Trump's tariffs impacting Dallas food businesses
A Chinese restaurant owner in Dallas says he is doing all he can to avoid raising prices despite tariff concerns.
Café Hunan serves traditional Chinese food with original Chinese products such as some sauces and vegetables only produced in China.
Carey and others in the restaurant business are hoping the tariff talks are tamped down, and that countries can negotiate amenable solutions.
A Chinese restaurant owner in Dallas says he is doing all he can to avoid raising prices despite tariff concerns. The tariffs bring a shrinking profit margin and an increase in worry about what additional planned tariffs might mean for business.
A lot of supplies used in the food industry come from China or other places in Southeast Asia.
Café Hunan on SMU Boulevard serves traditional Chinese food with original Chinese products such as some sauces and vegetables only produced in China.
Owner Mark Carey is concerned that climbing tariffs could really make things tight in the food service industry.
Not just food products but the packaging that everyone uses. The majority of it is not produced in this country. Most packaging used in all restaurants comes from China.
This impacts not only what comes from China, but also Mexico. Stuff that you just can't get in America.
What they're saying
Carey and others in the restaurant business are hoping the tariff talks are tamped down, and that countries can negotiate amenable solutions.
"It's going to just exponentially raise the prices on every dish. There's no two ways about it if that happens," said Carey. "Because a lot of the produce during the off-season all comes from Mexico, a large part of it so, hopefully, they'll get something worked out with the Mexican tariff fees. I think that's something that they'll get worked out, but they have to because we're not growing a lot of that product that we use in the wintertime in this state, in this country here."
While Carey's industry understands the trade imbalance...they have concerns about their bottom line.
I understand you got to crack an egg to make an omelet, right? So I get that, but also, at the same time, you have got to be careful with industries that really don't have the margins. I understand steel. There's competition there between our countries and other countries. I get all that but when it comes down to food products, our margins are so small that when you start affecting those prices, it's either going to put people out of business or it's going to get so expensive that people just aren't going to eat out anymore," said Carey.
What's next
While the treasury secretary says he expects a de-escalation in the tariff tug-of-war with China. He also said talks between the world's two largest economies had yet to formally start. Restaurant owners like Mark Carey at Café Hunan are hoping they will start and come to a good end soon.
The Source
Information in this article was provided by interviews conducted at Café Hunan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Trump's 30% Tariff Threat Targets EU and Mexico – Key Stocks at Risk by August 1
Tariffs are back, and this time the stakes are bigger. President Donald Trump said the U.S. will impose a 30% tariff on all goods from the European Union and Mexico, two trade partners that account for nearly one-third of total U.S. imports. The new tax hits on August 1 and could push up prices, disrupt supply chains, and pressure margins across industries from autos to retail. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. The EU accounted for $553 billion in U.S. imports in 2022, while Mexico contributed $454.8 billion, according to the U.S. Trade Representative. Together, they make up nearly one-third of all U.S. imports. A blanket 30% tariff on this scale will likely mean higher prices at checkout for American consumers, especially on goods like cars, auto parts, wine, spirits, pharmaceuticals, and electronics. Several Industries Are Bracing for Impact Retailers and importers will face tough decisions. Most will pass on the higher costs, raising prices on European and Mexican goods. Supply chains could also get squeezed. Companies that rely on components or materials from these regions may experience delays, price hikes, or need to find new vendors altogether. For investors, several consumer and retail names could feel the pressure. Automakers like BMW (BMWYY), Volkswagen (VWAGY), and Stellantis (STLA) have large export footprints from Europe. In the U.S., retailers like Costco (COST), Walmart (WMT), and Target (TGT) could see margin pressure if import costs rise. U.S. wine importers and spirits sellers like Constellation Brands (STZ) may also be affected if European products become more expensive. The EU and Mexico have both signaled they may respond. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen warned of 'proportionate countermeasures' if the tariffs go through. Mexico called the move 'unfair' and said talks are ongoing. More Tariffs on Deck The broader policy comes as part of Trump's tariff strategy, first launched on April 2 with a 10% blanket rate and higher duties on nearly 60 countries. That rollout caused market turbulence before being paused for negotiations. Only the United Kingdom and Vietnam have finalized preliminary trade deals since then. Trump has now reset the deadline for Aug 1, with tariff letters also been sent to 23 other partners, including Canada, Japan, and Brazil. If no new deals are reached, tariffs as high as 50% could hit a wide range of imports. That could weigh on consumer demand, raise inflation, and complicate supply chains heading into the holiday season. Investors will be watching for signs of trade resolutions or retaliations in the weeks ahead. Using TipRanks' Comparison Tool, we've gathered all the tickers mentioned in this article – each potentially exposed to margin pressure if the new tariffs take effect – and compared them side by side.
