logo
Senior Met officer sacked for second time over refusing drugs test

Senior Met officer sacked for second time over refusing drugs test

Independent6 days ago

A senior Metropolitan Police officer has been sacked by the force for a second time after refusing to take a drugs test.
Commander Julian Bennett was initially dismissed by a misconduct panel in October 2023 over the incident, but took his case to the Police Appeals Tribunal (PAT) in July last year and had his sacking overturned.
He was found to have committed gross misconduct by failing to provide a urine sample for a drugs test on July 21 2020, which led to his suspension shortly afterwards.
A panel found he had breached professional standards when he refused to provide the sample after being called in to do so in the presence of an assistant commissioner, instead offering to resign on the spot and asking for a meeting with then-commissioner Dame Cressida Dick.
Following the PAT's decision to revoke the dismissal, the Met considered a legal challenge by way of a Judicial Review but decided that Mr Bennett should face a fresh misconduct hearing last September.
The allegation proven against Mr Bennett was again found at the level of gross misconduct at the latest hearing.
The officer, who served in the force from 1976, had remained suspended throughout the process and will now be added to the College of Policing's barred list.
Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist said: 'I am enormously concerned that almost five years since this incident happened we have only now been able to dismiss Commander Bennett.
'This should have been a simple matter. Commander Bennett has never disputed he refused a lawful order to take a drugs test.
'As a senior officer who had chaired misconduct hearings, Commander Bennett was highly experienced and knew full well what was required of him, yet he made a choice not to co-operate.
'He has been suspended on full pay for an extraordinary length of time. I am sure Londoners will be as outraged as we are at the utter waste of public funds spent paying a senior officer to sit at home suspended and not work.'
Mr Twist said that 'while the Met is not responsible for all the delays in Commander Bennett's matter, we are also working hard to expedite cases and cut bureaucracy', adding: 'I am confident a situation like Commander Bennett's prolonged case would not happen again.'
Mr Bennett wrote the Met's drugs strategy for 2017-21 as a commander for territorial policing.
The document, called Dealing With The Impact Of Drugs On Communities, set up plans to raise 'awareness of the impact of drug misuse'.
He chaired misconduct panels over several years and freedom of information requests showed he presided over 74 misconduct hearings involving 90 officers between June 2010 and February 2012, leading to 56 officers being dismissed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diane Abbott is pushing the Left's biggest myth about immigration
Diane Abbott is pushing the Left's biggest myth about immigration

Telegraph

time27 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Diane Abbott is pushing the Left's biggest myth about immigration

The Labour Left were always bound to loathe Sir Keir Starmer's recent speech about the downsides of mass immigration. All the same, one of their objections to it strikes me as somewhat peculiar. At a rally on Saturday, the veteran Labour MP Diane Abbott thundered that Sir Keir's speech was 'nonsense' – because, as she stoutly reminded her audience, 'immigrants built this land'. Stirring stuff. I can see only one small problem. It's not strictly true, is it? Clearly Ms Abbott disagrees. Indeed, she proudly declared that her own parents 'helped to build this country'. As she herself acknowledged, though, they only arrived here from Jamaica in the 1950s. What precisely does Ms Abbott think Britain looked like, before her parents' ship pulled in? A barren, primitive, uncivilised wilderness, whose humble natives dwelt in bushes and subsisted on nettles and raw shrew? Did her parents look around, sigh, and then patiently set about erecting St Paul's Cathedral and Blenheim Palace? I'm not convinced that they did. In fact, I'm reasonably sure that most of this country was built a fair bit earlier, largely by people who were born in it. This is because, until quite recently, only a very small percentage of the population was born abroad. Between 1951 and 2001, the average annual net immigration figure was 7,800. In 2023, by contrast, it was 906,000. It doesn't take a mathematician of Ms Abbott's stature to recognise that this is quite a sharp increase. Still, I don't mean to pick on her. She's far from alone. In recent years, any number of Left-wing politicians and pundits have taken to pushing the line that 'immigrants built Britain'. On last week's edition of the BBC's Question Time, for example, the retired trade union leader Mark Serwotka informed viewers that Britain is only 'the great country it is because of centuries of immigration'. From the Left's point of view, I suppose I can see this tactic's advantages. Any time a voter dares suggest that net immigration of almost a million a year is a touch on the high side, and possibly not entirely sustainable in the longer term, shut them up by telling them that a) it's always been like this, and b) they should be grateful. The risk, though, is that some voters might feel a tiny bit insulted. Because the claim that 'immigrants built Britain' implies that the natives were so ignorant, lazy and useless, they achieved nothing until their superiors arrived from abroad to lift them out of savagery. Come to think of it, I'm reasonably sure that the Left used to have a word for that type of attitude. It was 'colonialism'. If you want a picture of the present... It was a bright cold day in June, and Winston Smith had just sat down at his desk in the Ministry of Truth. This morning he had an important job to do. A dangerous book urgently needed to be memory-holed. It was entitled Nineteen Eighty-Four. For decades, Nineteen Eighty-Four had been acclaimed as a landmark work of literature. Suddenly, however, it had been found to contain the most sickening thoughtcrime. The person who had made this shocking discovery was an American novelist named Dolen Perkins-Valdez. In a foreword she'd been commissioned to write for the book's latest edition, she declared that its main character exhibited attitudes towards women that were appallingly 'problematic'. Not only that, but the book didn't feature any characters who were black. 'A sliver of connection can be difficult for someone like me to find,' she wrote, 'in a novel that does not speak much to race and ethnicity.' Privately, Winston suspected that the reason the book did not speak much to race and ethnicity was that it had been written on a Scottish island by an Edwardian Englishman in the late 1940s. That was probably also the reason why none of its characters identified as genderqueer or pansexual, and why none of them had glued their buttocks to the M25 in support of puberty blockers for Palestine. But it was not Winston's place to make excuses for crimethink. In any case, he was used to such tasks. Not long ago he had been presented with the complete works of a children's author named Roald Dahl, and ordered to replace the entire text of each book with the endlessly repeated phrase 'BE KIND'. Had it been up to him, Winston would have been perfectly willing to rectify the text of Nineteen Eighty-Four, until all traces of crimethink had been eliminated. He could have ensured that it contained the correct number of characters who were 2SLGBTQIA+, neurodivergent or of Colour, and that they all expressed the officially mandated opinions about Islamophobia and net zero. The Ministry, however, had decided that there was no time. Better just to drop the offending object down the memory hole, and move swiftly on to his next task. This one was going to be tough. According to reports, there was a new TV adaptation of Harry Potter on the way, and the cast had completely failed to denounce JK Rowling. Winston had a lot of unpersoning to do.

