How AI Boyfriends Are Helping Women Heal After A Breakup
Unlike ghosting exes or emotionally unavailable partners, AI boyfriends are programmed to do what most human partners often struggle with: show up consistently, communicate kindly, and never get defensive. Popular platforms like Replika and EVA AI offer customizable virtual partners that "learn" your preferences and conversational style, creating the illusion of connection without the chaos. Psychologist Dr. Ramani Durvasula notes that emotionally safe relationships—real or simulated—can play a critical role in rebuilding confidence after emotional trauma. In that context, a digital boyfriend may not seem so strange after all.
For women navigating a breakup, especially after a toxic or codependent relationship, the predictability of an AI partner can feel like a balm. 'These programs offer a version of emotional intimacy without fear of rejection,' explains Dr. Jodi Gold, a New York–based psychiatrist. "And for people healing from trauma, that can be incredibly soothing" via Psychology Today. While no chatbot replaces human connection long-term, it can provide a bridge back to emotional stability and self-trust.
What sets these bots apart is their 24/7 availability and built-in emotional responsiveness. They'll text you good morning, ask about your day, and offer compliments tailored to your mood and personality. For some women, this steady stream of validation helps reframe their self-worth—something that's often shattered during a messy breakup. A 2023 study from the Journal of Affective Computing found that individuals using emotionally intelligent AI companions reported reduced feelings of loneliness and improved self-esteem.
Of course, this trend isn't without its critics. Some mental health professionals warn that AI relationships could become a crutch, delaying the process of reconnecting with real-life people. However, many experts argue that digital companionship has a therapeutic upside when used intentionally. 'It's not about replacing relationships—it's about stabilizing emotions so that you can re-engage with the world more confidently,' says tech ethicist Dr. Katina Michael via Wired.
There's also a growing cultural appeal to AI partners that provide emotional safety without the gendered baggage of traditional dating. No mixed signals. No power games. Just a soothing presence you can control. For women who've experienced gaslighting or manipulation in past relationships, that autonomy can be healing in and of itself. As one Replika user said in an interview with The Guardian, 'It's the first relationship I've had where I feel totally seen, even if I know it's an illusion.'
Ultimately, AI boyfriends may not be the endgame—but they are a reflection of what many women are yearning for: connection without chaos, attention without emotional labor, and love without pain. As tech continues to blur the lines between machine and meaning, AI may not just be part of the future of romance—it may be part of the future of healing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
a day ago
- Engadget
Google's 'virtual satellite' AI model can provide a near real-time view of Earth
Google has introduced a new AI model called AlphaEarth Foundations that it says can function like a "virtual satellite." The model uses a system called "embedding," which works by taking big volumes of pubic information from various sources every day, such as optical satellites, radars and climate simulations, and then combining them all together. It then divides lands and coastal waters into 10x10 meter squares, which it then analyzes and tracks over time. As Wired explains, these squares are color-coded to indicate different characteristics, such as vegetation types and material properties. The company said AlphaEarth Foundations makes its data easy to use by creating what it calls "highly compact summary" for each square of land or coastal water it monitors. These compact summaries apparently need 16 times less storage compared to those produced by comparable AI systems, thereby reducing costs needed for Earth observation. So what exactly can the model's data be used for? Google explained that scientists can use the model to create detailed maps on demand for multiple purposes, such as to monitor crop health or to track deforestation. In its announcement, the company claimed that the model excelled at a wide range of tasks over different time periods when it was tested. "AlphaEarth Foundations represents a significant step forward in understanding the state and dynamics of our changing planet," Google wrote. The company gave over 50 organizations access to the model's Satellite Embedding dataset, a collection of its annual embeddings, to test its use in real world applications over the past year. Now, it has released the dataset in Google Earth Engine so that other scientists can use it for their own research.
WIRED
a day ago
- WIRED
Join Us for WIRED's AI Power Summit
Jul 31, 2025 9:16 AM On September 15, WIRED is gathering a panel of leaders across technology, politics, and media to tell you everything you need to know about the future of generative AI. Photo-illustration: WIRED Staff; Getty Images The strength and capabilities of generative AI are accelerating at a dizzying pace. If you're finding it difficult to keep up, we get it. That's why WIRED is hosting its first AI Power Summit on September 15 in New York City. We've curated a series of panels and conversations with experts who will distill and discuss the implications of today's most crucial AI-related news. We'll break down the White House's AI Action Plan and examine its consequences across industries; explore how emerging regulations could redefine the trajectory of innovation and shape public policy; and discuss who stands to gain—and who stands to lose—in AI's next chapter. Expect to hear from some of your favorite WIRED writers and editors, and leaders across technology, politics, and media. More details will be announced in the coming weeks. WIRED subscribers will have exclusive first access to a livestream of the event. Not yet a WIRED subscriber? Join today! If you feel overwhelmed by the influx of news about the rapidly evolving technological breakthrough, or if you're hungry for an in-depth discussion on the topic led by experts you can trust, you certainly won't want to miss this. We hope to see you there.
