DOGE Cuts Kill Georgia Internet Access Program For Black People
Several federal grants designed to expand internet access for rural and Black communities as well as help fund several non-profits focused on Black healthcare in Georgia were cut as part of the DOGE endeavor earlier this year.
According to The Current, the Digital Equity Capacity Program was a federal grant intended to address the digital divide and provide high-speed internet access to rural and low-income communities, with $22 million set aside specifically for Georgia. The grant was abruptly canceled earlier this year by the Department of Commerce after Trump saw the word 'equity' and immediately labeled it 'a racist and illegal $2.5 billion giveaway,' on Truth Social.
The grants weren't only designed to help Black and brown communities; seniors, veterans, people with disabilities, and low-income families would have also received assistance to help catch up with the digital age. Georgia had a whole, 466-page plan outlining how they would spend the money.
It would improve cell tower service across the state as well as provide access to fiber optic internet in rural communities such as McIntosh County. A third of McIntosh's population is Black and the county has a median income of $50,000, which is $25k less than the state at large.
The plan would also expand telehealth services to those rural and low-income communities, as well as upgrade digital literacy to help identify cyber and telephone scammers. Speaking as a man with a Black grandmother, I know firsthand that our elders are especially susceptible to misinformation and scammers. With scammers getting more sophisticated and more robust, this is information that would help protect some of our most vulnerable. Source: Lacheev / Getty
The Georgia DOGE cuts didn't stop at digital equity, they also targeted the Georgia Department of Public Health and various grants that would help improve the lives of Georgia's Black population.
The Georgia-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) lost $334 million in funding due to federal funding cuts earlier this year. As a result, several non-profits focused on Black health in Georgia have lost funding. The Center for Black Women's Wellness lost $438,000 as a result of the DOGE cuts. BLKHLTH Inc., a non-profit focused on vaccine equity in Georgia's Black community, said they would lose nearly $500,000.
'We are a small nonprofit and this was a million-dollar reimbursable grant, so that was a large percentage of our anticipated budget for the year,' BLKHLTH co-founder Kadijah Ameen told GPB.
One of the most notable, and dangerous, funding cuts revolves around HIV/AIDS research and prevention. The Trump administration has already tried to withhold congressionally approved funding for nonprofits focused on HIV research and sexual health within the LGBTQ community. Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' cuts funding for HIV research, surveillance, and prevention efforts.
Federal funding cuts to HIV research and prevention efforts would especially hit Georgia's Black population. Black people are only 31 percent of Georgia's population, yet make up 67 percent of new HIV diagnoses in the state.
There's a lot of noise (for good reason) about the various atrocities and absurdities committed by the Trump administration on a daily basis. Yet the most insidious evil of the current administration is the way it has managed to weaponize the dollar to cause undue harm to Black, brown, and most vulnerable communities.
SEE ALSO:
Are DOGE's Massive Layoffs Hurting Black Workers?
The Great White Heist: Trump's Plan to Bankrupt America
SEE ALSO
DOGE Cuts Kill Georgia Internet Access Program For Black People was originally published on newsone.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
Trump, Putin face defining moment on Ukraine
Close Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here The latest in politics and policy. Direct to your inbox. Sign up for the Evening Report newsletter Subscribe {beacon} PRESIDENT TRUMP and Russian President Vladimir Putin face a potentially a defining moment on the world stage when they arrive in Alaska on Friday for a bilateral summit, as Trump hopes to broker an end to Putin's three-year war with Ukraine. Trump and Putin are scheduled to meet at 3:30 p.m. Eastern time Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson near Anchorage. It's their first meeting since 2018. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will not be present. The summit will only be attended by Trump, Putin and their translators. Following the private meeting, Trump and Putin plan to conduct a joint press conference. If Putin declines, Trump will give his own press conference, he told 'The Brian Kilmeade Show.' Trump has sought to dampen expectations for what gets resolved at the summit. 'Tomorrow, all I want to do is set the table for the next meeting which should happen shortly,' Trump said Thursday during an Oval Office press conference. But Trump has also sounded bullish at times, saying there is only 'a 25 percent chance this meeting will not be a successful meeting.' 'I believe now [Putin]'s convinced that he's going to make a deal. He's going to make a deal,' Trump said Thursday on Fox News Radio. 'We're going to find out — I'm going to know very quickly.' NBC News reports that Putin told a group of advisers he believes the Trump administration is making 'energetic and sincere efforts to stop the fighting, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict,' according to a translated readout from the Kremlin. Trump says he hopes to have a trilateral meeting, potentially in Alaska again, with Putin and Zelensky in the near future. Trump has had a rocky relationship at times with Zelensky. But lately, Trump has reserved his ire for Putin, threatening economic sanctions and greenlighting the sale of U.S. munitions to European countries for Ukraine's defense. 