Han Duck-soo joins People Power Party, Kim's candidacy revoked
Former Prime Minister and acting President Han Duck-soo joined the People Power Party around 3 a.m. on Saturday, following the party leadership's decision to revoke ex-Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo's status as presidential candidate.
Han announced in a press briefing that he has joined the People Power Party as of Saturday and highlighted his goal of helping South Korea 'move forward.'
'I only have one goal – it's to prevent the miracle that's happening from ending and to help South Korea continuously move forward. I believe that is the will of pthe people and the will of my fellow party members,' he added.
Ahead of Han's announcement, the party's leadership decided to 'cancel the nomination' Kim following a meeting of the election management committee and emergency committee.
The party then opened a new candidate registration process from 3 a.m. to 4 a.m. Kim reportedly reapplied for the process. The party's new presidential candidate will be announced during a national committee meeting scheduled for Sunday.
Kim warned to take legal actions against the party's moves as the meeting of the election management committee and emergency committee convened.
The ruling party's unprecedented move came amid a growing rift within the conservative bloc over the candidacy merger scenario between Kim and Han.
The party leadership had pressured Kim to swiftly unify his candidacy with Han by Sunday, which is the deadline for candidate registration with the National Election Commission. Kim, who officially won the People Power Party's primary race last week refused to heed to the party's request, denouncing it as an 'illegal' plan to replace him with Han as candidate.
Han, who was more popular in various opinion polls, compared to Kim, had insisted the merger to be finalized by Sunday. He pointed to the need to better counter Democratic Party of Korea candidate Lee Jae-myung, who has led several opinion polls, without dividing the conservative votes.
The party's decision to cancel Kim's nomination came hours after Kim and Han held their third meeting over the issue of candidacy merger. The meeting collapsed in less than 30 minutes after it kicked off at 8:30 p.m. at the National Assembly. The previous two meetings also ended without agreements.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Editorial] No retaliation in probes](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] No retaliation in probes
Special counsels should be neutral figures to avoid suspicions of revenge, oppression Three bills mandating special counsel probes into allegations involving the administration of former President Yoon Suk Yeol were enacted Tuesday following approval at a Cabinet meeting. One of the bills requires special counsels to investigate insurrection and treason charges related to Yoon's failed declaration of martial law. The second bill calls for a probe into allegations against Yoon's wife, Kim Keon Hee. She allegedly accepted luxury goods as bribes, manipulated stock prices and intervened illegally in the People Power Party's nomination of candidates for the National Assembly. The third bill deals with the death of a Marine who drowned while searching for missing flood victims and the presidential office's alleged pressure on officials investigating his death. The bills mark the first legislation for President Lee Jae-myung since taking office last week. Their passage through the Assembly was led by the ruling Democratic Party of Korea. Simultaneous special counsels investigating three cases against key figures from the previous administration and possibly lawmakers from the People Power Party are unprecedented. In light of the seriousness of the allegations, the truth needs to be uncovered. But the investigations should be impartial and transparent. If not, they are likely to be caught up in suspicions of political retaliation. Investigations of the allegations in question are either completed or ongoing. They were conducted separately by the prosecution, the police and the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials. The government and the ruling party say the legislation was intended to increase the efficiency of the investigations by integrating the separate probes and revealing the overall truth in all three cases, but there is concern about the scale of the investigation and how special counsels are appointed. As many as 120 prosecutors will be assigned to three special counsel teams. This figure is more than half of the number of prosecutors at the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office, the nation's largest. Hundreds of investigation officers and assistants will also join. Allocating so many resources to the special counsel probes could set back investigations into other cases affecting the lives of ordinary people. Among other provisions, the bills give only the Democratic Party and the minor opposition Rebuilding Korea Party, which almost always stands by the now-ruling party, the exclusive right to recommend special counsels in the three cases. It is hard to dispel worries about the political neutrality of their investigations. The appointment of special counsels is a supplementary system designed to keep those in power from pushing biased investigations. It should be used in exceptional circumstances and only as necessary. But the Democratic Party unilaterally passed bills that expand the scope of special counsel probes and grant nominating authority exclusively to certain parties. It is true that suspicions about the previous administration still need to be addressed, and some investigations have been criticized as insufficient. But in a situation where Lee and the Democratic Party are now in power, it is questionable whether special counsels are even necessary to investigate the previous administration instead of using the existing judicial system. It is difficult to erase suspicions of political motivations. The opposition People Power Party has condemned the bills, arguing that the special counsels' "triple investigations" are political revenge. If the investigations were used as a lever of power for political suppression, as the People Power Party worries, it would be a grave threat to democracy. The special counsel investigations should not split the nation into "us versus them," either. People experienced deep division during the Moon Jae-in administration due to its drive to eliminate "the evils of the past," which led to claims of a political vendetta. Lee vowed to base his government on "integration." If so, the special counsel probes should serve as a just means of revealing the truth and ultimately restoring the rule of law, not a means for retaliation and oppression. That begins with appointing special counsels who are politically unbiased and widely respected.
