Diaspora sidelined again in presidential election
presidential election
later this year. While her antennae for injustice may be directly proportional to her interest in the job, I agree that 'insult' is a good word to describe the upcoming election – but not because
Fianna Fáil
might sit it out. Rather, it looks like Irish citizens in
Northern Ireland
, and Irish citizens living abroad, will yet again be sidelined from electing the next president.
As someone from the Border, and resident in Scotland and therefore ineligible to vote, the fact that Ms Hanafin made her comments at the MacGill Summer School in Glenties, Co Donegal, feels significant to me. Imagine three people who heard her statements live driving home after: one to Sligo, another to Strabane, while another visits family before driving to Derry Airport en route back to Glasgow. Three Irish citizens, all invested in Irish society, all driving about the same distance ... and only one of them will get to vote for their next head of state. Talk about insults.
Though we abroad and in the North are disenfranchised, it says more about the Republic than it does about us. This whole sorry situation is a greatest hits compilation of Irish politics: myopia and snobbery, inertia and benign neglect
Since 1990 we've had a Northern candidate in every presidential election, and a reliable part of campaigning since then has been pulling the big lever marked 'diaspora heart strings'. And yet, we still have no say in choosing the person who comes to visit Irish cultural centres around the world, as eager voters in a candidate's backyard over the Border can do nothing but cross their fingers.
What message was the lamp in the window of the Áras trying to convey exactly? 'Don't call us, we'll call you?'
READ MORE
Though we abroad and in the North are disenfranchised, it says more about the Republic than it does about us. This whole sorry situation is a greatest hits compilation of Irish politics: myopia and snobbery, inertia and benign neglect.
It's not that our political parties aren't fussed about the issue, it's that they aren't fussed enough.
Sinn Féin
and
Aontú
have brought it up, but they seem resigned to the fact there will be no change this time round: Sinn Féin's idea of a win is a referendum on presidential polling day. Aontú is even less ambitious: the party appears to want to create a hierarchy of disenfranchisement by putting Northern citizens' right to vote to the nation first. Other parties such as Fianna Fáil are happy to perpetuate the Kafkaesque ballet, floating candidates such as Deirdre Heenan who can't vote for herself, while
Fine Gael
said it wouldn't oppose a referendum, but it was all about timing. Would it help if we all chipped in to buy the Dáil a big clock?
This issue first got near the business end of decisiveness in 2013, at the constitutional convention. Despite two seminal referendums where the 'Home to Vote' dimension was massive in the 2010s, it was kicked to touch in 2019 owing to Brexit, then floated off into space just when we should have locked in the expanded franchise to coincide with choosing President Michael D Higgins's successor.
But no worries lads, we've got our finest minds on solving this by 2032. Maybe.
Our status as non-voters opens up huge logical gaps, let alone political ones. A Polish citizen living in Drogheda can vote for their president. A Brazilian citizen in Dundalk can vote for their president. But Irish citizens over in Newry or New York can't vote for theirs? Nobody is suggesting the infrastructure to make this happen would be a quick build, but we are replete with global examples, and we've had more than a decade to follow them. But Irish politics is like the old excuse for not fixing the roof: it wasn't a problem in sunshine, and it's too wet to sort it now.
That Irish legislators have been inert on this for years is not surprising, but the snobbery among some commentators in the Republic is truly shameful. When it looked like a referendum might actually happen, we were subjected to mean-spirited diatribes from commentators who seemed to think Irish people abroad were so doe-eyed or doctrinaire we would vote for a bust of John Wayne from The Quiet Man – and, if they're in the North, a bust with a balaclava over it. The same commentators also regularly invoked an old American revolutionary slogan in opposition, 'no representation without taxation', not appearing to realise they had the slogan the wrong way around. But yeah, we are the ignorant ones.
One pundit even had the gall to claim extending the franchise would 'dilute' the electorate. Dilute! This, after the excruciating 2018 'Dragons' Den' election, which we may as well have renamed Áras Got Talent
.
Given the incoherent sugar-rush campaigning style of a few candidates last time around, maybe the Republic's solution needs to be less concentrated.
Wherever we are, whatever our voting status, this presidential election represents a big crossroads for us all: this election is a question of what we want Ireland to be in the next decade and beyond, and the answer affects Irish citizens in Enniskillen just as much as Ennis, Glasgow as much as Galway. To take just one issue, the next president will be supreme commander of a defence force that is contending with unprecedented forks in the road as regards its role in the world, and neutrality will surely be a hot topic in the election. But our voice on vital issues such as these stands to be muted at precisely the time Ireland and Irishness should be at its most pluralistic.
Unless the Government somehow speedruns something procrastinated on for a dozen years, the choosing of our most important symbolic dignitary in the world will just be another thing that happens to us. Irish citizens abroad and in the North stand by the Republic – but the Republic is driving right past.