'He's not going to mess around with me,' Trump said Thursday. Trump this week had a virtual meeting with Zelensky and other European leaders, who left the meeting satisfied that the president wouldn't seek to negotiate away any land on Ukraine's behalf. The European leaders, who have at times clashed with Trump over Ukraine and tariffs, left the meeting sounding optimistic that they're on the same page with the U.S. president. NewsNation's Robert Sherman was one of a few select journalists invited to interview Zelensky this week. Read his dispatch from Kyiv here. MORE ADMINISTRATION NEWS • Trump's rating on honesty and trustworthiness hit a new second-term low in the latest Economist/YouGov poll. • Trump selected a Democrat to chair the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, passing over the panel's one Republican member. • The Food and Drug Administration is considering revoking the authorization of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children younger than 5 years old. • National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya says the federal government canceled millions of dollars worth of mRNA research contracts because the general public does not trust the technology. • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) declared that an emissions agreement between California and four major truck makers is 'unenforceable.' The FTC said car manufacturers would not abide by California's pollution rules, which are stricter than federal standards. • The Food and Drug Administration is considering placing a black-box warning on antidepressant use in pregnancy. 💡Perspectives: • The Hill: Trump risks catastrophic defeat by meeting Putin in Alaska.• Foreign Affairs: Israel's emerging occupation consensus.• National Summit: Trump-Putin meeting won't bring a deal on Ukraine.• The Hill: Trump must not give anything away in Alaska. • Stars and Stripes: Strengthening America's defense starts with stronger rail Read more: • What to know about base where Trump, Putin are meeting. • Trump nods to Europe on a future peace force for Ukraine. • Alaska to take center stage at Trump-Putin summit. • Trump presses Nobel Peace Prize case: 'The pressure's on'.CATCH UP QUICK Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard is going after her predecessor, James Clapper, pointing to a newly declassified email as part of her argument that there was an attempt by the Obama administration to undermine President Trump with their investigation of Russia's 2016 election interference. First Lady Melania Trump is demanding Hunter Biden retract and apologize for comments he made linking her to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The Trump administration's religious and moral carveouts to an ObamaCare requirement that all employer health plans cover contraception at no cost were blocked by a federal judge. NEWS THIS AFTERNOON© UPI photoDozens arrested overnight in DC amid federal crackdownFBI Director Kash Patel said Thursday that 45 arrests were made overnight in Washington, D.C., as part of President Trump's federal crackdown on crime in the District. Patel said there were 29 immigration-related arrests, 16 arrests tied to violent crime and three pertaining to illegal firearms. Other arrests pertained to possession of child sex abuse material, illegal drug trafficking, fugitive apprehensions and an assault on a federal officer. One man, 37-year old Sean Charles Dunn, was captured on video getting in an officer's face and slamming a Subway sandwich into his chest. Dunn took off running down the street and was chased down. He was charged with a felony. Attorney General Pam Bondi said Dunn was a Department of Justice employee and has been fired. 'If you touch any law enforcement officer, we will come after you,' Bondi posted on X. 'I just learned that this defendant worked at the Department of Justice — NO LONGER. Not only is he FIRED, he has been charged with a felony. This is an example of the Deep State we have been up against for seven months as we work to refocus DOJ. You will NOT work in this administration while disrespecting our government and law enforcement.' Residents of the District, one of the most highly concentrated Democratic voting regions in the country, have been protesting and heckling the National Guard troops Trump called into duty. Hecklers carried signs and shouted 'go home, fascists' and 'get off our streets,' The Associated Press reports. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents patrolled U Street, a popular night life destination. There was a heavy presence of Drug Enforcement Administration officers and National Guard at other popular spots around the city, including the National Mall and Navy Yard. Trump has cast the move as a trial run before potentially expanding the federal crime crackdown to other blue cities. "The Democrats are fighting the stopping of crime…this is the biggest of all issues," Trump said Thursday during an Oval Office press conference. "Crime is rampant in D.C., it's rampant in our generally blue-run cities and they better do something about it if they ever want to win another election." Rep. Dan Goldman (D-Calif.) said on MSNBC that the "militarization of our cities" violates "everything that we believe in [as] Americans.' Trump has cited a rarely used law regulating the District's self-governing authority to take over the District's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) for 30 days. Beyond that, Trump would need Congress to vote to extend the federal takeover of the local police. 'No f‑‑‑ing way,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told The Parnas Perspective. 'We'll fight him tooth and nail. … He needs to get Congress to approve it, and not only are we not going to approve it, but there are some Republicans who don't like either.' 💡Perspectives: • The Bulwark: How to prepare for Trump taking over your city. • Fox News: Safety is for every citizen, not just the lucky few. • Semafor: How Trump's DC takeover divided the city's Democrats. • Issues & Insights: The press is lying about DC crime. • American Prospect: Laying siege to Sanctuary Cities. • Very Serious: Democrats must do better than ignore elevated crime in D.C. Read more: • DeSantis planning second Florida immigration detention facility. • Tenn. officials vote to turn former prison into immigration detention facility. • Applicants approach elite colleges with greater trepidation. IN OTHER NEWS © Meg Kinnard, Associated Press Roundup: California redistricting poll a red flag for NewsomGov. Gavin Newsom (D) will kick off his effort to redraw California's congressional district maps at a press conference Thursday, but a new poll indicates trouble ahead. A new Politico-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab survey found that 64 percent of California voters prefer the current setup, whereby an independent redistricting commission handles the state maps, compared to 36 percent who support returning congressional redistricting authority to the state Legislature. Among independents, 72 percent favor keeping the independent commission in charge. Newsom is