logo
Ukraine to Europe – are you ready to fight tonight?

Ukraine to Europe – are you ready to fight tonight?

Yahoo04-04-2025

"Peace agreed upon," declared The Washington Times on September 28, 1938. By now, we should have learned: deals with predator states bent on conquest – whether Nazi Germany then or Russia today – don't buy peace; they invite war. In the last century, Europe didn't avert disaster; it sleepwalked straight into the deadliest conflict in humanity's history.
The lesson of Munich fades, but the truth remains – evil left unpunished spreads, and the cost of confronting it only grows with time.
Let's say it aloud, if Russia is not stopped in Ukraine, today's schoolchildren in Hamburg, Lyon, Milan, and Bristol will soon face a question their parents shun: will you fight for your home the way Ukrainians fought for theirs? Denial is not a strategy. It is capitulation.
Every morning since 2008, Europe has woken up to an ever-growing threat emanating from Moscow – but with no greater sense of urgency or appreciation for Dietrich Bonhoeffer's famous words "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act."
2008 was the year Russian tanks shattered the post-Cold War order, violating Georgia's sovereign borders. Russian lies, meanwhile, seeped into Europe's airwaves and Russian rubles corrupted the powerful and influential – business as usual.
Instead of recognizing the danger, Europe let fear dictate its response – fear of escalation, fear of economic blowback, fear of provoking the very aggression the Kremlin had already unleashed. Paralyzed by the belief that confronting Moscow was too risky, Europe missed the memo: not confronting it was and remains the most dangerous option of all.
Russia is waging an unprovoked war – standing up to it is both necessary and morally right. Doing so would not only strengthen European confidence but also help the continent rediscover its sense of purpose. But it requires leadership and boldness. Europe's politicians must be honest with their voters: either we mobilize the necessary support for Ukraine to win, or we will have to mobilize you – the citizens of Germany, France, the UK, Italy, Spain, and beyond – for military service in the years to come.
For much of the postwar era, Europe's pacifism was both a moral conviction and a convenient excuse. The devastation of two world wars instilled a deep aversion to military force, reinforcing the belief that restraint – not strength – ensured peace. Some politicians instrumentalized pacifism not to defend peace but to dodge responsibility – until the illusion of safety was shattered in 2008, again in 2014, and catastrophically in 2022.
Europe hasn't transcended war – the relative tranquility and unprecedented prosperity were underwritten by the power of deterrence, also known as NATO. Now, with Washington's focus shifting and Moscow's imperial ambitions spiraling out of control, the old pacifist reflex is worse than obsolete – it is a fatal liability.
A pro-peace demonstration that fails to name the aggressor – Russia – and acknowledge the ongoing suffering of the victim – Ukraine – is no solace to the 20,000 Ukrainian children forcibly taken to Russia over the last three years. And that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Moscow's war crimes against the most vulnerable. Years of Russian control since 2014 have already robbed countless Ukrainian children of their identities and futures – some of whom, tragically, were sent to die under the flag of their predatory, bloodthirsty kidnappers.
Ukraine is the target of Russian aggression, but make no mistake, our brave nation is not a security burden for Europe – but a provider if not the ultimate guarantor. By resisting the full-scale invasion, Ukraine has severely degraded Moscow's military capabilities. But more importantly, it chose to fight rather than surrender – a gift Europe has yet to fully appreciate. A well-armed, NATO-integrated Ukraine is what a credible deterrent against future aggression looks like.
Europe has real options it can activate. It can seize and transfer $300 billion in frozen Russian assets to Ukraine, form a European army as suggested by President Zelenskyy, commit to tightening sanctions or better enforcement of the existing ones, dealing with the so-called shadow feel, and upping support for Ukraine every month until the Russian army stops trying to erase Ukraine from the map.
If anything could de-escalate Moscow's appetite for violence, it is a Free World that stops apologizing for its power. Europe's economy is ten times larger than Russia's, and its population is three times as big. Why it feels compelled to cede the initiative after the Kremlin launched an overtly criminal war remains a mystery.
The idea that Russia is on the brink of going nuclear is the most dangerous misconception of all. The risk of Armageddon hasn't diminished – it has grown, because the West let the Kremlin's blackmail dictate its response, or rather, its non-response. Meanwhile, China has drawn a red line, warning Putin against the use of doomsday weaponry.
When someone points to the nonzero risk of nuclear war, remind them that caving to Moscow's threats would shred the non-proliferation order and make WWIII far more likely, not less. Give in once, and every dictator will take note – better get my own bomb.
There is no limit to the depravity of Russian war crimes in Ukraine. But one stands out as a screaming canary in the coal mine: forcing Ukrainian prisoners of war to fight against their own homeland. Several regions of Ukraine have now been under occupation for eleven years. Russian commissars are now conscripting Ukrainians in Donetsk, Luhansk, and Crimea – young men who weren't even teens when the occupation began.
The Russian flywheel of false grievances, hatred toward the West, endless lies, and a shift to a full wartime economy is spinning faster and faster. It'll go into overdrive, not slow down, if the civilized world fails to ensure Ukraine's victory and a restoration of justice for the victims of Russia's war crimes.
Neither Europe nor the U.S. get to decide what Moscow will do. The Kremlin isn't just clinging to power – it wages wars of aggression because it is rooted in Russia's imperial ethos, an insatiable thirst for conquest, and a culture not just tolerant of, but often eager to unleash, heinous violence. What the Free World can decide is how to respond. So far, it has chosen weakness and denial. This didn't end well in 1938. It won't end well now.
Andrew Chakhoyan, Academic Director at the University of Amsterdam.
Olga Aivazovska, Head of Board, Civil Network OPORA.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Renault to begin drone production in Ukraine, media reports
Renault to begin drone production in Ukraine, media reports

