Language row turns political: MVA, MNS claim victory as Maharashtra govt. backtracks
The rollback of Maharashtra's three-language policy in primary education has sparked a blame game, with the Bharatiya Janata Party accusing Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray of double standards, and his party's leaders defending Marathi pride.
The Maharashtra government on Sunday (June 29, 2025) withdrew its controversial government resolutions (GRs) dated April 16 and June 17, which mandated Hindi as the third compulsory language in Marathi and English-medium primary schools. The decision follows strong political Opposition and widespread protests by civil society, journalists, educationists, and Marathi cultural organisations.
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis announced that the State would set up a committee headed by educationist and economist Dr. Narendra Jadhav to study the issue and recommend an appropriate language policy. 'Until the committee submits its report, both government resolutions stand cancelled,' Mr. Fadnavis stated.
The original April 16 GR had made Hindi mandatory as the third language for Classes 1 to 5. Following public resistance, the government issued a modified GR on June 17, offering conditional flexibility — but the backlash continued.
The Opposition has hailed the government's decision as a victory for Marathi identity.
'Victory rally'
Mr. Thackeray on Monday celebrated the reversal and said, 'We have smashed the heads of Marathi haters. This unity should be preserved as we prepare for future battles.' He added that a victory rally would be held on July 5.
'We appreciate the political parties which came together with us despite different stands. Temporarily, they (the government) have cancelled the GR. If they had not cancelled, they would have seen the protest on 5th July. Many leaders from Eknath Shinde's Shiv Sena and Ajit Pawar's NCP are going to join us. A new committee led by Dr. Narendra Jadhav will report on this issue. The government has appointed financial experts for the education sector's decision. We will stage a victory rally on July 5,' the former Chief Minister told journalists.
Nationalist Congress Party (SCP) leader Jayant Patil said: 'Making Hindi compulsory did not work in Maharashtra. The withdrawal of its own decisions on Hindi imposition shows how alienated this government is from the concerns of the people. It also underscores the dysfunctionality of the administration.'
MVA allies, including the Shiv Sena (UBT), NCP (SCP), and Congress, had held protests outside the legislature with banners reading 'Mi Marathi' (I am Marathi) and slogans denouncing the Hindi imposition.
NCP (SCP) MLA Rohit Pawar said: 'We are not against Hindi, but against the compulsory teaching of Hindi at the cost of Marathi and local autonomy. Many political parties opposed the GR released by the Maharashtra government regarding the three-language policy. Marathi journalists and social organisations were also against it. When all of them got united on this matter, it overpowered the government, and finally, the State government decided to withdraw the GR on the three-language policy.'
BJP counters, claims credit
BJP Mumbai unit chief Ashish Shelar pushed back against Opposition claims and said, 'In reality, Maharashtra, the Marathi people, and the BJP have won this fight. Uddhav Thackeray is politicising a policy that began under his tenure.'
Mr. Shelar claimed that the original recommendation for a three-language policy stemmed from the Mashelkar Committee report constituted under Mr. Thackeray's chief ministership. 'He formed the committee and included his own party representatives. Why deny it now?' Shelar asked.
Minister Shambhuraj Desai also asserted that the GR was first accepted under the previous MVA regime. 'This is political opportunism, not policy critique,' he said.
Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut lashed out at the BJP alleging that they are making false claims of former Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray accepting the Mashelkar committee's report on the three-language policy.
'Lying is the BJP's national policy. These people are working with this policy in Maharashtra. If Uddhav Thackeray had submitted a report on the Mashelkar committee, it should be made public. A committee report has been released and placed in the Cabinet. Can't this be discussed? You forcefully discussed Hindi with the Cabinet — you did it because it is a national policy. If any national policy comes before the State, then discussing it is very important. Devendra Fadnavis has become the Chief Minister three times, does he not have that much knowledge?' he said at a press conference.
Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray said, 'People are trying to make the 150 to 200-year-old Hindi language as a national language superior to Marathi, which has a history of over 3,000 years. This is unacceptable, and I will not allow it. Hindi is not the national language to be imposed on other States. This kind of coercion is not right. Any attempt to place Hindi above Marathi will be opposed.'
Aaditya Thackeray, MLA and son of Uddhav Thackeray, claimed the rollback was achieved due to people's pressure, not the government's goodwill. 'We will keep up the pressure until a written assurance is given.' Along with Leader of Opposition in the legislative council Ambadas Danve, Bhaskar Jadhav and other Opposition legislators, Mr. Aaditya Thackeray staged a protest on the steps of Vidhan Bhavan, holding placards that said, 'Mi Marathi' (I am Marathi).
Mr. Danve said: 'We are happy that our demand has been partially met. But we are still sceptical of the Maharashtra government, especially since it has now formed another committee to study the matter further.'
Chief Minister Fadnavis reiterated that the decision was not a retreat but a step toward broader consultation. 'The Narendra Jadhav committee will involve experts, stakeholders, and public input to decide the way forward.'
