Pulaski and Izard Counties subject to election integrity review by state board
The Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners on Wednesday authorized election integrity reviews for Pulaski and Izard counties.
The board also voted unanimously to decertify all three members of an unnamed county's election commission after hearing the results of its staff's investigation of complaints about the 2024 general election. The board doesn't name counties when levying sanctions until the affected county and individuals have an opportunity to respond and either accept or challenge the proposed sanctions.
State law allows the board to conduct election integrity reviews in the odd-numbered years following an election. The board can choose the counties randomly or by a two-thirds vote if it has received information a substantial violation of election or voter registration laws has occurred.
The board issued a letter of reprimand earlier this month to Pulaski County Clerk Terri Hollingsworth over violations of state election law during early voting last year. A deputy clerk changed the street addresses of 132 voters in a precinct file without authorization, according to the SBEC letter. Other clerk's office employees caught the changes two days later but not before four voters had cast the wrong ballots. The employee resigned shortly after the incident, the letter says.
Unauthorized changes to voter records are considered a felony under A.C.A. 7-1-104, and the SBEC referred the matter to the Pulaski County prosecutor and the attorney general's Election Integrity Unit.
The SBEC also issued a letter of warning to the Pulaski County clerk for failing to prevent unauthorized changes to voter records.
The election integrity reviews approved by the state board Wednesday will seek to identify errors and any evidence of fraud in voter registration records and absentee voting documents as well as verify the accuracy and integrity of election results, according to ACA 7-4-124.
No specific mention was made about the reason Izard County will be the subject of an election integrity review, but the board voted at its December meeting to refer complaints from election monitors to SBEC staff for investigation.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Separate votes by the seven-member SBEC mean the chairman of the unnamed county's election commission won't be able to work in an official election role for 14 years and the other two commissioners for eight years.
SBEC Director Chris Madison said it would be up to the respective county political party committees to appoint new members to the election commission if the sanctions are accepted. County election commissions are composed of three members, two from the majority political party and one from the minority party.
County election officials were the subject of six complaints to the state board, including two that referred to a hostile environment created by the election commission chair and poll supervisors toward poll watchers.
The allegations included 'hostility and [an] overall lack of professionalism in dealing with poll watchers' and a failure by the chair and poll supervisors to 'recognize the rights and responsibilities of the poll watchers, thereby preventing the poll watchers from performing their duties,' SBEC legal counsel Waylan Cooper said.
Cooper said the investigation found evidence supporting the allegations, including an incident when the county commission chairman called sheriff's deputies to remove a poll watcher after the poll supervisor tried to prevent the watcher from sitting in a chair that allowed a full view of the voting process. The chairman also raised his voice while telling poll watchers they were being ejected from the location, intimidating at least one potential watcher from participating further, Cooper said.
'The hostility toward poll watchers later spread' to another voting site in the same city on Election Day, Cooper said, when a disagreement between the poll supervisor and a poll watcher led to the supervisor's husband, who was also a poll worker, verbally accosting the watcher with profanity and telling the watcher to leave.
'The backstory is that there's two political factions in this community, and the election officials are on one side of a local issue and the poll watchers on the other,' Madison told the board.
Madison made a similar remark about Izard County during the board's December meeting: '[Izard County] has a city that has two very engaged factions, and Hatfields and McCoys kind of comes to mind.'
'They have to be professional and adult enough to put aside that they don't like the people who are poll watchers and allow them to do their jobs,' SBEC member Sharon Brooks said. The law requires it and their training demands it, 'and they're not doing that,' she said.
The board voted unanimously to decertify the supervisor and her husband for four years. Madison noted that the couple has since moved to another county and Clemmer's motion applies statewide.
Regarding the allegations against the county commission chairman, SBEC member Bilenda Harris-Ritter said, 'I think it's unconscionable that the chair of the election commission is behaving like this … and encouraging other officials to behave like this.'
Harris-Ritter offered the motion to decertify the commission chair for seven two-year federal election cycles, the maximum the state board can impose.
Madison said the action was appropriate 'to help solve some problems up there.' The SBEC staff will be intimately involved in the county's election processes going forward, he said.
