US Supreme Court to weigh transgender athlete bans
The court said it would hear cases next term challenging state laws in Idaho and West Virginia banning transgender athletes from female competition.
More than two dozen US states have passed laws in recent years barring athletes who were assigned male at birth from taking part in girls or women's sports.
The conservative-dominated Supreme Court's decision to hear the cases comes two weeks after it upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming medical treatment for transgender minors.
The Supreme Court also recently backed a move by President Donald Trump, who campaigned on the issue of transgender athletes, to have transgender troops dismissed from the military.
Trump issued an executive order in February aimed at banning transgender athletes from girls and women's sports.
"From now on women's sports will be only for women," Trump said. "With this executive order the war on women's sports is over."
The executive order allows federal agencies to deny funding to schools that allow transgender athletes to compete on girls or women's teams.
In a high-profile case, the University of Pennsylvania agreed this week to ban transgender athletes from its women's sports teams, settling a federal civil rights complaint stemming from the furor around swimmer Lia Thomas.
The Department of Education said that UPenn had entered into a resolution agreement vowing to comply with Title IX, the federal law which prohibits sex-based discrimination in any educational program.
It follows an investigation by the department's Office for Civil Rights which found the university had violated Title IX by allowing transgender swimmer Thomas to compete in women's competitions.
Thomas became a lightning rod around the debate over transgender athletes in women's sport after competing in female collegiate competitions in 2022.
She had earlier swum on UPenn's men's team while undergoing hormone replacement therapy.
Critics and some fellow swimmers said she should not have been allowed to compete against women due to an unfair physiological advantage.
- 'Discriminatory laws' -
The Idaho case accepted by the Supreme Court stems from the Republican-led state's 2020 "Fairness in Women's Sports Act."
It was challenged by a transgender athlete at an Idaho university and lower courts ruled that it violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution.
West Virginia's 2021 ban on transgender athletes was challenged by a middle school student who was not allowed to compete for the girls' track team. An appeals court ruled that the ban was a violation of Title IX.
"We believe the lower courts were right to block these discriminatory laws, and we will continue to defend the freedom of all kids to play," Joshua Block, a senior counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement.
"Like any other educational program, school athletic programs should be accessible for everyone regardless of their sex or transgender status," Block said.
The Supreme Court will hear the cases during the term beginning in October and issue a ruling next year.
cl/bgs
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
Bessent says U.S.-China trade truce is "working pretty well"
The Trump administration is "very happy" with the current China tariffs agreement, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Tuesday. Why it matters: Bessent's comments on Fox News indicate a thawing of previously icy relations with China's ruling Communist Party ahead of the trade truce between the world's largest economies expiring on Nov. 10. Driving the news: Fox News' Laura Ingraham asked Bessent when he expected to see movement on the China talks after both nations agreed last week not to impose previously threatened higher levies. "China is, right now, the biggest revenue line in the tariff income," Bessent said. "If it's not broke, don't fix it. We have had very good talks with China. I imagine we'll be seeing them again before November," he said. "They have started shipping the rare earth magnets, which we agreed to. We had put some countermeasures on them that we've taken off. So I think right now the status quo is working pretty well." Context: The original deal lowered U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% from 145% and restarted the flow of crucial rare earth minerals out of China, per Axios' Courtenay Brown and Ben Berkowitz. What we're watching: Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said there's a "strong desire" on both sides for President Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping to hold a meeting, though no date has been set as yet.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
DOJ probing whether DC crime stats were manipulated
