South Korea says fighter jet misfire injured rises to 29
The number of people injured after South Korean fighter jets accidentally dropped bombs on a civilian area on Thursday increased to 15 civilians and 14 soldiers, the country's defence ministry said.
The latest tally included cases of ear damage due to the blasts, as well as people suffering from migraines and anxiety, Defence Ministry spokesperson Jeon Ha-kyu told reporters on Friday.
Two South Korean fighter jets mistakenly dropped eight air-to-surface bombs on a civilian town on Thursday. An ensuing blast shook homes and buildings, video footage showed.
The area impacted in Pocheon, which is about 40 kilometres (25 miles) northeast of Seoul, was outside of a training area close to the border with North Korea.
Nine of the wounded were currently hospitalised, including two who were seriously hurt, according to the spokesperson.
Eight 500-pound (225 kg) Mk82 bombs from two jets fell outside the designated range during joint live-fire exercises due to a pilot entering incorrect coordinates, the military said.
Authorities have suspended live-fire exercises until it was clearly established what had gone wrong, but the military said the incident would not affect major joint South Korean and US military exercises starting on Monday.
Near the defence ministry in Seoul, dozens of activists and residents from the affected town held a rally on Friday to demand a halt to military drills that threaten the lives and peace of people living in the area.
"We, Pocheon citizens, are fundamentally questioning these ongoing military exercises," said Lee Myoung-won, a Pocheon resident at the rally, adding it was unclear who the military drills were providing security for and what they were for.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
Oman delivers details of US nuclear proposal to Iran, Araghchi says
Omani Foreign Minister Badr Al Busaidi has presented details of a US proposal for a nuclear deal with Iran during a visit to Tehran on Saturday, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the proposal, saying US President Donald Trump 's special envoy Steve Witkoff 'has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime'. Mr Araghchi said in a post on X that the Omani Foreign Minister 'paid a short visit to Tehran today to present elements of a US proposal which will be appropriately responded to in line with the principles, national interests and rights of the people of Iran'. Iran and the US have held five rounds of talks – three in Muscat and two in Rome – mediated by the Omani Foreign Minister to resolve a decades-long dispute over Iran's nuclear programme. Mr Araghchi's statement came ahead of an anticipated sixth round, a date and venue for which have not been announced. One of the main sticking points has been US insistence that Iran give up its nuclear enrichment facilities, a demand Iran rejects. Mr Trump, who has restored a 'maximum pressure' campaign on Tehran since February, ditched a 2015 nuclear pact between Tehran and six world powers in 2018 and reimposed sanctions on Iran. In the intervening years, Tehran has overstepped limits set in the 2015 agreement on its nuclear programme, which were designed to make it harder to develop an atom bomb. In recent months it has stepped up its production of highly enriched uranium, according to a report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) seen by AFP on Saturday. In a separate in-depth report, the IAEA also criticised 'less than satisfactory' co-operation from Tehran over its scrutiny of the nuclear programme. 'While Iran continues to co-operate with the agency on matters of routine safeguards implementation, in a number of respects … its co-operation with the agency has been less than satisfactory,' the report said. Tehran denies it is seeking a nuclear weapon. It said the report is 'politically motivated and repeats baseless accusations', state media reported. Ms Leavitt said on Saturday that 'President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb'. She confirmed the latest US proposal had been communicated to Iran but declined to provide details. On Friday, Mr Trump said a deal was possible in the 'not-too-distant future'. Earlier in the week, he told reporters he had recently warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to take action that could disrupt the talks with Iran. Those comments appeared to signal US concern that Israel might strike Iran's nuclear facilities. But Mr Trump himself has repeatedly threatened to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities if diplomacy fails to achieve a deal.
