told the PA news agency: 'There should be no delay in getting children from Gaza the healthcare they need. 'I have met regularly with clinicians on their return from Gaza, who have shared the most distressing stories of the challenges of providing services to children without the equipment and medication that is needed, and in inadequate facilities where they are daily having to make life and death decisions, when in the UK, they know that they would be able to treat and save so many more lives. 'It is vital that we do everything to provide healthcare at scale and more so, do everything to stop the killing in Gaza.'
Rhyl Journal
2 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Sturgeon making Salmond claims because he cannot defend himself, niece says
Christina Hendry said if the former first minister and Alba Party leader was alive today he would have defended himself 'with every fibre of his being'. Ms Sturgeon made several claims about her predecessor in her memoir Frankly, which was published last week. She accused Mr Salmond of creating conspiracy theories over sexual harassment allegations and said he did not read the independence white paper before the referendum in 2014. Ms Sturgeon also said Mr Salmond 'wanted to destroy me' and would have rather seen the SNP fail than succeed without him. Appearing on the BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme, Ms Hendry criticised Ms Sturgeon. She said: 'The way I see it is if my uncle was here today, these things would not be being said. 'I believe they are being said because he's not here to defend himself, as he would have done with every fibre of his being.' Asked what she thought had motivated Ms Sturgeon to make the claims now, Ms Hendry said: 'I'm unsure. I think there's been a few people questioning that. 'But I think the timing of these things being said – there's been a number of years where they've not been said, that these things could have been said, and the timing of it now, where she's released the book and is looking to publicise that. 'I think many people have thought that could be the case.' In her book, Ms Sturgeon said Mr Salmond had never produced a 'shred of evidence' that he was a victim of a conspiracy, adding that he admitted to her the substance of one of the complaints against him. A judicial review into the Scottish Government's handling of complaints against Mr Salmond found the investigation was tainted by apparent bias while a court cleared him of all charges. Ms Hendry said: 'The bottom line is he was cleared in the highest court in Scotland and I think I'm unsure as to why it's being brought up. 'I do think there were people conspiring against him, and I think there's the truth will still come out. 'There are things to still come out in the public, and I think there are many people who should be thinking about their actions.' Ms Hendry added that her family was united in pursuing legal action against the Scottish Government over its botched harassment probe. In December, she announced she would run to be an MSP in one of Mr Salmond's former seats. Ms Hendry said she would contest the Banffshire and Buchan Coast seat for Alba that her uncle had planned to campaign in before his death in North Macedonia in October.
