logo
Letters: SNP has taken 18 long years to steer Scotland to success

Letters: SNP has taken 18 long years to steer Scotland to success

John Swinney has been at the heart of the Scottish Government since 2007 and was Nicola Sturgeon's number two for some considerable time. He has held such government positions as Finance Secretary, Secretary for Education and Skills, Secretary for COVID Recovery and now First Minister.
He ends his statement saying 'Centred on delivery, providing hope, it is a programme that seeks what is best for Scotland, a Programme for Government that gets our nation on track for success'.
On track for success? This surely begs the question what on earth have this hapless SNP administration being doing for the last 18 years – and clearly demonstrates they have achieved no success in any domestic policy area at all.
Richard Allison, Edinburgh.
​Read more:
No need to drink on our trains
I note that, with the usual fanfare, the First Minister has announced that peak rail fares are to be scrapped from September.
Bearing in mind that the Scottish Government only recently saw fit to end the peak fare deal, it is hard not to see the latest move as electioneering.
Any joy at this change of heart, however, must surely be tempered by the news that, at the same time, the alcohol ban is to be lifted. Why is it necessary for alcohol to be consumed onScotRail trains when it is widely available at all departure points?
Alcohol consumption on public transport leads, at best, to low-level anti-social behaviour and noise, to the detriment of the greater number of travellers who are happy to refrain. Surely a missed opportunity?
David Edgar, Symington, Biggar.
A Promise that must be fulfilled
Outlined in the Scottish Government's Programme for Government is the Children and Young People (Care) Bill.
This legislation aims to further support The Promise, produced by the Independent Care Review in 2020, and which is Scotland's pledge to care-experienced children and young people that they will grow up loved, safe, and respected.
As a coalition, along with others, we have been advocating for care-experienced individuals, who often face complex situations alone, to have the right to lifelong, independent advocacy.
This will ensure that care-experienced individuals are aware of their rights and can make informed decisions about their lives.
With the Promise Bill now part of the legislative landscape, it is time for this fundamental right, as committed to in The Promise itself five years ago, to be enshrined in law.
Too many individuals are currently missing out on the advice and support they desperately need, often when they need it most.
Scotland has an opportunity to lead the way, and the Bill provides the opportunity to deliver action on advocacy.
The Scottish Children's Services Coalition, Edinburgh: Kenny Graham, Falkland House School; Lynn Bell, LOVE Learning; Stephen McGhee, Spark of Genius; Niall Kelly, Young Foundations.
This pledge will surely be broken
John Swinney has made a remarkable promise to tackle the 8am doctors' appointment chaos by promising 100,000 more appointments to be made available to ease the logjam. I would ask, if he can do this, why did he not do it 10 years ago?
The simple answer is that this is just another election promise that won't be kept by the SNP, to add to the many broken promises made by them but never achieved.
Many doctors have already condemned this promise as completely unachievable as the resources are simply not there.
Dennis Forbes Grattan, Aberdeen.
SNP addicted to headlines
Smoke and mirrors. John Swinney promises 100,000 new GP appointments. Scotland's population is in excess of five million, therefore, in context, this is not a big number.
Reducing rail fares also just means a bigger bill for the taxpayer if ScotRail fails to make a profit.Once again, the SNP love the headlines but don't like the details and it is the details that matter.
Dr Gerald Edwards, Glasgow.
Life in England's cultural shadow
I can't agree with Neil Mackay's assessment of Scottish values in the context of a United Kingdom ('Trump and Farage prove there is such a thing as Scottish values', May 5). Scotland does not have a good track record of wealth generation and financial competence, going all the way back to 1707 and the Darien scheme entered in to with England. This was effectively a bail-out and the price was independence.
Following that humiliation, we have become used to living in the cultural shadow of England having our history, language and culture measured against an English standard. Our historical progress since 1707 has just been a matter of following England's example.
Scottish culture has been crudely stereotyped, portrayed as quaint and romantic, a pastiche of kilts, clans and bagpipes and somehow suspended in a distant past which no longer relevant.
The result has been a legacy of resentment and why many of us believe that greater control over our own politics would foster a more confident and self-assured culture.
The Scottish elite effectively capitulated to the English in the 1707 Act of Union and this one 'choice' has evolved into a pattern of behaviour to become a kind of habituated self-subjugation. This, like self-censorship, is a chosen pre-emptive suppression done to avoid something worse. Political Stockholm syndrome?
When institutionalised to a sufficiently general habit it becomes 'instinctive' and appears as natural or normal – in our case, the canny, circumspect people that the Scots are when they are not being uncouth English-hating savages (depending on your point of view).
This is the single ideological focus of the independence seekers, with no agreed plans for life after freedom whether it be currency, EU membership, borders or any of the other continuously unanswered questions.
At the end of the day, after 318 years it would be nigh-on impossible – not to say catastrophic – to attempt to untangle our relationships with England at a practical level merely to recover our self-esteem and atone for the sins of our fathers.
Accepting the constitutional situation as it is there is ample scope to prosper within the UK. A starting or reset point might be to exchange the current and tiresome blame-and-confrontation approach for one of co-operation and mutual respect. Some of my best friends are English!
Keith Swinley, Ayr.
Seceding from a Farage-led UK
It is being predicted that Nigel Farage could take power in Westminster - and this, ironically, on the anniversary of VE Day. Independence for Scotland has never been more important and if the UK elects a right-wing populist regime we cannot afford to wait for permission from the UK to vote for independence. Our government must declare our independence in the event of a Farage government in the UK.
David Currie, Tarland
Fast-changing landscape
The survey showing how far Reform UK has come in recent years '(Poll: Reform UK could be main opposition to SNP in Holyrood', May 7) is a warning to every mainstream politician.
I dislike all that Nigel Farage stands for but reluctantly concede that he is more relatable than other party leaders. It is not difficult to see why many disaffected voters warm to him. The political landscape changes so quickly and we can only hope that the main parties can by next May have re-appraised their public appeal and keep Farage out.
D Matthews, Glasgow.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mixed reaction from politicians to news Galloway will not become national park
Mixed reaction from politicians to news Galloway will not become national park

