Inflation eases to 2.7% year-on-year in March
The South African Reserve Bank is unlikely to cut interest rates next month, because of inflationary pressures that lie ahead
Consumer
On a monthly basis, consumer prices increased by 0.4% in March, according to data published by
The annual inflation rate for goods eased to 2% in March from 2.5% and that for services decelerated to 3.5% from 3.8%.
Inflation for housing and utilities was at 4.4%, while food and non-alcoholic beverages came in at 2.7% and restaurants and accommodation services were at 4.2%.
'Inflation pressure generally remains quite benign, and this vindicates the Reserve Bank's decision to cut interest rates since late last year,' said Elna Moolman, head of South Africa Macroeconomic Research at Standard Bank.
'This doesn't, however, necessarily remove all of the Reserve Bank's potential concerns around medium-term upside pressure on inflation from the global tariff developments and a weaker currency. This doesn't necessarily guarantee further interest rate cuts in the short term.'
The
Economists expect the central bank to keep rates unchanged again in May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
13 hours ago
- The Star
Reserve Bank probes Nthabeleng Likotsi over alleged false information in bank application
Sifiso Mahlangu | Published 5 hours ago The South African Reserve Bank has launched an investigation into Nthabeleng Likotsi and her bank, YWBN Mutual Bank, over claims that she may have provided false or misleading information during the bank's application process. The move follows a major fallout with investment firm AFRIBIZ Financial Services, and could lead to serious legal consequences for Likotsi. At the centre of the controversy is a failed R9 million deal between AFRIBIZ and YWBN. AFRIBIZ says it paid this amount for a 26% stake in the mutual bank. But after the bank allegedly failed to meet key regulatory requirements, the promised shares were not issued. Instead of receiving their 26% shareholding, AFRIBIZ claims it was offered just 2% as part of a "full and final settlement" — an offer the company immediately rejected. 'They sold us shares. We paid. Now we want what we paid for,' said a source close to AFRIBIZ's legal team. 'Returning the money is not good enough. That was never part of the agreement.' The Reserve Bank is now reviewing whether Likotsi or anyone at YWBN knowingly gave misleading or untrue information as part of their application to register the bank. Under the Mutual Banks Act, it is a criminal offence to do so. Legal experts say the situation is serious. Advocate Mandla Tshabalala, a corporate law specialist, explained: 'When someone pays for shares and you offer a refund instead, it sends the message that either the shares don't exist, or you never intended to follow through.' AFRIBIZ has made it clear they are not backing down. They insist that the R9 million payment was labelled as 'non-refundable' and was meant to secure actual shares, not a promise or future negotiation. 'This is not just about a disagreement,' said one banking insider. 'It raises questions about trust, transparency, and whether proper processes were followed from the beginning.' This is not the first time YWBN has faced trouble. In 2021, the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission Tribunal ruled that YWBN had failed to follow rules under the Co-operatives Act and ordered the return of funds to investors. For Likotsi, the situation is especially damaging. Just a few years ago, she made headlines as the first black woman to start a mutual bank in South Africa — a historic and inspiring achievement. But now, that legacy is under threat. 'She started on the wrong foot,' said a senior banking executive. 'This was a chance to prove that new leadership could work in the sector. But instead, we're seeing delays and avoidance.' Likotsi, however, has defended her actions. She says YWBN made the offer to AFRIBIZ in good faith, trying to resolve issues that arose after regulatory compliance problems. She insists the door remains open for future collaboration. Still, critics argue the damage has already been done. The Reserve Bank's investigation could take time, but its outcome may have lasting effects not only on Likotsi's future but on the image of mutual banking in South Africa. With AFRIBIZ considering legal action and investor trust shaken, YWBN faces an uphill battle to restore credibility. As the inquiry continues and public scrutiny intensifies, what once seemed like a bold step forward for financial inclusion now hangs in the balance.
Daily Maverick
15 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
South Africa's SMMEs are flying blind in a changing global order
Small businesses are yet again expected to absorb the shocks of stalling growth, economic policy and diplomacy. Small businesses are expected to keep the lights on, even as South Africa stumbles through an increasingly volatile global and domestic economic environment. While a 25 basis point rate cut at month end offered some respite, it's hardly the lifeline small, medium and micro enterprises (SMMEs) need, said Miguel da Silva, executive of business banking at TymeBank in the bank's SMME forecast for June. 'Some diminishing pressure on the cost of credit' followed the South African Reserve Bank's cut, Da Silva said. Yet, he said 'the economy needs every bit of help it can get'. VAT relief with a fuel levy sting The National Treasury's decision to hold VAT steady at 15% provided some short-term relief to cash-strapped SMMEs. But the olive branch came with a thorn. As of 4 June, petrol and diesel prices jumped by 16c and 15c per litre respectively. 'With many small businesses already operating on razor-thin margins, this 16c increase will likely be passed on to consumers, potentially dampening demand in an already constrained market,' Da Silva said. This adaptation to the Budget showcases the government's strained fiscal position. In a podcast discussion on Budget 3.0, Stanlib chief economist Kevin Lings pointed out that until South Africa lifts GDP growth above 3%, pressure on public finances will persist. 'The negative revenue impact from backtracking on the VAT increases proposed in the previous version of the Budget, as well as the weaker economic growth trajectory, is counteracted… by a combination of revenue and spending adjustments,' explained Dr Elna Moolman, Standard Bank Group head of South African macroeconomic research. 