The EU and Kiev are losing, and Trump is my witness

Russia Today

a day ago

Monday's White House summit featuring US President Donald Trump, Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky, and several senior EU figures ended without any grand announcements. Yet beneath the surface, a high-stakes diplomatic contest is unfolding over the Washington's role in the Ukraine conflict.
The lack of decisive outcomes suggests that the real work is happening behind the scenes. Trump's behavior – in particular his decision not to echo Kiev's or Brussels's messaging in the post-meeting briefings – is a signal. He is asserting his control over the narrative, reflecting that he remains unpersuaded by EU and Ukrainian arguments for continued Western entanglement in the conflict.
The summit and the diplomatic moves surrounding it are a tug-of-war, with Moscow's goal being to remove Washington's involvement in the conflict, while Brussel's and Kiev's is to keep it anchored in their corner.
The absence of new sanctions or pressure on Russia following last Friday's Putin-Trump summit in Alaska suggests Moscow is gaining momentum. Trump has even shifted from demanding a ceasefire to advocating direct peace talks – a position more congenial to Moscow.
EU leaders and Zelensky came to Washington to reinforce Trump's alignment. The want to persuade Trump: strengthen sanctions, maintain arms shipments, ensure Ukraine has a security architecture they want.
Thus far, though, their pull seems to be struggling. Trump, from the outset, appeared to put the EU and Ukraine on the defensive, signaling that their influence is limited.
The backdrop is critical: just days before, Trump hosted Putin in Anchorage, and that summit paved the way for more flexible diplomacy that sidesteps EU-defined preconditions. European leaders arriving at the White House now are playing catch-up – trying to steer a conversation already impacted by Trump's shift.
Everything hinges on security guarantees for Ukraine – a deeply contested issue. Moscow is adamant that any meaningful guarantee depends on Ukrainian neutrality and demilitarization. In contrast, Kiev and the EU are pushing for a reinforced Ukrainian military, possible NATO deployment on Ukrainian soil or even eventual NATO accession.
These efforts by the Europeans appear desperate, even naïve – given that Russia isslowly but steadily winning the war on the ground. And as Russia makes military gains, Kiev's and Brussels' wiggle room in the negotiations shrinks.
That said, their attempts shouldn't be dismissed outright. The shape of the peace deal slow-cooked in Washington will determine Ukraine's fate – and by extension, much of Europe's future security structure.
Moscow, meanwhile, remains unperturbed. After the meeting with Zelensky and the Europeans, Trump held a 40-minute phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Judging by the information released about the substance of the call, Trump made no demands and Putin offered no concessions. They talked about continuing direct Russia-Ukraine talks. They also discussed 'elevating' the level of the talks, and according to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who was present at Monday's meeting, direct talks between Putin and Zelensky could take place within two weeks.
It is clear that the Kremlin remains steadfast and poised to consider setting the terms while it holds all the military cards.
In the end, the Washington summit may have lacked ceremony and a spectacular outcome, but it was loaded with geopolitical subtext: a contest over whether the US remains a supporter to Ukraine or begins to shift back toward a more transactional, realist posture. The EU, recognizing its diminishing leverage, is trying to reclaim the narrative as the battleground, at least for now, is clearly tilting against it.