The board voted separately to decertify the other two members of that county's election commission over a complaint that the commission didn't deliver provisional ballots to the clerk and secretary of state until a week after the deadline. Unlike in many Arkansas counties, the clerk there is not the election coordinator; another member of the election commission is the coordinator.
In another case, the board voted to decertify an election commissioner in a different county for 14 years over his failure to show up on time to open a polling place at the start of early voting. Board members in support of decertification noted similar issues had happened in previous years.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
5 days ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States With Most—and Least—Popular Governors
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Most Americans approve of their governors, but some have higher approval ratings than others, according to the latest Morning Consult polling data. Why It Matters There will be 38 governor races between 2025 and 2026, and the incumbent's approval rating in each of these key races could be critical to their chances of being reelected or impact their party's ability to hold onto the seat. Gubernatorial races are generally less rigidly partisan than federal races, and some of the most popular governors are blue-state Republicans or red-state Democrats. What to Know Governor Phil Scott, a Vermont Republican, ranks as the nation's most popular governor, according to Morning Consult, which releases quarterly polling on governors' approval ratings. He has an approval rating of +52, despite his state consistently being among the most Democratic in the country. Vermont Governor Phil Scott arrives at his polling place in Berlin, Vermont on November 8, 2022. Vermont Governor Phil Scott arrives at his polling place in Berlin, Vermont on November 8, 2022. AP Photo/Wilson Ring, File Governor Kelly Armstrong, a North Dakota Republican, ranks as the second most popular governor in the country with a +48 approval rating, while Governor Andy Beshear of Kentucky ranks as the third most popular governor with a +39 approval rating. All but one governor has a positive approval rating, according to Morning Consult. Iowa is the only state whose governor has a negative approval rating in the poll, as Governor Kim Reynolds, a Republican, has a -7 approval rating. She is not running for reelection. Governor Janet Mills, a Maine Democrat, is the second least popular governor in the country with a +2 approval rating. Some Democrats view Mills as a potential Democratic candidate against GOP Senator Susan Collins, who could face a competitive reelection race in a state that backed Vice President Kamala Harris by about 7 percentage points last year. Although Mills easily won reelection in 2022, her approval rating could be a red flag for Democrats. "Janet Mills of Maine is term-limited as governor and viewed as one of the Democratic Party's best options to challenge moderate Republican Sen. Susan Collins in next year's midterm elections. But she's also the most unpopular Democratic governor in the country, and one of the only to lose popularity since the last quarter of 2024," the Morning Consult polling memo reads. Rhode Island Governor Daniel McKee, a Democrat, rounds out the three least popular governors with a +5 approval rating. There is little partisan difference in the ratings. Of the 10 most popular governors, five are Democrats and five are Republicans. Among the 10 least popular governors, six are Republicans and four are Democrats. The poll is based on surveys conducted from April to June 2025 among registered voters in each state. The sample size and margin of error vary by state, according to Morning Consult. What People Are Saying Michael Pearlman, a spokesperson for Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon, a Republican, told Newsweek: "These poll results are indicative of the good things going on in Wyoming. They also show that Wyoming citizens recognize that the Governor continues to put his head down and work to move the state forward -- including sticking to the issues that are truly important to most Wyoming folks. These include the state's economy, our education system, addressing mental health and continuing to strengthen our core energy industry. Most people in Wyoming want less government in their lives, the opportunity to make a good living, enjoy recreational activities and have their children receive an excellent education. Governor Gordon wants the same, and that shows in this poll." Rob Blanchard, director of communications for Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont, a Democrat, told Newsweek: "From making Connecticut more affordable for working families by cutting taxes and championing progressive priorities such as free childcare for families making less than $100k, paid family and medical leave, and increasing our minimum wage to one of the highest in the country, Governor Lamont has been focused on strengthening our communities and economy. Regardless of what any poll says — even the ones that show the governor with a 63% approval rating — he remains focused on making historic investments in education, ensuing every child has the best opportunity, and bringing costs down for families across Connecticut." Morning Consult's polling memo reads: "The second quarter of 2025 was another exceptional one for Republican Phil Scott of Vermont, who was the most popular governor for the 12th quarter running with a 72% approval rating." What Happens Next There will be two governor races this year, in New Jersey and Virginia, where Democratic Governor Phil Murphy and Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin, respectively, cannot run again due to term limits. In 2026, however, several governors will be up for reelection. Thirty-six states will hold gubernatorial elections. Those races will test whether some of the least popular governors, such as Oregon's Tina Kotek, a Democrat, or Texas's Greg Abbott, a Republican, can fend off challengers and whether some of the most popular governors, like Pennsylvania's Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, will see their popularity translate to strong electoral success.
