'Leave the library alone': Napier community fighting against Council proposal to close it
Photo:
Napier residents are dismayed by the
council's proposal to close the city's library for two years
in a bid to keep a lid on rates rises, calling for them to 'leave it alone'.
Consultation on the proposal closes in two weeks, as part of Napier's draft Annual Plan 2025/26. Local author Adele Broadbent, who worked at Napier Library for several years, told RNZ she hopes the Napier City Council gets the message loud and clear from the community.
"Just please leave it open. Leave the library alone. To lose that, for me, is like cutting your arm off.
"There are other places that can be closed for two years - the library is just too important. I'm really not sure why they are doing this," she said.
In 2017 the Napier Library on Station Street was closed because of the building's earthquake safety rating. It was moved into part of the MTG Hawke's Bay building as a temporary solution, and a new library is expected to open mid-2027.
Napier City Council is proposing to close the library from 1 July 2025, and keep Taradale's Library open seven days a week - which is about a 20 minute drive away.
"Taradale is way too far for some people. I know people who don't have access to a car, and lots of elderly who don't own cars and can't get out there - even bus services and things are not very good," said Broadbent.
She said losing the library is not just about access to books, which is incredibly important for all ages, but it's a loss of valuable and essential community services such as computer access, school programmes, and community activities.
"It's a not very well thought-out decision, it's too important. And literacy as it is, is battered and bruised, we really need access to those books and we really need the library to be kept open," she said.
Napier's annual average rates bill for 24/25 is $3513 and closing the library for two years would save the council $21.60 per rateable unit, or $1.80 a month per household.
Gareth Wardini, who owns Napier's independent bookstore 'Wardini's' with his wife Louise is keen to see the library stay open. He said people often assume the library is competition for his bookstore, but it's far from it.
"We're all part of the book lovers eco-system. A city the size of Napier should have a library - I know the council has lots of pressing financial issues, but the library does a lot for the community and it's not just about lending books.
"I personally believe libraries are an essential service," said Wardini.
Gareth and Louise Wardini.
Photo:
Supplied / Florence Charvin
He fears closing the library will be bad news for those who can't purchase books for their children.
"It'll be the parts of our community who perhaps can't afford books, that will suffer. It's about creating a safe space and a community hub, and for people who can't afford to buy books it's essential.
"We have terrible literacy rates in New Zealand and the library is a place where anyone can read and get book. Where are they going to take their tamariki to get books to read for them?," he worried.
Napier mayor Kirsten Wise said the proposal to close the library for two years has been a tough point to reach.
"It's a difficult decision for everybody. We're conscious of the impact this has and it won't be a decision that we make lightly.
Napier Mayor Kirsten Wise.
Photo:
Supplied / Napier City Council screenshot
"We were always going to be closing it early for the preparation of transferring to the new building.. about 8 months early, so now we're proposing to close it earlier than that," she said.
It's a move driven by the urgent need to save council costs, but the mayor admits that the savings per household for closing the library would be minor.
"It's not a huge saving, it's to the tune of about 0.5 to 0.6 percent of rates - but it's a reflection that we really have worked hard to find every single dollar of savings we can find."
Wise said the council is expecting a large number of public submissions against the closure.
"We know our community is passionate about keeping the library open.
"We're going to bolster mobile library services and get the van to people who can't get to Taradale," she said.
Napier City Council is also considering a number of other cuts to facilities for financial savings, such as closing the National Aquarium so it can be demolished and replaced with a building that's cheaper to run.
It's also looking at a third party operating the Napier ISite in a new location, leasing the Par2 MiniGolf business, handing the running of the Faraday Museum over to a charitable trust, and increasing fees at the Redclyffe Transfer Station.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
KiwiSaver Providers Hope Public Support For Contribution Increases Will See Default Rates Move Higher
KiwiSaver providers are unsurprised by the public support, and hope it will see default contribution rates increase further. Susan Edmunds, Money Correspondent KiwiSaver providers are hoping public support for increased contribution rates could provide the incentive to push them still higher. The latest RNZ-Reid Research poll included questions about the changes to the KiwiSaver scheme announced in the Budget. From 1 April next year, the default contribution rate for employers and employees will rise to 3.5 percent. The following April, it will be 4 percent. But the government will halve the credit it offers to people who contribute at least $1042 a year to their KiwiSaver, to a maximum $260.72. It will not be available to people earning more than $180,000. The poll showed a total of 61.2 percent of respondents supported the contribution change, 21.4 percent opposed it and 17.4 percent were not sure. Among National voters, almost 80 percent supported the change. But only 23.7 percent of total voters supported the government's move to halve the contribution rate, and fewer than half of National supporters. Fisher Funds chief investment officer Ashley Gardyne said he was not surprised by the findings. He said we should not stop at 4 percent plus 4 percent, and should push towards higher contribution rates. 'I think it's really positive we've seen the contribution rates increase, and ultimately if we want people to get to the right amount of savings in retirement those rates do need to move up through time.' He said the Australian model, where contribution rates slowly lifted over a number of years, could be one to follow. 'They took a really long-term, 10-year approach of increasing contributions by a little bit every year. The reality is it's tough to find extra money in your pay cheque to put into KiwiSaver but it is really important long-term as well to make sure you end up in the right position for retirement. 'Having a long-term vision like that is really important.' Kirk Hope, chief executive of the Financial Services Council, which represents KiwiSaver providers, agreed the results were expected. 'We've known for some time that in terms of contributions those will be relatively well received. Obviously it's a bit tougher if the government contribution is being halved or in some cases removed that's not going to be particularly popular, the key thing is the government continues to contribute something.' He said there should be a bipartisan agreement about a long-term strategy for retirement income. He said it was also worth discussing other steps the government could take, such as adjusting the tax settings. 