Korea Herald
10 hours ago
- Korea Herald
N. Korean leader Kim sends message congratulating Putin on Russia Day
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un sent a message congratulating Russian President Vladimir Putin on Russia Day, the North's state media reported Wednesday. North Korean Ambassador to Russia Sin Hong-chol "respectfully" conveyed Kim's message to the relevant official at the Russian foreign ministry, the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) said. Russia Day, which falls in June 12, is a national holiday that marks the 1990 adoption by the Russian parliament of the declaration of state sovereignty of the present-day Russian Federation. Details of Kim's letter were not disclosed, but the message likely reaffirmed the North's commitment to advancing their bilateral relations based on the treaty signed by the two leaders in June last year. In his previous message to Putin on Russia Day last year, Kim called their bilateral ties "a strategic asset" for both countries, reaffirming the North's steadfast commitment to advancing the relationship "in line with the demands of the new era." (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
15 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Is People Power Party headed for dissolution?
Expert says dissolving party 'would be difficult,' suggests strong reform, rebranding Voices either calling for or expressing concerns over the dissolution of the main conservative People Power Party have grown in recent days. This comes amid a widening rift within the party over the defeat in the June 3 presidential election, coupled with looming threats of being subjected to special counsel investigations targeting impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol on multiple charges connected to his failed martial law bid. But an expert expressed skepticism over the scenario of a dissolution, saying such cases have been rare. The liberal and ruling Democratic Party of Korea's Rep. Park Hong-geun on Wednesday floated the idea of swiftly passing a bill that he drafted in March that would dissolve the 'party of a president' convicted of impeachment or treason. In March, Park, along with several other Democratic Party lawmakers, drafted a bill to amend the Political Parties Act and allow the Ministry of Justice to review and file a dissolution of the party under such circumstances with the Constitutional Court, without delay. Under the current law, the Constitutional Court alone has the power to dissolve political parties. 'At the time when the bill was drafted, I wasn't focused on (pushing for) the passage of the legislation because I had reasonable expectations that the People Power Party would reflect upon their actions and reform once former President Yoon Suk Yeol was removed from office and the party loses the early election,' Park wrote in a Facebook post. 'With the People Power Party refusing to look back or reform until the end, shouldn't the National Assembly pass the amendment to the Political Parties Act and (the main People Power Party) be dissolved in accordance with the request of (the people) and a legal process?' Park denounced snowballing conflicts within the main conservative party. Interim leader Kim Yong-tae, has called for reform, including changing the months-old party line of voting against Yoon's impeachment motion. The majority of the People Power Party lawmakers boycotted the plenary vote on the party line. Supporters of Yoon within the conservative party, meanwhile, have called for party leadership, including Kim, to step down and take responsibility for the election loss. On the other side of the political sphere, former Daegu Mayor and heavyweight conservative politician Hong Joon-pyo has warned the People Power Party 'to brace for' President Lee Jae-myung's apparent plans to dissolve the party. 'After the Lee Jae-myung administration wraps up the special counsel investigations (against Yoon and his wife Kim Keon Hee) they are expected to launch a process to dissolve the party, so brace for (a situation) where every man will become himself,' Hong wrote in a Facebook post Wednesday. One of the three special counsel probe bills promulgated by Lee on Tuesday is to look into allegations that the People Power Party leadership at the time stood in the way of the Assembly's move to pass a motion to lift Yoon's martial law bid early in the morning of Dec. 4, 2024. Observers have expressed concerns this could serve as grounds for the Constitutional Court to approve the dissolution of the party. However, Park Sang-byeong, a political commentator and professor at Inha University, pointed out that the dissolution of a political party is a process that is 'more complicated than it seems on the surface' and that the court would find the leadership's alleged involvement to be an 'insufficient' argument. "There is expected to be reform or a rebranding of the party, but it would be difficult and insufficient for the Constitutional Court to dissolve the People Power Party on the current reasons cited by the ruling party," the expert said via phone. "A strong reform and rebranding would be a plausible solution for the People Power Party." mkjung@