Miami Herald
5 days ago
- Miami Herald
Even in states that fought Obamacare, Trump's new law poses health consequences
GOP lawmakers in the 10 states that refused the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion for over a decade have argued their conservative approach to growing government programs would pay off in the long run. Instead, the Republican-passed budget law that includes many of President Donald Trump's priorities will pose at least as big a burden on patients and hospitals in the expansion holdout states as in the 40 states that have extended Medicaid coverage to more low-income adults, hospital executives and other officials warn. For instance, Georgia, with a population of just over 11 million, will see as many people lose insurance coverage sold through ACA marketplaces as will California, with more than triple the population, according to estimates by KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News. The new law imposes additional paperwork requirements on Obamacare enrollees, slashes the time they have each year to sign up, and cuts funding for navigators who help them shop for plans. Those changes, all of which will erode enrollment, are expected to have far more impact in states like Florida and Texas than in California because a higher proportion of residents in non-expansion states are enrolled in ACA plans. The budget law, which Republicans called the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' will cause sweeping changes to health care across the country as it trims federal spending on Medicaid by more than $1 trillion over the next decade. The program covers more than 71 million people with low incomes and disabilities. Ten million people will lose coverage over the next decade due to the law, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Many of its provisions are focused on the 40 states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA, which added millions more low-income adults to the rolls. But the consequences are not confined to those states. A proposal from conservatives to cut more generous federal payments for people added to Medicaid by the ACA expansion didn't make it into the law. 'Politicians in non-expansion states should be furious about that,' said Michael Cannon, director of health policy studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. The number of people losing coverage could accelerate in non-expansion states if enhanced federal subsidies for Obamacare plans expire at the end of the year, driving up premiums as early as January and adding to the rolls of uninsured. KFF estimates as many as 2.2 million people could become uninsured just in Florida, a state where lawmakers refused to expand Medicaid and, partly as a result, now leads the nation in ACA enrollment. For people like Francoise Cham of Miami, who has Obamacare coverage, the Republican policy changes could be life-altering. Before she had insurance, the 62-year-old single mom said she would donate blood just to get her cholesterol checked. Once a year, she'd splurge for a wellness exam at Planned Parenthood. She expects to make about $28,000 this year and currently pays about $100 a month for an ACA plan to cover herself and her daughter, and even that strains her budget. Cham choked up describing the 'safety net' that health insurance has afforded her — and at the prospect of being unable to afford coverage if premiums spike at the end of the year. 'Obamacare has been my lifesaver,' she said. If the enhanced ACA subsidies aren't extended, 'everyone will be hit hard,' said Cindy Mann, a health policy expert with Manatt Health, a consulting and legal firm, and a former deputy administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 'But a state that hasn't expanded Medicaid will have marketplace people enrolling at lower income levels,' she said. 'So, a greater share of residents are reliant on the marketplace.' Though GOP lawmakers may try to cut Medicaid even more this year, for now the states that expanded Medicaid largely appear to have made a smart decision, while states that haven't are facing similar financial pressures without any upside, said health policy experts and hospital industry observers. KFF Health News reached out to the governors of the 10 states that have not fully expanded Medicaid to see if the budget legislation made them regret that decision or made them more open to expansion. Spokespeople for Republican Gov. Henry McMaster of South Carolina and Republican Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia did not indicate whether their states are considering Medicaid expansion. Brandon Charochak, a spokesperson for McMaster's office, said South Carolina's Medicaid program focuses on 'low-income children and families and disabled individuals,' adding, 'The state's Medicaid program does not anticipate a large impact on the agency's Medicaid population.' Enrollment in ACA marketplace plans nationwide has more than doubled since 2020 to 24.3 million. If enhanced subsidies expire, premiums for Obamacare coverage would rise by more than 75% on average, according to an analysis by KFF. Some insurers are already signaling they plan to charge more. The CBO estimates that allowing enhanced subsidies to expire will increase the number of people without health insurance by 4.2 million by 2034, compared with a permanent extension. That would come on top of the coverage losses caused by Trump's budget law. 