Daily Record

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Mixed reaction from politicians to news Galloway will not become national park

The decision was slammed by Labour's Colin Smyth, while Tories Finlay Carson and John Cooper criticised the NatureScot consultation. There has been a mixed reaction from politicians to the news that Galloway will not become Scotland's third national park. The decision was slammed by Labour's Colin Smyth, while Tories Finlay Carson and John Cooper criticised the NatureScot consultation. ‌ The SNP's Emma Harper believed the decision showed the Scottish Government had listened to local people. ‌ Reacting to Thursday's announcement from Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon at Holyrood, South Scotland MSP Mr Smyth said: 'For too long, Galloway has been Scotland's forgotten corner – and the government made it clear it wants to tear down the 'Welcome to Dumfries and Galloway' signs and put up 'No Entry' instead. 'The Cabinet Secretary knows she could've brought forward plans for Galloway that supported farming and forestry and helped them thrive. She could have built something special. Made a change for the better. Instead, she has taken the easy way out and walked away. 'The government has failed to set out an alternative to its inaction. No plan B to fix a local economy built on low pay. No action to stop the fastest depopulation in mainland Scotland'. 'This isn't just about ditching a national park – this is about ditching Galloway's future.' ‌ The Tories were critical of the consultation process. Dumfries and Galloway MP, Mr Cooper, said: 'The consultation on a Galloway National Park was deeply flawed – it was always far too vague. 'And while I raised right at the start questions about what weighting would be given to the opinions of those living in Dumfries and Galloway compared to those outwith, I never got a satisfactory answer. ‌ 'There were attempts to portray the 'blank sheet of paper' approach of the consultation as a good thing, but it was nebulous, and led to claim and counterclaim about what a Galloway National Park might be like. 'Galloway is not like the other two parks – our hills have hill farms, not just hillwalkers – and no way should remote and distant national park bureaucrats be anywhere near decisions on some of the most productive grassland in the UK. 'Agriculture is the backbone of the economy in Dumfries and Galloway, and it's not just about farmers and stockmen – it's about the hundreds of jobs in associated businesses, from seed merchants to machinery firms, to accountants who do the books.' ‌ Galloway and West Dumfries MSP Mr Carson added: 'The government's handling of the national park selection process has been opaque, inconsistent, and dismissive of genuine local engagement. 'Communities across Galloway invested time, energy, and hope into a process which could and should have united communities, but that process was poorly communicated and ultimately felt predetermined. ‌ 'Rather than fostering trust and collaboration, the Government's approach has sown division and confusion. It has left many wondering whether rural voices are truly being heard in this parliament. 'We could have avoided months of uncertainty and frustration. We should have had an independent review of the existing parks so that lessons could be learned.' Naturecot's consultation revealed the majority of people who responded were from the area that would be covered by the national park, with 54 per cent of respondents against the idea. ‌ South Scotland MSP Emma Harper said: 'Too often the Scottish Government and its agencies are accused of not listening to the voices of the people, so I hope those accusations can be brought to a peep now that the consultation process has been shown to be open, transparent and fair, and was one of the major factors determining the Government's decision. 'Going forward we need to strike the right balance between biodiversity, the natural environment, tourism and the economic development all of our communities are striving for regardless of their views on the park itself. 'I firmly believe that whatever views each of us held on the proposals that were on the table and expressed through the consultation process, we all collectively need to work together on how we develop Galloway economically, socially, and culturally over the years and decades ahead. 'That work would require to be done regardless of whether national park status was a reality, but now the decision has been made it's more relevant and urgent than ever.'

