Over half of those staying at Athlone asylum centre could begin to leave next week, High Court hears
At the court today, senior counsel Aoife Carroll, for the government, told Ms Justice Emily Farrell that of the remaining 125 people at the accommodation centre, 70 people had received offers of alternative accommodation and that the court should know their answers next week.
Last month, Ms Carroll told the court that 137 people were in emergency accommodation at the facility but that figures were dropping as alternative accommodation was being sought.
The High Court action was taken by Independent Ireland councillor for Moate-Athlone District Paul Hogan, who successfully applied to the court in December for a judicial review, arguing that the expedited development was unlawful.
The State has conceded to the court that the statutory instrument used to expedite the construction of the facility was 'invalid' and is working on repairing legislation.
A Statutory Instrument is a secondary legislation, made by a Minister, modifying or supplementing existing laws.
Councillor Hogan is taking the case against the office of the Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth.
Councillor Hogan claimed the Minister failed to adequately 'screen' the project for potential environmental impacts and that the Minister lacked the expertise to carry out such assessments in such an expedited manner.
Protests have been held in Athlone over the plan to further develop army-tent accommodation for a possible 1,000 asylum seekers.
Advertisement
Last month, Ms Justice Farrell said she would defer judgment quashing the use of the Statutory Instrument used to develop the emergency accommodation at Lissywollen in Athlone, Co Westmeath.
Ms Justice Farrell had said she wanted to wait for updates and to see draft legislation from the Oireachtas.
The government submitted it intended to remedy the legal issue over the bypassing of environmental assessments for the accommodation.
Today, Ms Carroll said the department was continuing to work to reduce the number of people at the facility but that there was 'significant pressure' on the system.
Regarding the repairing legislation, Ms Carroll said 'we have not made the progress hoped'.
Ms Carroll said that 'significant work' had been done on a general scheme and that it was hoped this would go for drafting in preparation for legislation.
Ms Carroll again asked for the court not to make final orders in the matter and to maintain the status quo pending the legislation which is hoped to be put to the Dail in November.
Ms Justice Farrell adjourned the matter to next week but warned she could not keep deferring final orders when the government had 'ample opportunity' to put legislation before the Dáil.
David O'Brien BL, for Councillor Hogan, said the government indicating 'loose dates' had been 'a regrettable motif' in the case.
Any November date for the legislation to come before the Dáil, which was indicated to the court in May, had been initially 'unrealistic… now, it is at the point of untenable' and his client was left 'without a modicum of explanation', he said.
Councillor Hogan claims the ministerial process employed was 'unlawful, irrational and a breach of fair procedures'.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sunday World
5 hours ago
- Sunday World
BBC faces criticism over delay in paying court-ordered damages to Gerry Adams
The corporation lost a major defamation case earlier this year after Mr Adams took them to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme and an accompanying online story Former Sinn Fein president Gerry Adams outside the High Court in Dublin after he won his libel action against the BBC (Brian Lawless/PA) The BBC has been criticised for not yet having paid court-ordered damages to former Sinn Fein president Gerry Adams. The corporation lost a major defamation case earlier this year after Mr Adams took them to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme and an accompanying online story. They contained an allegation that Mr Adams sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson. Mr Adams denied any involvement. In May, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Fein leader's legal costs. BBC Northern Ireland director Adam Smyth (centre) outside the High Court in Dublin after the court case (Brian Lawless/PA) Adam Smyth, director of BBC NI, expressed disappointment in the verdict and said the corporation believes it supplied extensive evidence to the court of the careful editorial process and journalistic diligence applied to the programme and accompanying online article. After the decision, the broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it took time to consider an appeal, subject to paying half the damages (50,000 euros or £42,000) and 250,000 euros (£210,000) towards solicitors' fees. In June, the BBC confirmed it would not pursue an appeal. However, it is understood that by August 1 the BBC had not paid the damages. Mr Adams previously indicated that he planned to donate what he receives to good causes. He specified that these would include for children in Gaza as well as groups in the Irish language sector and those who are homeless. A source close to Mr Adams told the PA news agency: 'The delay by the BBC is deplorable and it should move speedily towards discharging the order of the court.' A BBC spokesperson said: 'Total costs will be finalised and payable in due course.' Former Sinn Fein president Gerry Adams outside the High Court in Dublin after he won his libel action against the BBC (Brian Lawless/PA) News in 90 Seconds - Sunday, August 3rd
Irish Examiner
