logo
How Nitrate Film Adds Danger To The BFI FIlm Festival

How Nitrate Film Adds Danger To The BFI FIlm Festival

Forbes05-06-2025
The NFT1 at the BFI Southbank where the BFI Film on Film Festival will be running from 12th-15th ... More June 2025.
If you enter the foyer of the BFI on the London Southbank from the 12th to 15th of June 2025, you'll be confronted with a mechanical machine sporting a large lens at one end and large round disks on the other. This, of course, will be a film projector, complete with platters that contained film—the material that, when light was passed through them, enabled the magic contained inside them to be projected onto the big screen.
While most cinemagoers today would expect their films to be projected digitally, it was only around the 2010s that this became mainstream. For the first 120 years before this, all movies were projected from film, so there's an irony that for many, it will be the first time they will have seen a film projector.
'We thought it'd be fun, because people don't often get to see that kind of thing,' Dominic Simmons, the head of cinema technology, told me on a visit to the BFI Southbank ahead of the festival.
Indeed, this is exactly why there is a space for the BFI to run its now bi-annual Film on Film festival (it first ran in 2023), enabling cineastes, or even regular folk, to see movies on a format that is now exceptional in every sense.
The festival program includes screenings in various formats, from 8mm to 70mm, and 35mm nitrate, to black and white Cinemascope. As has been widely reported, headlining the festival are two showings of an original 1977 release print of Star Wars, sans the 'Episode: IV: A New Hope' subtitle that was only added in 1981, and, of course, the Special edition 'enhancements'. Furthermore, it's a high-quality dye transfer IB Technicolor print, an expensive format that offers the best image quality and the greatest durability, so something special for the lucky few that get to see it.
Other highlights include a 35mm print of The Killing, Stanley Kubrick's first feature from Kubrick's personal print collection, and a showing of his masterwork, 2001: A Space Odyssey, on the greatest possible film format, IMAX 70mm.
What's unique about the festival, though, is that it will provide the opportunity to see movies on nitrate, which was the film stock used from the beginnings of cinema in the 1890s up until 1951, when manufacturing ceased. It stopped making it for two good reasons. First, it is chemically unstable, which causes it to degrade over time, and second, it is highly flammable and can spontaneously combust. In the past, it has done so, causing extensive damage and even loss of life.
Today, screenings of films on original nitrate stock are rare, but five films will be screened at the BFI during the festival. This includes the oldest nitrate film print ever screened to a UK audience, Un Chien Andalou, Luis Buñuel and Salvador Dali's iconic 1929 surrealist classic, screening with Jean Renoir's Partie de campagne, which was released in 1946, but made in 1936.
Today, the majority of films created on nitrate simply no longer exist, and those that do have to be carefully stored. However, thanks to the dedication of BFI staff such as Dominic Simmons, its head of cinema technology, the BFI is one of the few institutions that not only has an archive that carefully preserves Nitrate film but also has the capability of projecting it safely.
The two projectors inside the booth at the NFT1, which, with its 1960s era dials and buttons, resembles an early TARDIS console room, are classics of their kind—two Philips DP70s, which can play both 35mm and 70mm film. A pair is essential, Simmons explained, so that reels can be swapped without recourse to having the entire film on platters, which, while easier for projectionists, require film reels to be spliced together, which can lead to damage.
Dials, buttons and switches give the interior of the NFT1 booth a wonderfully 1960s feel.
In 2021, the fire suppression equipment for nitrate film was reinstated after a change in projectors. This isn't because it's a legal requirement—you are allowed to show Nitrate movies without it, but Simmons says the BFI has 'that extra level of caution' in case the worst should happen.
The equipment consists of canisters containing Novec 1230, an inert liquid, which, in the event of a fire, would flood the projectors, suppressing the flames, while shutters would also automatically drop down to isolate the booth from the auditorium.
If, for some reason, this didn't happen automatically, the projectionists can also hit the large stop button on the projector to stop the film. Furthermore, there's the fact that the booth's walls are constructed of Durasteel.