12 new submarines set to be built in UK, the Government has announced
12 new submarines set to be built in UK, the Government has announced

Wales Online

time22 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

12 new submarines set to be built in UK, the Government has announced

12 new submarines set to be built in UK, the Government has announced Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer was due to say today: 'This plan will ensure Britain is secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering a defence dividend of well-paid jobs up and down the country' John Healey appeared on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg yesterday (Image: PA ) The Prime Minister was set to announce today, June 2, that the UK would build up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines and channel £15 billion into enhancing its warhead programme, as part of the Government's strategic defence review. The move will also support 30,000 jobs and is expected to create a further 40,000. ‌ The review includes 62 recommendations, with the Government expected to fully endorse significant investment in the UK's nuclear warhead programme during this parliament and the maintenance of the current arsenal. ‌ However, there has been some uncertainty regarding the Government's pledge to defence spending, following the Defence Secretary's inability to confirm whether the Treasury had secured funding to achieve a target of 3% of GDP by 2034. The construction of the new submarines, a key element of the Aukus alliance with the US and Australia, is expected to support 30,000 highly skilled jobs into the 2030s. It will also create 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate positions over the coming decade, according to the Ministry of Defence. Defence Secretary John Healey said: "Our outstanding submariners patrol 24/7 to keep us and our allies safe, but we know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression." Article continues below He added: "With new state-of-the-art submarines patrolling international waters and our own nuclear warhead programme on British shores, we are making Britain secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering on our Plan for Change with 30,000 highly skilled jobs across the country." The Government's commitment to maintaining the continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrent, constructing a new fleet of Dreadnought submarines and delivering all future upgrades, will be supported by a £15 billion investment into the warhead programme. From the late 2030s, a fleet of up to 12 SSN-Aukus conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines will take over from the seven astute class attack submarines that the UK is set to begin operating. ‌ In line with the strategic defence review, the Government will also commit to: Getting the armed forces to a stage where it would be ready to fight a war Boosting weapons and equipment stockpiles and making sure there is capacity to scale up production if needed in a crisis or war Buying up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons in a move due to support 800 defence jobs Setting up a new cyber command and investing £1 billion in digital capabilities More than £1.5 billion of additional funding to repair and renew armed forces housing. Sir Keir Starmer was due to say: "From the supply lines to the front lines, this Government is foursquare behind the men and women upholding our nation's freedom and security. ‌ "National security is the foundation of my Plan for Change, and this plan will ensure Britain is secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering a defence dividend of well-paid jobs up and down the country. "This strategic defence review will ensure the UK rises to the challenge and our armed forces have the equipment they need that keeps us safe at home while driving greater opportunity for our engineers, shipbuilders and technicians of the future." Both the Conservatives and the Lib Dems have expressed scepticism over Labour's commitment to financing what's proposed. ‌ After fulfilling its promise to elevate defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by April, 2027, the Government has voiced its "ambition to reach 3% in the next parliament". Mr Healey told The Times there was "no doubt" the UK would hit the 3% mark. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . However, during Sunday's broadcast of BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Mr Healey evaded the question regarding Treasury assurances for the proposed funding. ‌ He said he did not foresee an increase in armed forces personnel before the subsequent Parliamentary session amid ongoing recruitment and retention issues. Confronted with queries about when the Army might achieve its 73,000 personnel target, Mr Healey acknowledged: "We've narrowed the gap, but we've still got more people leaving than joining." His immediate priority is to reverse this trend before looking to expand numbers in the following Parliament. ‌ Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said: "All of Labour's Strategic Defence Review promises will be taken with a pinch of salt unless they can show there will actually be enough money to pay for them. "Whereas, far from guaranteeing the funding, John Healey has been hung out to dry by Rachel Reeves. As recently as Thursday, Healey promised that defence spending would definitely hit 3%, but today he's completely backtracked. "These submarines are not due to enter service till the late 2030s, so how can we have any confidence Labour will actually deliver them when they can't even sustain a policy on defence spending for more than 48 hours?". ‌ Lib Dem defence spokesperson Helen Maguire said: "This signals absolutely the right intent about the need to bolster the UK's defences in the face of Putin's imperialism and Trump's unreliability. "But this must come with a concrete commitment and detail on full funding. Labour's mere 'ambition' rather than commitment to reach 3% of GDP on defence leaves serious questions about whether the money for these projects will actually be forthcoming. "The 2034 timeline suggests a worrying lack of urgency from the Government. Unless Labour commits to holding cross-party talks on how to reach 3% much more rapidly than the mid-2030s, this announcement risks becoming a damp squib." Article continues below

