Hegseth Makes Bonkers Claim About Iran Strikes Place in History
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has sparked online ridicule after boldly claiming that the U.S. attack against Iran was the most complex and secretive military operation in history.
The bizarre comment was made during a press conference in which the former Fox & Friends host lashed out angrily at the media for reporting on a leaked intelligence report suggesting the strikes may not have 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear facilities.
Known as Operation Midnight Hammer, the strikes directed by Donald Trump on Saturday were carried out using deception, decoys, and bunker bombs to target Iran's key nuclear facilities.
But while the mission was militarily impressive, experts fear that the administration's decision to telegraph possible US involvement for days allowed Iran to stockpile some of its nuclear enrichment material before the attack took place.
Despite these concerns, Hegseth doubled down on Trump's claim that Iran's nuclear program had been 'obliterated', telling reporters: 'President Trump directed the most complex and secretive military operation in history, and it was a resounding success, resulting in a cease fire agreement and the end of the 12 day war.'
The comment about the attack's place in history sparked online ridicule from some, while others pointed out that other U.S. operations were arguably more secretive and complex.
'It is difficult to square that against other missions, such as the surprise D-Day landing in France in 1944 which involved hundreds of thousands of soldiers and led to the eventual defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II, or a more recent example, such as the SEAL Team 6 mission that killed Osama Bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan in 2011,' former navy and Iraq veteran John Ismay, a reporter for the New York Times.
'According to Hegseth, Trump dropping bombs from 30,000 feet is somehow more complex than coordinating the largest amphibious invasion in world history,' wrote a social media user on X, in reference to the D-Day operation. 'These people aren't just rewriting history, they're burning the textbooks.'
'Pete needs to back off the kool-aid,' quipped another.
Taking out Bid Laden was a highly classified mission involving black ops planning, intelligence tracking, and a daring night-time raid.
The D-Day operation was even more elaborate, as it involved multi-level cooperation between U.S, Canadian, British, and French troops as well as more than 150,000 soldiers landing on five beaches, more than 11,000 aircraft, and more than 7000 ships.
It also included a top-secret plan to mislead Adolf Hitler about when an invasion would take place.
At the press conference on Thursday, Hegseth and General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, gave the most detailed briefing yet of the planning and execution of the U.S. airstrikes.
They also pushed back on the leaked intelligence report, based on information just a day-and-a-half after the U.S. attack.
The early analysis by the Defense Intelligence Agency described the damage as 'limited' and said the strike may have set back the Iranian nuclear program by just a matter of months.
Hegseth said the agency itself had noted the assessment was a 'preliminary, low-confidence report that will continue to be refined.'
However, he and Caine offered no new assessments of the state of Iran's nuclear program or the full extent of the battle damage to the three targets: Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan.
Instead, Hegseth referred to the comments of the nation's spy agencies and others who backed the president's view about the success of the strikes.
Among them was a statement from CIA director John Ratcliffe, who wrote: 'CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's Nuclear Program has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes.
