logo
‘Systemic failures' led to unlawful death of girl at mental health unit

‘Systemic failures' led to unlawful death of girl at mental health unit

Independent2 days ago
The parents of a teenage girl who died after being left alone at a children's mental health ward by an agency worker using a fake ID have said 'systemic failures' led to her unlawful death.
Ruth Szymankiewicz was being treated for an eating disorder at Huntercombe Hospital in Berkshire and had been placed under strict one-to-one observation when on February 12 2022, she was left on her own by the member of staff responsible for watching her.
The 14-year-old was able to shut herself in her bedroom at the hospital's psychiatric intensive care unit – also known as Thames ward – where she self-harmed.
She died two days later at John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford.
On Thursday, an inquest jury sitting at Buckinghamshire Coroner's Court in Beaconsfield returned a conclusion of unlawful killing.
Speaking outside the court after the hearing, Mark and Kate Szymankiewicz said: 'When, at our most vulnerable as a family, we reached out for help; we ultimately found ourselves trapped in a system that was meant to care for her, to help her, to keep her safe, but instead locked her away and harmed her.
'Having been detained in a unit she should never have been sent to, Ruth was repeatedly denied access to the love and support of her family.
'We were excluded and completely disempowered. She was isolated, scared and alone.'
Mark, a consultant surgeon, and Kate, a GP, added: 'Over the last two weeks, we have heard about the numerous systemic failures at Huntercombe Hospital.
'Ruth was our daughter. But she could just as easily be your child, your niece or nephew, your grandchild.
'We hope that by sharing her story it can help inform the change needed in children's mental health services.'
During the conclusion hearing on Thursday, the jury foreman told the court: 'Ruth was not prevented from accessing the restricted material which could be used to self-harm.'
'Ruth was not prevented from accessing harmful material on the internet.
'Ruth's care pathway… was insufficient to allow improvement for discharge.
'From Ruth's admission to Thames ward, her responsible clinician deemed the ward to be neither suitable nor conducive to her recovery.
'Ruth's parents were not given adequate information about the appeal process, and refusal rights.'
Jurors could be seen crying as they recorded their conclusion, as well as the coroner and members of the family.
The agency worker responsible for watching Ruth – a man then known as Ebo Acheampong – had never worked in a psychiatric hospital environment before coming to Huntercombe on February 12 2022 for his first shift.
A police investigation later found he was hired by the Platinum agency – which supplied staff for Huntercombe Hospital – under a false name.
Mr Acheampong never returned to work at the hospital following the incident and fled the UK for Ghana.
The court heard the ward was missing at least half of its staff on the day Ruth, who had self harmed several times in the past, was left unsupervised.
Mr Acheampong was originally working on a different ward, but was asked to join the team on Thames ward because they were so short-staffed nurses could not go on breaks, jurors were previously told.
A risk management form known as a 'Datix incident' had been filed on the day by Michelle Hancey – a support worker with 18 years' experience at Huntercombe – who raised concerns the Thames ward team would 'fail to monitor patients on prescribed special observation because of staff shortage'.
During the inquest, jurors were shown CCTV footage of the moment Mr Acheampong left Ruth unsupervised while she sat in the ward's lounge watching TV, enabling her to leave the room.
She had been placed on the 'level three observation' plan following earlier incidents of self-harm – meaning she had to be kept within eyesight at all times.
In the footage, Mr Acheampong can be seen leaving the room repeatedly – at first only for seconds at a time, then for two minutes – prompting the teenager to walk up to the door and look into the lobby, seemingly waiting for the opportunity to leave the room.
She was last captured on CCTV walking out of the ward's day room 'completely on her own' before going straight to her bedroom and closing the door behind her, coroner Ian Wade KC told the inquest.
Around 15 minutes passed before a nurse discovered the teenage girl and raised the alarm.
Huntercombe Hospital had been inspected twice by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) prior to the incident, the inquest previously heard.
It was rated as 'overall inadequate' in a CQC report dated February 2021.
Active Care Group, which owned Huntercombe at the time of Ruth's death, has since closed the facility.
Following the inquest, a spokesperson said: 'We extend our heartfelt condolences to Ruth's family, friends, and all those affected by her passing.
'We deeply regret the tragic event that occurred, and we are truly sorry for the distress this has caused and recognise the profound impact it has had on everyone who knew her.
'In recent years, we have made significant improvements to the quality and safety in all of our services.
'We remain fully committed to working closely with our teams across the country to ensure consistently high standards of care for the individuals we support.
'We are dedicated to learning any further lessons through both this inquest process and others from across the NHS and Independent sector with the aim of preventing any future tragic incidents.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Families hit by Britain's worst scandals face inheritance tax threat
Families hit by Britain's worst scandals face inheritance tax threat