Strategic defence review live: Starmer warns of Russia threat as he launches plan to ready UK for war
Strategic defence review live: Starmer warns of Russia threat as he launches plan to ready UK for war

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Strategic defence review live: Starmer warns of Russia threat as he launches plan to ready UK for war

Sir Keir Starmer warned that Britain 'cannot ignore the threat Russia poses,' as he prepares to unveil new measures to put the country on war footing. The prime minister said the world is facing the greatest instability it has for years, ahead of announcing the government's long-awaited strategic defence review. When asked if Britain would go to war with Russia if it invaded a Nato member such as Lithuania, he told BBC Radio 4: 'I very much hope not, and in order to make sure that that isn't the case, we need to prepare. But we cannot ignore the threat that Russia poses.' Later on Monday morning, Sir Keir will unveil new defence measures as a government review concludes that Britain should be ready for war in Europe or the Atlantic. He will pledge to build up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines and invest £15 billion in the nation's warhead programme. However, the PM has faced questions as the announcements come without further spending promises. He said he would not 'indulge in the fantasy politics of simply plucking dates from the air' when it came to the commitment to raise defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP. Starmer to unveil defence review shortly Sir Keir Starmer is set to unveil the government's long-awaited strategic defence review shortly. The prime minister will announce new measures and then face questions from members of the media in Scotland. We will bring you the latest updated here. Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 09:39 Listen: Starmer warns of Russia threat as he launches plan to ready UK for war Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 09:36 Recap: Starmer warns of 'changing world' ahead of defence announcement Sir Keir Starmer appeared on BBC Radio 4 on Monday morning to speak about the government's new defence measures. If you're just joining us now, here is a recap of what he said: • He said Britain must 'prepare' for war in Europe. • He warned that the world is facing the greatest instability it has for 'many, many years'. • Sir Keir faced questions on the lack of spending promises alongside the new defence measures, to which he said 'indulge in the fantasy politics of simply plucking dates [for more spending] from the air'. • He warned that Britain 'cannot ignore the threat Russia poses'. Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 09:25 Starmer says he does not regret winter fuel payment cuts Away from defence policy, Sir Keir Starmer has also addressed his government's U-turn on winter fuel cuts. Appearing BBC Radio 4's Today programme, the prime minister suggested ministers do not regret the decision to means-test the winter fuel payment, even as they are planning steps to partially reverse the move. 'I want to look again at where the threshold is. That's for sure. I'll be clear with you,' he said. 'In relation to that, I do think it was our duty to stabilise the economy and to fill in that £22 billion black hole. And I'm not going to resile from that.' Ministers 'need to be absolutely clear where the money is coming from' before they set out details of a partial U-turn on the winter fuel payment, Sir Keir said. He added: 'But I take your point, which is that if we want to look again at which pensioners are eligible, then the sooner we have clarity on that, the better.' Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 09:17 How many submarines does the Royal Navy currently have? Sir Keir Starmer is set to announce that Britain will build up to 12 new nuclear-powered submarines. Currently, the Royal Navy operates nine submarines, including five Astute-class conventionally armed nuclear-powered attack vessels. The Astute class is Britain's largest and most advanced fleet of submarines. The remaining four are Vanguard-class ballistic missile submarines (SSBN), which carry the UK's Trident nuclear missile system. A new group, the Dreadnought class, will be introduced in the early 2030s. These will be both nuclear-powered and ballistic missile-armed. 