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Renault to begin drone production in Ukraine, media reports

French automaker Renault will begin manufacturing drones in Ukraine, France Info reported, marking a significant collaboration between the automotive and defense sectors. Renault will partner with a small French defense company to equip production lines on Ukrainian territory, with the drones expected to serve both Ukrainian and French military forces. While the French Defense Ministry declined to comment on Renault specifically, Defense Minister Sébastien Lecornu confirmed on June 6 that a major French car manufacturer would join forces with a defense SME to launch drone production in Ukraine. Speaking to Le Monde, Lecornu did not name the automaker, but praised the project as an 'unprecedented partnership.' The production will take place away from front-line areas, although the exact locations were not disclosed. Lecornu emphasized that the assembly would be handled by Ukrainians, citing their strong expertise in drone development and combat deployment strategies. Lecornu also said there is "no need" to send French citizens to work on the production line, since it will be set up in Ukraine, where Ukrainians "are better than us at designing drones and especially at developing the strategies that accompany them." This move underscores France's growing support for Ukraine's defense industry and comes as Ukraine continues to expand its own drone manufacturing capabilities. Presidential advisor Oleksandr Kamyshin recently said that Ukrainian producers have the capacity to make over 5 million FPV drones annually. Drone warfare has become a central component of the ongoing war, with both Ukraine and Russia increasingly relying on unmanned systems for reconnaissance and strikes. Recent long-range Ukrainian drone attacks, including hits on airfields deep inside Russian territory, have demonstrated the strategic value of such technology. We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

China's Rare Earths Weapon Could Kill Europe's Auto Industry
China's Rare Earths Weapon Could Kill Europe's Auto Industry

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China's Rare Earths Weapon Could Kill Europe's Auto Industry