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Market resilience challenged by Trump's weekend tariff salvo
Financial markets, which have shown increasing insensitivity to tariff threats from the U.S., will face a test at the Monday open after President Donald Trump declared a 30% rate for the European Union and Mexico effective Aug. 1. Trump has ratcheted up trade measures, promising that more tariffs are coming to everyone from Canada to Brazil to Algeria and inviting trading partners to negotiate further. Despite warnings of complacency from the likes of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon, investors have so far behaved as if they're counting on the U.S. president to back down, having seen previous U-turns from his administration. "Investors shouldn't bank on Trump only bluffing with the 30% tariff threat on EU goods," Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at Annex Wealth Management, wrote in an email. "That level of tariffs is punitive, but it likely hurts them more than the U.S., so the clock is ticking." Having set a record high in recent days, Bitcoin, which trades through the weekend, was little moved after the latest Trump missives. Currency markets will give earlier indications of the impact on global risk appetite when they resume trading at 5 a.m. Sydney time. The euro touched its strongest level against the dollar since 2021 this month as investors assessed the region's relative growth prospects. Meanwhile, the Mexican peso set a one-year high of 18.5525 versus the dollar on July 9. President Trump and his allies' criticism of Jerome Powell's handling of the expensive renovation of the Fed's headquarters - with some administration officials building a case to remove Powell from the Fed's Board of Governors - may also weigh on markets at the start of the week. Deutsche Bank AG strategist George Saravelos said the potential dismissal of Powell is a major and underpriced risk that could trigger a selloff in the U.S. dollar and Treasuries. "If Trump were to force Powell out, the subsequent 24 hours would probably see a drop of at least 3% to 4% in the trade-weighted dollar, as well as a 30 to 40 basis point fixed-income selloff, Saravelos said. The greenback and bonds would carry a "persistent" risk premium, he said in a note, adding that investors may also grow anxious about the potential politicization of the Fed's swap lines with other central banks. Tariff campaign Financial markets have been struggling with how to price in the on-again, off-again tariff campaign instigated by Trump so far in his second term. While markets responded to the April 2 "Liberation Day" announcements by selling risk assets and even U.S. Treasuries, those moves have now almost all reversed as the president delayed many of his threatened levies. The EU had been trying to conclude a tentative deal with the U.S. to stave off higher tariffs, but Trump's letter punctured the recent optimism in Brussels. The U.S. president did, however, leave an opening for additional adjustments. "As usual, there are many conditions and clauses that can get these rates reduced," Jacobsen wrote. "That's probably why the market might not like the tariff talk, but it's not panicking about it either." Even when Trump said that Aug. 1 would be a hard deadline, markets reacted as if that date was still negotiable. They did show some signs of caution Friday, when stocks fell from all-time highs as Trump intensified his trade offensive, and the dollar rallied for its best week since February. "The market isn't believing Trump, so we may see pressure on the exchange rate, but only temporarily," said Gabriela Siller, director of economic analysis at Grupo Financiero Base. "Unless the tariff actually goes into effect and is collected, because according to U.S. trade data, the IEEPA tariffs aren't being collected to the letter." In his letter to Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, Trump said the country has been "helping me secure the border," but added that it wasn't enough. The U.S. doesn't intend to apply the 30% rate to goods compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), according to a White House official. _____ (With assistance from Kelsey Butler.) _____ Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Elon Musk is no Ross Perot
The comparisons flood in. Elon Musk launches his 'America Party,' and every pundit reaches for the same tired parallel. Another Ross Perot. Another billionaire maverick. Another third-party earthquake waiting to happen. Wrong. Completely wrong. Musk represents everything Perot opposed. Where Perot stood for fiscal discipline, Musk embodies corporate welfare. Where Perot championed American manufacturing, Musk built his fortune on government funding and Chinese batteries. Where Perot offered genuine outsider credentials, Musk carries the stench of establishment cronyism. The surface similarities deceive. Both men possess massive wealth. Both nurse grudges against sitting presidents. Both promise to shake up the system. The differences run deeper than the Delaware River. Perot emerged