Brazil's Bolsonaro appeals house arrest order
Bolsonaro was placed under house arrest on Monday after an order was issued by Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes against him.
Moraes' decision cited a failure to comply with restraining orders he had imposed on Bolsonaro for allegedly courting US President Donald Trump's interference in the case.
Bolsonaro's lawyers had already said that they would appeal the decision to place him under house arrest.
In the document sent on Wednesday, the lawyers said that Bolsonaro did not brech the restraing orders. They also asked for the house arrest order to be voted on by a wider panel of Supreme Court justices.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
14 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Banke Bihari temple: SC stays Allahabad HC orders, questions 'intemperate' language
Synopsis The Supreme Court has expressed its disapproval of the Allahabad High Court's handling of a PIL concerning the Banke Bihari Temple in Vrindavan. The apex court questioned the "intemperate language" used against the Uttar Pradesh government and stayed the observations made by the single-judge bench, further halting proceedings and requesting a division bench review. IANS Banke Bihari temple The Supreme Court on Friday expressed displeasure over the orders passed by Allahabad High Court in a PIL over historic Banke Bihari Temple in Vrindavan and questioned the use of "intemperate language" against the Uttar Pradesh government. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi perused the orders of July 21 and August 6 by a single-judge bench of the high court on a PIL which challenged the ordinance Uttar Pradesh Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025 and stayed the observations made in them. Additional Solicitor General K M Nataraj, appearing for the Uttar Pradesh government pointed out to the bench that the high court conducted "parallel proceedings" on the issue and made certain "unwarranted observations" in the order. "What kind of intemperate language is being used by the high court? Like the state committed a sin by passing an ordinance. What is all this? Was the high court not informed that the Supreme Court was seized of the matter?" the bench said. Justice Kant further said the petitions challenging constitutional validity of a statute were always listed before the division bench but a single-judge passed the order in the present case. The bench ordered a stay on the observations made in the July 21 order, which appointed an amicus curiae besides the August 6 order having observations against the state. The top court also stayed further proceedings before the high court in the petition challenging the ordinance. It asked the Allahabad High Court chief justice to consider listing the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the ordinance before a division bench along with other petitions. On August 6, the high court criticised the state government's move to bring an ordinance proposing a statutory trust to manage the historic Banke Bihari Temple and observed that the state has committed a 'sin'. During the hearing, the single judge made sharp remarks on an attempt of the state government to take over the administration of the temple and asked the government to "leave the temple alone".
&w=3840&q=100){kind=logo}
First Post
18 minutes ago
- First Post
Will South Korea allow Google to export map data? US mounts pressure ahead of summit talks
South Korea has postponed a decision on Google's request to export map data for 60 days, citing security concerns. The move comes amid US pressure to resolve the issue ahead of a possible leaders' summit this month. read more People stand in front of a Google logo during a media reception at the Google France headquarters ahead of the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit in Paris, France. File Image/Reuters In response to pressure from the United States to resolve what Washington views as a non-tariff obstacle during recent trade discussions, South Korea postponed a decision on Friday on Google's request for authorisation to export map data, according to its transport ministry. After completing a trade agreement in late July, South Korea and the United States are getting ready for a summit of their leaders, which might take place this month. However, it was unclear if the map issue would be brought up at the meeting. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In 2016 and 2007, South Korea denied petitions by Google, whose parent is Alphabet, for permission to utilise map data on servers outside the nation, citing security concerns. In order to allow Google time to develop solutions that meet its security concerns, the National Geographic Information Institute of South Korea's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport stated in a statement that it has chosen to delay the decision for 60 days. Google claims that after undergoing a security evaluation by a government body, there were no security issues with its mapping data on South Korea, which are publicly accessible and utilised by several businesses. However, the business stated that it is actively negotiating with the South Korean government over any further security measures that the authorities may seek, as well as plans to buy blurred images from government-approved local partners. South Korea, whose 1950-53 war with North Korea ended without a peace treaty, argues that if it allowed such data to leave the country, the locations of military facilities and other sensitive sites could be revealed. But the US said restrictions on cross-border data flows have long served as barriers to operating navigation services through Google Maps and Apple Maps, resulting in US companies losing out in the South Korean market. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD South Korea had not made concessions on the map issue and also on further opening up agriculture, despite early and intense bilateral talks, presidential adviser Kim Yong-beom had said. Google said the lack of data restricts its Google Maps services in Korea, causing major inconveniences to foreign tourists. Late last month, Transport Minister Kim Yoon-duk said South Korea needed to be 'very cautious' about granting map access, saying defence and public safety were prioritised over trade.
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Dharmasthala burial row: SC refuses to gag media from covering case
New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Friday refused to gag media from reporting on the Dharmasthala mass burial case in Karnataka. Dharmasthala burial row: SC refuses to gag media from covering case A bench of Justices Rajesh Bindal and Manmohan, however, directed a trial court in Karnataka to decide afresh the plea filed by the secretary of the Dharmasthala Temple seeking removal of what he alleged was defamatory content targeting the family managing the temple. The top court noted gag orders were passed only in extremely rare cases and asked the petitioner to place all materials before the trial court. The bench clarified it hadn't expressed opinion on the merits of the matter The high court on August 1 set aside a gag order issued by a Bengaluru civil court restraining reportage on the burial case. The gag order was over reports on the alleged murders of women in Dharmasthala in the state's Dakshina Kannada district. The petitioner's lawyer alleged around 8,000 YouTube channels were running defamatory material against the temple. Harshendra Kumar D, Secretary of the Dharmasthala Temple body, moved the apex court seeking removal of the alleged defamatory content. On July 23, the CJI-led bench declined to hear another petition filed by YouTube channel Third Eye challenging a sweeping gag order that restrained media houses from reporting on matters related to the brother of Dharamadhikari D Veerendra Heggade of Dharamsthala in Karnataka. The plea, filed against an ex parte interim order of a local court, questioned the legality of the directive which directed as many as 390 media houses to remove nearly 9,000 links and stories related to the Dharamsthala burial case. The gag order was passed in Kumar's defamation suit alleging spread of false and defamatory online content, despite the absence of specific allegations against him or the temple authorities in any FIR. Karnataka Home Minister G Parameshwara recently said a thorough investigation must precede any conclusions regarding the alleged murders of women in Dharmasthala. The state government has constituted a special investigation team to probe the allegations. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