'The expenditure changes are dominated by scaling back some of the new spending proposed in the previous versions of the Budget, while the revenue adjustments include both the reversal of some of the tax relief previously proposed… and unspecified future tax hikes.' The Budget foreshadows a pivot to removing the regulatory burden on businesses. Though, as Da Silva noted, no specific SME-support programmes, funding initiatives or targeted relief measures have emerged. Q1 data highlights on the scale of struggle The economic scoreboard from Q1 depicts an economy in stagnation: GDP grew by just 0.1% in Q1 2025, with agriculture (+15.8%) the only area showing growth. The National Treasury revised 2025 growth expectations downward from 1.6%, from 1.8%. Official unemployment rose to 32.9%, from 31.9%, which translates to a decrease of 54,000 in the labour force. Youth unemployment increased to 46.1% from 44.6% in the first quarter of 2024. While the SME SA Funding Summit 2025 on Thursday, 12 June is expected to explore access to finance, Da Silva stressed that a functioning, reliable environment matters more. How does this affect you? No real relief for entrepreneurs: if you're running a small business, don't hold your breath for targeted funding or tax breaks. Government promises of support remain vague. Price volatility on imports and exports: If Agoa collapses or BRICS moves away from the dollar, expect price changes in imported goods and export delays. Policy fog = business risk: If you're a customer, supplier or entrepreneur, inconsistent policy and mixed messages from government and diplomats create risk, which translates into cautious spending, higher borrowing costs and business hesitancy. Agoa and the diplomatic see-saw South Africa's trade diplomacy with the US remains complicated, but functional for now. Trade Minister Parks Tau and Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen delivered a new framework to US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on 19 May, laying out a new bilateral trade proposal. 'We met and had a very cordial and constructive meeting with Ambassador Greer… We had a very open and frank exchange about how we can ensure mutually beneficial trade between South Africa and the United States of America,' said Steenhuisen. He further noted that 'the importance of both markets for each other, and obviously a lot of emphasis from the American side [on] wanting to rebalance some of the trade… and from our side, wanting to retain market access'. With Agoa set to expire in September 2025, a renewal is looking uncertain. Da Silva said that 'the complex challenge of either finding alternative markets or restructuring their operations' looms large for SMME suppliers in US markets. 'While the US is not our largest trading partner, it is an important one, with 8% of our exports destined for its shores,' said Maarten Ackerman, chief economist at Citadel. 'Of that 8%, a third is excluded from tariffs, but citrus exporters are likely to be hardest hit.' BRICS Summit brings new questions Then there's the BRICS Summit in Brazil in early July, where stakeholders are expected to discuss mechanisms to alleviate dependency on the dollar. 'For SMEs, particularly those in export-oriented sectors, this diplomatic tightrope walk translates into very real business planning challenges,' Da Silva explained. Navigating dual allegiances between BRICS and the West 'requires SMEs to develop strategies that can withstand diplomatic volatility while capitalising on emerging opportunities', Da Silva said. DM
IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
Reserve Bank probes Nthabeleng Likotsi over alleged false information in bank application
The South African Reserve Bank has launched an investigation into Nthabeleng Likotsi and her bank, YWBN Mutual Bank. Image: IOL / Independent Newspapers The South African Reserve Bank has launched an investigation into Nthabeleng Likotsi and her bank, YWBN Mutual Bank, over claims that she may have provided false or misleading information during the bank's application process. The move follows a major fallout with investment firm AFRIBIZ Financial Services, and could lead to serious legal consequences for Likotsi. At the centre of the controversy is a failed R9 million deal between AFRIBIZ and YWBN. AFRIBIZ says it paid this amount for a 26% stake in the mutual bank. But after the bank allegedly failed to meet key regulatory requirements, the promised shares were not issued. Instead of receiving their 26% shareholding, AFRIBIZ claims it was offered just 2% as part of a "full and final settlement" — an offer the company immediately rejected. 'They sold us shares. We paid. Now we want what we paid for,' said a source close to AFRIBIZ's legal team. 'Returning the money is not good enough. That was never part of the agreement.'The Reserve Bank is now reviewing whether Likotsi or anyone at YWBN knowingly gave misleading or untrue information as part of their application to register the bank. Under the Mutual Banks Act, it is a criminal offence to do so. Legal experts say the situation is serious. Advocate Mandla Tshabalala, a corporate law specialist, explained: 'When someone pays for shares and you offer a refund instead, it sends the message that either the shares don't exist, or you never intended to follow through.'AFRIBIZ has made it clear they are not backing down. They insist that the R9 million payment was labelled as 'non-refundable' and was meant to secure actual shares, not a promise or future negotiation.'This is not just about a disagreement,' said one banking insider. 'It raises questions about trust, transparency, and whether proper processes were followed from the beginning.' This is not the first time YWBN has faced trouble. In 2021, the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission Tribunal ruled that YWBN had failed to follow rules under the Co-operatives Act and ordered the return of funds to investors. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading For Likotsi, the situation is especially damaging. Just a few years ago, she made headlines as the first black woman to start a mutual bank in South Africa — a historic and inspiring achievement. But now, that legacy is under threat.'She started on the wrong foot,' said a senior banking executive. 'This was a chance to prove that new leadership could work in the sector. But instead, we're seeing delays and avoidance.' Likotsi, however, has defended her actions. She says YWBN made the offer to AFRIBIZ in good faith, trying to resolve issues that arose after regulatory compliance problems. She insists the door remains open for future collaboration. Still, critics argue the damage has already been done. The Reserve Bank's investigation could take time, but its outcome may have lasting effects not only on Likotsi's future but on the image of mutual banking in South Africa. With AFRIBIZ considering legal action and investor trust shaken, YWBN faces an uphill battle to restore credibility. As the inquiry continues and public scrutiny intensifies, what once seemed like a bold step forward for financial inclusion now hangs in the balance.