preparing to call a special election to allow California voters to cast ballots on a new gerrymandered map that is more favorable to Democrats. This comes as a response to the Texas legislature's move to redraw their maps to make them more favorable for Republicans. Newsom's proposed ballot measure would bypass the independent redistricting commission for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 election cycles, before reverting back to the existing system. President Trump urged Texas to initiate the rare mid-decade redistricting move, arguing Republicans could pick-up an additional five House seats in the 2026 midterm elections. Texas Democrats fled the state to deny the legislature a quorum and prevent a vote. They remain out of the state, although Gov. Greg Abbott (R) says he'll continue calling for new special legislative sessions until they return for the vote. Other red states, including Florida and Indiana, may follow suit. Newsom is urging other blue states, including Illinois and New York, to join him in countering the GOP's moves. 'It's time to move,' Newsom said on his podcast. 'You got to move. I mean, enough.' MEANWHILE… The Labor Department's producer price index (PPI), which measures inflation before it reaches consumers, spiked higher than expected, according to new data released Thursday. PPI rose nearly 1 percent in July, the largest jump in more than three years. The new PPI report puts the Federal Reserve in a tough spot when it convenes to decide on interest rates next month. The central bank is under pressure to keep prices low and employment high. The Hill's Tobias Burns explains: 'Cutting interest rates could help support the job market by easing borrowing costs for businesses. But doing so could also add fuel to inflation, which has lingered at an annual rate of 2.7 percent for two months since June, according to the consumer price index (CPI).' The stock market indices appear to have priced in a potential rate cut next month as they hover near record highs, although Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has been sensitive to a potential inflation spike from Trump's tariffs and has so far refused the president's demands to cut rates. 💡Perspectives: • The Liberal Patriot: The fool's gold of midterms success. • After Babel: Artificial intimacy is the next social experiment on the young.• The Wall Street Journal: Drug approvals hit FDA wall.• New York: Mamdani is pivoting. So is Cuomo.• Wall Street Journal: Trump, Chicago and no cash bail. Read more: • US applications for jobless benefits fell last week. • Law firms that settled with Trump are pressed to help on trade deals. • Bessent rips Pelosi, calls for single-stock trading ban in Congress. • Illinois judge denies Paxton's request to help arrest Texas Democrats. Stay Engaged Someone forward this newsletter to you? Sign up to get your own copy: See you next time!
Axios
a minute ago
- Axios
What to know about the isolated military base hosting Trump and Putin
Friday's summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to take place at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. Why it matters: The military base played a crucial role in the U.S. monitoring of the Soviet Union during the Cold War. But it's rarely been visited by non-military leaders in recent years, let alone two presidents. Driving the news: Trump and Putin's meeting on Ukraine, and the press conference that's expected to follow, are expected to take place at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, a little known military facility in Anchorage with a storied history. In addition to the relatively similar flight times from Washington and Moscow, the remoteness of the base may have made it more attractive. What they're saying: "Any place you can do it that kind of isolates it, and it makes it easier to control the setting is actually important for both sides," said Benjamin Jensen, senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "The last thing that President Trump would want is pictures of mass demonstrations about a war criminal like Putin being in the United States." Here's what you need to know about the base. Quick facts on Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Zoom in: The joint-base is home to the 3rd Wing of the Air Force, which operates fighter jets such as the F-22 Raptor, and is seen as a key hub for operations in Asia, the Arctic and the West Coast. The military based houses more than 32,000 people and accounts for roughly 10% of Anchorage's population, according to the U.S. military. The base has around $15 billion worth of infrastructure and covers 85,000 acres. The bottom line: JBER is seen by many experts as the only location in Alaska with sufficient security to host both Putin and Trump. How JBER was formed The big picture: The military base as its known today was created in 2010 when Elmendorf Air Force Base merged with Fort Richardson. Elmendorf played a crucial role in monitoring the Soviet Union during the Cold War and would also monitor for any possible nuclear attacks or military activity from the Pacific. The base has the nickname "Top Cover for North America" for that reason, per the base's website. Flashback: The Army first moved into Alaska in 1867 after the U.S. purchased the territory from Russia. The Air Force arrived in 1941 amid concerns related to World War II, and took on additional importance afterwards. "Elmendorf Field assumed an increasing role in defense of North America as the uncertain wartime relations between the United States and the Soviet Union deteriorated into the Cold War," the base's website reads. Worth noting: The Army moved to a new Fort Richardson in 1951 and the Air Force took control of the original Fort Richardson, renaming it Elmendorf Air Force Base. They merged in 2010, expanding infrastructure in the process, according to the base's website. Visits to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson The military base has previously played host to at least two U.S. presidents and one foreign dignitary. In 1971, President Richard Nixon hosted Emperor Hirohito of Japan at Elmendorf, which was a historic meeting as the first time a reigning Japanese emperor visited a foreign country. Thousands of people packed a hangar to watch the interaction. Former President Reagan stopped at Elmendorf in 1983 while en route to Japan and Korea. Most other visitors from D.C. have been defense officials scoping out the living conditions of service members in Alaska and discussing the base's mission.