'Other changes the government might be able to make to the tax system in the future to continue to incentivise particularly savings and even up the playing field between savings and investment and housing. That's some fundamental shifts in the tax system.' More incentives needed Ana-Marie Lockyer, chief executive at Pie Funds, said it was good to see that most people supported the contribution increase. 'In terms of the halving of the government contributions we need to acknowledge the government faced some hard choices as a result of the tight fiscal environment. But I believe we should be offering more incentives for Kiwis to save for their retirement, not fewer. 'Reducing the government contribution is more likely to impact the retirement balances of lower income earners – a group who deserve the same opportunities as everyone else.' She said even a reduced contribution of $261 a year could grow to more than $40,000 over a person's working life. 'I think what's more important than the dollar amount of the government contribution is the number of Kiwis who don't receive it, either because they're not eligible or they're not contributing enough. 'While it's a good thing that the government contributions are now available for 16- and 17-year-olds, I think the government missed a trick by not extending it to the increasing number of over-65s who are still working, whether by choice or necessity. 'What's probably more concerning is the thousands of KiwiSavers missing out on the MTC government contribution each year because they're not contributing enough to qualify, leaving millions of dollars on the table. 'So the poll is actually a timely reminder for people to ensure they've contributed at least $1043 by 30 June in order to receive the full government contribution of $521 – before it reduces to $261 next year.' A spokesperson for Finance Minister Nicola Willis said the changes to KiwiSaver were designed to help Kiwis to save more and make the scheme more fiscally sustainable. 'For example, an 18-year-old earning the minimum wage of just under $49,000 a year who invests in a balanced fund can expect to have almost $910,000 in KiwiSaver at age 65. Under the old settings it would have been about $732,000. 'The results are similar for most other people. The Retirement Commissioner estimates the changes will increase retirement savings for about 80 percent of KiwiSaver members.'
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
KiwiSaver Providers Hope Public Support For Contribution Increases Will See Default Rates Move Higher
KiwiSaver providers are unsurprised by the public support, and hope it will see default contribution rates increase further. Susan Edmunds, Money Correspondent KiwiSaver providers are hoping public support for increased contribution rates could provide the incentive to push them still higher. The latest RNZ-Reid Research poll included questions about the changes to the KiwiSaver scheme announced in the Budget. From 1 April next year, the default contribution rate for employers and employees will rise to 3.5 percent. The following April, it will be 4 percent. But the government will halve the credit it offers to people who contribute at least $1042 a year to their KiwiSaver, to a maximum $260.72. It will not be available to people earning more than $180,000. The poll showed a total of 61.2 percent of respondents supported the contribution change, 21.4 percent opposed it and 17.4 percent were not sure. Among National voters, almost 80 percent supported the change. But only 23.7 percent of total voters supported the government's move to halve the contribution rate, and fewer than half of National supporters. Fisher Funds chief investment officer Ashley Gardyne said he was not surprised by the findings. He said we should not stop at 4 percent plus 4 percent, and should push towards higher contribution rates. 'I think it's really positive we've seen the contribution rates increase, and ultimately if we want people to get to the right amount of savings in retirement those rates do need to move up through time.' He said the Australian model, where contribution rates slowly lifted over a number of years, could be one to follow. 'They took a really long-term, 10-year approach of increasing contributions by a little bit every year. The reality is it's tough to find extra money in your pay cheque to put into KiwiSaver but it is really important long-term as well to make sure you end up in the right position for retirement. 'Having a long-term vision like that is really important.' Kirk Hope, chief executive of the Financial Services Council, which represents KiwiSaver providers, agreed the results were expected. 'We've known for some time that in terms of contributions those will be relatively well received. Obviously it's a bit tougher if the government contribution is being halved or in some cases removed that's not going to be particularly popular, the key thing is the government continues to contribute something.' He said there should be a bipartisan agreement about a long-term strategy for retirement income. He said it was also worth discussing other steps the government could take, such as adjusting the tax settings. 'Other changes the government might be able to make to the tax system in the future to continue to incentivise particularly savings and even up the playing field between savings and investment and housing. That's some fundamental shifts in the tax system.' More incentives needed Ana-Marie Lockyer, chief executive at Pie Funds, said it was good to see that most people supported the contribution increase. 'In terms of the halving of the government contributions we need to acknowledge the government faced some hard choices as a result of the tight fiscal environment. But I believe we should be offering more incentives for Kiwis to save for their retirement, not fewer. 'Reducing the government contribution is more likely to impact the retirement balances of lower income earners – a group who deserve the same opportunities as everyone else.' She said even a reduced contribution of $261 a year could grow to more than $40,000 over a person's working life. 'I think what's more important than the dollar amount of the government contribution is the number of Kiwis who don't receive it, either because they're not eligible or they're not contributing enough. 'While it's a good thing that the government contributions are now available for 16- and 17-year-olds, I think the government missed a trick by not extending it to the increasing number of over-65s who are still working, whether by choice or necessity. 'What's probably more concerning is the thousands of KiwiSavers missing out on the MTC government contribution each year because they're not contributing enough to qualify, leaving millions of dollars on the table. 'So the poll is actually a timely reminder for people to ensure they've contributed at least $1043 by 30 June in order to receive the full government contribution of $521 – before it reduces to $261 next year.' A spokesperson for Finance Minister Nicola Willis said the changes to KiwiSaver were designed to help Kiwis to save more and make the scheme more fiscally sustainable. 'For example, an 18-year-old earning the minimum wage of just under $49,000 a year who invests in a balanced fund can expect to have almost $910,000 in KiwiSaver at age 65. Under the old settings it would have been about $732,000. 'The results are similar for most other people. The Retirement Commissioner estimates the changes will increase retirement savings for about 80 percent of KiwiSaver members.'