11 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
BBC faces criticism over delay in paying court-ordered damages to Gerry Adams
The BBC has been criticised for not yet having paid court-ordered damages to former Sinn Féin president Gerry Adams. The corporation lost a major defamation case earlier this year after Mr Adams took them to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme and an accompanying online story. They contained an allegation that Mr Adams sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson. Mr Adams denied any involvement. In May, a jury at the High Court found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Féin leader's legal costs. BBC Northern Ireland director Adam Smyth (centre) outside the High Court in Dublin after the court case (Brian Lawless/PA) Adam Smyth, director of BBC NI, expressed disappointment in the verdict and said the corporation believes it supplied extensive evidence to the court of the careful editorial process and journalistic diligence applied to the programme and accompanying online article. After the decision, the broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it took time to consider an appeal, subject to paying half the damages (€50,000) and €250,000 towards solicitors' fees. In June, the BBC confirmed it would not pursue an appeal. However, it is understood that by August 1 the BBC had not paid the damages. Mr Adams previously indicated that he planned to donate what he receives to good causes. He specified that these would include for children in Gaza as well as groups in the Irish language sector and those who are homeless. A source close to Mr Adams told the PA news agency: 'The delay by the BBC is deplorable and it should move speedily towards discharging the order of the court.' A BBC spokesperson said: 'Total costs will be finalised and payable in due course.'
Irish Times
16 hours ago
- Irish Times
State secures Supreme Court appeal against citizenship ruling for children of same-sex couples
The State has secured a Supreme Court appeal against a High Court ruling that found failings in how Irish citizenship-by-descent laws treat children born to same-sex parents living abroad. Two separate cases determined by the High Court earlier this year involved children born abroad to two sets of legal mothers following donor-assisted human reproduction (DAHR). In the case of one Irish mother living in Australia, referred to as 'Ms X', her children, on whose birth certificates she is named, were refused passports because she was not their gestational mother, biological father or adoptive parent. Therefore, the Minister for Foreign Affairs found she did not meet the definition of 'parent' under section 7 of the 1956 Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act, from which citizenship by descent can be derived. READ MORE The High Court declared that she, her children and her family were treated unequally because the Government failed to provide a way for the boys to achieve Irish citizenship. In the other case, a passport was refused for a Spanish-born child, despite the Irish citizen, 'Ms Y', being the genetic mother but not the gestational mother, having donated her egg to her partner. The High Court found the Minister erred in interpreting section 7 as excluding Ms Y as the child's parent. It also held that Irish law does not afford a properly tailored means of vindicating the rights of a child born abroad to a non-genetic, non-gestational Irish citizen mother. An application made by the Minister for Foreign Affairs, the Attorney General and Ireland seeking to appeal the decisions argued the High Court failed to properly determine the nature and extent of the State's equality obligations. The State parties said there is a need for certainty about who qualifies as a parent or mother. The answer to this question will affect the development of the law in an area of 'particular sensitivity', they said. 'Such determination will have significant implications for, and effects on, the statutory arrangements which are in place, and which will be put in place, to regulate DAHR.' The State parties said the issue is a 'matter of general public importance which will affect a considerable number of people in regard to an important aspect of their lives'. They contended an appeal brings 'no prejudice' to the families and would benefit them 'as it will lead more quickly to a final and conclusive determination of the issues'. In the case of 'Ms Y', in particular, the State said the High Court's interpretation of the section 7 definition of a parent is 'novel and without precedent and is contrary to the vast majority, if not all, prior precedent'. 'It introduces a considerable degree of uncertainty into the law in regard to DAHR, in particular, as to what are the exact circumstances when a genetic mother can qualify as a parent; and as to whether, for the purposes of citizenship by descent, a child can have more than one mother or have more than two parents,' it said. Neither family opposed the State's appeal applications. They both recognised the importance of clarifying the law, saying it is in the public interest to gain certainty as to who qualifies as a 'parent' under citizenship laws. The families have been permitted to cross-appeal claiming, among other points, the High Court was wrong to find that a non-genetic, non-gestational legal parent does not meet the section 7 definition of a parent. Speaking to The Irish Times earlier this year, Ms X said she was 'extremely disappointed' her homeland would not recognise her as a parent to her two sons. 'To be told you are not a parent of your own child is a very hard thing to have to listen to,' she said.