The Justice Department is investigating whether the Washington, DC police department manipulated crime statistics to make the district seem more safe than it actually is. 'We're of course looking into this because the reality is that we know that DC has been an incredibly unsafe place to live, for a very long time,' Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in an interview Tuesday with Fox News host Laura Ingraham. The investigation into the allegations that DC's Metropolitan Police Department fudged data to make crime rates appear lower is reportedly being led by the office of DC US Attorney Jeanine Pirro, according to multiple outlets. 3 President Trump holds up a statistical graph on DC homicide rates as he speaks during a news conference on crime in the nation's capital at the White House in Washington, DC, on Monday, Aug. 11, 2025. The Washington Post via Getty Images Any officials found to have been manipulating federal data could face fraud, obstruction or making false statements charges, according to the Washington Post. Allegations of fake crime stats in DC predate President Trump's sweeping interventions in the nation's capital aimed at cracking down on crime. Michael Pulliam, an MPD commander, was put on paid leave in mid-May amid an internal investigation into changes he allegedly made to the district's crime data, NBC Washington reported last month. Pulliam allegedly falsified violent crime statistics to make them appear more favorable for the city, an accusation he denies. Pulliam's police union has defended him and accused MPD leadership of ordering subordinates to falsify violent crime data. 3 An infographic showing the Washington, DC homicide rate. Anadolu via Getty Images 3 A Capitol Police officer, right, with the help of Washington Metropolitan police officers, takes a man into custody near Union Station, Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, in Washington. AP 'In some ways, it's not surprising that we hear about reports of this type of conduct that suggests that DC is safer than everybody that lives here knows to be true,' Blanche said on 'The Ingraham Angle.' 'So, we're investigating it, and hopefully we'll get to the bottom of it at some point soon,' he added. Trump appeared to confirm the investigation Monday night in a Truth Social post. 'D.C. gave Fake Crime numbers in order to create a false illusion of safety,' Trump wrote. 'This is a very bad and dangerous thing to do, and they are under serious investigation for so doing!' the president added. The DC US Attorney's Office and MPD did not immediately respond to The Post's requests for comment.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
As Democrats wage national redistricting war, Republicans may have the upper hand
WASHINGTON — As California legislators begin the process of reconfiguring its congressional districts and creating a more Democratic-friendly map in next year's midterms, the party could be pushing itself into a national redistricting war — and one that would likely hold them at a disadvantage. The California Legislature will work to pass its proposed version of the state's congressional map this week, which would give Democrats an advantage in five additional House seats in the state. After that, the revised map will be on the ballot in November when California voters participate in a special election for municipal races. That means Democrats' attempt to thwart Republican redistricting efforts in other states, namely Texas, where President Donald Trump is pushing for Republicans to draw more GOP-friendly districts, will come down to whether California leaders can convince enough voters to support the gambit. And that may be easier said than done. Even if California is successful and counteracts the five seats Republicans say they'll flip in the Lone Star State, it could ignite efforts in other states to redraw their maps for partisan leverage. Doing so would be an easier fight for Republican-led states than those led by Democrats, largely because of the laws put in place by party leaders to avoid this exact situation. Democrats face more obstacles than Republicans in redrawing maps As state leaders threaten a redraw of their maps, Republicans have an advantage over their Democratic counterparts due to local laws impeding partisan gerrymandering attempts. Most redistricting efforts are completed through state legislatures and more easily accomplished in states with single-party control, meaning one party controls both chambers of the state legislature and the governor's mansion. In that category, Republicans have the trifecta advantage: There are 26 states under complete GOP control compared to just 15 under complete Democratic control. Once you factor out the states that don't have split congressional representation — for example, Utah, which only has Republican seats so a map redraw wouldn't do anything to change the calculus — you are down to 15 red states and eight blue states with seats available to flip. Even then, at least four of those Democratic-led states require independent commissions (or some hybrid system with state legislators) to change congressional maps in the middle of the decade. That complicates their efforts while the Republican states would only require their legislatures to do the heavy lifting. 'Even if (Democrats) are hell bent on doing this, I don't think it's going to be a very easy thing for them to do as a matter of their various state laws,' John Malcom, the vice president of the conservative Heritage Foundation's Institute for Constitutional Government, told the Deseret News in an interview. 