Ironically, as this was installed many years ago, asbestos, which is known for its fire-resistant properties. While this might be good in terms of fire protection, due to the serious health risk it poses, asbestos has been banned for new builds for many years. As Simmons explains, this is why nothing can ever be removed from the walls of the NFT1 booth, in case it disturbs the dangerous material underneath the Durasteel. This explains why the interior of the booth appears to be, much like a film print itself, locked in a moment in time.
While some might worry about all the precautions needed to show nitrate, Simmons noted that the last time a nitrate film fire occurred at the BFI Southbank (then the National Film Theatre) was in 1968, and while the booth was damaged, no one was hurt. Indeed, I note that the report on the BFI website seems more concerned with the fact that in the same year at the NFT, Jean-Luc Godard started a punch-up.
The two Philips DP70 projectors in situ in the BFI Southbank NFT1 booth.
He admitted, however, that there was an element of stress in running a nitrate print with 450 people in the audience to worry about. This is why, to ensure things go smoothly, there is a team of twelve projectionists working in shifts over the four days of the festival.
'You've got to make sure you're in the right headspace to do it,' he says, 'because you need to be concentrating all the time.'
When it comes to choosing which nitrate films to show in the festival program, a shortlist is drawn up by James Bell, senior curator at the BFI National Archive and programme director for Film on Film, and the wider team. Before this can be done, however, the BFI has to be sure that the print is suitable for exhibition.
As most of the 43,000 nitrate prints stored in the BFI's master film store in Warwickshire have been in storage for decades, each possible selection must be manually checked first. As the BFI's curatorial archivist Sonia Genaitay explained to me, this is a complex and time-consuming process.
Just as projecting nitrate is challenging, their delicate nature means that storing them safely in the archive is equally difficult. To protect them, they are stored at minus five degrees, and before a print can be examined, it must be acclimatized. To avoid the buildup of potentially damaging condensation, this must be done gradually by thawing it out over 24 hours.
They are then transported to the Berkhamsted conservation center, where their condition is examined for deterioration. A key issue is shrinkage, as this could make it unsafe to project. If any strain is placed on the perforations, it could tear inside the projector. Genaitay says that on average, they look at 8-10 prints before finding one good enough to reach the next stage—testing on an actual projector.
The candidate is then cleaned up using ultrasonic machines, and then image quality specialists are brought in to decide if it makes the grade, as what looks good on the bench might not when projected. A key aspect is the number of previous splices, as too many risk the film jumping inside the projector, which again could lead to a break. It's also only at this stage that the sound can be checked, which is another factor that might render it unusable. All in all, Genaitay says finding and getting the five prints for the festival was a six-month process.
Speaking to Genaitay, it was clear that this was a labor of love, however, and she says that she'd watch all four of the nitrates 'over and over again'. Of the four, her favorite is Blanche Fury, describing it as 'one of the most amazing titles in the programme,' due to its 'just perfect,' rich, dye-transfer technicolor print.
While she says that's the one to watch, Genaitay also encourages everyone to see a black and white nitrate title too, if they can, such as Dancing with Crime, starring Richard Attenborough. 'To see a nitrate which is silver-rich on the screen? It's quite incredible.'
So, while battling dangers, whether they in a galaxy far, far away, or in the projection booth a few meters away, with every screening of each special print, the Film on Film Festival is, for a few fleeting moments, shining a flickering light onto a unique piece of our celluloid past.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Rumor Claims Lucasfilm Is Building New Jedi Order Era Coming to STAR WARS Universe — GeekTyrant
New Rumor Claims Lucasfilm Is Building New Jedi Order Era Coming to STAR WARS Universe — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time2 hours ago