As Maharashtra heads into the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections, language identity has emerged as a prominent electoral issue. The government is keen to avoid further unrest while Opposition parties are rallying around Marathi pride.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Sheikh who wrested soccer & coddles warlords
File photo: A Sudanese soldier looks through documents found in the bedroom of a Rapid Support Forces commander, days after the paramilitary was driven out of that part of Khartoum. (Picture credit: NYT) NAIROBI: Weeks before Sudan flamed into a calamitous civil war, one of the richest men in the Middle East, Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, welcomed an architect of the chaos to his Persian Gulf palace. The sheikh, a younger brother of the powerful ruler of the United Arab Emirates, is recognised in the West as a collector of superyachts and racehorses, and is perhaps best known as the owner of Manchester City, a hugely successful English soccer team. Last year, his team in New York won approval to build a $780 million soccer stadium in the borough of Queens, the first in the city. Yet there he was, in February 2023, openly entertaining a notorious commander from the deserts of western Sudan — someone who had seized power in a coup, built a fortune on illicit gold and was accused of widespread atrocities. Mansour had hosted the Sudanese commander, Gen Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo, two years earlier at an arms fair in the UAE. When Sudan's conflict exploded, in April 2023, Mansour helped the general wage war. Charities controlled by Mansour set up a hospital, saying they were treating civilians. But according to US and United Nations officials, that humanitarian effort was also a cover for the secret Emirati effort to smuggle drones and other powerful weapons to Dagalo's group, the Rapid Support Forces, or RSF. A flood of evidence has emerged of massacres, mass rape and genocide by Dagalo's forces. The Emiratis deny arming any side in the war, but the US has intercepted regular phone calls between Dagalo and the leaders of the UAE, including Mansour. An enigma of a Sheikh Despite owning one of the world's most famous soccer teams, Mansour, 54, has remained an enigma, often showing a chameleonlike ability to disappear into the background. Yet, in interviews with more than a dozen US, African and Arab officials, he is described as being at the sharp end of his country's aggressive push to expand its influence across Africa and the Middle East. In places such as Libya and Sudan, they say, Mansour has coddled warlords and autocrats as part of a sweeping Emirati drive to acquire ports and strategic minerals, counter Islamist movements and establish the Persian Gulf nation as a heavyweight regional power. 'He's the fixer, the handler, the one sent to places without much glamour or publicity, but which are important to the Emiratis,' said Andrew Miller, a former senior US diplomat. Tides beginning to change Last year, the British govt passed a law that, in effect, prevented Mansour from acquiring a venerable UK newspaper, fearing it could affect press freedom. Trials in the United States and Malaysia have uncovered accusations that Mansour profited from 1 MDB scandal, one of the world's biggest financial frauds. A UK panel is considering sweeping accusations that Manchester City has cheated on a grand scale. If found guilty, the team could be fined or stripped of titles. The story of the Emirates In his grandparents' time, most inhabitants of what is now the UAE were date farmers, camel herders and pearl fishermen. The discovery of oil in the 1960s transformed Dubai into an archetype of petrostate bling. The capital, Abu Dhabi, is a finance hot spot and aspiring AI superpower. One family sits at the top. The Al Nahyans of Abu Dhabi are the world's second-richest family after the Waltons of the US, by some estimates. They have ruled the UAE since 1971, and their power is concentrated in a group known as the 'Bani Fatima' — six sons of the favoured wife of the country's founding father, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan. Three of the sons dominate. The eldest brother, Mohammed, 64, known as MBZ, has been the de facto ruler for over two decades. Under him is Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, 56, often referred to as the 'spy sheikh' — a sunglasses-wearing national security adviser and fitness enthusiast who has bonded with Zuckerberg over jujitsu. The thirdmost powerful brother, Mansour, as deputy PM and VP, controls key institutions, including the UAE central bank, the national oil company and the Abu Dhabi criminal authority. He chairs Mubadala, a fast-growing $330 billion sovereign wealth fund with investments in AI, semiconductors and space tourism.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Court denies interim relief to Samajwadi MLA over remarks praising Aurangzeb
The Bombay High Court on Monday declined to grant interim relief to Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Azmi in connection with FIRs filed over his remarks praising Mughal ruler Aurangzeb. The court, however, issued notices to the Maharashtra government and the complainants who had lodged the case stems from comments made by Azmi during the last Budget session of the Maharashtra Assembly, where he praised Aurangzeb at a time when actor Vicky Kaushal's film Chhava was in the spotlight. Azmi was later suspended from the session following a political two FIRs were filed against him—one by Naresh Mhaske, a first-time Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde faction) MP from Thane, and the other by Kiran Nakti, Vibhag Pramukh of Shiv Sena in Navpada, Thane. The complainants cited an interview in which Azmi had allegedly praised Aurangzeb, saying he was a good administrator under whose rule India was known as the 'Golden Sparrow' and that India's GDP was 24 per cent, attracting British interest in the further claimed that Azmi had said the Indian borders extended to Burma and Afghanistan during Aurangzeb's reign and that people had gold in their homes, prompting the British to come to complaints also mentioned that Azmi said Aurangzeb's army had Hindu commanders and that the battles he fought were not between Hindus and Muslims. Azmi allegedly added that the current ruling political party in India aimed to destroy Muslims, which, the complainants argued, created communal tension and hurt Hindu religious for Azmi, advocate Mubin Solkar informed the bench that two FIRs had been registered against his client. 'The FIRs have been filed by Azmi's political opponents with respect to certain comments made by him. Both the FIRs are identical, not even a word is different. Only complainants' names are different,' Solkar reviewing the FIRs, the bench comprising Justices AS Gadkari and Rajesh S Patil directed the issuance of further requested the court to stay the filing of a chargesheet against Azmi as an interim measure. However, the bench responded, 'Then what will happen?' and refused to grant such relief. The court has scheduled the next hearing on Azmi's plea after four weeks.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Maharashtra
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Language lessons: There's no replacing English
To truly realise NEP's vision, a two language policy of English + Mother Tongue is better than GOI's hasty mother-tongue directive. Without English, children will be at a disadvantage in higher education & jobs The strongest roots of culture grow in the soil of a world-class education. In its pursuit to implement New Education Policy 2020, GOI in May issued a circular reaffirming that primary education ought to be delivered in pupils' mother tongues. The argument is that learning in a native language improves comprehension and fosters critical thinking. Yet the directive had an unrealistically tight deadline for implementation – to commence by July. It has plunged schools into disarray, raising a critical question: Is this a progressive step or a political tool that betrays India's future? Read the full story on TOI+. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