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Families hit by Britain's worst scandals face inheritance tax threat

Families of the victims of two of Britain's worst scandals face an inheritance tax sting on their compensation. Ministers had promised that money paid to dead victims of the Post Office and infected blood scandals would be free from inheritance tax, capital gains tax and income tax. But lawyers representing bereaved families have since discovered that this only applies to the first transfer of money from a victim's estate. If the money went to a victim's spouse or civil partner and they then passed it on to their children, that would be a second transfer and could be subject to inheritance tax at 40 per cent. For the compensation to go to a child or someone other than a spouse inheritance tax-free, that recipient would have to be specified in the victim's will as the beneficiary of the first transfer — not something that is possible for the children of victims who have died. It is estimated that 30,000 victims were given blood infected with HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C by the NHS between the 1970s and early 1990s. More than 3,000 people have died as a result. Thousands of sub-postmasters were wrongly accused of taking money from their tills between 1999 and 2015when a glitch in the Horizon accounting software was really to blame. Some £13.6 billion was set aside for compensation to victims across both scandals. Jade Gani from the Association of Lifetime Lawyers, a trade body for those who represent older and vulnerable people, said: 'It is a massive flaw in the system that families who have already lost so much could now have to pay back significant sums to the body ultimately responsible for the scandal.' The infected blood scandal is widely considered to be the biggest treatment disaster in the history of the NHS. Thousands of patients were given contaminated blood after accidents, during childbirth or medical procedures. Patients were also given treatments that contained infected blood. About 6,000 people who suffered from haemophilia, a condition that prevents the blood from clotting properly, and other bleeding disorders received treatments to replace missing clotting agents that were made from contaminated blood plasma. In May 2024 the prime minister Rishi Sunak apologised for a 'decades-long moral failure' and promised to pay 'whatever it costs' to compensate victims. More than £11.8 billion was set aside, which included money for infected victims and those affected by the scandal, such as partners and children. The government has paid £1.5 billion to victims since payments began in December. Payments were said to be protected from inheritance tax, but it has now emerged that this only applied to the first transfer. This is not an issue for victims who get their compensation during their lifetime because they can change their will so that family members are mentioned as first transfer beneficiaries of the compensation and so won't have to pay tax on it. • Infected blood judge angered by slow and 'unjust' compensation But the payments to victims who have already died, which are due to begin later this year, will only be inheritance tax-free for the first-transfer beneficiary — usually a spouse or civil partner who can inherit their partner's estate inheritance tax-free anyway. The first £325,000 value of an estate is free from inheritance tax (£500,000 if it is worth less than £2 million and includes a main home left to a direct descendant). Spouses or civil partners can inherit without paying inheritance tax, and they can also inherit each other's allowances, meaning a couple can pass on up to £1 million inheritance tax-free. With some blood scandal compensation payments set to hit £2 million and many in line to get about £1 million, it is likely that most victims' estates will breach the allowances. Anything left in an estate above the tax-free allowance can be taxed at 40 per cent. The decades-long delays to compensation payments mean many surviving beneficiaries are now in their eighties and nineties, and will not have enough time to give away their money tax-free. Gifts fall out of your estate for inheritance tax purposes if you live for seven years after they are made. If you live for three to seven years then anything above your allowances is taxed on a sliding scale. Die before three years and it will remain part of your estate and may be taxed at the full 40 per cent inheritance tax rate. It was reported on Wednesday that the chancellor was considering scrapping the seven-year rule or extending the seven years to ten or beyond. Ben Bell from the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners, a trade group for inheritance planners, said: 'This is a major injustice. Parliament made provision for the payments to be exempt from inheritance tax, but the delay in making the payments means that the government will, in many cases, get 40 per cent of the payments back in inheritance tax.' Owen McLaughlin's father, Steve, was born with haemophilia and died in 1989 aged 34 after being given blood plasma infected with HIV. 'My father has never met my wife, he never met my kids. All the important events in my life, he wasn't there,' said Owen, 55, from Exeter. Steve left everything to his wife, Pam, who is now 80 and suffering from a number of health conditions, including multiple sclerosis. She expects to get more than £500,000 in compensation and wants to pass it on to her two sons and six grandchildren, but will then need to survive at least seven years if they are to fully escape inheritance tax. 'It is unfair because if my dad had known there would be this future compensation and the tax rules would be as they are, he would have written his will differently,' Owen said. 'It is completely immoral that the government can pay compensation for a frankly heinous act and then think about immediately taking it back through inheritance tax.' Chris Wood's father, John, was infected with HIV in 1982 after being given blood during a triple heart bypass operation to treat his angina. He lived with the disease for years without knowing, before getting seriously ill during the Christmas of 1992 and being admitted to hospital. He died three weeks later, devastating Chris and his two sisters. Chris's, mother Rita, who is 91, will inherit John's compensation and wants to give it to her children straight away but with her estate worth more than her IHT-free allowances the family face having to pay back £360,000 if she dies within three years. 'I understand it has to stop somewhere, but the exemption should carry through to immediate family,' said Chris, 53, from Chelmsford in Essex. 'We could have to pay back 40 per cent of what we get within a year or two — it's a kick in the teeth after all we have been through.' About 700 sub-postmasters were convicted of offences including fraud, false accounting and theft based on incorrect information provided by the Horizon accounting system. Some went to prison and thousands more were wrongly accused. With the earliest cases now 26 years ago and compensation still being paid, the victims are facing similar inheritance tax worries. Stephen Lewis from the law firm Schofield and Sweeney, which represents 50 sub-postmasters, said that while there would be fewer families affected than with the infected blood scandal, inheritance tax was an issue. 'I anticipate there will be a sizeable element that this could affect just by the fact that we are dealing with compensation for events from up to 25 years ago,' he said. A third of the 10,814 Post Office victims are still waiting for compensation, and at least 345 died before being compensated. Neil Hudgell from the law firm Hudgell Solicitors, which represents 1,000 sub-postmasters, said: 'Compensation ought to be treated holistically as to the close family unit, and there shouldn't be any tax payable on the first or second transfers after compensation is paid.' The Association of Lifetime Lawyers and Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners has written to HM Revenue & Customs about the issue in a push for change. A beneficiary of a will has the option to redirect money to new beneficiaries if they choose through a deed of variation. If done within two years of death, the change will be treated as if the deceased included them in the original will, meaning that compensation could be exempt from inheritance tax. This, however, is not an option for the beneficiaries of many infected blood victims, who died more than two years ago. The Association wants the two-year limit to begin on payment of compensation, rather than death, which would give the initial beneficiary time to ensure that family members benefit from the tax exemption. Gani said: 'Many victims have paid the ultimate price with their lives and now, unless the law changes, their families are forced to pay again; this time to the taxman.' The government said: 'While no amount of compensation will make up for the suffering people have endured, we are committed to delivering compensation as swiftly as possible. 'Victims' compensation is exempt from inheritance tax when applied to the estate of the person to whom the compensation payment was made, and this relief will not extend to subsequent beneficiaries of the deceased person's estate.'