Paddy Duffy is originally from Donegal but has been living in the UK since 2012 working as a TV producer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
29 minutes ago
- Irish Times
A letter from Michael O'Leary: ‘MetroLink is a mad, bad project'
Sir, – Unbelievable!! Only an Irish Times columnist (with no known experience in transport) could waste her half-page column, slagging off Dermot Desmond and myself for criticising the Dublin MetroLink, without once mentioning the projected cost of approximately €20 billion!! Being criticised by Irish Times columnists is always a great compliment. In what crazy country could we seriously consider wasting approximately €20 billion of taxpayer money on a railway line, serving a narrow strip of the north Dublin population from Swords to St Stephen's Green, all of whom are well served currently by bus connections? The cost/benefit of this insanity has never been published, because it cannot be justified. Dermot Desmond's transport view should carry significant weight, given his very successful rescue, redevelopment and sale of London City Airport for approximately $1 billion in 2006. My own, (less?) humble view is based on almost 40 years' experience of growing, what is now the world's largest passenger airline. READ MORE But sadly we are both guilty of 'being rich', so therefore dismissed by The Irish Times 'experts', who know so much more about transport. I wouldn't quibble with a MetroLink from Swords to St Stephen's Green if it was free, but there are far better uses of taxpayer funds, than this white elephant. Muddled thinking, free of any cost/benefit analysis, such as that displayed by Justine McCarthy, is how you deliver a children's hospital (which should have cost €200 million) at a final cost of €2.5 billion and rising. My criticism of the MetroLink is based on the fact, that very few passengers at Dublin Airport will ever use it. It takes passengers into St Stephen's Green, so some small minority of inbound visitors might use it, but the vast majority of Irish originating passengers, who need to get to Dublin Airport early in the morning, or are travelling to/from outside the D2 / D4 area, won't use it. Dublin Airport is just 9km from the centre of the city, and is well served by competitively priced bus connections, which takes passengers to the city centre, and to points all over Ireland at low fares. These passengers won't switch to a €20 billion metro. Your columnist claims that I 'opposed the second terminal at Dublin Airport in 2010. I didn't. Dublin needed a second terminal l and I offered to build it on the North Apron for just €200 million, as Ryanair had proposed. I simply pointed out that the Dublin Airport Authority (DAA), wasted €2 billion, building Terminal 2 in the wrong place (a cul-de-sac) and with no ability to future expand. Now that the second runway has opened on the north apron, the chronic congestion in the T2 cul-de-sac bedevils the T2 airlines on a daily basis. I note Ms McCarthy failed to offer her opinion on the Dublin Airport second runway (a project which I also supported), yet which the airlines and our passengers are prevented from using, by a 2007 (Road Traffic) Planning restriction. We elected a new government last November which promised to remove this cap 'as soon as possible', which would enable the airlines at Dublin to grow traffic, new routes, tourism and jobs. Sadly, eight months later the Government has failed to take any action to scrap this cap. More inexcusable delay and inaction from our political class. To summarise, both I and Dermot Desmond believe, wasting €20 billion on a Dublin Airport metro, is an unjustifiable waste of scarce taxpayer funds. I object because the majority of Dublin Airport passengers won't ever use this vastly overpriced service. Dermot correctly suggests that Al and electric road transport will solve the problem at a fraction of this €20 billion over the next decade. The fact that an unqualified Irish Times columnist considers that 'two rich men' are wrong, only renews my faith that this MetroLink is a mad, bad project. Add some more buses to service the citizens of Swords, Ballymun, Collins Avenue, and Glasnevin, and The Irish Times could save Irish taxpayers (me included!) about €19.9 billion rather than squandering these funds, as we have on the world's most expensive, and least efficient, Children's Hospital. If the next time Ms McCarthy wants to offer an opinion on government transport projects, perhaps she could address the cost benefit of the project, rather than slagging off two successful – albeit opinionated – business people. We won't always be right, but we will be right, far more often than the misguided, anti-business Irish Times 'chatterati'. – Yours, etc, MICHAEL O'LEARY. Chief Executive, Ryanair, Dublin.