Goat kid born prematurely 'beats odds' to join Bournemouth herd
Goat kid born prematurely 'beats odds' to join Bournemouth herd

BBC News

time31 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Goat kid born prematurely 'beats odds' to join Bournemouth herd

A baby goat has "beaten the odds" after it was born three weeks premature and will join a herd living on a cliffside at a seaside was delivered at a farm in Bournemouth on 31 June, weighing 2.1kg (4.6lb), but the kid's mother Hettie rejected two animals are part of a group that graze steep cliffs in the town as an alternative to the local council managing the cliffside Tanya Bishop, who said this was the smallest kid she had seen since she began breeding goats in 2009, is now hand rearing Midget. Posting on the Bournemouth Goats Facebook page a few days after Midget was born, Ms Bishop said: "His little eyes are still closed and may not open for another few weeks, but he's warm, safe and getting stronger with every hour."We know he's not out of the woods just yet but for now we're celebrating this small win for our little fighter."She continued: "Our vet gave him a clean bill of health... no nasty bugs, no infections." Speaking to the BBC, she added: "Midget has beaten the odds because we have the facilities to look after him."The moment he hit the floor we had the means to intervene because mum walked away and wasn't interested in the slightest."She said it was common for a goat to reject its kid if it was premature.A breeding project is under way to expand the herd to graze the area between West Cliff to has come from a government agreement with Natural England. You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.

Beverley youth hub built by DIY SOS responds to vandalism rumours
Beverley youth hub built by DIY SOS responds to vandalism rumours

BBC News

time31 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Beverley youth hub built by DIY SOS responds to vandalism rumours

The leaders of a new youth centre built by DIY SOS volunteers said false rumours of vandalism had led to a stream of "awful" comments Saturday, an exercise machine left outside the Cherry Tree Centre in Beverley was mistaken for vandalism of new gym equipment, which was installed last people took to social media suggesting vandalism had been inevitable, describing the building of the centre as a "waste of time and money". Centre manager Jo Ramsay said no vandalism had taken place and young people deserved better than to be labelled as "scum" who did not deserve their new youth hub. "If you walked in our shoes and see the difference that we can make to these young people, everyone deserves chances," Ms Ramsay said she felt "sad and gutted" after a picture of the exercise machine attracted more than 100 comments on Facebook, including "kids have no respect for anything or anyone" and "that's what they get for putting a youth centre on an estate".The Cherry Tree Youth Hub was built by volunteers in May with support from the BBC television show DIY recent years, youth workers had been supporting young people in the Swinemoor area of the town out of gazebos and car new building has a kitchen, a laundry room, toilets and areas for young people to relax and take part in inspectors and Humberside Fire and Rescue still need to sign off the building before it can be opened but Ms Ramsay said young people were gathering in the park in greater numbers as enthusiasm for the facility was growing."It's excitement and they just can't wait to start using the youth hub. "We are here for an opportunity and for chances, not to have negativity like this."The team is hoping to have the hub open before the summer to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store