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
KiwiSaver Providers Hope Public Support For Contribution Increases Will See Default Rates Move Higher
KiwiSaver providers are hoping public support for increased contribution rates could provide the incentive to push them still higher. The latest RNZ-Reid Research poll included questions about the changes to the KiwiSaver scheme announced in the Budget. From 1 April next year, the default contribution rate for employers and employees will rise to 3.5 percent. The following April, it will be 4 percent. But the government will halve the credit it offers to people who contribute at least $1042 a year to their KiwiSaver, to a maximum $260.72. It will not be available to people earning more than $180,000. The poll showed a total of 61.2 percent of respondents supported the contribution change, 21.4 percent opposed it and 17.4 percent were not sure. Among National voters, almost 80 percent supported the change. But only 23.7 percent of total voters supported the government's move to halve the contribution rate, and fewer than half of National supporters. Fisher Funds chief investment officer Ashley Gardyne said he was not surprised by the findings. He said we should not stop at 4 percent plus 4 percent, and should push towards higher contribution rates. "I think it's really positive we've seen the contribution rates increase, and ultimately if we want people to get to the right amount of savings in retirement those rates do need to move up through time." He said the Australian model, where contribution rates slowly lifted over a number of years, could be one to follow. "They took a really long-term, 10-year approach of increasing contributions by a little bit every year. The reality is it's tough to find extra money in your pay cheque to put into KiwiSaver but it is really important long-term as well to make sure you end up in the right position for retirement. "Having a long-term vision like that is really important." Kirk Hope, chief executive of the Financial Services Council, which represents KiwiSaver providers, agreed the results were expected. "We've known for some time that in terms of contributions those will be relatively well received. Obviously it's a bit tougher if the government contribution is being halved or in some cases removed that's not going to be particularly popular, the key thing is the government continues to contribute something." He said there should be a bipartisan agreement about a long-term strategy for retirement income. He said it was also worth discussing other steps the government could take, such as adjusting the tax settings. "Other changes the government might be able to make to the tax system in the future to continue to incentivise particularly savings and even up the playing field between savings and investment and housing. That's some fundamental shifts in the tax system." More incentives needed Ana-Marie Lockyer, chief executive at Pie Funds, said it was good to see that most people supported the contribution increase. "In terms of the halving of the government contributions we need to acknowledge the government faced some hard choices as a result of the tight fiscal environment. But I believe we should be offering more incentives for Kiwis to save for their retirement, not fewer. "Reducing the government contribution is more likely to impact the retirement balances of lower income earners - a group who deserve the same opportunities as everyone else." She said even a reduced contribution of $261 a year could grow to more than $40,000 over a person's working life. "I think what's more important than the dollar amount of the government contribution is the number of Kiwis who don't receive it, either because they're not eligible or they're not contributing enough. "While it's a good thing that the government contributions are now available for 16- and 17-year-olds, I think the government missed a trick by not extending it to the increasing number of over-65s who are still working, whether by choice or necessity. "What's probably more concerning is the thousands of KiwiSavers missing out on the MTC government contribution each year because they're not contributing enough to qualify, leaving millions of dollars on the table. "So the poll is actually a timely reminder for people to ensure they've contributed at least $1043 by 30 June in order to receive the full government contribution of $521 - before it reduces to $261 next year." A spokesperson for Finance Minister Nicola Willis said the changes to KiwiSaver were designed to help Kiwis to save more and make the scheme more fiscally sustainable. "For example, an 18-year-old earning the minimum wage of just under $49,000 a year who invests in a balanced fund can expect to have almost $910,000 in KiwiSaver at age 65. Under the old settings it would have been about $732,000. "The results are similar for most other people. The Retirement Commissioner estimates the changes will increase retirement savings for about 80 percent of KiwiSaver members."