At three weeks old, I thought my baby was going to die
At three weeks old, I thought my baby was going to die

Times

time4 hours ago

  • Times

At three weeks old, I thought my baby was going to die

F ive months ago, aged 41, I gave birth to my daughter, after five gruelling years of fertility treatment as a single mother. When Violet was eight days old, a friend came to visit. She's a neonatal nurse. She had a cold sore and said: 'I'm not going to kiss her, of course.' I thought little of it, assuming she was being overcautious because of her profession. When Violet was two and a half weeks old, I said to my maternity nurse: 'She feels a bit warm, she doesn't feel quite right.' She looked as though she was getting conjunctivitis. Thermometers gave variable results, so we took her to the GP, who said: 'She's fine.' The next day, Violet still felt warm. After an e-consultation with the GP, who again told me not to worry, I called 111. You don't want to be a nuisance, but they said to bring her in. Though she was smiley during the examination, I had this funny feeling. They said: 'Because she's so small, and going on your gut, we're going to do a lumbar puncture.'

Vanessa Feltz, 63, jokes 'looking gaunt is fantastic' as she joins Lizzie Cundy, 57, to discuss weight loss jabs after news Mounjaro cost is set to double
Vanessa Feltz, 63, jokes 'looking gaunt is fantastic' as she joins Lizzie Cundy, 57, to discuss weight loss jabs after news Mounjaro cost is set to double

Daily Mail​

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Vanessa Feltz, 63, jokes 'looking gaunt is fantastic' as she joins Lizzie Cundy, 57, to discuss weight loss jabs after news Mounjaro cost is set to double