  • Geek Tyrant

New Rumor Claims Lucasfilm Is Building New Jedi Order Era Coming to STAR WARS Universe — GeekTyrant

A new rumor has surfaced about the future of the Star Wars universe. The last Star Wars movies we saw on the big screen were not received well by the fan base, as they were not very cohesive, and had a lot to live up to with the high hopes of viewers going in. We've seen several shows set in the same universe released since then, with many of them being pretty good, but yet again, we are facing a new set of films headed our way. Aside from The Mandalorian and Grogu , which is anticipated by fans of the series, and Star Wars: Starfighter , starring Ryan Gosling, it's been announced that the next film to take place inside the timeline we know from the main nine films will be called Star Wars: New Jedi Order . This was previously announced, but a new rumor claims that this film will just be the start of a new era in the Star Wars timeline. According to industry scooper Daniel Richtman, Lucasfilm plans to create a New Jedi Order era that will be set after the events of The Rise of Skywalker . This era will 'be similar to the Mandoverse' and will 'gradually build towards a major event that brings together characters introduced in past films.' According to Ritchman, this era will begin with the upcoming Daisy Ridley Rey movie. This is just a rumor at this time, as it has not been officially confirmed by Lucasfilm, but it does make sense that they'd shoot for a new trilogy that could maybe be seen as redemptive by the fans. What we know so far about the first film is that Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy ( Ms. Marvel ) has been tapped to direct the Rey movie, which will take place about 15 years after The Rise of Skywalker , and will focus on Rey constructing a new Jedi Order. Stay tuned for updates on the Star Wars universe.

Is an AI backlash brewing? What 'clanker' says about growing frustrations with emerging tech
Is an AI backlash brewing? What 'clanker' says about growing frustrations with emerging tech

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Is an AI backlash brewing? What 'clanker' says about growing frustrations with emerging tech

It's a slur for the AI age. 'Clanker,' a word that traces back to a Star Wars video game, has emerged in recent weeks as the internet's favorite epithet for any kind of technology looking to replace humans. On TikTok, people harass robots in stores and on sidewalks with it. Search interest for the term has spiked. On X, Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., used the term last week to tout a new piece of legislation. 'Sick of yelling 'REPRESENTATIVE' into the phone 10 times just to talk to a human being?,' he posted on X. 'My new bill makes sure you don't have to talk to a clanker if you don't want to.' In one video, which has more than 6 million views on TikTok, a small, four-wheeled delivery robot gets berated with the word. 'It makes me sick just seeing a...' Nic, a 19-year-old student and aspiring content creator in Miami Beach who posted the video, says as it approached, adding: 'Clanker!' A slur is generally defined as a word or phrase meant to denigrate a person based on their membership to a particular group such as a race, gender or religion — one that goes beyond rudeness into overt bigotry. They are almost always directed at people. 'Clanker' appears to have peeked into the internet's lexicon starting in early June, with Google Trends data showing a sudden uptick in search interest. An entry on a website dedicated to documenting the varied weirdness of the internet, traced the term back to the 2010s, when Star Wars communities adopted it from its use in various Star Wars shows to refer to battle robots. Other pieces of science fiction also predicted the rise of slurs for machines, most notably 'Blade Runner,' with 'skinjob' to refer to highly advanced, humanlike robots. But there's a catch. By using a slur in a way that would typically apply to a human, people are also elevating the technology, offering some sense that people both want to put down the machines and recognize their ascension in society. Adam Aleksic, a linguist who is also a content creator focused on how the internet is shaping language, said he first noticed the emergence of 'clanker' a couple of weeks ago. Its use mirrored classic slurs related to racial tropes and appeared to emerge out of a growing 'cultural need' related to growing unease with where advanced technology is heading. In one video — somewhat ironically appearing to have been created by AI — a man berates his daughter during a family dinner for dating 'a goddamned clanker,' before his wife steps in and apologizes to the robot. 'What we're doing is we're anthropomorphizing and personifying and simplifying the concept of an AI, reducing it into an analogy of a human and kind of playing into the same tropes,' Aleksic said. 'Naturally, when we trend in that direction, it does play into those tropes of how people have treated marginalized communities before.' The use of 'clanker' is rising as people are more often encountering AI and robots in their daily lives, something that is only expected to continue in the coming years. The steady expansion of Waymo's driverless cars across U.S. cities has also come with some human-inflicted bumps and bruises for the vehicles along the way. Food delivery bots are an increasingly common sight on sidewalks. In the virtual world, cybersecurity firms continue to warn about the proliferation of bots on the web that comprise a growing share of all web traffic — including as many as one in five social media accounts. The anti-machine backlash has long been simmering but is now seemingly breaking to the surface. A global report by Gartner research group found that 64% of customers would prefer that companies didn't use AI for customer service — with another 53% stating they would consider switching to a competitor if they found out a company was doing so. People are becoming more worried about AI taking their jobs, even though evidence of actual AI-related job losses is relatively scant. 'Clanker' is also not the first pejorative term for something related to AI to have spread across the internet. 'Slop' as a catchall term for AI-generated content that is of low quality or obviously created by AI — such as 'shrimp Jesus' — entered internet parlance last year and has since become widely used. Other anti-AI terms that have emerged include 'tin skin' and 'toaster,' a term that traces back to the science fiction show Battlestar Galactica. And there's even some pushback — joking and serious — about whether such slurs should be used. In a Reddit community for Black women, a post about 'clanker' offered some sense of the tension: 'And I know it's probably a joke in all from social media, but I can't help but feel like it's incredibly tasteless.' Others have noted that some of the enthusiastic embrace of 'clanker' feels more about being able to throw around a slur rather than any deeper issue with technology. Nic, whose TikTok video helped spark the 'clanker' phenomenon, said he sees both why people have taken to the phrase as well as why some find it problematic. Nic, who asked to withhold his last name out of privacy concerns, said he did sense some people were using the word as a stand-in for a racial epithet. Still, Nic, who is Black, said he saw the term more broadly as a lighthearted way to express a growing anxiety with where technology is headed, particularly as it pertains to the future of employment. 'I see it as being a push back against AI,' he said. 'A lot of lives are being changed because of robots ... and me personally I see it as a stupid way of fighting, but there's a little truth to it, as well.' This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword

'Star Wars: Starfighter' casting news: 'House of the Dragon' star is officially teaming up with Ryan Gosling
'Star Wars: Starfighter' casting news: 'House of the Dragon' star is officially teaming up with Ryan Gosling

Tom's Guide

time2 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

'Star Wars: Starfighter' casting news: 'House of the Dragon' star is officially teaming up with Ryan Gosling

The good news keeps coming for "Star Wars" fans — after the exciting announcement that superstar Ryan Gosling would be leading the beloved franchise's upcoming standalone film, "Star Wars: Starfighter," the cast has just gotten an equally exciting, and fiery, addition: "House of the Dragon" star Matt Smith. The British actor already knows his way around a major genre franchise, from his role as the 11th Doctor in the BBC sci-fi classic "Doctor Who" and Daemon Targaryen in HBO's fantasy drama "House of the Dragon." Now, he'll be joining the "Star Wars" universe, according to a Deadline exclusive, though details on the villain that Smith will reportedly play are scant. It's a bit of a full-circle moment for Matt Smith, who was originally cast in 2019's "Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker," though the part didn't make it onscreen. "Starfighter" will take place approximately five years after the events of that film. 'We were close to being in it, but it never quite happened. I think the thing they were thinking of before. Eventually, the part became obsolete, and they didn't need it. So, I never got to be in 'Star Wars,'' he told the "Happy Sad Confused" podcast in 2021. Though he played coy on exactly who he was meant to play in "The Rise of Skywalker,' Smith added, 'It was a really groovy part and concept. It was a big thing, a big story detail. A transformative 'Star Wars' story detail. But it never quite got over the line. It was a big shift in the history of the franchise.' Looks like he'll get another chance to make a mark on the fan-favorite franchise along with Gosling and previously announced cast member Mia Goth in "Star Wars: Starfighter," which will be helmed by Canadian filmmaker Shawn Levy ("Deadpool & Wolverine", "Free Guy"). With a screenplay written by Jonathan Tropper ("Warrior," "Your Friends & Neighbors", "Starfighter" will reportedly not be connected to the nine films that make up the franchise's ongoing Skywalker Saga, and will serve as a standalone film. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. "It's not a prequel, not a sequel," Levy announced in April at a Star Wars Celebration panel in Tokyo, per The Hollywood Reporter. "It's a new adventure. It's set in a period of time that we haven't seen explored yet." Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store