2 June 2025 09:04 'The sooner the better,' Starmer says on winter fuel U-turn The Independent's Political Correspondent Archie Mitchell reports: Sir Keir Starmer has said 'the sooner… the better' on when his U-turn on winter fuel cuts will take effect. The prime minister has vowed to restore the payments to some pensioners after a furious backlash. And, hinting a decision could come as soon as next week's spending review, he said: 'If we want to look again at which pensioners are eligible, then the sooner we have clarity on that, the better.' But, asked about the cuts, he said they were 'the right thing to do' given Labour's economic inheritance after the general election. 2 June 2025 08:46 'Yes' Britain will hit 3 per cent of GDP on defence spending Sir Keir Starmer has said Britain will hit a target to spend 3 per cent of its GDP on defence by 2034. The prime minister refused to set out an exact date by which the goal will be reached, but that Labour would ensure it is delivered. Sir Keir said he would not be able to say when it will be met until he knew how it would be paid for, adding: 'I don't believe in performative fantasy politics, and certainly not on defense and security.' And he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'It needs to be ramped up, capability ramped up, but there has to be a defense dividend, which is, what do we get back into our economy?' 2 June 2025 08:36 Starmer getting ready to go to war with Russia (if necessary) The Independent's Political Editor David Maddox reports: Keir Starmer is on the Today Programme this morning talking about his defence review and was asked directly by presenter Nick Robinson if the UK would go to war with Russia if it attacked Lithuania. The prime minister's answer was quite clear and can be summed up as yes, if necessary. The strategic defence review catchline is making Britain 'war ready' and with a war raging in Europe started by Vladimir Putin that can only mean one thing. 'The world has changed, we are entering a new era,' Sir Keir said. 'That's a common feeling across Europe and more broadly.' On the question of Russia potentially invading Nato ally Lithuania, he said: 'I very much hope not.' Hoping not, is not saying he would not do it. In fact it means he would do it in those circumstances. The head of the army Sir Mark Rowley has warned that the UK could be fighting a war in two years while others have warned Russia could invade the Baltics in the next decade. The prime minister hopes readiness to fight will be a deterrent in itself.'In order to make sure that isn't the case (war with Russia), we need to prepare.' Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 08:34 Starmer responds to lack of spending promises on new measures Sir Keir Starmer has declined to promise more spending on defence as he unveils new measures to get Britain on war footing. 'We had a commitment for 2.5 per cent for end of parliament we pulled that right forward to 2027,' he told BBC Radio 4. 'When showed that when we say there's a new era in the defence and security of our country as our first priority that we meant it. He added: 'But I'm not going to indulge in the fantasy politics of simply plucking dates from the air until I'm absolutely clear that I can sit here in an interview with you and tell you exactly how that's going to work.' Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 08:32 Starmer: 'We cannot ignore the threat of Russia' The Independent's Political Correspondent Archie Mitchell reports: Sir Keir Starmer has warned that Britain 'cannot ignore the threat Russia poses'. The prime minister said the UK has to prepare itself to fight a war in order to deter Russian aggression and avoid a conflict with Vladimir Putin. He said the world is facing the greatest instability it has for years, and kept the door open to Britain going to war with Russia if it invades a European Nato member such as Lithuania. He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'In order to make sure that that isn't the case, we need to prepare. But we cannot ignore the threat that Russia poses.' Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 08:23

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store