Vanessa Feltz joked 'looking gaunt is fantastic' as she joined Lizzie Cundy to discuss weight loss jabs on her talk show on Friday. The former This Morning presenter, 63, has long been open about her struggles with her weight, which have seen her fluctuate between a size 10 and 22. She previously described the emotional rollercoaster of dieting as soul-destroying and has shared her experiences with gastric band surgery. Now, in a clip from her show shared on Instagram, Vanessa and Lizzie, 57, offered their thoughts on the growing trend of weight loss jabs. Lizzie said: 'You can tell some celebrities that are going too far on it, because they are looking gaunt… and you don't want to look like that.' Vanessa quipped: 'I always want to look it. I'm desperate to look gaunt. I've always wanted to look gaunt. 'I think being gaunt would be a fabulous look having been fat for so many years. I think gaunt would just be fantastic.' Mounjaro price increases Mounjaro®▼ (tirzepatide) KwikPen® Dose Current UK List Price New UK List Price (From September) 2.5mg £92 £133 5mg £92 £180 7.5mg £107 £255 10mg £107 £255 12.5mg £122 £330 15mg £122 £330 Lizzie replied: 'But I don't think it's good when you hear these stories that it isn't always perfect having these jabs and you really got to know your own body and if it doesn't feel right, don't keep doing it. 'You know, there are other ways. And I think it's really important we hear the other side.' 'I totally agree,' Vanessa said. It comes after Mounjaro manufacturer Lilly sparked panic among slimmers on Thursday after revealing it would more than double the price of the drug in the UK. The US pharmaceutical giant announced the cost would soar from September 1, with the wholesale price of a month's supply of the highest dose rising from £122 to £330. Lilly claimed it had initially launched Mounjaro in the UK at a price 'significantly below the European average to prevent delays in NHS availability' but that this must now change 'to ensure fair global contributions to the cost of innovation'. The announcement, however, does not affect the price the NHS pays, as the service has negotiated a heavily discounted rate for those getting the drug on prescription. But there are thought to be around 1.5 million people on weight loss drugs in the UK with more than half of them on Mounjaro—and estimates suggest nine in 10 pay for these drugs privately. She added height to her slender frame with a pair of hot pink heels and carried her belongings in a pink Dior tote bag After the show wrapped up, Lizzie put on a leggy display in a pink floral shirt mini dress as she left the studio. She added height to her slender frame with a pair of hot pink heels and carried her belongings in a pink Dior tote bag. The star completed her look with a stylish pair of sunglasses and appeared in good spirits as she headed to her next destination. It comes after Lizzie's son married his long-term partner in Italy. She was among close family and friends last month as Josh Miller exchanged vows with fiancée Martina Bassenger, a creative director for London based production company Sons of Rigor Films. With Venice serving as an appropriately romantic backdrop, the happy couple - who met five years ago - looked stunning as they posed for photos with their parents shortly after the ceremony. Martina opted for traditional white on the day, with the brunette walking the aisle in a custom floor-length gown and matching veil. Meanwhile Josh, an actor and producer, chose a smart two piece suit from Nathan Palmer Bespoke Tailors, offset with a white dress shirt and bow tie. Sharing an array of photos from the wedding on social media, she wrote: 'My boy only got married!…. I'm so proud I could burst!! Here's to the most beautiful couple Josh and Martina.. I've not stopped crying with joy.' The weekend provided a reunion of sorts, with the presenter accompanied by ex-husband Jason Cundy - the groom's father - for an additional series of photos as the reception spilled over into the evening. Radio broadcaster Cundy, a former footballer who played as a centre-back for Chelsea, Tottenham Hotspur and Ipswich Town before retiring in 2000, opted for a cream linen suit as he watched his son exchange vows. Lizzie previously discussed the breakdown of her marriage during an appearance on Vanessa Feltz's Channel 5 show in May. The presenter married Jason in 1994, with the couple welcoming two children before divorcing in 2010. 'At the time it broke my heart,' she told Feltz. 'As I said, I think I had a breakdown, I didn't eat, I lost an incredible amount of weight. I was very upset and Vanessa you were there and supporting me very much.' However, she explained that she has been able to move past the hurt and has since built a strong friendship with her ex-husband. She added: 'But life moves on and I say to everyone, make friends. There's no point being bitter and angry and that does go. And when I see him now, I don't think of that at all.' The truth behind new diet drug craze - Hollywood is hooked on it, and social media is fanning demand for the latest weight-loss 'miracle' Over the summer I was lucky enough to be invited to a 60th birthday at which the after-dinner entertainment was a private performance by one of the UK's leading male pop stars. More eye-popping than the actual show, though, was how incredible said star looked. He was a mere shadow of his former self, prancing around the stage in a silver catsuit. His secret? Semaglutide, or Ozempic as it is branded, a new diet drug that everybody – but everybody, darling, including one of the world's most famous supermodels – is apparently taking. Originally developed