Khaleej Times
9 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Oman presents elements of US nuclear deal proposal to Iran
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said his Omani counterpart presented elements of a US proposal for a nuclear deal between Tehran and Washington during a short visit to Tehran on Saturday. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said later on Saturday that US President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff "has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it's in their best interest to accept it". Araqchi said in a post on X that Iran "will respond to the US proposal in line with the principles, national interests and rights of people of Iran". His statement came ahead of an anticipated sixth round of talks between Washington and Tehran to resolve a decades-long dispute over Iran's nuclear programme. The date and venue of the talks have not been announced yet. "President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb,'" Leavitt said in a statement, confirming that the US proposal had been communicated to Iran. She declined to provide further details. Trump said on Friday that an Iran deal was possible in the "not-too-distant future". Earlier in the week, Trump told reporters he had recently warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to take actions that could disrupt nuclear talks with Iran. Those comments appeared to signal US concern that Israel might strike Iran's nuclear facilities while US diplomatic efforts were under way. Trump himself has repeatedly threatened to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities if diplomacy fails to achieve a deal. One of the main sticking points in the talks between US and Iranian officials has been US insistence that Iran give up its nuclear enrichment facilities, a demand Iran rejects. Trump, who has restored a "maximum pressure" campaign on Tehran since February, ditched a 2015 nuclear pact between Iran and six world powers in 2018 during his first term and reimposed crippling sanctions on Iran. In the intervening years, Tehran has steadily overstepped the 2015 agreement's limits on its nuclear programme, designed to make it harder to develop an atomic bomb. Tehran denies it is seeking a nuclear weapon.
Middle East Eye
12 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Exclusive: Hamas offers to release ten captives over sixty days in three stages
Hamas has requested changes to a US-backed ceasefire plan intended to halt Israel's military offensive in Gaza, the group said on Saturday. Middle East Eye has obtained the full 13-point proposal through informed Palestinian sources. The document outlines the terms Hamas has conditionally accepted, including a 60-day ceasefire with US President Donald Trump acting as guarantor of Israel's compliance. The plan would see Hamas release ten living Israeli captives and the remains of 18 others in three phases. For the living captives four on day one, two on day 30, and four on day 60. As for the bodies, six will be returned on day ten, another six on day 30, and the remaining six on day 50. In return, Israeli forces would begin withdrawing to positions held before 2 March 2025. A Palestinian source close to the negotiations criticised Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff for pushing a deal that lacks clarity and guarantees, telling MEE it shows 'ill intention,' warning it could lead to the collapse of the fragile talks. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Speaking to MEE on condition of anonymity the Palestinian source said that the "insistence of Witkoff to release the captives in the first week shows ill intention, and based on previous experience, the Israelis will just go back into full-blown war and sabotage the rest of the deal.' 'Hamas felt betrayed twice by Witkoff' - Palestinian source 'What guarantees do the Palestinians have for an end to the war, Witkoff and the Israelis are not showing an intention or a path to end the war,' the source added. 'Witkoff's only concern is the release of the Israeli captives, but he shows a complete disregard for the continuous killing of thousands Palestinian civilians, majority of whom are women and children, and the suffering of the spread of famine for the two million Palestinians in Gaza" the Palestinian source noted. 'Hamas felt betrayed twice by Witkoff. The first when Israel broke the US guaranteed deal on 2 March by imposing the embargo on aid and then returning to full blown war on 18 March, with Witkoff's and the American administration's full support and cover," the source said. "And the second time, when Hamas released the American-Israeli soldier with an expectation of humanitarian relief and a new approach towards the negotiations, which clearly has not been the case,' they added. Ambiguity around Israeli withdrawal and aid During the ceasefire negotiations, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu demanded that all ten living captives and the eighteen bodies be released on the first day — a condition Palestinian negotiators rejected, fearing Israel would resume its military onslaught immediately after. Hamas is demanding that Israeli forces withdraw to the positions they held before 2 March 2025 — a move short of full withdrawal from the Gaza Strip — but the Palestinian source said Witkoff has failed to specify where, exactly, Israeli troops would redeploy. 'Withdrawal to where? Witkoff is also quite unclear about this,' the Palestinian source told MEE. The Palestinian source also expressed frustration over the lack of transparency in the proposed aid mechanism. 'Witkoff is not clear about the mechanism of distribution of aid,' they added. 'Bahbah negotiated with Hamas, reached a deal with them, and agreed it with Witkoff. Witkoff then met with Dermer and Netanyahu refused it, which lead to Witkoff walking back on his deal' - Palestinian source More broadly, the Palestinian source said the current framework doesn't offer a viable route to end the war. 