China earlier this year introduced restrictions on its exports of rare earths. The move marked a new stage in the US- China trade spat, when the two sides no longer tried to out-tariff each other but took to more concrete steps. The problem is, the restrictions don't just apply to U.S. companies. And they may well deliver the fatal blow to Europe's struggling auto industry. China controls 90% of the world's rare earths processing capacity. It is the indisputable, if not exactly celebrated in the West, master of the rare earths industry. And now, it is using this position to make a point to trade partners that have gone above and beyond to restrict Chinese exports to their own countries and regions—essentially the same thing that Washington does when it uses the dominance of the dollar to sanction governments it doesn't see eye to eye with. Rare earths are used in a perhaps surprisingly wide variety of products. More specifically, it's rare-earth magnets that are troubling carmakers on both sides of the ocean. 'Without reliable access to these elements and magnets, automotive suppliers will be unable to produce critical automotive components, including automatic transmissions, throttle bodies, alternators, various motors, sensors, seat belts, speakers, lights, motors, power steering, and cameras,' the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an industry body, wrote in a letter addressed to the Trump administration in early May. The letter, cited by Reuters in a recent report on the rare earths restrictions, is one of what looks like a cry for help that is only going to get louder. It was signed by auto industry leaders including Toyota, Volkswagen, and General Motors, which thanked the administration for trying to resolve the issue. If they didn't, the carmakers said, it would be only a matter of time before car factories started shutting same is happening in Europe, and it's worse—because with Trump, U.S. carmakers no longer have to worry about EVs. With the current European parliament and the Commission, local carmakers do have to worry about EVs, a lot. Because EVs feature greater amounts of those rare earths than internal combustion engine cars. And European carmakers have been mandated with the production and sale of certain minimum numbers of these EVs over the next three years. 'I informed my Chinese counterpart about the alarming situation in the EU car industry — the rare earth and permanent magnets are essential for industrial production… this is extremely disruptive for industry,' the European Union's trade commissioner, Maros Sefcovic, said this week, as quoted by the Financial Times. He added that the 'Carmakers are warning of huge production difficulties in a short period of time.' The clock, in other words, is ticking and China does not really seem in a hurry to stop it. The restrictions that Beijing implemented in mid-April are not literal—or direct. They are in the form of a new licensing regime for anyone who wants to buy rare earth magnets from Chinese producers. To do that, the prospective buyer needs to apply for a license, provide a substantial amount of information, and wait. As a Bosch spokesperson described it, the application process was 'complex and time-consuming, partly due to the need to collect and provide a lot of information.' Because of this complexity, only a few car parts suppliers have been granted such licenses, making the car companies' freak-out only a matter of time, really. But this is coming at a really bad time for European carmakers, despite the substantial rise in EV sales. They are still to turn in a solid profit on their electric cars and they are supposed to be making ever more of these—which means a lot more rare earths. Things are not that swell in the United States, either, after President Donald Trump accused the Chinese of violating a deal the two earlier agreed, on the temporary relaxation of trade warfare, including tariffs and other trade restrictions—only to be slapped back with the accusation that he did that first, by restricting semiconductor exports. Things are not looking good for the car industry right now but there is, as always, a silver lining. It consists in the fact that the world is entirely dependent on a single source of rare earths and this is not a sustainable or secure state of affairs. There has been a lot of talk in both Europe and the United States about building their own supply chains in such critical materials but action has not really been forthcoming. Even if it was, building a supply chain from scratch takes many years—just ask China. Yet the rare earths drama may boost Europe's resolve to actually start working on that supply chain, however long it takes to build it. Import dependence can be fatal. By Irina Slav for More Top Reads From this article on

ICE moves to dismiss cases in bid to fast-track deportations after courthouse arrests
ICE moves to dismiss cases in bid to fast-track deportations after courthouse arrests

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

ICE moves to dismiss cases in bid to fast-track deportations after courthouse arrests