'It's not going to be easy for them to do, and they have less room to maneuver because they've already done a remarkably effective job of redistricting (some states) in a way that … dilutes Republican votes.' California gambles with those obstacles in place Unlike a majority of states, California hands the power of map-drawing not to state legislators but instead to an independent redistricting commission that is meant to draw nonpartisan boundaries based purely on population data. The commission was first enacted in 2010 and is made up of five Republicans, five Democrats and four voters who are not affiliated with either of the major parties. California is mandated by its state constitution to utilize the commission only once a decade, and it already did so in 2021. In order to work around this, California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced last week he would introduce a constitutional amendment circumventing those laws. The catch: California voters, who largely support the independent commission, have to approve throwing away the panel's nonpartisan maps until after the census is taken again in 2030 and new maps are drawn for the 2032 election cycle. A recent Politico/Citrin Center/Possibility Lab survey found 64% of voters support keeping the independent commission, compared to just 36% who said state lawmakers should draw the maps. But some members of the commission who drew the current boundaries support throwing out the map, with the agreement that the panel will be reinstated later. But even with that endorsement, Republicans plan to fight back with accusations that Democrats are defying the will of the voters. 'I think that it will be seen as a negatively partisan thing if they try to go back on what the voters only recently approved,' Malcolm told the Deseret News. 'But you know, Gavin Newsom is making it very clear that the lane he wants to run for president in is the 'I'm the anti-Trump guy.' And so being nakedly partisan is not something that Gavin Newsom is going to shy away from.' Still, Democrats could have some luck as nearly half of the state's voters belong to the party compared to just 24.7% who are registered Republicans, according to the Public Policy Institute of California. Another 21.9% identify as independents. California and Texas could set off firestorm in other states With Texas expected to approve its new map as early as this week and California moving full steam ahead on its proposal this fall, the boundary battle could elevate to an all-out war encompassing several states across the country. More than half a dozen states are publicly considering changes to their congressional maps next November in an attempt to gain leverage — especially as it becomes likely California will simply neutralize Texas and neither party will benefit. Democrats in New York have openly suggested they would look at ways to change congressional maps to squeeze out GOP lawmakers in vulnerable districts while Florida Republicans are considering the opposite in the Sunshine State. But other states are slowly entering the conversation, such as Indiana, where Republicans already hold a 7-2 advantage to Democrats. All seven of those House Republicans came out in support of redrawing the map on Monday after President Donald Trump began looking to the state as another opportunity to secure his majority. 'Now, with President Trump and the entire Hoosier Republican Congressional delegation expressing support for Congressional redistricting, the General Assembly should act swiftly to get the job done,' Rep. Marlin Stutzman, the first Indiana Republican to announce his support, said in a statement to the Deseret News. 'Hoosiers deserve Congressional districts that ensure voting records are reflected accurately in their Congressional districts.' Despite uphill battle, Democrats say they can't give up Although Democrats face more obstacles than Republicans, the redistricting battle is emerging as a war they must wage, strategists say — lest they risk an unenthusiastic base that has already expressed frustration the minority doesn't do enough to thwart Trump's agenda. 'The way I look at it, you have to fight fire with fire,' Brad Bannon, a Democratic strategist based in Washington, D.C., told the Deseret News. 'You just can't let the Republicans gerrymander their way to a House majority that they're going to have difficulty protecting.' Republicans currently hold a 219-212 majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, a historically slim margin that has often made it difficult for the party to advance legislation even with a Republican trifecta. With control of the White House and Senate, Republicans have enjoyed total control of Washington — something that is at risk next November. Historical trends show that the party of the sitting president typically loses control of the House during midterm elections. If Democrats manage to flip the House, it would deal a massive blow to Trump and likely thwart his agenda for his final two years. As a result, Trump is pressing state Republican leaders to deliver additional seats through redistricting — which some strategists say is a sign of political desperation and should motivate Democrats not to let up. 'Democrats have an opportunity to take back the House, and it won't stop the abuses in the Trump regime, but it will slow them down,' Bannon said. 'Democrats will have the opportunity to call hearings and investigations into the Trump administration, and I don't think we can afford to let that opportunity go by. So I think Democrats should go full steam ahead.'