'What guarantees do the Palestinians have for end of the war? Witkoff and the Israelis are not showing an intention or a path to end the war.' According to the Palestinian source, earlier in the negotiation process, Bishara Bahbah, a Palestinian-American mediator working for the Trump administration, reached an understanding with Hamas and had an agreement in place, which Witkoff had initially signed off on. However, after meeting Israeli Minister Ron Dermer and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Witkoff reversed course and withdrew support for the deal. 'Bahbah negotiated with Hamas, reached a deal with them, and agreed it with Witkoff. Witkoff then met with Dermer and Netanyahu refused it, which lead to Witkoff walking back on his deal,' the Palestinian source said. The remarks reflect growing Palestinian distrust in the negotiation process, with Hamas increasingly sceptical that the proposed deal will deliver a credible and enforceable end to the war. US-Israel coordination and fears of resumed war Reporting from Axios indicates that Witkoff's ceasefire proposal was "fully coordinated with Israel and was a result of his meeting with Netanyahu's confidant Ron Dermer at the White House on Tuesday." Axios also reported that Hamas pushed for language stating that if a permanent ceasefire deal isn't reached within 60 days, the temporary truce would automatically be extended indefinitely. Earlier this week Drop Site news reported that Witkoff's latest ceasefire proposal was crafted with Netanyahu which explicitly does not guarantee an end to Israel's war on Gaza Palestinian negotiators have largely agreed to ceasefire provisions it signed on 17 January which Israel broke on the 18 March resuming its military campaign. In the revised document submitted by Hamas negotiations for a permanent ceasefire would begin immediately once the temporary truce takes effect. A key clause put forward by Hamas calls for an 'independent committee of technocrats' to manage Gaza's affairs after a permanent ceasefire is secured — a move that would see Hamas relinquish governing authority in the Strip. Israeli army tanks take position at the border between Israel and the Gaza Strip on May 29, 2025 (AFP) However, reports indicate that Witkoff and Netanyahu have sought to remove clauses that would see Hamas handover administrative control in Gaza an indication that the war on Gaza could resume after 60 days. Witkoff dismissed Hamas's amendments on Saturday as 'totally unacceptable and only takes us backward.' He demanded that the group accept the existing framework for proximity talks set to begin next week. Earlier on Saturday, Hamas welcomed Witkoff's proposal but said it required key modifications. A Hamas official told Al Jazeera the group had already agreed to an earlier version a week prior, only for Witkoff to return with an altered plan that, according to Hamas, omitted crucial elements. 'We cannot accept such a proposal as a baseline for negotiations,' said senior Hamas official Basem Naim, citing the absence of guarantees for a 60-day ceasefire, humanitarian aid, and full Israeli withdrawal. Surge in humanitarian aid In its formal response, Hamas also demanded urgent humanitarian and reconstruction measures. These include immediate aid access coordinated through the United Nations and organisations such as the Red Crescent, in accordance with an agreement signed on 19 January 2025, when the first ceasefire agreement was signed. During the negotiation phase, final plans will be drawn up to rebuild homes, public facilities and critical infrastructure, alongside aid for those affected by the war. Displaced Palestinians ferry bags of food aid after storming a World Food Programme warehouse in Deir el-Balah in the central Gaza Strip on May 28, 2025 (AFP) The group called for full restoration of "electricity, water, sanitation, communications and roads, along with the resumption of services at hospitals, health centres, schools and bakeries." Hamas also pressed for unrestricted movement via the Rafah crossing with Egypt and the revival of trade and commercial flows. Its proposal for a permanent ceasefire would entail a "five-to-seven-year halt in hostilities", guaranteed by the US, Egypt and Qatar. While negotiations are ongoing, Washington would remain committed to maintaining the truce and facilitating aid delivery, with a target to conclude talks within 60 days. Ceasefire terms and prisoner exchanges Hamas has stated in its proposal that 'all Israeli military activities in Gaza will cease upon the entry into force" of the ceasefire agreement. Ireland stands by claim Israel committing genocide in Gaza Read More » The group added that during the truce, Israeli military and reconnaissance aircraft would be grounded for 10 hours each day, and for 12 hours on days when prisoner exchanges take place. The proposal also highlighted that the US President is committed to ensuring both sides respect the ceasefire. According to the document, the President 'insists that negotiations during the temporary ceasefire, if successfully concluded by agreement between the parties, will lead to a permanent solution to the conflict.' On the issue of Israeli captives, Hamas outlined that it would release ten living Israeli captives and 18 bodies in return for a number of Palestinian prisoners and bodies, to be determined by mutual agreement. The document says the exchange would take place 'simultaneously and according to an agreed-upon mechanism.' Hamas further pledged to guarantee the 'health, welfare, and security' of Israeli detainees immediately after the ceasefire begins. In return, Israel would be expected to ensure similar treatment for Palestinians held in its prisons and detention centres, 'in accordance with international law and norms.'