Irish Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
New developments in Sean Rooney murder as Lebanon agrees to hunt down killer
Lebanese authorities have vowed to hunt down the murderer of Private Sean Rooney – and are also appealing the sentences to others involved in the killing, it has emerged. Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Defence Simon Harris announced on Tuesday night that Lebanese prosecutors have agreed to take urgent steps to find Mohammad Ayad – the Hezbollah member convicted in his absence by a military court in Beirut last month of the December 2022 murder of Donegal-born Private Rooney, 24. Ayad was sentenced to death in absentia – after he was released from custody last year on medical grounds. He is believed to be recuperating in a hospital and now Lebanese prosecutors have agreed to search for him and bring him back into custody. Even though he was sentenced to be executed, the death penalty has not been implemented in more than 20 years in Lebanon and if he is caught he is likely to be locked up for at least a decade. Lebanese authorities agreed to begin a search for him after the Tánaiste contacted them following the July 28 decision of the court. He expressed the Irish government's disappointment at the court's decision – especially the sentences handed down to five of Ayad's co-conspirators. Ayad was also fined 100 million Lebanese pounds (approximately €950) by the court, as well as being convicted of the soldier's murder. It also sentenced Ali Suleiman to three months in prison and a similar fine, and Ali Khalifa to one month in prison and the same fine. The court also fined Hussein Suleiman, Mustafa Suleiman and Ali Hakim 200 million Lebanese pounds (approximately €1,900) each, and declared Mohammed Mazhar innocent due to insufficient evidence. They were all prosecuted over the December 2022 attack on an Irish UNIFIL armoured utility vehicle driven by Private Rooney and containing three other soldiers which was headed to Beirut Airport. They were en route in a convoy to Beirut to bring colleagues to the airport so they could return to Ireland for a funeral. Private Rooney was shot dead, while his Cork born colleague Trooper Shane Kearney suffered life changing head injuries. Two other soldiers Corporal Joshua Phelan and Trooper Nathan Bryan survived the attack. The Tánaiste contacted Lebanese authorities shortly after the verdicts were handed down by the Lebanese military court and now authorities have agreed to reexamine the case. Mr Harris contacted authorities to express the government's disappointment – and that of the Rooney family. He met Private Rooney's family last week and committed to holding urgent talks with the Lebanese Justice and Defence Ministers in order to press for an appeal. Those talks took place on Tuesday and Mr Harris told Private Rooney's mother, Natasha McCloskey, of the developments later in the day. Pte. Sean Rooney's mother, Natasha McCloskey was briefed by Tánaiste Simon Harris on Tuesday night. A spokesman said the Lebanese Government has appointed a new military chief prosecutor who now will take over the case. An appeal against the sentences has been formally lodged with the military Cassation Court. Tánaiste Simon Harris spoke to Lebanese authorities on Tuesday. And Lebanese authorities have committed to taking urgent steps to get Ayad back into custody. Speaking after the meeting, Mr Simon Harris said: 'I very much welcome the confirmation today from the Lebanese Justice and Defence Ministers that an appeal has been formally lodged against the sentences handed down in the case of the death of Private Seán Rooney and the injuries of his colleagues. 'I have this afternoon spoken with Sean's mother Natasha, who I was pleased to also meet last week. I informed her of today's developments and have committed to following up directly with the Lebanese Government in relation to the appeal itself. 'In my calls with my Lebanese counterparts, I made it clear that the sentences handed down in this case are simply not acceptable and are very disappointing. 'They have caused great upset and insult to the Rooney family and everything must be done to ensure justice is served for Seán and his colleagues who were injured.' Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Ireland's AI future: the clock is ticking
Given the scale of the claims being made for artificial intelligence, it is striking how slow the Oireachtas has been to give the subject sustained attention. AI is routinely described as having the potential to transform society, disrupt the global political order and even alter what it means to be human. Yet it was only this year that the Joint Committee on Artificial Intelligence began its work, holding its first public session in June. This week its chair, Fianna Fáil TD Malcolm Byrne, set out his thinking on what must happen next. Byrne believes Ireland could position itself as 'the AI island' but warns that the opportunity will be lost without swift and decisive action. He says he would be disappointed if both a new AI office and an AI observatory are not operational by next year. The office will be tasked with implementing the EU's AI Act, while the observatory will assess the technology's effects, from employment disruption to identifying future skills needs. In Byrne's view, those who embrace AI will displace those who do not, whether they are doctors, architects or lawyers. He welcomes the Government's plan for an AI summit during Ireland's EU presidency in 2026 and argues for clear ethical frameworks in education, where students are already using AI tools. He also points to the technology's current uses in Ireland, from automating recycling processes to analysing tax data. Such calls for urgency are sensible and overdue. But preparing the State for the changes ahead will require far more than offices, observatories and summits. The debate is complicated by the sweeping and often speculative claims surrounding AI, from the elimination of entire job categories to science-fiction visions of superintelligent machines destroying the human race. This discourse is unfolding against the backdrop of a global investment surge, with leading AI companies commanding extraordinary valuations and data centres proliferating at breakneck speed. History suggests such frenzies rarely end without turbulence. READ MORE Byrne's proposals are shaped by the EU's AI Act, which will impose a detailed regulatory roadmap over the coming years. That approach contrasts sharply with the let it rip stance favoured by Donald Trump's administration in the US, and with the UK's less prescriptive, more innovation-oriented strategy. Which philosophy will prove more effective is an open question but the divergence will have real consequences for competitiveness. If Ireland is serious about becoming 'the AI island', it must reckon with the reality that others are moving faster and with considerable resources. Ambition is necessary, but so too is a clear-eyed appraisal of the scale of the challenge and the pace of change. Without that, the island will be an observer, not a leader, in the age of AI.