from genuine business success. He built Electronic Data Systems from nothing. He created real value, real jobs, real innovation. His wealth came from solving actual problems, not gaming government handouts. Musk built his empire on taxpayer subsidies. Tesla survived on government credits. SpaceX feeds off NASA contracts. His companies consume public money like a Vegas slot machine consumes quarters. He represents the opposite of Perot's self-made independence. The timing exposes another crucial difference. Perot entered politics during America's economic malaise. Recession gripped the nation. Deficits soared. Voters craved fiscal responsibility. His message matched the moment. Musk launches his party during economic recovery. Stock markets reach record highs. Unemployment stays low. His fiscal responsibility message lands like a lead balloon in a helium factory. More importantly, Perot possessed something Musk lacks entirely: credibility on his core issue. When Perot talked about budget deficits, people listened. He had never taken government handouts. He understood business efficiency. He could legitimately claim outsider status. Musk talking about government waste sounds like a meth addict lecturing about sobriety. His companies gorged themselves on federal subsidies for decades. He personally benefited from programs he now claims to oppose. The hypocrisy stinks from orbit. The political landscape has also shifted dramatically since 1992. Perot faced two establishment candidates, the president, George H.W. Bush and his Democratic challenger Bill Clinton. Voters hungered for alternatives. The third-party lane stretched wide and inviting. Today's political map offers no such opening. Trump already occupies the anti-establishment space. He owns the outsider brand, despite being president. Musk cannot out-populist the master populist. The media environment has transformed beyond recognition. In 1992, Perot could command television attention through sheer novelty. Cable news was young. Social media did not exist. A billionaire buying airtime could reach millions of uncommitted voters. Now everyone screams into the digital void. Attention spans shrink by the nanosecond. Musk's X antics already overexpose him. His brand suffers from overexposure, not invisibility. Perot also offered policy substance beneath the theatrics. His deficit charts bored audiences, yet they conveyed serious proposals. He understood complex economic issues. His solutions made mathematical sense, even if they were politically unrealistic. Musk offers conspiracy theories and vanity projects. His policy knowledge barely scratches the surface. He confuses tweeting with governing. He mistakes social media engagement for political support. The coalition mathematics doom Musk from the start. Perot drew votes from both parties roughly equally. His appeal crossed traditional lines. Fiscal conservatives and government skeptics existed in both camps. Musk's potential supporters cluster overwhelmingly on the right. He cannot build a truly bipartisan coalition. Democratic voters despise him. His only hope lies in cannibalizing Republican support. This creates a fatal strategic problem. Every vote Musk gains likely comes from Trump's column. He cannot expand the anti-establishment coalition because he lacks cross-party appeal. He can only divide it. The structural barriers have hardened since Perot's time. Ballot access requirements have increased. Campaign finance laws favor established parties. The debate commission now excludes third parties more effectively. Perot qualified for the presidential debates in 1992. Those appearances legitimized his candidacy. Current rules make such inclusion nearly impossible. Without debate access, third parties wither in obscurity. The fundamental character differences matter most. Perot, for all his quirks, projected competence. He ran a disciplined campaign. He stayed on message. He treated politics seriously. Musk treats everything as a game. He changes positions hourly. He picks fights on social media. He lacks the temperament for sustained political combat. Perot understood American voters. He spoke their language. He shared their concerns. He offered real solutions to real problems. Musk lives in a Silicon Valley bubble. He mistakes X for reality. He confuses online engagement with electoral support. He fundamentally misunderstands the American electorate. The comparison insults Perot's legacy. He may have been eccentric, demanding and difficult, but he changed American politics permanently. He forced both parties to address fiscal responsibility. He proved that third parties could compete. Musk offers nothing comparable — no serious policy agenda, no coherent vision, no sustainable coalition. His proposed new party is just another billionaire's vanity project disguised as political reform. The America Party will follow the same trajectory as Musk's other attention-grabbing schemes — media frenzy, gradual reality, ultimate failure. John Mac Ghlionn is a writer and researcher who explores culture, society and the impact of technology on daily life.