to treat type 2 diabetes, it is used off-label (for a purpose other than that for which it was licensed) in both the US and the UK to treat obesity. In research conducted by its billionaire manufacturer, the Danish-based pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk, patients lost an average of 17 per cent of their overall body weight over 68 weeks. This compares with five to nine per cent for 'oldschool' anti-obesity drugs such as Metformin. Only available in the UK on the NHS if you have type 2 diabetes, Ozempic can be obtained through a private doctor, and if you are willing to take it without medical supervision – not recommended by doctors (see panel) – you can get it online through various weight-loss programmes. It is sometimes taken in tablet form but more commonly as an injection. Predictably, Hollywood has been aware of Ozempic for a lot longer than us – Variety magazine recently quipped that the drug deserved its own thank-you speech at the Emmys, as so many stars on the podium had obviously been taking it. Elon Musk raved about its more powerful sister drug, Wegovy, on Twitter; Kim Kardashian, it is hotly rumoured, used semaglutide to lose 16lb in order to fit into Marilyn Monroe's dress for the Met Ball. On TikTok the hashtag #ozempic has had more than 285 million views. Thanks to the hype, there has been a surge in demand, causing shortages on both sides of the Atlantic, with a backlash against influencers and celebrities hogging supplies ahead of desperate diabetes sufferers. Predictably, Big Pharma has come up with an alternative – tirzepatide (brand name Mounjaro), manufactured by Eli Lilly – but it has yet to be approved by the US Food & Drug Administration for weight loss. Novo Nordisk has issued a statement to say its supplies will be replenished by the end of the year, but it hasn't quelled anxiety. At least two middle-aged male friends of mine who started using it in September are getting themselves in a twist about being caught short before the holidays. As one private London GP remarked to me: 'It's like the H RT panic last spring.' So what exactly is this drug? Semaglutide belongs to a class called GLP-1 agonists, which not only regulate blood sugar but, as was discovered about a decade ago, also mimic the gut hormones that regulate our appetites – the ones that tell the brain when we are hungry or full. There are, of course, side effects: acid reflux, nausea, exacerbation of IBS symptoms and fatigue (but much less so than in earlier GLP-1 agonists such as Saxenda), as well as pancreatitis, gallstones and, in very high doses, it has caused thyroid tumours in rats. Meanwhile, when you stop using it the effect wears off immediately and in some cases it won't work at all. 'I would describe semaglutide as an example of very smart science,' says leading consultant endocrinologist Dr Efthimia Karra from her private practice off London's Harley Street. 'But it is not a panacea for everyone. Around a fifth of users do not respond to it. This is because the human body favours weight gain, thus when you lose weight the body will do anything to revert to its highest BMI. The heavier you are the harder it is to lose weight. If a patient has made no progress in three months, I will take them off it.' Banker's wife Laura, a native New Yorker in her mid-50s who had hovered between decades, started using it in January. 'The Paleo diet, 5:2, CBT, NLP, bootcamp, diet delivery services – I've tried them all,' she says from the family home in Hampshire, 'and I've always yo-yoed right back. After my last annual checkup I seriously contemplated giving up. Then my doctor suggested semaglutide.' After only a month she noticed her clothes had become looser. From then on, the weight started dropping off. 'The strange thing was, I wasn't eating anything different. I just couldn't physically have seconds any more, and the idea of pudding after a full meal had lost its allure.' Three months on, she is two stone lighter ‒ though occasionally she suffers heartburn if she eats too late at night or drinks alcohol ‒ and when we spoke in autumn, she was looking forward to losing another stone by Christmas. 'There is a niggling voice that tells me it is both risky and lazy to take a drug to lose weight, and I worry that it will all pile on again if I stop taking it. But if it does, I will seriously consider taking it indefinitely.' Private London GP Dr Martin Galy has been prescribing semaglutide for about a year to clients who cannot lose the weight they gained in menopause. He has seen it have a transformational effect, too, on much younger women who suffer polycystic ovary syndrome. 'PCOS sufferers are difficult to treat, and you can imagine how body image plays a very important part when it comes to self-esteem.' But according to Tom Sanders, professor of nutrition and dietetics at King's College London, it is not a magic bullet. Commenting on a study on semaglutide published in The New England Journal of Medicine in 2021, he says, 'The challenge post-weight loss is to prevent a regain in weight,' he wrote. It may prove to be useful in the short term, but 'public health measures that encourage behavioural changes such as regular physical activity and moderating dietary energy intake are still needed'. That said, given our rising national obesity statistics and the escalation in accompanying health issues such as heart failure, cancer and obstructive sleep apnoea clogging up hospital beds, we're going to need something. Semaglutide may be the rich person's drug today, but might it be approved for more widespread use? Only time will tell.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store