'That is problematic and scary for us,' said Eric Boley, president of the Wyoming Hospital Association. He said his state, which did not expand Medicaid, has a relatively small population and hasn't been the most attractive for insurance providers — few companies currently offer plans on the ACA exchange — and he worried any increase in the uninsured rate would 'collapse the insurance market.' As the uninsured rate rises in non-expansion states and the budget law's Medicaid cuts loom, lawmakers say state funds will not backfill the loss of federal dollars, including in states that have refused to expand Medicaid. Those states got slightly favorable treatment under the law, but it's not enough, said Grace Hoge, press secretary for Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly, a Democrat who favors Medicaid expansion but who has been rebuffed by GOP state legislators. 'Kansans' ability to access affordable healthcare will be harmed,' Hoge said in an email. 'Kansas, nor our rural hospitals, will not be able to make up for these cuts.' For hospital leaders in other states that have refused full Medicaid expansion, the budget law poses another test by limiting financing arrangements states leveraged to make higher Medicaid payments to doctors and hospitals. Beginning in 2028, the law will reduce those payments by 10 percentage points each year until they are closer to what Medicare pays. Richard Roberson, president of the Mississippi Hospital Association, said the state's use of what's called directed payments in 2023 helped raise its Medicaid reimbursements to hospitals and other health institutions from $500 million a year to $1.5 billion a year. He said higher rates helped Mississippi's rural hospitals stay open. 'That payment program has just been a lifeline,' Roberson said. The budget law includes a $50 billion fund intended to insulate rural hospitals and clinics from its changes to Medicaid and the ACA. But a KFF analysis found it would offset only about one-third of the cuts to Medicaid in rural areas. Trump encouraged Florida, Tennessee, and Texas to continue refusing Medicaid expansion in his first term, when his administration gave them an unusual 10-year extension for financing programs known as uncompensated care pools, which generate billions of dollars to pay hospitals for treating the uninsured, said Allison Orris, director of Medicaid policy for the left-leaning think tank Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 'Those were very clearly a decision from the first Trump administration to say, 'You get a lot of money for an uncompensated care pool instead of expanding Medicaid,'' she said. Those funds are not affected by Trump's new tax-and-spending law. But they do not help patients the way insurance coverage would, Orris said. 'This is paying hospitals, but it's not giving people health care,' she said. 'It's not giving people prevention.' States such as Florida, Georgia, and Mississippi have not only turned down the additional federal funding that Medicaid expansion brings, but most of the remaining non-expansion states spend less than the national average per Medicaid enrollee, provide fewer or less generous benefits, and cover fewer categories of low-income Americans. Mary Mayhew, president of the Florida Hospital Association, said the state's Medicaid program does not adequately cover children, older people, and people with disabilities because reimbursement rates are too low. 'Children don't have timely access to dentists,' she said. 'Expectant moms don't have access nearby to an OB-GYN. We've had labor and delivery units close in Florida.' She said the law will cost states more in the long run. 'The health care outcomes for the individuals we serve will deteriorate,' Mayhew said. 'That's going to lead to higher cost, more spending, more dependency on the emergency department.' KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
I Worked With Stephen Colbert. Here's Why His Cancellation Should Scare You