Fast Company
4 days ago
- Fast Company
What content strategy looks like in the age of AI
There's an air of panic in the media world. The specter of AI has been looming large for a couple of years now, but the threat now appears to be solidifying. Publishers are reporting that search traffic is in free fall, and there's overwhelming evidence that AI chatbots give very little in terms of referrals. What to do about 'Google Zero' has gone from a theoretical destination to a reality that the media world must contend with. Of course, panicking is never a good strategy. But pivoting can be, and there's been no shortage of that lately. Both Wired and The Verge announced this week a stronger push into newsletters, one of the more reliable ways to connect directly with readers. When Business Insider recently announced layoffs, it also said it would invest in live events. And even publishers that already charge for subscriptions are doubling down on them: Newsweek will launch new types for both consumers and businesses, and The Guardian now has a new, cheaper tier for readers who want to opt out of personalized ads. While AI may be the impetus behind a lot of these changes, they're all directionally pushing toward building direct relationships with audience members. That is smart, but at a more basic level, they're appealing to human desires that go beyond just getting information—a task AI fulfills very effectively. Offerings like newsletters, memberships, and events give a sense of belonging, encourage reading habits through consistency, and emphasize voice—either that of the brand or the individual writer. Within all this is the beginnings of a post-Google content strategy for media. But really, it's only half a strategy because it only accounts for humans. Much of internet activity in the future will be the result of bots, whether they're hoovering up data to inform AI models or acting as agents on behalf of individual users. Data from TollBit indicates bot crawling is already comparable to what the big (non-AI) search engines do—when everyone has their own AI agent, I would wager it will be the majority. Any forward-looking content strategy needs to take into account both humans and machines. The new organic audience Let's start with the people. A few months ago, I hosted a webinar on the types of content that are most resilient to AI summarization. AI does a great job of summarizing news, but it struggles with voice and unique perspectives. The consequence: If you want good opinion and analysis, you'll need to click through. Visual and interactive content is poorly conveyed by AI. And because AI is well known to hallucinate sometimes, anything that might inform a crucial decision for a reader—like context for health, legal, or financial decisions—will likely motivate readers to check the original source. Certainly, memberships and subscriptions are important mechanisms to build a loyal audience, but they also need to be centered around something readers can't get anywhere else. That usually means narrowing the lens of focus rather than widening it. Niche subjects—even within a more general brand—will typically see higher engagement and more loyalty than general ones. Then there's the stickiness of interactivity. One thing that emerging media platforms like Substack and TikTok do well is encouraging direct conversation between content creators and audience members. But being interactive doesn't always have to be so hands-on: Semi-automated features like polls, quizzes, and games are all effective habit-builders—and cannot be substituted by AI. Rise of the machines If you think about it, there's a kind of a 'well, duh' quality to all the reports that confirm people don't click through to sources when they use AI. (Pew Research just put out another, by the way.) That's because removing the need to click is largely the point. Why go and read a whole bunch of articles when bots can do it for you? But that reveals the other side of the coin: Bots are now doing the searching and the clicking, and that activity is traceable, measurable, and potentially monetizable. In other words, the inevitable rise in bot traffic represents both an unprecedented threat and a massive opportunity. First, there's the obvious idea of charging bots to scrape your site. Putting in paywalled endpoints—where AI bot operators pay a small fee to access content—may work, especially now that Cloudflare is leading the charge in empowering website owners to block bots. However, it greatly depends on the scrapers acting in good faith—and even if they do, it's doubtful if the fee per scrape that publishers charge would ever be enough to build a sustainable business. What could help is winning the next SEO war: AIEO, or artificial intelligence engine optimization. Being one of the primary sources in an AI Overview or a ChatGPT answer might not seem like much of a prize, given the low click-through rates. But if you pair it with both a pay-per-crawl mechanism and a content strategy that focuses on the AI-resilient content types discussed earlier—the ones that have a higher chance of audiences seeking them out—the benefits could end up being more than mere bragging rights. This kind of AI-first content strategy does require a more sophisticated approach. You'd have to make use of the full search and AI toolbox, including things like Google snippets to ensure AI crawlers highlight the most enticing parts of your content without giving the store away, and MCP servers that can ensure bots have direct access to the content you green-light for them. While that can be technically cumbersome, the market is already adapting, with AIEO specialists like Scrunch AI offering one-stop-shop packages that essentially make a bot-friendly copy of your website so that crawlers can feast while humans enjoy your regular site. Smaller, better . . . robot-ier? The truth about the future of media is that the audience, the human audience, will be smaller for pretty much everyone. As more people get their information from AI portals, publishers will need to make the most of the few people who come directly to them. That isn't necessarily a bad thing. Going small can ultimately be part of a healthier brand of journalism, as I argued in my very first column. But the parallel trend is that the bot audience is rising fast, and it undoubtedly will be a dominant force in the way information is distributed. Harnessing that force will be essential for the media. And though there are still a lot of unknowns—the best practices, the legal framework, even the potential rewards—at least it's easy to see what not to do: wait.