'This includes new intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years. CIA continues to collect additional reliably sourced information to keep appropriate decision-makers and oversight bodies fully informed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
9 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
‘Rights are under attack': S.F. Pride parade kicks off with mix of flamboyance, resistance
As San Francisco's month-long LGBTQ+ Pride celebration culminated Sunday in a massive rainbow-laden party packing city streets, event leaders made one thing clear: These were no ordinary festivities. President Donald Trump's recent assault on queer and transgender protections prompted some of San Francisco Pride's biggest corporate sponsors to flee, raising important questions about the iconic event's future. Should it become more of a protest than a party? And, present political climate aside, could a budget shortfall force organizers to scale things back? With Pride at an inflexion point of sorts, prominent officials tried to strike a delicate balance: voice defiance against many of the Trump administration's LGBTQ+-related policies, all while trumpeting Pride's potential as a unifying force during turbulent times. The result was a one-of-a-kind event that reflected the complexities of the moment and epitomized this year's theme of 'Queer Joy is Resistance.' 'This Pride hits different than recent prides,' Delaware Rep. Sarah McBride, the first openly transgender person elected to Congress, said in an interview with the Chronicle as she visited San Francisco for the Pride events. But, she added, it's also a moment to remember how far the LGBTQ+ movement has come, and to 'rediscover our superpower as a community.' As hundreds of thousands of spectators flooded Market Street and the Civic Center for one of the nation's largest Pride parades, they saw the zany antics and flamboyant fun that have long been Pride's signature. There was a lone nudist applying sunscreen, a group of dancers in glittering cowboy hats bobbing to Lady Gaga's 'Applause,' and rainbow-bedazzled attendees wearing Pride flags as butterfly wings. Through it all, somber reminders of the challenges LGBTQ+ people and other minority groups face peppered the festivities. At one point, San Francisco Sheriff Paul Miyamoto and a handful of SFPD officers passed through a mostly silent crowd, passing out rainbow flags. Wearing a purple hologram jacket, State Sen. Scott Wiener waved to the crowd atop a truck trailer as he held a sign that read, 'ICE out of SF.' Emblazoned across the T-shirts of San Francisco City Attorney's Office employees were the words, 'See You in Court,' with the Statue of Liberty and a rainbow flag. This was a not-so-subtle reference to the eight lawsuits filed by the city against the Trump administration. 'As the Trump administration violates the Constitution and undermines the rule of law every day, we have to defend our city and our communities,' City Attorney David Chiu said while riding atop a dinosaur float. 'Everyone's rights are under attack.' By taking a more obstinate stance than in recent years, Sunday's festivities conjured memories of Pride celebrations from the 1970s and '80s — a time when politics were at the forefront, and corporate sponsors remained an afterthought. The throwback vibe seemed warranted. After all, just days after the 10th anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling that recognized same-sex marriage nationwide, many LGBTQ+ people feel quite under attack. 'Trump is trying to take away the rights of human beings,' said Kristina Corrozza, who waited 30 years to come to their first Pride. 'San Franciscans won't stand for it.' Just in the five months since Trump took office for a second, non-consecutive term, he has removed transgender people from the military, prevented federal insurance programs from paying for gender-affirmation surgeries for young people, and attempted to keep transgender athletes out of girls and women's sports. Then the Southern Baptist Convention, empowered by the overturning of Roe v. Wade, set its sights this month on ending same-sex marriage. Some agendas, like Trump's move to rename the Harvey Milk naval ship, have felt like a direct shot at San Francisco — a city that has long taken pride in being a bastion for the LGBTQ+ community. In the process, S.F. Pride organizers had to reckon with a sobering truth: Major corporations tend to value moving product over inclusivity. Since Trump was elected again, LGBTQ+ allyship has become increasingly unprofitable. This helps explain why five major corporate donors — including Comcast and Anheuser-Busch — pulled out of the event this year. Despite a late fundraising push spearheaded by smaller businesses, S.F. Pride entered Sunday about $180,000 short of its $2.3 million fundraising target. 'If we, somehow, in these next 10 days, can find another $175,000, and people show up on Pride Sunday, and our beverage program does well and our donations increase at the gate, we might get through this difficult period,' Suzanne Ford, the executive director of San Francisco Pride, recently told the Chronicle. All that raised the stakes for what was once a lighthearted celebration of the LGBTQ+ community. For many of the families who flocked to Market Street and the Civic Center for parade floats, musical acts and general pandemonium, Sunday's festivities represented a vital opportunity — not just to show the world that inclusivity is worth celebrating, but to reaffirm that political oppression can only make allies stronger, corporate sponsors or not. Marcella Pesavento lives in the neighborhood and walks her dog by every parade. But for this Pride, she stopped and climbed atop a traffic bollard to show her support. 'With everything going on with Trump, it feels important to stand up and be ourselves,' she said. 'It makes people feel they are not alone.'