Stephen Colbert makes me laugh so hard, sometimes it pisses me off. I loved him on Exit 57 and Strangers With Candy, but it was in 1997 — when I was the co-creator and head writer of The Daily Show — that I saw him do what I love most: roast the media while being the media. He had a gig then at Good Morning America, and had produced a puff piece with just the right amount of satirical self-importance that felt perfect for The Daily Show. I immediately went to my then-colleague and co-creator Madeleine Smithberg and said, 'Let's get Colbert for the show.' She agreed, and shortly thereafter, Stephen became part of our 'fake news' team and helped redefine what late-night comedy and political satire could be. More from Rolling Stone Israel Seizes Aid Flotilla Bringing Baby Formula, Medicine to Gaza Oklahoma's Trump-Loving, Bible-Thumping Superintendent Faces Porn Probe The Democratic Party's Brand Is Cooked Stephen isn't just a brilliant satirist — everything he does is anchored in something real. His comedy has always had a moral core, rooted in his faith, his commitment to calling out injustice, and his belief that the powerful should be held accountable. He uses his voice and humor to tell the truth with deep humanity and sharp wit. So forgive me if I don't buy the official line that CBS canceled The Late Show, which has run nightly for over three decades, purely for 'financial reasons.' Sure, legacy networks are scrambling to stay solvent in the age of streaming and short-form content. But the timing here is hard to ignore. Colbert has consistently called out Donald Trump and slammed the media's growing cowardice in the face of fascism. Add to that, CBS parent company Paramount — run by nepo billionaire David 'Little Larry' Ellison — just settled for $16 million with Trump, who is now flapping his yap about being promised more billions for airtime and ads. But we're supposed to believe it's just dollars and cents? Stephen isn't expensive. He's a threat. A wildly popular, truth-telling comic with moral clarity is dangerous in this moment. Especially when he's white, male, and too influential to be dismissed as fringe. But here's the thing. For many of us who've been doing political comedy for decades, this doesn't come as a shock. It's just rare to see it happen to someone with that kind of power and platform. As a comedian who is loudly progressive and proudly pro-abortion, I've had more doors slammed in my face than opened. Even these days, comedy clubs often won't book comics with opinions — unless those opinions lean Joe Rogan-adjacent. Local news outlets that used to promote my shows won't talk to me now. Even in my hometown. And if a club knows you might mention abortion onstage? Doesn't matter if the audience is there for you — good luck finding a venue that'll stand behind you. It's too controversial. Too niche. Too feminist. Men might not laugh. Today, Louis C.K. and Dave Chappelle are packing stadiums and scoring Netflix deals, while comedians like Kamau Bell, Larry Wilmore, Samantha Bee, and Michelle Wolf lose their shows. Always for 'financial reasons.' Funny how that works. It seems like the only political jokes this industry is willing to defend are the ones that punch down. This isn't new; it's the story of my career. I saw early on that network executives didn't want progressive voices. Worse, they'd claim they wanted 'edgy,' as long as it didn't disrupt the advertisers or make shareholders squirm. Super edgy. So I left The Daily Show. I co-founded Air America. I launched what would become Abortion Access Front. I built my own platforms. I had to, because nobody in corporate media was investing in spaces where comedy could tell the truth and spark action. Especially if a woman was pitching it. Political comedy done right is not just entertainment. It reminds the people most affected by abuse of power that they're not alone. It gives them a voice. It shines a light on the cruelty of the greedy. It's resistance as joy. I've been moved to see the other late-night hosts rally around Stephen. It's the right thing to do. But it also underscores the privilege gap in this space: These are all white men who have held those coveted late-night slots for years. They have the safety nets to speak out without wondering if they will be blackballed or be unable to feed their families. No one will call them 'shrill' or 'difficult' for showing righteous anger on Stephen's behalf. What must that be like? This is why Colbert's cancellation hits different. Not just because he's one of the greats, but because his ousting is a warning shot. It tells comedians — even the white, male, successful ones — that there's a line. And if you cross it, they'll find an excuse to take you out. Underneath those thinly veiled excuses is fear. Fear of the power comedians have. Fear that people might actually listen while they are laughing. Knowing Stephen and his values, I don't think we're at risk of losing his voice. I hope he takes his brilliance somewhere he has full creative control. We need him, and we need the brilliance of every political comic still brave enough to speak out. Because those of us doing this work? We don't wait for permission. We build it ourselves. Mic in hand. Middle finger raised. Lizz Winstead is a comedian, activist, co-creator of The Daily Show and the founder of Abortion Access Front, a team of comedians, writers, and producers that uses humor to destigmatize abortion and expose the extremist anti-choice forces working to destroy access to reproductive rights in all 50 states. Best of Rolling Stone Every Super Bowl Halftime Show, Ranked From Worst to Best The United States of Weed Gaming Levels Up Solve the daily Crossword