Boston Globe
a minute ago
- Boston Globe
Harvard faculty has not — and will not — cave to Trump demands
While Harvard decision-makers have Advertisement This myopic focus on the university's administration ignores a truth fundamental to the future of American higher education: Salvation does not and cannot lie in the hands of the Harvard Corporation — the university's secretive, self-appointed governing board made up of financiers and power players. Universities are much more than the individuals who come to campus a few times a year to review high-level operations. Advertisement The role of faculty is fundamental. We are the teachers, researchers, and writers who have committed our professional lives to learning and free inquiry, working together with students to advance truth with rigor, independence, and integrity for the collective benefit of society. That commitment means that, unlike our distant governing boards, we will not give up so easily — no matter what kind of deals are signed in our name. At Harvard, for instance, while the university's leadership has earned well-deserved plaudits for its legal challenges to the most egregious of Trump's punitive measures, it was not, in fact, the administrators who took that bold step first. It was the faculty. When the Trump administration started threatening Harvard, the university leadership's initial response worryingly pointed toward accommodation, seeking compromise at the bargaining table and implementing controversial internal changes that echoed the demands coming from the federal government. As Perry Bacon, a staff writer for the New Republic, recently Advertisement By contrast, faculty, students, and alumni This pattern — in which faculty, students, staff, and alumni lead and university leadership follows — has been repeated at the national level. Researchers in the University of California system Advertisement Members of university boards can retreat to their day jobs, but for the broader university community, the Trump administration's attacks are truly existential. It is our colleagues who have seen their clinical trials suspended, their years-long collaborative projects canceled, and — especially if they work on topics disfavored by the Trump administration, like climate change, racial and gender equity, or Middle East politics — their speech chilled or suppressed on issues central to their professional expertise. While the restoration of unlawfully canceled funding is critical, achieving that cannot come at the expense of academic freedom and intellectual independence. One AAUP member, a computer scientist who has lost nearly all his research funding, penned a personal note to Harvard's president last week, expressing alarm at the prospect of a deal with the government. He wrote movingly of how difficult it has been to watch the foundations of his identity — as a child of immigrants and a scholar dedicated to advancing knowledge — come under withering assault. 'But I am willing to endure that pain,' he continued, 'if by being here at Harvard, I am part of the fight to restore the values of the country. If Harvard settles, I do not know if that will be the case anymore.' Those values are more important now than ever. If trustees are willing to engage in extortionate backroom dealings with political operatives, it must be the role of faculty, staff, students, and alumni to protect academic freedom, university independence and free speech. In our own lawsuit on behalf of Harvard, we will not trade these principles away. We will fight against any substantive changes to faculty hiring and tenure reviews; any 'exceptional' treatment of some academic units and centers; any policy favoring or disfavoring applicants for admission, hiring, or appointment on the basis of political viewpoint; any sharing of information about Harvard affiliates with the government beyond what is legally required for legitimate purposes; and any appointment of an external overseer. Advertisement Cash payouts to resolve allegations of illegality that have never been properly established or investigated, as at Columbia, are unacceptable; sacrificing non-gender-conforming community members to satisfy the Trump administration's retrograde gender ideology, as at Brown and Penn, is unacceptable. It will take more than lawsuits to preserve what remains of this country's democracy. But the forms of student and faculty action mentioned here point the way. Corporate boards of trustees are not synonymous with the universities themselves, and they are not the ones most motivated to defend the core values of higher education. We are. And we won't capitulate.