As Vadzim Baluty watched his son Aliaksandr Baluty get arrested by six plainclothes U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers directly after an immigration court hearing, he had the sinking feeling he'd made a costly mistake. Vadzim Baluty, accompanying his son for his first court appearance in his asylum bid, agreed last month when an ICE prosecutor offered to drop the case against the recent Belarusian migrant, not realizing his son would be swiftly detained as soon as the pair exited the courtroom. 'I felt like we had fallen into a judicial trap,' he said in Russian through an interpreter in an interview with The Hill. 'We left the courtroom and an ICE officer told us our son was going to be deported in three days. Nobody told us the decision that we made — what it was going to cause.' ICE prosecutors across the country are increasingly moving to dismiss cases against migrants in a bid to fast track their deportations. While a dismissal might seem like the end of a battle to remain in the county, some leaving courthouses have instead been met by ICE agents who are then free to arrest them and place them in expedited removal proceedings, speeding their deportation without a court hearing. Rekha Sharma-Crawford, an immigration lawyer and board member with the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) called it a 'bait and switch.' 'The troubling thing here is that people are doing the right thing and going to court. They hear what they think is great news, that their case is dismissed. But instead, they are subject to a bait and switch and a plainclothes ICE agent will then arrest them. They are detained and then they are pressured to sign documents that basically sign away all of their rights, and they are subject to expedited removal and don't have a chance for a full and fair hearing,' she said in a call with reporters. Vadzim Baluty, a 47-year-old Belarusian political activist who was granted asylum in 2022 after fleeing the Lukashenko dictatorship, thought ICE was aware of his petition to bring his children to the country. He also didn't think Aliaksandr Baluty, now 21, would be deported after entering the country legally. His son was permitted to enter the U.S. through Mexico after waiting in the country seven months for an appointment made through the Biden-era CBP One app. Such a dynamic has only become possible with the shift from the Trump administration, which has expanded the scope of expedited removals. While the process previously was used only for migrants within two weeks of their entering the country and within 100 miles of the border, the Trump administration now allows the tool to be used up to two years after a person enters the U.S. regardless of where they are in the country. Critics call the move an end run around due process and fault the administration for using ICE officers who are often not in uniform and may be wearing masks. Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) went to an immigration courthouse in his district last week, sitting in on court proceedings and witnessing ICE prosecutors dismiss cases followed by migrants being arrested by plainclothes agents as they exited — something he called 'Gestapo-like behavior.' 'The Department of Homeland Security has implemented, over the last week, a coordinated effort to do an end run around our legal system in order to remove nonviolent, noncriminal immigrants trying to come into this country through a lawful pathway of immigration proceedings, and in many cases, asylum proceedings,' he said at a press conference afterward. 'By recommending dismissal of their cases, the Department of Homeland Security is essentially taking jurisdiction away from the court, removing the asylum application from going forward, and then allowing the immigration agents to arrest these people and put them in a deportation proceeding under a different authority than the one that they just dismissed, which has fewer rights and applies in very few circumstances.' Sharma-Crawford said it's especially confusing for pro se litigants — those representing themselves in court. Not only are they being approached by plainclothes officers, but they may not know what to do next. Those placed in expedited removal are not entitled to a hearing, but they can request an interview with an asylum officer if they fear they will be persecuted if returned to their home country. If they pass that screening, their case could be returned to immigration court. Vadzim Baluty has since hired attorney Malinda Schmiechen to represent his son, who asked for the credible fear interview that would route his case back into the immigration court system. Aliaksandr Baluty told them how during a visit to register for the mandatory draft, military officials in the country made a veiled comment about his father and said they were going to teach him to 'love the motherland.' Another officer in the room said, 'You will be in the army for your father.' 'The draft officer said that I — in the army — I would be punished for my father,' Aliaksandr Baluty told an asylum officer, according to a transcript of the interview his attorney shared with The Hill. At his father's advice, Aliaksandr Baluty fled that night to nearby Georgia. Military officials later showed up at his mother's house with a forged conscription document, saying they would prosecute him as a draft dodger. Schmiechen was informed Thursday night, however, that an asylum officer rejected the claim, calling it 'a betrayal all around.' 'I feel like this is a betrayal against our law, against the America that is a sanctuary for so many, and against young Aliaksandr, who fled for his life and seeks to live peacefully with his family,' Schmiechen told The Hill. 'It's a betrayal because the government attorneys betrayed the law with their motion to dismiss, knowing that it would lead to Aliaksandr's detention. It's a betrayal because the American government is using taxpayer money unnecessarily to detain Aliaksandr, and it's a betrayal to Aliaksandr, whose detention is treating him like a criminal, though he's not one.' The arrests come as the GOP at large has vented frustration at the immigration court system, where cases can languish in a years-long backlog. The Department of Homeland Security defended the courthouse arrests as well as their use of expedited removal. 'Most aliens who illegally entered the United States within the past two years are subject to expedited removals. Biden ignored this legal fact and chose to release millions of illegal aliens, including violent criminals, into the country with a notice to appear before an immigration judge. ICE is now following the law and placing these illegal aliens in expedited removal, as they always should have been,' the department said in a statement. 'If they have a valid credible fear claim, they will continue in immigration proceedings, but if no valid claim is found, aliens will be subject to a swift deportation.' Goldman also criticized ICE for using plainclothes officers, saying that in his observations, agents had printed out photos of those they would be arresting and were often wearing masks. 'When I asked them, 'Why are you wearing a mask?' One person told me, 'Because it's cold.' I asked him if he would testify to that under oath, and he walked away and wouldn't respond to me,' he said. 'Another person admitted that they were wearing masks so that they are not caught on video. And my question to them is: 'If what you are doing is legitimate, is lawful, is totally aboveboard, why do you need to cover your face?'' Schmiechen said she's working quickly to explore other options for Aliaksandr Baluty, including requesting that his credible fear claims be reviewed by an immigration court judge. If that doesn't work, she's planning to make a filing in federal court. 'I just feel like we don't have much time at this point,' she said. To Vadzim Baluty, the whole episode has chilling parallels with what he experienced in Belarus. 'This is how it began,' he said. The arrest of his son, just feet from the courthouse doors, happened in less than 60 seconds and left him in shock. He said he never imagined the words 'stop prosecution' could have led to 'expulsion from the country and separation of father and son.' 'Everything is starting to remind us that we are not in a free country. What is happening today is vaguely reminiscent of the birth of a dictatorship, when they categorically begin to solve the political issue at the moment with immigration,' he said. 'I don't feel safe now. None of the immigrants feel safe in the U.S.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store