Singapore ranked 21st in Global Cities Index 2025 by Oxford Economics
Depositphotos/obstando
SINGAPORE: Singapore has clinched the 21st spot in the Global Cities Index 2025, a comprehensive ranking of the world's top 1,000 cities published by UK-based think tank Oxford Economics.
The index evaluates cities based on five key dimensions: economy, human capital, quality of life, environment, and governance.
Singapore scored a total of 83.9 out of 100, putting it ahead of many regional peers and just outside the global top 20. Notably, Singapore's performance in the 'quality of life' category stood out, placing it 4th worldwide, affirming the country's clean urban environment, high safety standards, and strong infrastructure.
New York City retained its crown as the world's top-ranked city for the second year running, achieving a perfect score of 100. London and Paris followed in second and third places respectively.
Rounding out the top 10 were San Jose, Seattle, Melbourne, Sydney, Boston, Tokyo, and San Francisco—underscoring the dominance of cities from the United States and advanced economies in the index.
While Singapore fared well overall, its rankings across the different categories varied. It came in 23rd for environment and 41st for human capital—categories that assess ecological sustainability and workforce talent, respectively.
However, its rankings in economy (106th) and governance (135th) were noticeably lower, suggesting room for improvement in areas such as business dynamism, economic diversity, and government transparency or regulatory effectiveness.
The Global Cities Index, produced annually, is widely regarded as a benchmark for assessing urban competitiveness and liveability. Oxford Economics compiled the rankings using a mix of quantitative data points and expert assessments across all five dimensions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
35 minutes ago
- CNA
South Korea's Lee, Trump agree to work towards swift tariff deal, Lee's office says
SEOUL/WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump and South Korea's new president Lee Jae-myung agreed to work toward a swift tariff deal in their first phone call since Lee was elected this week, Lee's office said on Friday (Jun 6). Trump has imposed tariffs on South Korea, a long time ally with which it has a bilateral free trade deal, and pressed it to pay more for the 28,500 US troops stationed there. Separately, Trump allies have aired concerns about Lee's more conciliatory stance towards China, Washington's main geopolitical rival. Lee, a liberal, was elected on Jun 3 after former conservative leader, Yoon Suk Yeol, was impeached and ousted. The future of South Korea's export-oriented economy may hinge on what kind of deal Lee can strike with Trump, with all of his country's key sectors from chips to autos and shipbuilding heavily exposed to global trade. His term began on Wednesday. "The two presidents agreed to make an effort to reach a satisfactory agreement on tariff consultations as soon as possible that both countries can be satisfied with," Lee's office said in a statement. "To this end, they decided to encourage working-level negotiations to yield tangible results." Trump invited Lee to a summit in the US and they plan to meet soon, according to a White House official. Analysts say the first opportunity for the two to meet could be at a G7 summit in Canada in mid-June. Lee's office said the two leaders also discussed the assassination attempts they both experienced last year as well as their enthusiasm for golf. Lee underwent surgery after he was stabbed in the neck by a man in January last year, while Trump was wounded in the ear by a bullet fired by a would-be assassin in July. South Korea, a major US ally and one of the first countries after Japan to engage with Washington on trade talks, agreed in late April to craft a "July package" scrapping levies before the 90-day pause on Trump's reciprocal tariffs is lifted, but progress was disrupted by the change of governments in Seoul. Lee said on the eve of the elections that "the most pressing matter is trade negotiations with the United States." Lee's camp has said, however, that they intend to seek more time to negotiate on trade with Trump. While reiterating the importance of the US-South Korea alliance, Lee has also expressed more conciliatory plans for ties with China and North Korea, singling out the importance of China as a major trading partner while indicating a reluctance to take a firm stance on security tensions in the Taiwan Strait. Political analysts say that while Trump and Lee may share a desire to try to re-engage with North Korea, Lee's stance on China could cause friction with the US. A White House official said this week that South Korea's election was fair, but expressed concern about Chinese interference in what analysts said may have been a cautionary message to Lee. Speaking in Singapore last week, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said many countries were tempted by the idea of seeking economic cooperation with China and defense cooperation with the United States, and warned that such entanglement complicated defense cooperation.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
US, China to hold trade talks on June 9 in London, Trump says
US President Trump on Friday (Jun 6) said three of his cabinet officials will meet with representatives of China in London on Jun 9 to discuss a trade deal. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said Treasury Scott Bessent, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, and United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will attend from the US side. "The meeting should go very well," Trump wrote. The scheduling of the meeting comes a day after Trump spoke to Chinese President Xi Jinping in a rare leader-to-leader call amid weeks of brewing trade tensions and a battle over critical minerals. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's January inauguration. Though stocks rallied, the temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and US complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model.
Independent Singapore
5 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Should I stay in my government job, or should I look for a new one?
SINGAPORE: A young Singaporean sought career advice online, writing that they've been working in a government role for the past three years but now wonder if it's time to move on to the next job. In a post on r/askSingapore on Thursday (June 5), u/chicky-mcnuggys wrote that they're now 26 years old and have been at the job since graduating. 'First ranking was ungraded, second and latest grades were C+. My ex-boss, with whom I had good relations, was pushing for me to get a B and had given me multiple stretch assignments, but someone else instead got the B because she was 'due' for promotion. Before my ex-boss left, she gave me additional assignments to justify a better grade for the next ranking, and I've completed them, with good reviews from Senior Management,' the post author wrote. They added that they hoped to get a rating of B in the next two years, which would qualify them for a promotion. See also How businesses can leverage their perks via skill swapping The problem appears to be their new boss, who seems less than generous with rankings. 'Let's just say that hope is out the window because s/he had no good feedback at all for me,' they wrote. While their supervisor disagrees with the feedback the new boss gave, in the end, what the boss says carries the most weight. This is causing the post author to worry that the next time they could be promoted would be in three or four years, and by then, they will be between 29 and 30 years old. 'Which is quite slow, no?… Is this normal, or should I just look elsewhere?' they asked, adding that they're due for rotation soon, which means they'll need to start again in a new division. 'I feel like I'm putting in 101% effort, but it sucks knowing it goes unacknowledged especially since I had to do way more than I'm expected to (since I was given stretch assignments),' they added, asking for advice as to whether or not they should keep their job, given the current job market. Commenters were sympathetic toward the post author, with many becoming upset on their behalf over someone else being due for promotion getting the 'B' rating instead of the post author. One advised them to manage their expectation about promotions. 'Title promotion can be fast, like with a senior/lead tagged to your current title. Usually comes with a little pay bump. Grade promotion is the one that takes longer. This one got a considerable bump in pay and usually takes three to four years from starting the position…unless you are chosen by heaven.' 'I always say, want to climb fast and high, go private sector to chiong, but also risk getting sacked for no reason. Gov't is slow and steady (unless you're a scholar) but (confirmed) will have a job through hell and back,' opined another. Others reassured her that for their age, their career progression is normal and that they shouldn't worry about it too much. See also Top 10 predictions for China cross-border e-commerce in 2019 'Gov't job good. Think thrice and understand private sector risks. Have a good financial plan for your career before any move,' urged a Reddit user. /TISG Read also: 'Just get your foot in the door,' Singaporeans tell new grad who's worried their starting salary isn't so high
