PTI parliamentary committee rejects SC verdict on reserved seats
The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) parliamentary committee has categorically rejected the Supreme Court's Constitutional Bench verdict, which set aside its July 12, 2024, judgment. That ruling had reinstated PTI as a parliamentary party and allowed it to secure reserved seats in the legislature.
Last week, the Supreme Court overturned its July 12 ruling on reserved seats, accepting review petitions and upholding the Peshawar High Court's decision. As a result, the PTI lost its reserved seats.
In response to the court's ruling, PTI held a crucial meeting of its parliamentary committee in Islamabad on Wednesday to discuss the implications of the recent verdict.
The meeting, attended by PTI members of the National and Provincial Assemblies, senators, and central leadership, focused on analysing the political landscape post-verdict and formulating a parliamentary strategy. It also saw heated exchanges between some leaders, suggesting internal party tensions.
🔴 LIVE | Imran Khan Announces Massive Tehreek After 10th Muharram | PTI's Leadership Important Press Conference https://t.co/kkO21Ntn1P — PTI (@PTIofficial) July 2, 2025
"تحریک انصاف کے مشترکہ پارلیمانی اجلاس میں مخصوص نشستوں کے فیصلے، تحریک اسیران جیل کے خط اور عمران خان کے حکم پر تحریک چلانے پر غور کیا گیا۔ ہم سب عمران خان کی قیادت میں متحد ہیں۔ انشاءاللہ تحریک کا اعلان اور لائحہ عمل جلد عوام کے سامنے آ جائے گا۔" بیرسٹر گوہر علی خان pic.twitter.com/Al4lXFpfTA — PTI (@PTIofficial) July 2, 2025
Amir Dogar, a member of the National Assembly, initiated the discussion by presenting a written message from imprisoned PTI leaders, expressing concern over their mistreatment and lack of medical facilities in jail.
Sheikh Waqas Akram revealed that seven party workers had lost their lives due to illness while in jail, and prisoners' basic rights were being denied. Nisar Jutt criticised K-P Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur over the provincial budget, stressing that party leaders should avoid making contradictory statements without mutual consultation.
Jutt also reaffirmed support for PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan, stating that he was appointed by the founder and, therefore, has the full mandate of the party.
Ali Muhammad Khan supported inter-party negotiations during the meeting, mentioning that if the leadership chooses to negotiate, the party would support it. However, if protests were chosen, the party would also participate.
Zartaj Gul proposed that protests should be held at the constituency level instead of in Islamabad and suggested forming an empowered committee for negotiations.
Read: PTI loses court battle for reserved seats
A unanimous resolution was passed during the meeting, calling for every possible effort to secure the release of the founding chairman, ensuring the health and well-being of other imprisoned leaders, and rejecting the court's verdict on reserved seats. The resolution also demanded that PTI leaders and lawyers be allowed to meet Imran Khan immediately.
After the meeting, Barrister Gohar, Salman Akram Raja, Gandapur, and Akram held a press conference to clarify the party's stance. Gandapur said the party is ready to sacrifice everything for the release of founder Imran Khan.
He added that if anyone attempts to topple their government through unconstitutional means, he would quit politics. Raja stated that Pakistan's resources have been looted for eight decades and emphasised the need to fight for the basic rights of the people.
Barrister Gohar reiterated that the party follows the instructions of the founder, and any decisions regarding negotiations, protests, or other political actions will be made with his approval.
Akram maintained that there is complete unity within the party and that the political and legal struggle will continue under the founder's leadership. He also reaffirmed the party's unanimous rejection of the court's decision on reserved seats.
SC overturns PTI's claim to reserved seats
The Supreme Court overturned a 2024 judgment that had allowed PTI to claim reserved seats in national and provincial legislatures.
The order issued by a 10-member constitutional bench allowed multiple review petitions filed by the ruling coalition and dismissed its earlier decision that had recognised PTI, through its alliance with the Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC), as eligible for reserved seats.
With a majority of seven judges the top court ruled in favour of the review, effectively annulling the apex court's July 12, 2024, verdict. That judgment had previously restored PTI's status as a parliamentary party and ordered the ECP to allocate reserved seats for women and minorities.
Following the new decision, nearly 80 reserved seats in national and provincial assemblies will be reallocated among other parliamentary parties, excluding the SIC. The move gives the ruling coalition a two-thirds majority in parliament.
It is worth noting that the Peshawar High Court had earlier dismissed the SIC's challenge to the Election Commission of Pakistan's decision, which had refused to allocate reserved seats to the party.