Chicago Tribune
14 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Republican Senate tax bill would add $3.3 trillion to the US debt load, CBO says
WASHINGTON — The changes made to President Donald Trump's big tax bill in the Senate would pile trillions onto the nation's debt load while resulting in even steeper losses in health care coverage, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said in a new analysis, adding to the challenges for Republicans as they try to muscle the bill to passage. The CBO estimates the Senate bill would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, a nearly $1 trillion increase over the House-passed bill, which CBO has projected would add $2.4 to the debt over a decade. The analysis also found that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law, an increase over the scoring for the House-passed version of the bill, which predicts 10.9 million more people would be without health coverage. The stark numbers are yet another obstacle for Republican leaders as they labor to pass Trump's bill by his self-imposed July 4th deadline. Even before the CBO's estimate, Republicans were at odds over the contours of the legislation, with some resisting the cost-saving proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid and food aid programs even as other Republicans say those proposals don't go far enough. Republicans are slashing the programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks put in place during his first term. The push-pull was on vivid display Saturday night as a routine procedural vote to take up the legislation in the Senate was held open for hours as Vice President JD Vance and Republican leaders met with several holdouts. The bill ultimately advanced in a 51-49 vote, but the path ahead is fraught, with voting on amendments still to come. Still, many Republicans are disputing the CBO estimates and the reliability of the office's work. To hoist the bill to passage, they are using a different budget baseline that assumes the Trump tax cuts expiring in December have already been extended, essentially making them cost-free in the budget. The CBO on Saturday released a separate analysis of the GOP's preferred approach that found the Senate bill would reduce deficits by about $500 billion. Democrats and economists decry the GOP's approach as 'magic math' that obscures the true costs of the GOP tax breaks. In addition, Democrats note that under the traditional scoring system, the Republican bill bill would violate the Senate's 'Byrd Rule' that forbids the legislation from increasing deficits after 10 years. In a Sunday letter to Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley, the top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, CBO Director Phillip Swagel said the office estimates that the Finance Committee's portion of the bill, also known as Title VII, 'increases the deficits in years after 2034' under traditional scoring.
Fox News
15 minutes ago
- Fox News
New satellite imagery shows ongoing activity at Iran's Fordow nuclear complex after US airstrikes
Recent satellite imagery has revealed ongoing activity and fresh evidence of significant damage to tunnels and access roads at Iran's underground Fordow uranium enrichment site caused by last week's airstrikes. The facility was targeted by Israeli forces on June 23, one day after the U.S. carried out strikes using bunker-buster bombs. The new high-resolution satellite imagery, collected by Maxar Technologies, shows an excavator and several personnel positioned immediately next to the northern shaft on the ridge above the underground complex. The crane also appears to be operating at the entrance to the shaft, where several additional vehicles are seen below the ridge, parked along the access path that was built to access the site. Maxar's photos also reveal the complete destruction of a facility north of the site, surrounded by more craters and scattered dust. One more crater and visible burn marks are seen on a western access route. Analysts believe the primary goal of the strikes was to hinder access to the sites and complicate repair efforts. Both the United States and Israel have stated that these military actions were aimed at hindering Iran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon. Iran has rejected these accusations, maintaining that its nuclear program is entirely peaceful. The Fordow site, which is buried within a mountain near Qom, about 60 miles southwest of Tehran, was bombed by the U.S. on June 22, resulting in six prominent craters and a noticeable spread of grey debris, according to satellite photos. On the following day, Israel confirmed it had conducted a second strike on Fordow, specifically targeting the roads leading to the facility. Iranian officials later acknowledged this attack. Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters during a Pentagon briefing last Sunday that while all three Iranian nuclear sites targeted in the strike "sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," the full damage would take time to assess. The latest strike on Fordow comes as the Israel Defense Forces said Israel also launched a series of strikes targeting the notorious Evin prison and several Iranian military command centers in an "ongoing effort to degrade the Iranian regime's military capabilities." Stepheny Price is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. She covers topics including missing persons, homicides, national crime cases, illegal immigration, and more. Story tips and ideas can be sent to