Earlier, in its short order on July 12, 2024, eight out of 13 judges concluded that 39 out of 80 MNAs on the list were elected candidates of the PTI, positioning it as the largest party in the National Assembly.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Imran 'found linked' to May 9: LHC
The Lahore High Court (LHC) has observed while referring to the testimonies of two police officials that former prime minister Imran Khan has been found involved in a conspiracy hatched for the violent events that occurred on May 9, 2023. An LHC division bench headed by Justice Syed Shahbaz Ali Rizvi issued the detailed order regarding the dismissal of Khan's post-arrest bail applications recently. The bench had dismissed the bail applications in eight first information reports (FIRs) registered against the former PM in connection with the May 9 riots. Inspector Ismat Kamal and Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) Hassan Afzal had in their statements termed Imran Khan the mastermind of the incidents that had occurred on May 9. They said that in meetings held on May 4, 2023, at the Chakri Rest Area in Rawalpindi, and on May 7 and 9 in Lahore, Khan had given directions to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leadership to attack military and sate installations in addition to police officials to build pressure in case he was arrested. The officials stated that the leader had said that no one should go home until his release. They said the party leadership had termed Imran their red line and said they would jam the country by inciting the public if he was arrested. The court observed that the role attributed to the petitioner, as evident from the reproduced statements, attracts the provisions of Section 120-B and Section 121-A of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), which stood applied in the case. The reproduced statements of Inspector Ismat Kamal and ASI Hassan Afzal prima facie reflect that a conspiracy and abetment related to the offences committed on May 9 were perpetrated by the petitioner in different meetings, it observed. Meanwhile, an anti-terrorism court summoned more prosecution witnesses on July 10 in a case registered against PTI leaders regarding the May 9 riots after the arrest of the party's founding chairman. The ATC judge recorded the statements of five prosecution witnesses in the case. Sarwar Road police had registered the case against the leaders over disturbing law and order, creating chaos, arson and inciting the public after the arrest. The ATC extended the bail hearing till July 8 of Shah Mehmood Qureshi, Umar Sarfraz Cheema and other leaders in cases registered against in connection with the riots. In another case of setting ablaze vehicles outside Jinnah House, the judge fixed July 10 for further proceedings. Defamation case A district court reserved its decision on Prime Minister Mian Shehbaz Sharif's application for making a legal notice part of the record and to record secondary evidence in a defamation suit against Imran Khan. The district court judge was hearing the PM's defamation suit filed against the PTI founder, seeking Rs10 billion in compensation over an accusation of offering him bribe to withdraw the Panama Papers case. The PTI counsel opposed the application, arguing that the legal notice was not signed by the petitioner and no secondary evidence could be recorded at this stage. The petitioner's counsel argued that suit had been filed after fulfilling legal formalities and the notice had been sent. He requested the court to allow secondary evidence. After hearing arguments from both sides, the judge reserved the decision, which is likely to be announced by July 10. On June 2, the prime minister had replied to the queries of the counsel representing the PTI founding chairman during cross-examination. The queries revolved around PM Shehbaz Sharif's affidavit, including its content, institution, stamps, attestation and other aspects of the case. The PM had appeared through video link. He had admitted that his name had been neither mentioned in the anchorperson's questions nor in the replies given by the respondent, but asserted that it was clear that the baseless accusations were aimed at him.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Regime change in K-P?
Listen to article The simmering row between Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and the federal government is a precursor to more political instability. The reported moves by the ruling coalition at the Center to dislodge the PTI dispensation in Peshawar are ill-advised. The seasoned men at the helm in Islamabad should desist from any such brinkmanship. It is unfortunate that no lessons have been learnt from such bitter episodes of our chequered political history, as democracy and public representation are falling down the abyss. Thus, the evolving diatribe of regime change in K-P will not only have a severe political fallout, especially as the opposition is already pushed to the wall, but also grave ramifications for the restive province that is engaged in a showdown with non-state actors. The opportunity to dismantle the PTI's two-third majority in K-P has arisen in the wake of the Constitutional Bench's decision on reserved seats. While the party has been stripped of its due share, the wafer-thin opposition in the provincial legislature is all set to grab 25 seats — something that emboldens them to usher in a change of guard by luring 35 more legislators into their ranks. But it goes without saying that this floor-crossing, under coercion, will breed discontent and instability. Other measures being contemplated are dissolution of the assembly and imposing Governor Rule. But such tactics — resorted to in Punjab, Balochistan and K-P in the past — are unlikely to stand in the court of law, or in public opinion. The federation should avoid being judgmental on K-P government's performance, as it is not its cup of tea. The way ahead is to let the Gandapur government be on its own, and launch efforts to kickstart a dialogue for bringing down the political temperature. PTI's stance that it is open for talks should be responded to by the coalition in Islamabad with a sincere roadmap, which could entail redressing grievances of the party, especially release of political prisoners including former PM Imran Khan. Such a move would offset PTI's plans for agitation, and usher in a semblance of serenity.
Express Tribune
10 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Imran involved in May 9 conspiracy, rules LHC
Listen to article The Lahore High Court (LHC) ruled on Thursday that former prime minister Imran Khan was involved in a conspiracy behind the violent events of May 9, 2023, citing testimonies from two police officials. The court dismissed Imran's post-arrest bail petition, noting sufficient grounds for criminal conspiracy and abetment. According to the detailed order, statements by Inspector Ismat Kamal and Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) Hassan Afzal place Imran as the one who perpetrated meetings held on May 4 at Chakri Rest Area, Rawalpindi, and on May 7 and 9 in Lahore. The court said this undermines the argument that Imran was in jail during the violence on May 9. 'These statements attract the provisions of Section 120-B and Section 121-A of the Pakistan Penal Code,' reads the judgment. Both sections deal with criminal conspiracy and abetment of mutiny, which carry serious legal consequences. Read: LHC rejects Imran's bail in eight May 9 cases During the hearing, the court observed that Imran's prior conviction in the Al-Qadir Trust case was uncontested. It also said that his alleged statements and actions had led to the loss of lives and damage to state property. The prosecution submitted audio and video clips, including transcripts prepared by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA), which require forensic examination. The authorities had obtained court permission to conduct photogrammetry, polygraph and voice-matching tests within jail premises. However, investigators reported that Imran repeatedly refused to cooperate, hindering progress. The court concluded that the charges fall under the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), which bars bail in serious offences. It found no new circumstances to justify further inquiry or release on bail. 'In collective consideration of the are not inclined to grant post-arrest bail to the petitioner,' the court stated, dismissing the petition outright.
